OKX, MetaMask, Matter Labs back dispute resolution court for AI agents

Cryptocurrency & Free Speech Finance

A group of crypto and Web3 firms that includes OKX, MetaMask, Matter Labs and Genlayer have formed the “Internet Court” to reach dispute resolutions between AI agents.These days, AI agents negotiate and pay one another without humans in the loop, but as with human-to-human transactions, agent-to-agent transactions will run into contractual disagreements.The problem is that agentic systems have no way to settle these disputes, and traditional courts are not built to handle such cases. Hence the need for the 27-firm-backed protocol, led by the Genlayer Foundation, which makes AI-based payments, escrow and dispute resolution interoperable, according to a press release.Agentic…

Cryptocurrency & Free Speech Finance

Ether Bridged To Robinhood Chain Tops $70M in First Week

The amount of Ether bridged to Robinhood’s new layer-2 blockchain exceeded $70 million in just the first week, according to Token Terminal. Robinhood Chain, an EVM-compatible Arbitrum-based layer-2 network that uses ETH as its native gas token, launched on July 1 with the company describing it as “AI-native and purpose-built for real-world assets.” “If adoption continues, the chain could become a meaningful new source of demand for ETH,” said Token Terminal on Thursday. Robinhood has also offered tokenized stocks to customers in more than 120 countries, responding to a surging demand for tokenized US equities. Ethereum and its layer-2 scaling networks have been a…

AI & Crypto

Read More

Politics

Brickbat: Hard Labor

Media & Culture

In England, a major report found that more than 500 mothers and babies died or were seriously harmed at Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust because of poor care over 13 years. The inquiry looked at problems at two hospitals and blamed…

Don't Miss!

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Photo: WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM/swiss-image.ch/Jolanda Flubacher Benjamin Netanyahu’s coalition wants to impose what it calls “institutional neutrality” on the country’s universities. The proposals – which could become reality within a month – would prevent higher education institutions from taking political positions, organising strikes or suspending teaching in response to political developments. University presidents would themselves be barred from expressing views that might be perceived as political or could encourage others to be. All of which sounds more like “neuter” than “neutrality”. There’s a concession: lecturers and students can express themselves politically and “participate in public discourse” provided that the activity is done privately “and is not specific to the institution or done by virtue of their academic or administrative role and does not harm the institution’s regular activity”. These are very broad caveats, which will still leave people very exposed. There’s nothing subtle about these plans. They’re clearly designed to stop campuses mobilising against controversial government measures, of which in Netanyahu’s Israel there are now many. They will also chill academic freedom more broadly. After all, universities are not meant to be impartial spaces. They are meant to be intellectually independent and curious. They are meant to question orthodoxies, challenge power and create conditions in which difficult ideas can be tested. In the words of poet Stephen Spender in his op-ed that launched Index, “universities represent the developing international consciousness which depends so much on the free interchange of people, and of ideas.” Israeli academics understand the danger. One organisation opposing the proposals described them as “the essence of dictatorship, tyranny of silencing and instilling fear in those whose nature is independent thought”. They warned: “History will remember who was in positions of power and did not turn over every stone to prevent the elimination of Israeli academia and democracy.” This is not the first attack those within Israeli universities faced. As reported by our writer Akin Ajayi, Palestinian academics and students within Israel have already experienced harassment in various forms. This led to one person telling us “silence is the best option”. Then there’s the destruction of Gaza’s higher education system, which has been described by some as “scholasticide”. The assault is not confined to academia either. I read about the plans in Israel’s leading, left-leaning newspaper Haaretz. The following morning came news that the newspaper’s offices had been vandalised after a masked man threw a brick through its entrance. Haaretz has repeatedly been targeted, while only last week a similar attack struck Channel 12 News in Tel Aviv. In May this year, Israeli journalist Oren Persico wrote for us about how Israel’s targeting of Palestinian journalists had helped create an atmosphere in which Israeli journalists increasingly found themselves under attack too. His argument echoed Martin Niemöller’s famous warning: once repression becomes normalised against one group, it rarely stops there. Hence what we’re seeing in universities – both the continuation and the escalation of Netanyahu’s assault on freedom of expression. READ MORE