FSNN | Decentralized News Aggregation for Free Speech

Anthropic is testing the most powerful AI model it has ever built, and the world wasn’t supposed to know yet.A data leak reported by Fortune on Thursday revealed that the AI lab behind Claude has trained a new model called “Mythos,” which it internally describes as “by far the most powerful AI model we’ve ever developed.” The model was discovered in a draft blog post left in an unsecured, publicly searchable data cache, alongside nearly 3,000 other unpublished assets, according to cybersecurity researchers who reviewed the material.Anthropic confirmed the model’s existence after Fortune’s inquiry, calling it “a step change” in…

Bitcoin Drops Below $68K but Long-Term Holder Buying Accelerates

6 hours ago

Senator Warren is Probing Bitmain over US Security Risks: Report

7 hours ago0 Views

Bitcoin Slumps on Oil Fears as March Monthly Close Risks Deeper Sell-Off

8 hours ago0 Views

What Exactly Is a Groyper?

9 hours ago0 Views

ECB Study Questions How Decentralized DeFi Governance Really is

9 hours ago0 Views

Bitcoin Recovery Time Extends If Selloff Deepens Below $60K

10 hours ago0 Views

Today in Supreme Court History: March 27, 1996

11 hours ago0 Views

Spot Bitcoin ETFs Break 4-Week Inflow Streak with $296M Outflows

11 hours ago0 Views

Media & Culture

Taylor Lorenz: Is Social Media Responsible for Bad Parenting?

In a precedent-setting verdict this week, a Los Angeles jury held Meta and YouTube responsible for addicting a young woman to their services and exacerbating her mental health struggles. The jury recommended the two companies pay $6 million to the plaintiff, now 20, identified in court documents as Kaley or KMG. The verdict came a day after a New Mexico jury found that Meta harmed the mental health of children, failed to protect them from sexual predators, and violated state law. In this special bonus episode of The Reason Interview, Nick Gillespie talks with tech journalist Taylor Lorenz, founder of…

Today in Supreme Court History: March 28, 1955

Watch out Bitcoin devs. Google says post-quantum migration needs to happen by 2029.

Contrary to Allegations, the Data Show Little Fraud in Arizona School Choice Program

AI & Crypto

Politics

No § 230 Immunity for Meta’s AI-Generated Ads

Media & Culture 13 hours ago

From Tuesday’s decision by Chief Judge Richard Seeborg (N.D. Cal.) in Bouck v. Meta Platforms, Inc.: This case is the latest installment in an expanding genre: suits against social media companies for participating in the creation and promotion of fraudulent…

Court Upholds Injunction Against Disclosing Information Learned from Discarded City Documents

14 hours ago

Great Moments in Unintended Consequences: (Vol. 21)

15 hours ago

Media & Culture

Sealed Charges Doesn’t Mean Unmentionable-in-Court-Filings Charges

Media & Culture

Ex-FBI-Agents Alleging They Were Fired for Working on “Arctic Frost” Can Proceed Pseudonymously

Media & Culture

Trump Backs Section 702 Reauthorization After Once Calling To ‘KILL FISA’

Theranos Fraudster Elizabeth Holmes’ Sentence Reduced by 1 Year

Minnesota Bills Would Create State Right To Sue Government Officials for Constitutional Violations

Judge Rejects ‘Orwellian Notion’ That Anthropic Is a Supply Chain Risk for Disagreeing With the Government

Maine Lobsterman Asks the Supreme Court To Strike Down a Rule Allowing the Government To Track His Boat 24/7

Khan v. Yale University #TheyLied Case Dismissed Because of Plaintiff’s “Egregious” Litigation Misconduct

Less Than 50 Percent of New Yorkers Support Hochul’s Nicotine Pouch Tax

Trump’s War in Iran Risks Ruining His Entire Foreign Policy

Don't Miss!

Ripple turns to AI to stress-test the XRP Ledger as institutional use cases scale

Lummis Says CLARITY Act Offers Strong DeFi Protections

Is Race-and-IQ Research a Crime?

ICE Adds $600M to Polymarket Investment Despite US Regulatory Scrutiny

Detroit Set to Enter Michigan‘s Battle against Coinbase Prediction Markets

16 hours ago0 Views

Bitcoin, Altcoins Give Back March Gains As Investors Cut Risk

17 hours ago0 Views

Morgan Stanley Sets Bitcoin ETF Fee at Ultra-Low 0.14%

19 hours ago0 Views

The Innovation Trap: Why AI Defies Governance

19 hours ago0 Views

P2P.me Team Discloses Polymarket Bets Tied to Funding Round

20 hours ago0 Views

US Tech Companies Must be Accountable in US Courts for Facilitating Persecution and Torture Abroad, EFF Urges US Supreme Court

20 hours ago0 Views

Hegseth’s War On Anthropic Encounters The First Amendment

20 hours ago0 Views

Nigerian police beat journalist Muhammad Sani Adamu during Eid celebrations

20 hours ago0 Views

Editor's Picks

XRP Sharpe Ratio Rise Aligns With Sustained Whale Inflows

Cryptocurrency & Free Speech Finance 12 hours ago

Stablecoins Will Be Crypto’s “ChatGPT Moment,” Says Ripple

Cryptocurrency & Free Speech Finance 15 hours ago

Hey, Game Devs: The ‘Placeholder Assets’ Excuse For Using AI Is Running Really Thin

Media & Culture 16 hours ago

Bitcoin miners are becoming AI companies and selling their BTC to fund the transition

Cryptocurrency & Free Speech Finance 16 hours ago

AI Is Not About To Become Sentient

Debates 20 hours ago

California Governor Newsom Signs Prediction Market Insider Trading Order

Cryptocurrency & Free Speech Finance 21 hours ago

Bitcoin Traders Bet On Sub-$66K BTC In April Due To Rising Fear

Cryptocurrency & Free Speech Finance 22 hours ago

Binance Australia Hit With $6.9M Fine After Investors Lose Millions on Derivatives

Cryptocurrency & Free Speech Finance 22 hours ago

Opinions & Debates

Debates

When Indigenous Myth Replaces Science Class

News Room

In the early 2000s, I spent much of my time over the course of several years fighting the incursion of religion into science classes in the United States. At the time, the main target of religious fundamentalists was evolution. Well-funded groups at places like the Discovery Institute were trying to insert the religious concept of Intelligent Design (ID) into high school science classes on an equal footing with biological evolution—in spite of a lack of evidence in favour of the notion that the current complexity in biological species required divine intelligence to arise, and a massive amount of counter-evidence that…

Debates

Trump’s Edifice Complex

Debates

Melbourne’s Justice Problem

Debates

Iran’s Hidden War Against the West: Emily Schrader

Debates

Robert Trivers and the Roots of Human Suffering Character

Debates

Iran War Tests Trump — and a Vulnerable China

Debates

The UAE’s Case for Sovereignty Over Ideology

Latest News

Cryptocurrency & Free Speech Finance

Morgan Stanley enters bitcoin ETF race with market-leading low fee

Morgan Stanley plans to price its proposed spot bitcoin BTC$65,811.84 exchange-traded fund (ETF) at 14 basis points, a level just below current low-cost options…

Cryptocurrency & Free Speech Finance

Stablecoin Jitters, AI Micropayments Reshape Crypto

Stablecoins are once again at the center of the crypto business narrative — but for very different reasons.Circle’s sharp sell-off this week highlights how…

Cryptocurrency & Free Speech Finance

Gavin Newsom Bans California Public Officials From Prediction Market Insider Trading

In brief California public officials are banned via executive order from using inside information to make money on prediction markets. The ban extends to…

Media & Culture

Turns Out That Advertisers Not Wanting To Fund Neo-Nazi-Adjacent Content Isn’t An Antitrust Violation

from the it-was-always-a-shakedown dept Remember when Elon Musk told advertisers to “go fuck” themselves and then sued them for the crime of taking his…

BTC price falls below $67,000 as 10-year Treasury yield nears 1-year high of 4.5%

24 hours ago

Coinbase Users Push Back against Prediction Markets Notifications

24 hours ago

NYSE Parent Company Finalizes Polymarket Investment, Totaling $1.6 Billion

24 hours ago

FBI Tells Senate It’s Still Bypassing 4th Amendment By Purchasing Location Data From Third Parties

1 day ago

Journalist Anna Kalyuzhna harassed over Facebook post on Ukraine assault regiments

1 day ago

Ondo, CC sidestep macro concerns with institutional deals as BTC, ETH prices slide: Crypto Daybook Americas

1 day ago

US Lawmakers Publish Competing Crypto Tax Bill Proposal

1 day ago

Anthropic’s ‘Most Capable’ AI Model Claude Mythos Leaks, Deemed Major Cybersecurity Threat

1 day ago

Knowledge Creation and A.I. | Free Speech Future Event Series

1 day ago

Daily Deal: The 2026 Microsoft Office Pro Courses Bundle

1 day ago

Becoming by Michelle Obama was among the targeted titles. Photo: Patti McConville/Alamy When a school librarian from Greater Manchester came to Index with a shocking story about nearly 200 books being hauled from her shelves and losing her career to a “safeguarding” complaint, we promised to conceal her identity. At her request, we renamed her Emily and we did not name the school. She was terrified about the repercussions if her name was known, both from the school and from other people who might target her online. We kept our promise. Now, a local media outlet has uncovered and published the name of the school. Emily’s identity remains hidden. The school in question is the Lowry Academy in Salford, part of the United Learning Trust. There were extra details Index could not reveal when the name of the school was concealed. We can now address these issues, which are in the public interest. We can reveal how the local authority upheld the safeguarding complaint that destroyed a librarian’s career, the evidence that contradicts the school’s response and the bigger concerns for both Greater Manchester and the United Learning Trust. Initially, Emily told Index, she thought the situation “was a sick joke”. She first heard of the threat to her job when the Lowry Academy’s headteacher took umbrage at Laura Bates’ book Men Who Hate Women in the school library. The nonfiction title, where Bates goes undercover to expose vast misogynist networks and communities, had been ordered by Emily for the Life 101 section for older students, after training she had received about incel culture. The school launched an investigation into both the library and Emily. She was soon reported to the local authority as a safeguarding risk, simply for stocking books. Nearly 200 books were removed and AI was used to categorise the reasons for each book’s removal. You can read more about what happened to Emily in our investigation. While the name Lowry Academy is new, the public might be more familiar with it as the former Harrop Fold School, featured on the Channel 4 documentary Educating Greater Manchester. The school, whose leadership changed after it was fully academised in 2020, had a “good” Ofsted rating in 2024, but it was noted that pupils in key stage 4 had limited time devoted to personal, social and health education. The academy is now part of the United Learning Trust, which says on its website that its ethos “is our expression of our Christian roots, in schools which are fully inclusive and both welcome and respect students and staff of all faiths and none”. A former student from Lowry Academy got in contact with Index, after the name of the school was revealed. He studied at the school until 2024, and said he spent all of his break times in the library. He described the vast and inclusive set of books, spanning across genres. He said he found the library purge and the way Emily was treated “quite grotesque.” “It was disgusting how it was all handled,” he added. He was shocked by the list of targeted books, and said he’d read a few of the biographies. He also read a lot of George Orwell, while he has friends who read many of the manga books. He believes the loss of titles from the library will have a big impact on current students who, like him, find a safe space in the library. “They won’t have the freedom of reading what they want to read,” he said. While the Lowry Academy did not respond to Index for comment, the Manchester Mill reported that the school told them: “It is not the case that books have been ‘banned’ by the school. Following concerns that a number of books within the library were neither age nor content appropriate, an audit was conducted. Following this, books have been placed into age-appropriate categories and returned to the shelves. A very small number of books were deemed inappropriate even for older children due to their content and have been removed.” It may be true some books have now been returned, but they were undoubtedly removed in the first instance. Lowry Academy refused to engage with Index or other organisations to explain what had happened to the books. Index has documentary evidence to support the claim that the books were indeed initially removed from the library during an “audit”. In an email from the school to Emily during the investigation, she was told: “Attached is the list of books [the designated safeguarding lead] has removed from the library. Please note that the audit is still ongoing, and the DSL has confirmed that she is alleging these books are not suitable to remain in the library. The investigation will be based on the attached list.” Further to this, in the school’s investigation report, they concluded with the recommendation: “Continue the audit of all library resources until the Designated Safeguarding Lead (DSL) is satisfied that any material deemed inappropriate for a school setting has been removed.” In an email from the school to Emily during the investigation, she was told: “Attached is the list of books [the designated safeguarding lead] has removed from the library. Please note that the audit is still ongoing, and the DSL has confirmed that she is alleging these books are not suitable to remain in the library. The investigation will be based on the attached list.” Further to this, in the school’s investigation report, they concluded with the recommendation: “Continue the audit of all library resources until the Designated Safeguarding Lead (DSL) is satisfied that any material deemed inappropriate for a school setting has been removed.” Index has seen extensive documentary evidence proving Emily’s claims. These documents have also been seen by the Chartered Institute of Library and Information Professionals (CILIP) and their School Libraries Group (SLG), who have both been supporting Emily. During their investigation, evidenced in these documents, the school shared examples of the removed books with the trust’s safeguarding lead, who said: “The school should ensure that library materials reflect the values and ethos of the school”. The values described on the school website are “aspiration, respect, confidence, creativity and resilience”. The investigation report said that the trust’s safeguarding lead had stated: “Some of these books would be indefensible to parents and expressed concern that the material does not represent a balanced view aligned with the values the trust seeks to promote.” During the investigation, the school also showed concern for their reputation, writing in a report: “I believe there has been a failure to prevent students accessing inappropriate books, this constitutes a serious safeguarding breach under KCSIE 2025. Had parents been aware of this, the school’s reputation could have been brought into significant disrepute.” The Lowry Academy story is not simply a case of one overzealous headteacher. Not only have several senior members of staff been involved, but the trust and the local authority have also played key roles. Margaret Woodhouse, the chair of the school’s governing body, is also the independent chair of the Greater Manchester Learning Partnership, where school leaders across the region work together. Emily was reported to the local authority as a safeguarding risk on 9 December 2025 and her hearing was held on 5 January 2026, after she had resigned. When the committee, known as a LADO, made their decision in January 2026, they substantiated the allegation, stating that Emily had not caused direct harm but that she had failed to follow safeguarding procedures. Index has seen redacted minutes of the meeting. The meeting was held by Salford City Council, and there were four people in attendance. Two were from the school, one was the LADO chair and one was the LADO administration officer. The allegations against Emily were specifically around “introducing inappropriate material into the school library” and nothing else. No previous concerns about her had been raised. In the meeting, the school’s senior vice-principal explained that the referral was made “after discovering multiple books in the school library containing inappropriate content. These books had been loaned to children and did not align with the school’s curriculum”. They confirmed that the investigation was prompted by their discovery of Men Who Hate Women, saying: “the content was inappropriate for children and even challenging for adults to access”. At one point, the LADO chair asked why Emily “began ordering controversial titles and whether this was a recent development”. She later “confirmed several books were adult literature and therefore unsuitable for a school setting”. Some of the books removed include Michelle Obama’s Becoming, Dan Brown’s The Da Vinci Code and Andrew Flintoff’s autobiography Second Innings. As Caroline Roche, chair of the School Libraries Group (SLG) told Index, librarians all make different decisions about which books to stock based on their students and communities, and are ready to defend their collections. Indeed, many GCSE English set texts were not written for children, including Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, William Shakespeare’s Macbeth and To Kill A Mockingbird by Harper Lee. They contain challenging topics, as do many others. In Salford City Council’s decision, there appears to have been a lack of understanding of the role of a school library – an increasing occurrence when it comes to school leadership, when there is an absence of statutory guidance for school libraries. The Lowry Academy boasts on its website that “reading is central to the development of our students”, and talks of how students can read all kinds of genres – horror, graphic novels and classics among them. Students will “be exposed to unfamiliar topics to broaden their understanding of the world around them,” the school writes. Many titles in these genres were indeed removed from the school library during the purge. The school’s investigation discussed the removal of a Nineteen-Eighty-Four graphic novel. And mere paragraphs later described how a senior staff member felt the library’s ‘Life 101’ section (where Emily kept books for school leavers) was inappropriate, “based on the association with the television program Room 101, where undesirable items are symbolically discarded”. They were seemingly oblivious to Room 101’s origins in Orwell’s Nineteen-Eighty-Four. The day Index published our investigation, the Lowry Academy posted a Facebook video promoting a The Traitors-style game, where staff would be “banished”. It was filmed in the school library. “It has come to our attention that among our staff we have some traitors,” one staff member says on the video, without an ounce of irony. Not for the fact that one of their staff has already been “banished”, not for the fact that books have been banished and not for the fact that The Traitors is a programme about murder and deception, not made exclusively for young people. Although, of course, enjoyed by many. Index believes this story is of huge public interest. Not only because the freedom to read and intellectual freedom are under attack in a school setting, but also because important safeguarding procedures appear to have been misused by multiple people. We fear we will see more stories like this if changes are not made, and that school librarians will self-censor through fear. Index has approached the Lowry Academy, United Learning Trust and Salford City Council for comment. United Learning acknowledged the request but did not provide a comment before publication. The others have not replied. READ MORE

1 day ago

Photo: Janine Wiedel Photolibrary/Alamy Disney’s 2025 release Elio was a flop. Some believe they self-censored and that contributed to its commercial failure. The central character was initially portrayed as queer-coded, reflecting original director Adrian Molina’s identity as an openly gay filmmaker. There was then a change of director, audience testing, feedback from leadership and any hint of gay was removed. Standard editing procedure? Perhaps. Changes to a film from test stage to release aren’t unusual and Index doesn’t cry censorship just because something gets cut. Pixar’s chief creative officer Pete Docter recently justified the removal of Elio’s LGBTQ+ plot elements, saying Pixar is “not [making] therapy” and that parents should be in the driving seat when it comes to these conversations. Again fine. We don’t need everything our kids watch to be learning opportunities or “therapy”. It’s OK for some stuff to simply be about entertainment, though I’d argue the two need not be in conflict. But context is everything. Disney’s 2026 offering, Hoppers, was accused of dialling down themes of environmentalism, while the director of a movie in early development apparently said there shouldn’t be divorce in it. Whatever was included or not in the film – and we will never know the reasons for certain edits – Hoppers was still not nearly conservative enough for MAGA influencer Alex Clark, who dubbed it “non-Biblical” and unsuitable for children under 10. Children aged 10 to 13 should only watch it if they could discuss it with their parents afterwards, she opined. Concerns that Hollywood is being asked to bow to an increasingly censorious conservative right, rather than embracing artistic freedom, are demonstrably not the idle musings of the ultra-paranoid conspiracy theorist – and that’s when we do pay attention. The topic of what’s appropriate for children to see and read is hot right now. Last week we reported on a Manchester school that had targeted close to 200 books from its library over “safeguarding” concerns. Where book banning occurs, it’s pretty much always justified by the same line – the titles aren’t age-appropriate – often with little to no explanation given beyond that. Why, for example, is it ok for children to study racist depictions in Othello, as they routinely do at secondary school, and yet not read Michelle Obama’s biography, the latter being on the Manchester cull list? The conversation around age-gating online has a similar flavour, albeit with more understandable origins; kids can now fairly easily access porn online that is more extreme than anything available in Soho’s seediest licensed sex shops back in the day and a trial that concluded yesterday in California found Meta and Google liable for mental harm caused to a young woman who became hooked on the platforms as a child (they look set to appeal the ruling). We should be able to discuss and address issues with the online world (as I do here) and acknowledge that not everything is fine to show to children and young people. Age classifications are there for a reason. But we should also be wary. The language of “safeguarding” and “age-appropriateness” can and is easily co-opted by those with an agenda that goes far beyond genuine concern for children and young people’s well-being. Taken to its extreme this agenda lands you in a place like Hungary, where children’s books with LGBTQ+ themes are routinely wrapped in plastic, lest a kid leaf through one in a bookshop. Or worse still Russia, which passed a law aimed at protecting children from “harmful information” back in 2012 and has since then been removing books with abandon, jailing queer people (who’ve been cast as the central propagators of harm) and creating an internet that more closely resembles Beijing’s. Protect our most vulnerable, yes, just avoid throwing free expression to the wolves in the process. READ MORE

Disney’s 2025 release Elio was a flop. Some believe they self-censored and that contributed to its commercial failure. The central character was initially portrayed…

Trending

Popular

BROWSE OUR EDITOR'S HAND PICKED NEWS!

The News Roundup

AI & Crypto

Politics

Don't Miss!

Editor's Picks

Subscribe to Updates

Opinions & Debates

Latest News

Subscribe to Updates

Cookies

Manage Cookies

Your permission applies to the following domains: