Close Menu
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
  • Home
  • News
    • Politics
    • Legal & Courts
    • Tech & Big Tech
    • Campus & Education
    • Media & Culture
    • Global Free Speech
  • Opinions
    • Debates
  • Video/Live
  • Community
  • Freedom Index
  • About
    • Mission
    • Contact
    • Support
Trending

EBay rejects GameStop’s $56 billion bid as bitcoin exposure back in focus

14 minutes ago

Istanbul Blockchain Week returns in June 2026 amid surging crypto adoption in Türkiye

30 minutes ago

North Korean Crypto Hackers Stole $2.1B in 2025, 60% of All Losses: CertiK

32 minutes ago
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Discord Telegram
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
Market Data Newsletter
Tuesday, May 12
  • Home
  • News
    • Politics
    • Legal & Courts
    • Tech & Big Tech
    • Campus & Education
    • Media & Culture
    • Global Free Speech
  • Opinions
    • Debates
  • Video/Live
  • Community
  • Freedom Index
  • About
    • Mission
    • Contact
    • Support
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
Home»News»Media & Culture»Nextel, Sinclair Fold On Kimmel Ban, Showing Once Again That If You Fight Trumpism, You Usually Win
Media & Culture

Nextel, Sinclair Fold On Kimmel Ban, Showing Once Again That If You Fight Trumpism, You Usually Win

News RoomBy News Room7 months agoNo Comments4 Mins Read1,025 Views
Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest Copy Link LinkedIn Tumblr Email VKontakte Telegram
Nextel, Sinclair Fold On Kimmel Ban, Showing Once Again That If You Fight Trumpism, You Usually Win
Share
Facebook Twitter Pinterest Email Copy Link

Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

Key Takeaways

Playback Speed

Select a Voice

from the community-“service” dept

There’s a bit of a trend emerging: when you decide to stand up and fight against Donald Trump and his parade of dim authoritarian sycophants, you usually win. If you fecklessly fold (like CBS, Meta, Columbia, and countless others), these annoying assholes just keep pushing you harder for concessions.

That’s certainly the lesson from ABC’s effort to ban Jimmy Kimmel for no good reason.

The flood of public outrage at the Disney/FCC suspension of Jimmy Kimmel ultimately forced the company to retreat and put Kimmel back on the air. Disney apparently didn’t much like the wave of folks cancelling their Disney+ streaming video subscriptions in response to the government and a major corporation coordinating a frontal assault on the First Amendment.

And while local right wing broadcast affiliates Nexstar and Sinclair tried to impose their will and extend the ban, that didn’t work out well either. Both companies continued to “pre-empt” Kimmel last week with reruns and game shows, but announced on Friday they’d be returning his program to the air after annoyed locals had some success convincing advertisers to pull their funding.

Both companies were hoping to curry favor with the Trump administration, which is planning to eliminate the country’s remaining media consolidation limits and rubber stamp another round of mergers that will make U.S. local broadcast journalism worse than ever. And while both companies may have convinced Donald they’re very obedient poodles, their efforts clearly came with a public cost.

In internal memos and public statements, both companies tried to insist they were simply trying to protect local communities from dangerous comedians despite the fact Kimmel said absolutely nothing remotely controversial. Sinclair put it this way in a statement issued last Friday:

“Our objective throughout this process has been to ensure that programming remains accurate and engaging for the widest possible audience. We take seriously our responsibility as local broadcasters to provide programming that serves the interests of our communities, while also honoring our obligations to air national network programming.

…As a company rooted in local stations, Sinclair remains committed to serving our communities with programming that reflects their priorities, earns their trust, and promotes constructive dialogue.”

This line of bullshit is particularly amusing given Sinclair’s history of airing everything from dangerous election fraud conspiracy theories to dangerous right wing medical disinformation. That’s stuff that really does harm the local communities they “serve,” but because it’s in line with management’s radical right wing ideology, it apparently gets a pass.

Sinclair then proceeds to pretend that this had nothing to do with government censorship, insisting they’d decided to engage in stupid behavior all on their own:

“Our decision to preempt this program was independent of any government interaction or influence. Free speech provides broadcasters with the right to exercise judgment as to the content on their local stations. While we understand that not everyone will agree with our decisions about programming, it is simply inconsistent to champion free speech while demanding that broadcasters air specific content.”

This too is amusing, given that all of the major broadcasters, Sinclair, Nexstar, and Tegna, are all pushing the Trump administration to let them merge into one even bigger, shittier, company. Similarly the big four networks (ABC, FOX, CBS, NBC) have been lobbying the Trump administration to eliminate other protections banning mergers among media’s biggest companies.

Trump FCC boss Brendan Carr clearly was (once again) abusing his agency’s merger approval authority to bully companies into doing the administration’s bidding if they want their mergers approved, which is illegal censorship and a trampling of the First Amendment regardless of whether Sinclair and Nexstar executives are feckless dipshits who were enthusiastic about the whole thing.

Brendan Carr had been hinting for months before the Kimmel ban that one of his top priorities would be to strengthen local right wing broadcasters trying to dress up right wing propaganda as journalism. Both by rubber stamping their harmful mergers, and by giving them greater government support in their battles for concessions with their nationwide affiliate partners.

Carr clearly saw the Kimmel situation as an opportunity to test the waters. It went… poorly, with Carr and the agency receiving massive, unprecedented public backlash from Republicans and Democrats alike. Carr’s now making the rounds trying to lie about what happened, hoping to fend off several fledgling investigations into his clearly illegal abuse of FCC power and waste of taxpayer resources.

Filed Under: brendan carr, bullies, censorship, comedians, cowards, donald trump, first amendment, jimmy kimmel, journalism, local broadcasters, media

Companies: abc, disney, nexstar, sinclair, tegna

Read the full article here

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using AI-powered analysis and real-time sources.

Get Your Fact Check Report

Enter your email to receive detailed fact-checking analysis

5 free reports remaining

Continue with Full Access

You've used your 5 free reports. Sign up for unlimited access!

Already have an account? Sign in here

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email Telegram Copy Link
News Room
  • Website
  • Facebook
  • X (Twitter)
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn

The FSNN News Room is the voice of our in-house journalists, editors, and researchers. We deliver timely, unbiased reporting at the crossroads of finance, cryptocurrency, and global politics, providing clear, fact-driven analysis free from agendas.

Related Articles

Cryptocurrency & Free Speech Finance

North Korean Crypto Hackers Stole $2.1B in 2025, 60% of All Losses: CertiK

32 minutes ago
Media & Culture

ABC Shows A Backbone In FCC Fight, Shows FCC Manufactured A Controversy Surrounding James Talarico

48 minutes ago
Media & Culture

Lawsuit Against UW Social Work School Over Retaliation for Allegedly Anti-Trans Essay Can Go Forward

48 minutes ago
Cryptocurrency & Free Speech Finance

Morning Minute: Circle Stock Soars After Q1 Beat, $222M Arc Raise

2 hours ago
Media & Culture

Today in Supreme Court History: May 12, 1790

2 hours ago
Cryptocurrency & Free Speech Finance

Is This Bitcoin Bear Market Different? Analysts Weigh In

3 hours ago
Add A Comment

Comments are closed.

Editors Picks

Istanbul Blockchain Week returns in June 2026 amid surging crypto adoption in Türkiye

30 minutes ago

North Korean Crypto Hackers Stole $2.1B in 2025, 60% of All Losses: CertiK

32 minutes ago

ABC Shows A Backbone In FCC Fight, Shows FCC Manufactured A Controversy Surrounding James Talarico

48 minutes ago

Lawsuit Against UW Social Work School Over Retaliation for Allegedly Anti-Trans Essay Can Go Forward

48 minutes ago
Latest Posts

Sarah Wynn-Williams delivers her acceptance speech at the British Book Awards 2026 Index on Censorship last night honoured two women at the British Book Awards in London who showed bravery in standing up to rich and powerful people. Both authors refused to be silenced despite legal threats and went on to write international bestsellers. The first was Virginia Giuffre’s book Nobody’s Girl: A Memoir of Surviving Abuse and Fighting for Justice and the second Sarah Wynn-Williams’ Careless People: A Cautionary Tale of Power, Greed and Lost Idealism. Co-presenting the award with Index was Yulia Navalnya, the activist, publisher and wife of the late Alexei Navalny. The Freedom to Publish Award has been supported by Index for the last four years. CEO Jemimah Steinfeld not only praised both women but also the tenacious publishers Transworld and Pan Macmillan. She said: “This year’s freedom to publish award will honour two different books and authors. These books are not the same story. They are not the same abuses. What happened to them is not morally comparable,” she said, adding: “But both books experienced a series of legal hurdles before they were published. Both authors were silenced, repeatedly. Both authors continued still to speak up because they believed their stories were of public interest. And both authors were fortunate to find tenacious publishers who refused to back down.” Yulia Navalnya said: “History knows one thing: a forbidden word does not disappear. It always returns.” Giuffre began work on her book, a testimony of her abuse at the hands of Jeffrey Epstein, his partner Ghislaine Maxwell and others, with journalist Amy Wallace in 2020 and it was published posthumously, following her death in April 2025. Legal teams in the US and UK worked extremely hard to build a defence for publication that would stand up in court. Go ahead was only given six weeks before publication. Giuffre’s editor and publisher at Transworld, Susanna Wadeson, said: “Virginia’s book puts their victims back at the centre of our concerns. It was essential that we find a way to publish it and give her a platform – perhaps even more so after she had died.” The publication of Wynn-Williams’ book was equally challenging. An account of her time at Facebook, the book makes allegations about the company’s internal culture and practices. Meta dispute the claims. They secured a ruling on the eve of publication to stop her from publicising the book. She runs the risk of a US$50,000 fine if she does so, a figure that apparently represents damages Wynn-Williams has to pay for breaching the separation agreement she signed with Meta in 2017. Joanna Prior OBE, CEO, Pan Macmillan, said: “Sarah Wynn William’s courage is extraordinary and Pan Macmillan is proud to stand with her and ensure her voice is heard. We believe the book remains the ultimate authenticated record – a vital weapon against those who use power and money to silence inconvenient stories. Careless People speaks for everyone who cares about the safety of our children and the transparency of the global platforms that shape our lives. No individual should be silenced by corporate tactics, especially when the public interest is this high.” The Freedom to Publish award serves a double purpose – to highlight censorious practices impacting the book industry and to celebrate those who fight back. Arabella Pike, a publishing director at HarperCollins UK, was the inaugural winner of the prize in 2022 for her work defending Catherine Belton’s book Putin’s People and Tom Burgis’s Kleptopia from SLAPP libel actions. Since then, it has been awarded to Salman Rushdie following his brutal attack, Margaret Atwood whose books are constantly the subject of book challenges in the USA, and Boris Akunin, Russia’s bestseller writer who was labelled a “terrorist” by Vladimir Putin, which led to his books being pulled from distribution across Russia. Philip Jones, editor of The Bookseller and chair of The British Book Awards, said of last night’s winners: “The Freedom to Publish Award acts as our response to those who would silence the truth, and this year recognises the bravest of people, Virginia Roberts Giuffre and Sarah Wynn-Williams. READ MORE

57 minutes ago

CleanSpark stock slides 9% as quarterly earnings miss estimates on bitcoin holdings loss

1 hour ago

Wells Fargo Boosts Strategy Stake in Q1 2026

2 hours ago

Subscribe to News

Get the latest news and updates directly to your inbox.

At FSNN – Free Speech News Network, we deliver unfiltered reporting and in-depth analysis on the stories that matter most. From breaking headlines to global perspectives, our mission is to keep you informed, empowered, and connected.

FSNN.net is owned and operated by GlobalBoost Media
, an independent media organization dedicated to advancing transparency, free expression, and factual journalism across the digital landscape.

Facebook X (Twitter) Discord Telegram
Latest News

EBay rejects GameStop’s $56 billion bid as bitcoin exposure back in focus

14 minutes ago

Istanbul Blockchain Week returns in June 2026 amid surging crypto adoption in Türkiye

30 minutes ago

North Korean Crypto Hackers Stole $2.1B in 2025, 60% of All Losses: CertiK

32 minutes ago

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest news and updates directly to your inbox.

© 2026 GlobalBoost Media. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Our Authors
  • Contact

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

🍪

Cookies

We and our selected partners wish to use cookies to collect information about you for functional purposes and statistical marketing. You may not give us your consent for certain purposes by selecting an option and you can withdraw your consent at any time via the cookie icon.

Cookie Preferences

Manage Cookies

Cookies are small text that can be used by websites to make the user experience more efficient. The law states that we may store cookies on your device if they are strictly necessary for the operation of this site. For all other types of cookies, we need your permission. This site uses various types of cookies. Some cookies are placed by third party services that appear on our pages.

Your permission applies to the following domains:

  • https://fsnn.net
Necessary
Necessary cookies help make a website usable by enabling basic functions like page navigation and access to secure areas of the website. The website cannot function properly without these cookies.
Statistic
Statistic cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
Preferences
Preference cookies enable a website to remember information that changes the way the website behaves or looks, like your preferred language or the region that you are in.
Marketing
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.