A Connecticut Couple Is Fighting for the Right To Let People Hike on Their Land

Media & Culture

One of the most enduring principles of liberty is owning property. “America’s Founders understood clearly that private property is the foundation not only of prosperity but of freedom itself,” Roger Pilon, founder of the Cato Institute’s Center for Constitutional Studies, wrote in 2017. And yet all too often, bureaucrats put unnecessary rules and regulations on how we can use our property. One couple is fighting with their town over the right to just let people go for a walk on their land.* Charles Copley met his wife, Elizabeth, at Oxford University, while they were each pursuing a Ph.D. After living…

Photo: Sergio Kian/UnSplash There are many things to adore about China. The high-speed rail networks are great. Zooming from Shanghai international airport into the city at 431 km per hour is an extraordinary experience. The food is varied and delicious. While the country has a problem with sexual and domestic abuse within relationships, the streets are very safe. I miss being able to walk home at any hour down a dark lane without clutching keys in my hands. I could go on and many in fact do. A current trend – Chinamaxxing – sees young people from the West in thrall to China and taking to social media to say as such. One choice phrase is: “You met me at a very Chinese time in my life.” Chinamaxxers often overlook or downplay the negative parts of the country. The retort will typically be: “our countries aren’t perfect”. And they’re right. Europe, the UK and the USA do have problems, ones we often point out at Index. Still, some perspective is needed. We’re not talking about sporadic violations; we’re talking about systematic abuse at scale. I was bemused by an article in The New World this week interviewing a Chinamaxxer who had to change his VPN three times just to do the interview and muffle his voice when speaking about Tibet and Tiananmen Square. In the UK, a VPN is still very much a choice, not a requirement, and speaking quietly is usually done out of respect to neighbours and noise pollution, rather than from a fear you’re being spied on and could receive a knock at the door. I wonder too what the Chinamaxxers make of the fact that Gao Zhen, a prominent Chinese-American artist known for provocative sculptures of Mao Zedong, was sentenced Tuesday to three years in prison for slandering China’s “heroes and martyrs”? I wonder what they’d make of Guo Degang, lauded for his comedy on the national stage, now being investigated for allegedly improvising parts of a patriotic song? How would they respond to a new report from the International Campaign for Tibet, which showed how Beijing is tightening its grip on the region further, the recently passed and euphemistically labelled Promoting Ethnic Unity and Progress Law helping here? In Hong Kong, activist Chow Hang-tung was convicted simply for organising Tiananmen vigils. A letter from her published by us spoke of the subtle torture of handcuffs designed to constrict and contort the body. Thoughts on this? And what about the woman who was arrested outside the same courtroom for wearing a t-shirt with Japanese characters, which were apparently deemed seditious? These are just some examples from the last week. This isn’t a case of whataboutery. I’m not asking Chinamaxxers to comment on the rights record of Venezuela or Belarus. I’m not even asking them to remark on all these individual cases. But for those who call themselves spiritually Chinese, to bypass the bad and the ugly in favour of just the good is either wilful ignorance, self-censorship or both. READ MORE

Cryptocurrency & Free Speech Finance

Flock CEO Asks Americans to ‘Compromise’ on Privacy as Camera Backlash Grows

In brief Flock Safety CEO Garrett Langley told Fox News that the country has to prioritize a compromise between privacy and safety. He compared calls for an outright ban to banning vehicles, pointing to drunk driving and seatbelt laws as the better model. Langley’s remarks followed a Washington Post investigation that found police departments were not auditing how officers used the cameras. The CEO of Flock Safety has called for “compromise” amid a growing backlash against the company’s AI-powered license plate cameras, which have been vandalized across the country and have drawn bipartisan fire in Congress.”What we have to prioritize…

AI & Crypto

Read More

Politics

Don't Miss!