Close Menu
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
  • Home
  • News
    • Politics
    • Legal & Courts
    • Tech & Big Tech
    • Campus & Education
    • Media & Culture
    • Global Free Speech
  • Opinions
    • Debates
  • Video/Live
  • Community
  • Freedom Index
  • About
    • Mission
    • Contact
    • Support
Trending

How a Treasury buyback tweak helped bitcoin surge 25% to nearly $80,000 in days

4 minutes ago

$9.25M Verdict Against N.Y. Times, in Libel Case Brought by Alabama Basketball Player

46 minutes ago

Zcash jumps 48% to over $800 as Grayscale spot ETF push adds to ‘next bitcoin’ buzz

1 hour ago
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Discord Telegram
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
Market Data Newsletter
Saturday, August 22
  • Home
  • News
    • Politics
    • Legal & Courts
    • Tech & Big Tech
    • Campus & Education
    • Media & Culture
    • Global Free Speech
  • Opinions
    • Debates
  • Video/Live
  • Community
  • Freedom Index
  • About
    • Mission
    • Contact
    • Support
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
Home»News»Global Free Speech»The high price journalists paid for LGBTQ+ reporting, and how to protect yourself now
Global Free Speech

The high price journalists paid for LGBTQ+ reporting, and how to protect yourself now

News RoomBy News Room2 months agoNo Comments12 Mins Read5 Views
Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest Copy Link LinkedIn Tumblr Email VKontakte Telegram
The high price journalists paid for LGBTQ+ reporting, and how to protect yourself now
Share
Facebook Twitter Pinterest Email Copy Link

Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

Key Takeaways

Playback Speed

Select a Voice

As LGBTQ+ communities celebrate Pride this June, many journalists continue to face an ugly reality: simply reporting on this community can open them up to prosecution, physical attacks, threats, arrest, exile, and even death. 

Avijit Roy, a Bangladeshi-born American who blogged about LGBTQ+ rights and free expression, was stabbed to death alongside his wife after receiving death threats related to his reporting in February 2015. About a year later, Xulhaz Mannan, who founded the first and only LGBTQ+ magazine in Bangladesh, was stabbed to death in his home.

Camera operator Aleksandre “Lekso” Lashkarava underwent surgery after defending a colleague from a group of about 20 anti-LGBTQ+ protesters in Georgia in 2021 who, according to that colleague, repeatedly kicked him in the head and left him in a pool of blood. Lashkarava was found dead at his home six days later.

Georgian camera operator Aleksandre Lashkarava (right) died after he was beaten by anti-LGBTQ+ demonstrators at a protest. (Photo: Formula News/YouTube)

Although the official concluded the cause of death was heroin intoxication, family members said they lacked trust in the autopsy findings because international experts were not allowed to participate. Lashkarava’s family, colleagues, and many members of the media accused the government of attempting to shift responsibility for its failure to ensure journalists’ safety, or even cover up its complicity in stoking or condoning violence against the LGBTQ+ community and the press.

These are three among more than 70 journalists CPJ has documented who were attacked for reporting on LGBTQ+ issues over a period of two decades. 

“Being a queer journalist and reporting on LGBTQ communities has very different degrees of danger depending on where you are and what you’re doing,” said Kae Petrin, president of the Trans Journalist Association, a mostly U.S.-based organization that has membership in Canada, South America, and Asia.

See below: Tips on protecting yourself while on assignment

“In some of the education work I’ve done, [I’ve spoken to reporters who] may or may not be LGBTQ+, but are publishing in countries where there are already so many press freedom issues, and then there’s new anti-LGBTQ legislation,” Petrin told CPJ. “Many of those reporters can’t even figure out how to publish stories about what’s going on in their country safely, regardless of their identities.” 

Around the world, some governments are using every tool in their arsenal to suppress reporting on LGBTQ+ news, including vague, widely applied legislation. 

In June 2013 in Russia, President Vladimir Putin passed legislation that legitimizes discrimination against LGBTQ+ persons and subsequently discourages news coverage. Several countries have passed similar laws, including Uganda in 2023 and Georgia in 2024; Turkey proposed its version of the law in 2025. At the state and federal level, the United States legislators passed dozens of anti-LGBTQ+ laws in 2026 and proposed hundreds more.

Konstantin Iablotckii, a Russian LGBTQ+ rights defender who died in 2024, told CPJ in 2013 that laws like these mean that violence against the LGBTQ+ community is not being reported on because of fear that their journalism would be conflated with producing “gay propaganda.” 

The message journalists receive is clear: report on this community, and you could become a target.

US Ambassador to Hungary David Pressman speaks to journalists as he takes part in the Budapest Pride Parade in Hungary on June 22, 2024. (Photo: AFP/Ferenc Isza)

These moves serve not only to punish journalists and outlets, but the issues they were trying to document. When journalists cannot safely report on LGBTQ+ people, those voices are lost to the public record. Crimes committed against them go undocumented. Their humanity remains unobserved. 

“Reporters are often the first step in actually verifying information…and the people who are paying the most attention to what’s happening to queer communities in terms of hostile legislation and populist governments funding transnational anti-LGBTQ policy work,” Petrin told CPJ. “The harder it becomes to access an audience, to access government buildings, to access public space, the harder it becomes for the reporters who are often most invested in telling these stories to chase them down and to be able to do quality and novel reporting.”

Although CPJ does not carry specific data on the experiences of journalists who identify as LGBTQ+, a look through our archives illustrates, from 2003-2025, the price of bearing witness for this community. These incidents began more than 30 years after the first Pride marches took place:

  • Russian authorities fined LGBTQ+ activist and journalist with Parni+ Vadim Vaganov 100,000 rubles (US$1,242) on charges of spreading “LGBT propaganda” in social media posts in August 2025. Vaganov, became the first personidentified by the Russian Justice Ministry as a member of the “international LGBT movement” in April 2025, since the Supreme Court designated the non-existent movement as “extremist” in November 2023. 
  • Russian authorities fined Vladislav Voronin, editor-in-chief of Sports.ru, 200,000 rubles (US$2,487) in April 2025 on charges of “LGBT propaganda” over an article about British LGBTQ+ oriented football club Stonewall FC.
  • Russian authorities fined Samvel Avakyan, editor-in-chief of Sport24 200,000 rubles (US$2,487) in July 2025 on charges of “LGBT propaganda.”
  • Slovakian state prosecutors filed defamation and slander charges against Michal Havran, related to a column he wrote criticizing a catholic priest’s anti-LGBTQ+ statements. In September 2020, the charges were dropped. 
  • Despite no formal laws against homosexuality, Egypt sentenced journalist Mohamed al-Gheiti to a year in prison and a fine of 3,000 pounds (US$168) for promoting homosexuality and inciting debauchery in January 2019. The charges were in connection with Al-Gheiti’s interview with a gay man about his relationships and a fellow journalist who posed as a gay man on the dating app Grindr to learn more about the community. 
  • A Singapore court fined blogger Alex Au Waipang $8,000 (US$5,850) on contempt of court charges in March 2015 in connection with an article he wrote suggesting that a chief justice had manipulated court dates on a constitutional challenge to a law criminalizing sex between men. Singapore decriminalized gay sex in 2022.  
  • Iranian journalist Siamak Ghaderi was sentenced to four years in prison for multiple charges, including “spreading falsehoods,” in January 2011, after he responded to the former President’s claim that there were no homosexuals in Iran by publishing several interviews with gay Iranians. He was also given 60 lashes for “cooperating with homosexuals.” CPJ honored him as an International Press Freedom awardee after his release in 2014. 
  • Uzbek authorities convicted and imprisoned journalist Ruslan Sharipov after his arrest in May 2003 on several charges, including sodomy. Sharipov, who is openly gay, denied the charges, saying that authorities had tortured him to get a confession. Sharipov moved to the U.S. after gaining political refugee status in 2004. 

  • Several dozen people, some of whom wore masks, used bottles and sticks to beat four journalists after they reported on a meeting of local LGBTQ+ activists in March 2023 in Bosnia and Herzegovina. The journalists told CPJ at the time that police were at the scene but did not intervene. 
  • A group of more than 1,000 people demonstrating against an LGBT Pride rally attacked at least 53 journalists covering the event in Georgia in 2021. Two reporters told CPJ that they saw demonstrators targeting anyone who had a camera, was wearing a press vest, or was otherwise identified as a member of the media. Another reporter told CPJ that he ran to a group of 10 police officers who saw the attack and asked them to intervene, but he was ignored; another officer used an anti-gay slur and added that the journalists should expect to be attacked for reporting on the Pride rally.

  • The Press Service of Uzbekistan’s Ministry of Interior accused journalist Agnieszka Pikulicka of spreading “negative and unobjective information” about Uzbekistan and violating the country’s media laws after she interviewed an LGBTQ+ activist who was hospitalized after being beaten in April 2021. 
  • An advisor to the Chechen President and Muslim preachers accused Novaya Gazeta of defamation and threatened retaliation after the outlet published investigative articles that 100+ men whom authorities suspected of homosexual acts were rounded up and tortured in secret prisons in the North Caucasus republic in 2017. At least three men were killed, according to Novaya Gazeta. Journalist Elena Milashina had to leave Russia for several months, and the outlet received an envelope containing an unidentified white powder. 
  • Carlos Serrano, director of Radio Diversia, left Colombia in May 2009 after receiving death threats against him and other reporters from the radio station. Radio Diversia is a radio station dedicated to advocating for LBGTQ+ rights. The threat came from a group that identified itself as “La Organizacion,” which has been linked to threats to groups working with HIV/AIDS, the LGBTQ+ community, and sex workers. 

  • Russian Security Service officers detained three journalists who had traveled to the northwestern city of Svetogorsk after the mayor claimed there were no LGBTQ+ people and it was a “city without sin” in March 2017. Those detained and prevented from reporting in the city were: Igor Zalyubovin, a reporter with Moscow-based independent magazine Snob; Vladimir Yarotsky, a Snob photographer; and Yevgeniya Zobnina, a correspondent for Moscow-based independent Dozhd TV.
  • The U.S. Park Police prevented several journalists from reporting on LGBTQ+ rights activists who handcuffed themselves to the White House gate in April 2010.

  • The Jordanian government blocked access to My.Kali, an “LGBTQIA-inclusive” outlet, in July 2016, following an interview by the outlet’s founder entitled “How do homosexuals live in Jordan?” 

  • Çağlar Cilara, host of “Those on the Agenda,” was fired and her show was canceled after a leftist politician made comments in support of LGBT rights during a March 2019 broadcast in Turkey. The outlet, TV5, said pro-government media was using the interview as part of a campaign against the channel. 

  • Ugandan authorities issued a one-week suspension to Gaetano Kaggwa, a popular radio presenter for Capital FM, for airing a debate on homosexuality in September 2007.

More on the challenges of reporting on LGBTQ+ issues and being an LGBTQ+ journalist

Tips on protecting yourself while on assignment

To stay safe while reporting, there are steps journalists can take to manage identity-based risk and ensure they feel empowered in their reporting. It’s crucial that journalists feel safe and secure while on assignment so they can deliver the news, analysis, and information the public needs to know to make informed decisions about their daily lives. 

All journalists should conduct a risk assessment ahead of any assignment they are concerned about, even if they are reporting from a familiar place. A risk assessment, which can be a brief conversation with your editor, colleague, or other trusted person about potential risks and mitigation tactics, is a great way to evaluate how your identity could be both a risk point and an asset. Are you going to an event or covering a story that might bring additional scrutiny because of how you’re perceived or who you are? How visible are you? How does your identity interact with your story, or connect you to your sources? What does a check-in procedure look like, and what type of support is available from your newsroom or editor? It is important for editors to give journalists space to bring up safety concerns and debrief after an assignment. 

Journalists are seen on the ground as riot police clash with participants of an unauthorized Pride march in Istanbul, on June 26, 2022. (Photo: AFP/Bulent Kilic)

Review any laws and legislation related to LGBTQ+ rights in the country or city you’re reporting in, whether you’re in your country of residence or traveling for an assignment. New or changing laws around issues such as bathroom access and ID restrictions can hinder journalists’ ability to report freely and safely, particularly when traveling or moving through border controls and checkpoints. Discuss these laws with your editor or newsroom, and make plans to mitigate any pending legislation that may impact your ability to report safely. 

Always consider the type of event you’re reporting on, and whether there’s any risk of escalation. Journalists should consult CPJ’s guide on how to assess and implement situational awareness while reporting to keep themselves and their colleagues safe. Ideally, journalists who are concerned about their safety will report with a colleague. If that’s not possible, review CPJ’s guidance on solo reporting best practices.

When in doubt, speak with your newsroom, editor, or colleagues about the best approach to keeping you safe while reporting. That may mean temporarily changing beats, pivoting to a less public-facing role, or reporting under an alternative name. You are important, your work matters, and you are more important than any story.

Thank you to Kae Petrin, president of the Trans Journalists Association, for their insight into the safety of trans journalists and identity-based risk. 

Journalists who would like to speak with CPJ for more information and guidance on how to protect their safety should email [email protected]. 

CPJ’s safety chatbot provides journalists with immediate access to physical, digital, legal, and psychosocial safety information. Text CPJ’s safety chatbot on WhatsApp by messaging “hello” to +1-206-590-6191 and selecting from a menu of safety topics

Read the full article here

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using AI-powered analysis and real-time sources.

Get Your Fact Check Report

Enter your email to receive detailed fact-checking analysis

5 free reports remaining

Continue with Full Access

You've used your 5 free reports. Sign up for unlimited access!

Already have an account? Sign in here

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email Telegram Copy Link
News Room
  • Website
  • Facebook
  • X (Twitter)
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn

The FSNN News Room is the voice of our in-house journalists, editors, and researchers. We deliver timely, unbiased reporting at the crossroads of finance, cryptocurrency, and global politics, providing clear, fact-driven analysis free from agendas.

Related Articles

Global Free Speech

2 French journalists, Togolese fixer detained 26 days following arrest while documentary filming in northern Togo

14 hours ago
Global Free Speech

  Chow Hang-tung and Lee Cheuk-yan, co-leaders of the now disbanded Hong Kong Alliance in Support of Patriotic Democratic Movements of China (HKA) were found guilty today (21 August 2026) of incitement to subversion, because they organised vigils attended by tens of thousands in Hong Kong’s Victoria Park to mark the 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre. The vigils were banned in 2020 and both have been detained since 2021. Below is a translation of Chow Hang-tung’s message to the world, published yesterday I’m curious about tomorrow’s verdict. Justice resides in the hearts of the people; there’s no need to look up to such top-down judgments. One verdict is nothing. Thank you all for walking alongside me in different ways. I have received all your support and blessings. ************ Because I don’t want everyone to worry too much, and I don’t want the focus to be lost, I’m sharing these feelings that have been weighing on my mind since the trial: Several years ago, I made a documentary with friends, trying to visualise the issue of torture by inviting Hong Kong friends to experience the various forms of torture suffered by protesters in China, so that it wouldn’t just remain a “tragedy” on paper. The “torture” depicted in the film was designed and researched by me. I thought I had some understanding of the subject, but only in the last couple of days have I realised I was a completely incompetent “torture officer” back then. I knew absolutely nothing about inflicting physical pain. It’s true that some things are impossible to comprehend no matter how much you read about them; you have to experience them firsthand. I say this because since the trial began, the Correctional Services Department [Hong Kong’s prison authority] has changed its method of transport. It’s no longer just simple handcuffs; now they use a full set of handcuffs, leg irons, waist chains, and ankle chains, and then lead the prisoners like dogs on a chain. From the written description alone, it seems like it’s just more inconvenient and somewhat humiliating, nothing like torture. But it’s only when you actually put on those shackles that you realise the devil is in the details. Ordinary handcuffs have buckles on both sides that connect with slipknots, allowing for limited movement between the hands. However, this set of specially made handcuffs has an outer layer of hard plastic covering the outer layer, locking the hands tightly together. This alone wouldn’t be so bad, but the “rings” on the handcuffs aren’t the round kind you usually see in adult stores (uh, I’ve been there, but only to buy props for filming!). Instead, there’s an additional hard material inside, shrinking into a flat, crescent shape that fits snugly at the thickest part of the wrist. So, when the wrist is inside, there’s absolutely no possibility of rotation; you can only constantly twist your arm to accommodate the angle designed by the handcuffs. That already restricts movement to two dimensions. Then comes the small buckle on the waist chain, which locks the handcuffs above the abdomen. If you dare to relax and let your hands hang down, the buckle will move up and lock into the thicker part of the wrist. Moreover, the locking angle is an extremely unnatural twisted pretzel, forcing one to constantly hunch their shoulders, hunch their back, bend their wrists, and twist their arms to try and avoid the handcuffs getting stuck in their wrist bones. However, complete avoidance is impossible; after all, constantly hunching one’s shoulders for the entire journey from Tai Lam [the prison where Hang-tung is incarcerated] to West Kowloon [the courthouse where the trial is taking place] would likely lead to muscle cramps. So, one can only “choose” which part of the body shall suffer in turn—when the shoulders are too tired, let the bones ache; when the hands are numb with pain, tighten the shoulders further. Then, throughout the entire journey, although most of the time is spent “still,” one is already exhausted from the unseen “muscle battle.” Not to mention, no matter how you are locked, you have to carry your belongings; for me, that means court documents. With that added weight, it is inevitable that the handcuffs will cut into the flesh. The deep marks carved into the wrists don’t fade even after a whole day in court. It turns out that locking a person’s joints in certain relative positions can create a kind of “interlocking” effect between body parts. But to the untrained eye, it’s invisible—”It’s just putting your hands in front of your stomach, child’s play.” Sigh, just looking at that statement, I feel I have no reason to complain; but I never imagined the combined effect of locking all the joints would be so powerful. Thinking back to when I was researching for the documentary, I only focused on finding the most exaggerated physical movements, the torture methods most easily identifiable by the naked eye. I was indeed viewing the victims’ experiences through the eyes of a layman. When I “tortured” my friend, the handcuffs were loosely fastened. I was completely unaware that locking the joints was the key—it really was just a childish experiment. Sophisticated torture, much like mature totalitarianism, avoids the visible, “violent” acts of violence. Its power lies in exploiting and creating internal conflicts among the people, fostering constant mutual surveillance, control, and reporting. This diffuses the perpetrators, making it impossible to identify or apprehend any single “evildoer.” People appear to have “choices,” but they are ultimately forced to choose between harming one party and abandoning another. Power, however, seems detached, never directly intervening. Visible, publicly observable conflicts vanish, leaving only unseen internal strife. The damage to society can be far more lasting and profound than occasional violence. On a more personal level, I find my resistance to physical torture is quite low. When my body aches, my mind becomes blank, overwhelmed by aches and pains, making it impossible to enjoy the scenery as usual. If I were subjected to some of the Ten Great Tortures of the Qing Dynasty, I might confess quickly. The ability to endure torture truly requires dedicated training. So, on the bright side, these 75 days of transport can be seen as initial training in physical endurance—as long as my hands aren’t ruined? To say that this correctional system is intentionally designed to torture prisoners wouldn’t be accurate; it’s just that the prisoners’ comfort or pain isn’t a consideration in its design. So, frankly, what I have endured is far from real torture; at best, it was just a preliminary glimpse. The designers’ primary consideration was probably “safety first,” ensuring prisoners have no possibility of movement. Ultimately, prisoners are at the bottom of the food chain—voiceless, powerless. Our opinions, even after suffering, are meaningless in the face of “safety.” Not to mention asking what security needs there were – frankly, even without handcuffs, a weak scholar like me couldn’t escape. Using so many tricks is overkill, but where can I reason with that? In cases where national security is invoked, even if a lawsuit is filed, it will have to be dropped and legal fees paid. But it’s precisely because I don’t want to never have anywhere to voice my grievances, and I don’t want people to remain silent and at the mercy of others, that I must persist in fighting for democracy and human rights, and for systemic change. In this sense, this new experience offered by Correctional Services is actually helping to strengthen my resolve to fight. Well then, thank you for this generous gift. I will certainly not let you down and will fight this ongoing battle well. I also hope that everyone can gain something from this long trial, perhaps just a little bit of strength, a little bit of encouragement, and that would be enough to fulfill my wish! This message was first posted on Chow Hang-tung’s Patreon account yesterday. We are publishing this with the permission of Brian Kern who translated her message on his Substack account     READ MORE

17 hours ago
Global Free Speech

CPJ joins call to extend UN fact-finding mission on Sudan

21 hours ago
Global Free Speech

Reporting in Somalia is becoming a much more dangerous proposition. Photo: UNSomalia/Ilyas Ahmed “Do you know that we can kill you? To us, your life is worth less than a cigarette.” These are the words with which operatives from Somalia’s National Intelligence and Security Agency (NISA) threatened freelance journalist Mohamed Bulbul, days after he co-authored a news report for UK news outlet The Guardian about the prosecution of activist Sadia Moalim Ali. Two days after the article ran in June 2026, Bulbul was having dinner with two fellow journalists at a restaurant in Mogadishu’s Zoobe area when armed men wearing black masks entered the establishment. “They walked straight towards our table [shouting] ‘Stand up! Stand up!’” Bulbul told Index. The masked men beat all three journalists before they dragged him outside, placed a bag over his head and forced him into a vehicle.  After being moved between two police stations and the offices of the regional police commissioner, Bulbul was interrogated by NISA officers about the article. “They asked me why I had published it.” He was then, he said, given three choices: “Work with us and take money, leave the country, or if you refuse both, we will kill you.” Bulbul fled Somalia and is now in an undisclosed safe location. “Saving my own life become my priority,” he said. “I can no longer spend time with my parents or my children.” Bulbul’s experience is not unique. Across Somalia, journalists and press freedom advocates say that intelligence and security agencies are intimidating, detaining and otherwise silencing reporters. Recent cases in Mogadishu and Puntland state indicate the state’s growing reliance on intelligence agencies and extra-legal actions, rather than the police and the courts, to deal with critical journalism. On 2 July, journalist Suways Jama Mohamed was arrested outside her home in Garowe, Puntland. Suways, founder of Suways Media, a Facebook-based news platform covering social issues, was detained after the platform published a 15-second video showing armed militia operating in her neighbourhood. She was held in Puntland’s Garowe Central Prison for 13 days before being released on bail on 15 July. Mohamed has been charged with spreading false information, defamation, insulting public officials and disturbing public order. If convicted, she could face up to three years in prison. Qareen Abdiweli, Suways’ lawyer, has challenged both the legal basis of the charges and the court’s jurisdiction. “A journalist cannot be prosecuted under the Penal Code for acts related to the exercise of their profession,” Abdiweli told RSF. Suways’ defence team have filed a motion asking for the case be referred to the Puntland Media Council, the media regulatory body. The case is pending. Less than two weeks after Suways’ arrest, Mohamed Jama Mohamad, an independent journalist who had previously worked for private television channel SBC TV, was also detained in Puntland state. Mohamed had been reporting on business closures in the city of Bosaso, following an increase in port taxes. Mohamed was taking photographs of the closed market when he noticed several men following him. “They looked suspicious and kept talking on their phones while following me everywhere I went.” Moments later, a vehicle pulled to a halt beside him. “[The people in the vehicle] weren’t police officers,” Mohamed told Source. “Their uniform [sic] looked more like military uniforms.”  Mohamed was forced into the vehicle without explanation, blindfolded and then taken to a detention facility run by the Puntland Intelligence Service (PISA). Mohamed said that he was held for four days without seeing a lawyer or being arraigned before a court.  “I had simply been taken from the marketplace. No warrant. No judge. No lawyer.” According to the Somali Journalists Syndicate (SJS), these arrests are indicative of the government’s wish to suppress free expression. In June, SJS reported the abduction by NISA agents of journalist Mascuud Warsame, founder of Xogbile TV, in Mogadishu. Warsame was released, without charge, after 39 days in detention. For media organisations, these incidents are becoming increasingly familiar. “Compared with previous years, the overall pattern of violations remains consistent,” Abdalle Ahmed Mumin, Secretary General of the Somali Journalists Syndicate, told Index. “But this year has seen a sharp increase in arbitrary arrests [and] politically motivated detentions, particularly during the ongoing political and constitutional crisis in Somalia.” Somalia’s federal government is currently advancing amendments to the country’s constitution despite objections from two federal states. This may have implications for the balance of power between the federal states, and critics fear that it will allow incumbent president Hassan Sheikh Mohamud to extend his current term of office. Mumin said that while journalists in Somalia have long been obliged to deal with intimidation and violence, the first seven months of 2026 have seen a spike in the use of prolonged detention without charge, alongside more overt interventions by Somalia’s intelligence agencies. Security analyst Samira Gaid told Index that Somalia’s security institutions are increasingly being used as a tool to suppress journalism, activists and anyone courageous enough to challenge the government.  “The role of the media is to hold those in public office accountable,” she said.  “Yet journalists are being targeted simply because they reported information that the government did not want the public to know.” International partners, according to Gaid, invested heavily in building Somalia’s security institutions – a key priority following the end of the country’s destructive civil war. “Those institutions are now being used in ways that go beyond the law.”  Gaid said, noting that NISA was created to protect national security rather than investigate journalists or detain civilians engaged in legitimate reporting. The journalists interviewed for this article all described strikingly similar experiences – arrests without warrants, detention by intelligence agencies, questioning over their reporting. For Somalia’s independent media, the message is becoming increasingly clear; reporting on anything deemed sensitive by the authorities may carry consequences extending far beyond the newsroom. READ MORE

21 hours ago
Global Free Speech

The University of Cambridge. Photo: llee_wu / ICC BY-ND 2.0 Last month Index ran a story about a filmmaker and activist from Pakistan. His name was Roshaan Khattak and he was exploring human rights violations in Balochistan. Cambridge University had accepted him on a research pathway, with the understanding that completing this successfully would lead to him being accepted on the PhD programme. But then Khattak received a death threat and there was an unidentified explosion outside his college which scared him. He expected Cambridge to protect him but instead, as Khattak told Index, he was first locked out of his college then, despite achieving a distinction for his work, was told that he could not progress to doing a PhD and his enrolment was terminated. He saw this, and his supervisors agreed with him, as the university caving in to transnational repression. There has been little national newspaper coverage of his case. On the contrary, there was excessive and sometimes unjustifiable coverage of the allegations of plagiarism made against Professor Jason Arday. He was once hailed by Cambridge as their newest Black recruit and at 37, the youngest professor at the university. As Stephen Bush in the FT observes the question of race then became the focus of the media’s coverage, rather than Arday’s academic integrity. As the university came under increasing pressure, it announced an investigation into Arday. Since Arday’s death, there have been calls to impose curbs on the media. As you might expect, Index strongly opposes any regulation as an impingement of the right – indeed the duty – of the press to report on matters of genuine public interest. What purpose would regulation have served here? It might have shut down legitimate questions about Cambridge and its reputation for academic excellence; about the appointment of academics at the university; and about plagiarism, itself a growing issue across academia. Indeed, public focus on the role of the media in the events of the last few weeks has allowed Cambridge, arguably a more powerful institution than the press today, to evade scrutiny of its role in elevating Arday. Cambridge is supposed to be a world leader in research and teaching, yet when Arday was appointed three years ago, according to the BBC, there were only five other Black professors at Cambridge out of a total of more than 970. The numbers nationally are appalling too: 270 Black university professors in the whole of the country. There are so few Black professors today in British academia that they fear that they too will become the targets of impossible levels of public scrutiny – into their research, into their lives, into their very right to occupy a place in the public sphere on the basis of what they do for a living: in short that their freedom of expression will be curtailed. Also, research at Cambridge seems to be concentrated around subjects that are politically and financially advantageous to the institution – as opposed to research that has clear merit, but is less relevant with respect to commercial interests and priorities. Research income from China topped £23 million in 2024/25. The Judge Business School has formed a partnership with the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia’s defence ministry. I started with Khattak, a scholar from Pakistan whom Cambridge first welcomed and then cast aside. I end with the tragedy of Arday, who became the focus of arguments that extended far beyond the question of the rigour of his academic practice. The link between the two is that Cambridge adopted both as instruments that served its own purposes; then abandoned them when that purpose no longer suited them. Both cases have implications, direct and indirect, for the right to free expression in universities. READ MORE

22 hours ago
Global Free Speech

From prosecutions to bans and spurious copyright claims: how Kazakhstan’s journalists are being silenced

2 days ago
Add A Comment

Comments are closed.

Editors Picks

$9.25M Verdict Against N.Y. Times, in Libel Case Brought by Alabama Basketball Player

46 minutes ago

Zcash jumps 48% to over $800 as Grayscale spot ETF push adds to ‘next bitcoin’ buzz

1 hour ago

America Is Building a Surveillance State Like China’s

2 hours ago

Exorcist Files vs. Jesus 911 Libel Suit Can Go Forward

3 hours ago
Latest Posts

RFK Jr. Loses It Over CNN Host Doing The Math On Meal Costs From His Cooking Show

4 hours ago

The U.S. Is Sending Deportees to Countries They’ve Never Called Home

4 hours ago

Trump Once Promised International Students Green Cards. Now The Government Might Charge Them $100,000 To Work.

5 hours ago

Subscribe to News

Get the latest news and updates directly to your inbox.

At FSNN – Free Speech News Network, we deliver unfiltered reporting and in-depth analysis on the stories that matter most. From breaking headlines to global perspectives, our mission is to keep you informed, empowered, and connected.

FSNN.net is owned and operated by GlobalBoost Media
, an independent media organization dedicated to advancing transparency, free expression, and factual journalism across the digital landscape.

Facebook X (Twitter) Discord Telegram
Latest News

How a Treasury buyback tweak helped bitcoin surge 25% to nearly $80,000 in days

4 minutes ago

$9.25M Verdict Against N.Y. Times, in Libel Case Brought by Alabama Basketball Player

46 minutes ago

Zcash jumps 48% to over $800 as Grayscale spot ETF push adds to ‘next bitcoin’ buzz

1 hour ago

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest news and updates directly to your inbox.

© 2026 GlobalBoost Media. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Our Authors
  • Contact

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

🍪

Cookies

We and our selected partners wish to use cookies to collect information about you for functional purposes and statistical marketing. You may not give us your consent for certain purposes by selecting an option and you can withdraw your consent at any time via the cookie icon.

Cookie Preferences

Manage Cookies

Cookies are small text that can be used by websites to make the user experience more efficient. The law states that we may store cookies on your device if they are strictly necessary for the operation of this site. For all other types of cookies, we need your permission. This site uses various types of cookies. Some cookies are placed by third party services that appear on our pages.

Your permission applies to the following domains:

  • https://fsnn.net
Necessary
Necessary cookies help make a website usable by enabling basic functions like page navigation and access to secure areas of the website. The website cannot function properly without these cookies.
Statistic
Statistic cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
Preferences
Preference cookies enable a website to remember information that changes the way the website behaves or looks, like your preferred language or the region that you are in.
Marketing
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.