Close Menu
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
  • Home
  • News
    • Politics
    • Legal & Courts
    • Tech & Big Tech
    • Campus & Education
    • Media & Culture
    • Global Free Speech
  • Opinions
    • Debates
  • Video/Live
  • Community
  • Freedom Index
  • About
    • Mission
    • Contact
    • Support
Trending

Trump’s Iowa Steel Mill Is a Win for Steelmakers. What About Everyone Else?

41 minutes ago

Crypto for Advisors: The CLARITY Act failed, but the rules came anyway

56 minutes ago

NEAR Intents Hit By $3.8M Exploit In Latest Crypto Platform Hack

58 minutes ago
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Discord Telegram
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
Market Data Newsletter
Thursday, October 1
  • Home
  • News
    • Politics
    • Legal & Courts
    • Tech & Big Tech
    • Campus & Education
    • Media & Culture
    • Global Free Speech
  • Opinions
    • Debates
  • Video/Live
  • Community
  • Freedom Index
  • About
    • Mission
    • Contact
    • Support
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
Home»News»Global Free Speech»Surging Israeli settler violence hurts West Bank journalists
Global Free Speech

Surging Israeli settler violence hurts West Bank journalists

News RoomBy News Room11 months agoNo Comments8 Mins Read3 Views
Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest Copy Link LinkedIn Tumblr Email VKontakte Telegram
Surging Israeli settler violence hurts West Bank journalists
Share
Facebook Twitter Pinterest Email Copy Link

Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

Key Takeaways

Playback Speed

Select a Voice

Sulaymaniyah, Iraq, November 14, 2025—With settler violence against Palestinians in the occupied West Bank spiking, journalists are also facing more frequent and severe attacks. 

So far in 2025, the Committee to Protect Journalists has documented 11 incidents involving at least 19 Palestinian and five international journalists by Israeli settlers — some alongside soldiers — compared with one attack on an Israeli journalist in 2024. Two assaults on Palestinian journalists occurred after the Israel-Gaza war began on October 7, 2023, an event that journalists say marked as the start of the surge. 

The United Nations documented more than 260 settler attacks in October, coinciding with the annual olive harvest season — the highest number since U.N. records began in 2006. It has condemned the apparent impunity enjoyed by the settlers. 

“With global attention remains focused on Gaza, extremist settlers in the West Bank have been waging one of the most aggressive and successful campaigns of intimidation and land seizure since Israel’s 1967 occupation of the territory, targeting not only Palestinians, but also all journalists who report on this mounting violence,” said CPJ Regional Director Sara Qudah. 

Most attacks on journalists occurred near Israeli settlements near Palestinian towns and farmland, which are frequent flashpoints for violence. The settlements are illegal under international law as they are built on land that Palestinians want for a hoped-for future state. 

At least 17 journalists either said they were wearing “Press” vests or imagery showed they were wearing that insignia, according to CPJ research.

‘Unprecedented levels of terror’

Settlers, some masked and armed with sticks, Palestinians, activists, and journalists near Nablus on November 8, 2025. (Screenshot:Al Jazeera/YouTube)

Hanaa Mahameed, a correspondent with Lebanese satellite channel Al Mayadeen, said settler violence against Palestinians has reached “unprecedented levels of terror” with “systematic group attacks carried out under army protection and full legitimacy from the Israeli government.” 

An Israeli government spokesperson did not respond to CPJ’s request for comment via messaging app. 

Mahameed, who was threatened in 2023 while reporting on settler attacks, told CPJ that she believed journalists were targeted to “deter reporting and prevent exposure of what’s happening on the ground — the killings, destruction, and land seizures.” 

“I have avoided traveling to extremely dangerous areas, such as the Jordan Valley or the South Hebron Hills … to protect my team and local guides,” she said, describing Palestinian journalists as having the “weakest” security, compared to Israeli and international reporters.

Noa Bornstein-Hadad, editor-in-chief of the Israeli news site Politically Correct, said that since Hamas’ October 7 attack, “violence in the West Bank has not only intensified — it has gained legitimacy, under the cover of the trauma.” 

She said Israeli law enforcement ”rarely intervenes effectively” and most Israeli media “avoid systematic reporting on settler violence.”

2025 incidents

  • On November 8, Israeli settlers, some masked and armed with sticks and sharp tools, attacked a group of reporters covering Palestinian farmers and international volunteers harvesting olives in the northern village of Beita, injuring at least five journalists. 

Al Jazeera reporter Mohammed Alatrash told CPJ the settlers descended and “attacked anyone in sight,” so he leapt into a valley to escape as stones rained down, fracturing his leg and destroying his camera. Alatrash said his camera operator Lou’y Alsaeed received medical treatment for his injuries, while Reuters news agency reporter Raneen Sawafta was severely beaten on the head and chest. 

“We were wearing ‘Press’ vests and helmets — without them, our injuries would have been far worse,” he said, describing the attack as “organized and tactical,” with settlers moving in groups “like militias.” 

A Palestinian journalist exits an ambulance upon arriving at Rafidia Hospital in Nablus after reportedly being injured by Israeli settlers while covering the olive harvest in the Palestinian village of Baita, in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, on November 8, 2025.
A Palestinian journalist exits an ambulance at Rafidia Hospital in Nablus after being injured while covering the olive harvest in the Palestinian village of Baita on November 8, 2025. (Photo: APF/Jaaafar Ashtiyeh)

Alatrash said no Israeli soldiers came to stop the violence — a charge rejected by an IDF spokesperson, who told CPJ via messaging app that Israeli soldiers “arrived at the scene and operated to disperse the confrontation” and the incident “was transferred to the Israel Police” for investigation.

Nasser Ishtayeh, who works for the Hong Kong-based photo agency SOPA Images, told CPJ that settlers beat him with sticks and stones on his shoulders, neck, and arm, and he fell several meters down the hillside. Doctors found nerve damage on the right side of his neck and body, he said. 

Nael Bowetel of China’s Xinhua News Agency told CPJ that he was struck with stones,  chased for nearly two kilometers, and underwent surgery for a fractured right leg.

  • On October 19, American journalist Jasper Nathaniel was stoned and his car window was smashed with a club by settlers while covering an assault on Palestinian farmers in Turmus Ayya, north of Ramallah. He told CPJ the attackers ignored his shouts of “Press, American, press.
  • On October 10, four Palestinian journalists — Jaafar Ashtiyeh of Agence France-Press (AFP), Wahaj Bani Mufleh of Ramallah-based Quds News Network, Saja Al-Alami of Cairo-based Al-Ghad TV, and Yazan Hamayel of Palestinian Al-Fajr TV — were injured while covering a settler attack on farmers in Beita. 

Ashtiyeh was beaten and hospitalized, while the others sustained gas inhalation and stun grenade injuries. “They burned my car and began throwing stones at us,” Ashtiyeh told CPJ.

  • On July 16, freelance journalist Sidqi Rayan, Quds News Network reporter Abdullah Bahsh, and French photo agency Sipa Press photographer Nasser Shtayyeh were assaulted and had their cameras destroyed while covering settler attacks near Nablus. Bahsh, 29, told CPJ, “Three settlers stopped us — two carrying M16 rifles. They smashed two cars, confiscated a camera, and threatened to shoot us.”
  • On July 13, settlers attacked a CNN crew led by reporter Jeremy Diamond in Sinjil, north of Ramallah, smashing their vehicle’s rear window. Diamond wrote on X that the assault reflected “a sliver of the reality many Palestinians face in the West Bank.”
  • On July 5, settlers stoned a correspondent and camera operator for Germany’s DW and their vehicle in the central Palestinian town village of Sinjil.
  • On May 27, freelance photographer Issam Rimawi was attacked and his two cameras were stolen by masked settlers while covering a wheat harvest near Ramun, east of Ramallah, leaving him with a skull fracture, heavy bleeding.
  • On May 17, American journalist and podcaster Eric Maddox was beaten by settlers while filming a march in Hebron’s Old City. Israeli forces detained him the next day. Videos showed soldiers restraining and taking him away.
  • On May 3, two settlers, one armed, detained Palestinian social media-based Al Ersal Network correspondent Karim Khmaisa and freelance journalists Ahmad Al-Khatib and Mohammed Turkman in northern Al-Mughayir village, interrogated them for half an hour, and threatened to kill them.
  • On March 24, the Palestinian co-director of Oscar-winning film “No Other Land” Hamdan Ballal was assaulted by settlers near the southern city of Hebron and detained by Israeli forces for several hours.
Hamdan Ballal, left, and Rachel Szor, winners of the best documentary feature film award for "No Other Land," attend the Governors Ball after the Oscars on March 2, 2025, in Los Angeles.
Hamdan Ballal, left, and Rachel Szor, winners of the best documentary feature film award for “No Other Land,” attend the Governors Ball after the Oscars on March 2, 2025, in Los Angeles. (Photo: AP/John Locher)
  • On April 27, a settler driver tried to run over freelance journalist Mohammed Turkman in the central Al-Mutawi Valley while he worked with journalist colleagues Ahmad Al-Khatib and Shaher Al-Fuqaha. “The attempted ramming made me decide to work alone, because there is no protection at all,” Turkman told CPJ.

Earlier incidents during the Israel-Gaza war

  • On April 13, 2024, Israeli photographer Shaul Golan of Yediot Aharonot newspaper and Ynet news site was beaten while documenting settlers torching homes in the central village of Al-Mughayyi. “I shouted that I was Jewish and a journalist, but they kept beating me,” he said, adding that police present did not intervene and opened an investigation only two months later.
  • On November 17, 2023, settlers attacked Al Jazeera photographer Joseph Handal after he passed the Container checkpoint east of Bethlehem. “They blocked the road near a bypass gate, forced me to stop, smashed my car’s lights and windows, and hit me in the face with a stone,” Handel told CPJ.
  • On October 8, 2023, journalist Mohammed Turkman, 28, from Ramallah, was targeted in an online smear campaign accusing him of terrorism. “I received hundreds of messages within hours,” he told CPJ. 

An IDF spokesperson told CPJ via messaging app that the army “takes all possible measures to minimize harm to uninvolved civilians and journalists” and that “all relevant incidents are reviewed according to field circumstances and international law.” 

Investigations into suspected settler assaults on journalists were handled by the police, the spokesperson added. The police spokesperson did not respond to CPJ’s messages requesting comment.



Read the full article here

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using AI-powered analysis and real-time sources.

Get Your Fact Check Report

Enter your email to receive detailed fact-checking analysis

5 free reports remaining

Continue with Full Access

You've used your 5 free reports. Sign up for unlimited access!

Already have an account? Sign in here

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email Telegram Copy Link
News Room
  • Website
  • Facebook
  • X (Twitter)
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn

The FSNN News Room is the voice of our in-house journalists, editors, and researchers. We deliver timely, unbiased reporting at the crossroads of finance, cryptocurrency, and global politics, providing clear, fact-driven analysis free from agendas.

Related Articles

Global Free Speech

CPJ urges Morocco to end press surveillance following Amnesty report 

2 hours ago
Global Free Speech

          As news broke that 84,270 people, including more than 32,000 children, had been affected by Nepal’s catastrophic floods, one visual offered something the world desperately needed in the moment: hope. The video shows a little girl, buried under thick mud, being is rescued by Nepal’s emergency teams. Instinctively, the viewer roots for her as rescuers carry her to safety, wrapping her shivering body in a red shawl. But the most moving moment of the video comes towards the end. The girl is sitting motionless in a relief camp, an officer feeding her warm soup. As the camera lingers on her face, a faint smile almost begins to show. It is the kind of image that can offer the viewer respite from the horrors of a humanitarian crisis. The video rapidly spread rapidly across all social media platforms, with commentators calling it a miracle. Of sorts. In fact, it was an AI miracle. Agence France-Presse (AFP) Fact Check’s investigation led them to an India-based creator, who admitted creating the video with the help of AI-generative tools. His justification was disarmingly straightforward: emotionally engaging visuals perform well online. This was just one of the many digitally-manufactured “miracles” put into social media heavy rotation during the floods. Another clip, showing a bridge collapsing into floodwaters swallowing vehicles and human lives, seemed to have been lifted straight out of a Roland Emmerich disaster film. The video racked up more than 2 million views on X before it was debunked as AI-generated by Factly. What made this social media post stand out for me was the identity of one of the people sharing it – an experienced news editor. The post, still pinned on his X profile and with more than 2 million views, suggests that even experienced newsroom decision-makers could be fooled by synthetic disaster footage – or, worse still, be untroubled about the veracity of such videos. Both videos incorporate the visual language of short films, but were not released in cinemas or on Netflix. They surfaced on Facebook, X and Instagram, even as emergency teams continued to search for the thousands of people that went missing after a glacial collapse triggered devastating floods in Nepal and Tibet on August 26. Even as survivors photographed authentic eyewitness footage, synthetic visuals emerged alongside them. The floods became one of the first major climate disasters in South Asia where documentation and fabrication coexisted in the same visual ecosystem.     Screenshot of debunked Nepal floods footage “During earlier disasters, our primary challenge was identifying old footage, establishing where a video was recorded and determining whether it was being presented in the correct context,” Saurabh Shukla told Index. Shukla is founder and editor-in-chief of NewsMobile, an India-based independent media organisation that debunks AI-related deepfakes and focuses on verified information. “The biggest difference today is the sheer speed at which fabricated and misleading visuals entered the information ecosystem,” Shukla said. “With generative AI, we now have an additional challenge – determining whether the event depicted in a video ever happened in the first place.” This has fed into a media environment where unverified visuals are disseminated faster than the verified facts reported by journalists. “Speed without verification can amplify confusion, while verification without timely reporting can leave an information vacuum,” Shukla said. “The challenge for newsrooms is to strike the right balance between being fast and being accurate.” The first images of rescue missions in secluded mountainous regions almost always come from locals, and thus forming the spine of disaster reporting. These inevitably blurry and shaky recordings do not have the polished quality of professional news reporting, but do carry something far more consequential: the credibility that comes with eyewitness documentation. These images often shape the core of the collective memory of a tragedy. But in an age of visual manipulation and trickery, that presumption of authenticity no longer holds. Factly conducted 30 fact-checks into coverage of the Nepal floods; fully one-third involved AI-generated visuals. “Beyond checking the location, source, and context of a visual, we also had to establish whether the visual itself was authentic,” Akshay Kumar Appani, lead fact checker and researcher at Factly, told Index. “During breaking disasters, old AI-generated visuals can spread rapidly while being presented as current footage. This makes it harder for journalists to establish the truth. The visual of the miracle child perfectly captured this dilemma. It was designed to evoke an emotional reaction; but it also looked like the kind of footage that journalists hope to find during crisis reporting. The video was vertically filmed. The camera movement was wobbly. The lighting was grainy. The muffled background sound felt believable. The video presented none of the glaring distortions that once made AI interventions easy to spot. Fabricated videos, today, can be produced to mimic the aesthetics of authentic citizen journalism. It was for this precise reason that the floods presented journalists with a crisis that went beyond recognising AI-generated images: they were increasingly obliged to verify whether the footage reaching them was genuine in the first place. Screenshot of video debunked by Factly Newsmobile’s verification process increasingly involves examining individual frames, conducting reverse-image searches, analysing visual inconsistencies and using AI-detection tools where appropriate. “However, detection tools are only one part of the process. We still need corroboration,” Shukla said. “We cannot rely solely on automated detection tools,” Sumit Dubey, South Asia digital verification editor for AFP’s Fact Check vertical, told Index. Fact-checking, he explained, requires going beyond automated outputs: tracing the original source, examining context, verifying metadata, looking for corroborating evidence and, where possible, speaking to relevant sources. “Automated tools are useful indicators, but fact-checking cannot be outsourced to a button,” Dubey said. The proliferation of synthetic media output in the wake of natural disasters is not new. It’s the sophistication of the output that has changed. For years, much of the public conversation around AI manipulation centred on faces: celebrity deepfakes, altered political speeches and fabricated portraits. The Nepal floods flipped that narrative. Almost every fabricated clip featured rivers, glaciers, collapsing hillsides, dams, flooded valleys or stranded animals. “AI-generated environmental content poses a different problem: [the] tells are failures of physics rather than anatomy,” Mahsa Alimardani told Index. Alimardani is associate director for technology threats and opportunities at Witness, a global organisation helping people use video and technology to protect and defend human rights This explains why the Nepal videos were so plausible. The miracle girl video wasn’t believable just because of her facial expressions. It was convincing because the sludge moved convincingly, because the choreography resembled actual emergency rescues, because the emotional tonality seemed genuine. “Most post-hoc detection tools were designed for content featuring physical characteristics, and they currently struggle significantly with environmental and disaster content,” Bruna Martins dos Santos – policy and advocacy manager, Witness Technology Threats and Opportunities – told Index. “Journalists might also struggle because many tools have limited capabilities to identify synthetic content generated elsewhere,” she said. Another emerging trend is the increasingly complicated role of Big Tech itself in detecting and labelling fake generative-AI content. Some of the clearest AI verdicts came from detection tools built by the very same companies whose models created the same fakes. Three weeks after the US state of California and the EU mandated the requirement for greater transparency with respect to AI-generated content, Witness and Indicator tested thirteen major AI providers. They found that seven had no public detector at all. “The capability to identify synthetic content partly existed. The governance around it did not,” Alimardani said. When both authentic and synthetic content circulate in disaster situations, the biggest challenge that journalists face is that of establishing truth amidst widespread public uncertainty and doubt. According to Martins dos Santos, “Journalists and local fact-checkers can face immense time pressure, often wasting scarce resources re-detecting the same recycled disaster footage across multiple platforms and languages.” The greatest danger emerging from Nepal may not be that people believed the fake videos. It may be that they have begun to doubt the real ones. Shukla’s concern is that people may stop trusting visual evidence altogether. “Imagine a situation where genuine footage of a disaster emerges, but people dismiss it as AI-generated. Facts become secondary to perception.” Within days of the floods, even authentic CCTV footage from the Gyirong border was being perceived as AI-generated, prompting fact-checkers to establish that the scenes it depicted were real. This exposed a troubling issue: even authentic visuals can no longer be taken at face value. Martins dos Santos told Index that the phenomenon has a name: “Liar’s dividend”, whereby the mere existence of convincing synthetic content allows bad actors to dismiss genuine, damaging evidence as fake simply by claiming it was AI-generated. This means that genuine footage is no longer accorded credibility immediately; it may first be perceived with suspicion. “This means a video may look completely authentic and still be fabricated. Conversely, genuine footage can contain compression artefacts that make it appear suspicious,” Shukla warned. Appani, for his part, noted that synthetic media doesn’t merely affect verification in real time. It also reshapes collective memory. “Widely circulated synthetic or recycled footage may eventually be remembered as genuine imagery from the disaster. Generative-AI could therefore affect not only how disasters are verified in real-time, but also how they are documented and remembered in the future.”The Nepal floods left destruction in its wake, and also a warning for journalists covering climatic disaster. The defining challenge of disaster reporting is no longer capturing the first image, but establishing which image the world can trust. In Shukla’s words: “For fact-checkers, the challenge is not just determining whether a video is real. It is establishing whether it actually belongs to the event it claims to depict.” READ MORE

3 hours ago
Global Free Speech

CPJ, partners call on Malta to ensure broad consultation on draft media reform bill 

5 hours ago
Global Free Speech

Hong Kong journalist Tang Ho-wing arrested in latest sedition case

21 hours ago
Global Free Speech

Taliban shut down 3rd Shiite-centered media outlet in 4 months in Afghanistan

23 hours ago
Global Free Speech

Iran sentences 2 journalists as media crackdown widens

1 day ago
Add A Comment

Comments are closed.

Editors Picks

Crypto for Advisors: The CLARITY Act failed, but the rules came anyway

56 minutes ago

NEAR Intents Hit By $3.8M Exploit In Latest Crypto Platform Hack

58 minutes ago

Near Intents Hacked for $3.8M Days After Denying North Korea-Linked Bitget Hacker

59 minutes ago

Jewish Community Center’s Lawsuit Against “Goyim Defense League” Can Go Forward

2 hours ago
Latest Posts

CPJ urges Morocco to end press surveillance following Amnesty report 

2 hours ago

NEAR Intents hit by $3.8M exploit, pauses cross-chain services in latest crypto hack

2 hours ago

Stablecoins Can Drain From Banks And Nations At Lightning Speed

2 hours ago

Subscribe to News

Get the latest news and updates directly to your inbox.

At FSNN – Free Speech News Network, we deliver unfiltered reporting and in-depth analysis on the stories that matter most. From breaking headlines to global perspectives, our mission is to keep you informed, empowered, and connected.

FSNN.net is owned and operated by GlobalBoost Media
, an independent media organization dedicated to advancing transparency, free expression, and factual journalism across the digital landscape.

Facebook X (Twitter) Discord Telegram
Latest News

Trump’s Iowa Steel Mill Is a Win for Steelmakers. What About Everyone Else?

41 minutes ago

Crypto for Advisors: The CLARITY Act failed, but the rules came anyway

56 minutes ago

NEAR Intents Hit By $3.8M Exploit In Latest Crypto Platform Hack

58 minutes ago

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest news and updates directly to your inbox.

© 2026 GlobalBoost Media. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Our Authors
  • Contact

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

🍪

Cookies

We and our selected partners wish to use cookies to collect information about you for functional purposes and statistical marketing. You may not give us your consent for certain purposes by selecting an option and you can withdraw your consent at any time via the cookie icon.

Cookie Preferences

Manage Cookies

Cookies are small text that can be used by websites to make the user experience more efficient. The law states that we may store cookies on your device if they are strictly necessary for the operation of this site. For all other types of cookies, we need your permission. This site uses various types of cookies. Some cookies are placed by third party services that appear on our pages.

Your permission applies to the following domains:

  • https://fsnn.net
Necessary
Necessary cookies help make a website usable by enabling basic functions like page navigation and access to secure areas of the website. The website cannot function properly without these cookies.
Statistic
Statistic cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
Preferences
Preference cookies enable a website to remember information that changes the way the website behaves or looks, like your preferred language or the region that you are in.
Marketing
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.