Close Menu
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
  • Home
  • News
    • Politics
    • Legal & Courts
    • Tech & Big Tech
    • Campus & Education
    • Media & Culture
    • Global Free Speech
  • Opinions
    • Debates
  • Video/Live
  • Community
  • Freedom Index
  • About
    • Mission
    • Contact
    • Support
Trending

Paramount Reveals Company Will Be 49.5% Owned By Foreign Investors If Warner Bros Merger Approved

15 minutes ago

Just "Felonious Peccadillos"; I'm "Overqualified for Oklahoma"; Bar Association, "Bring It on Bitch": Surprisingly Ineffective in Fighting Disbarment

17 minutes ago

Kraken parent Payward closes $550 million Bitnomial deal, securing full CFTC derivatives stack

35 minutes ago
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Discord Telegram
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
Market Data Newsletter
Monday, May 4
  • Home
  • News
    • Politics
    • Legal & Courts
    • Tech & Big Tech
    • Campus & Education
    • Media & Culture
    • Global Free Speech
  • Opinions
    • Debates
  • Video/Live
  • Community
  • Freedom Index
  • About
    • Mission
    • Contact
    • Support
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
Home»News»Global Free Speech»Senegal rebel leader rejects prosecution claims against journalist René Capain Bassène
Global Free Speech

Senegal rebel leader rejects prosecution claims against journalist René Capain Bassène

News RoomBy News Room2 hours agoNo Comments8 Mins Read1,925 Views
Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest Copy Link LinkedIn Tumblr Email VKontakte Telegram
Senegal rebel leader rejects prosecution claims against journalist René Capain Bassène
Share
Facebook Twitter Pinterest Email Copy Link

Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

Key Takeaways

Playback Speed

Select a Voice

A key Senegalese rebel leader, César Atoute Badiate, has broken his silence on jailed journalist René Capain Bassène, refuting the prosecution’s claim that Bassène was a militant fighting for independence of the Casamance region who incited him to murder 14 illegal loggers in 2018. 

“René Capain Bassène is neither an MFDC representative nor a leader to give me orders [to kill],” said Badiate, who heads one of the main factions of the separatist Movement of Democratic Forces of Casamance (MFDC), in his first public statement about the case.

“He was neither a member nor a spokesman for the MFDC. I knew him as a journalist and writer,” he wrote to CPJ in March, from exile in neighboring Guinea-Bissau where he is negotiating a peace deal with Senegalese authorities.  

A former U.S. envoy to the Casamance, Mark Boulware, also expressed shock that “a real journalist” with deep knowledge about one of Africa’s longest running armed conflicts was handed down a life sentence, while a respected local academic, Paul Diédhiou, told CPJ that Bassène had been a “victim of demonization” in the media, even though his balanced reporting was crucial in documenting Senegal’s history.

One of Senegal’s worst miscarriages of justice

René Capain Bassène’s wife, Odette Victorine Coly, holds a banner requesting a presidential pardon for the journalist during President Bassirou Diomaye Diakhar Faye’s visit to Ziguinchor in December 2025. The banner reads, “Presidential pardon for René Capain Bassène.” (Photo: Courtesy of René Capain Bassène’s family)

CPJ regards Bassène’s prosecution as one of Senegal’s worst miscarriages of justice, where a journalist and author, who has devoted his life to understanding and ending the conflict, is in jail for a crime he could never have committed. 

On June 13, 2022, a Casamance court found Bassène guilty of complicity in murder, attempted murder, and criminal association for the execution of 14 men illegally collecting wood in the protected Bayottes forest, near Ziguinchor, Casamance’s largest town.

CPJ’s podcast presents extensive new evidence about Bassène’s conviction, including interviews with several former co-defendants — all acquitted in 2022 — who said they were forced, through beatings and electric shocks, to falsely implicate Bassène. It raises serious questions about the integrity of a case that has become one of West Africa’s most emblematic press freedom concerns. 

Listen to the podcast René Capain Bassène, wrongly convicted, which examines the journalist’s life, career, and trial, through the voices of those involved. 

CPJ’s 2025 investigation also revealed significant flaws in the trial, with some witnesses who didn’t even know Bassène signing transcripts of interviews that had been altered to include inaccurate information, doubts about emails allegedly sent from the journalist’s account, and the geolocation of his phone at the time of the murders remains disputed. 

Four people told CPJ they saw Bassène in Ziguinchor on the afternoon of the killings, one of whom said they watched a football match together. Bassène also told CPJ that he was stripped naked, beaten until he lost hearing in one ear, and electrocuted on the genitals during questioning. 

Despite this, the Supreme Court upheld Bassène’s life sentence.

“Enough is enough,” said Bassène’s wife, Odette Victorine Coly, who has raised their four children alone since 2018. “His children need their father’s love … His unjust detention has gone on for far too long.”

Sign CPJ’s petition calling on Senegal’s President Bassirou Diomaye Diakhar Faye to right a monumental miscarriage of justice by releasing Bassène here.

A leading expert in Casamance conflict

Separatists belonging to the Movement of Democratic Forces of Casamance (MFDC) arrive ahead of the release of seven captured Senegalese soldiers at an abandoned settlement, Baipal in Gambia on February 14, 2022. Separatist rebels from Senegal's southern Casamance region on Monday handed over seven Senegalese soldiers whom they had captured three weeks ago, AFP reporters saw, demanding nothing in return.
MFDC rebels arrive in Gambia in 2022 to hand over seven Senegalese soldiers whom they had captured three weeks earlier. (Photo: AFP/ Muhamadou Bittaye)

Bassène is a leading expert in the Casamance conflict, which began in 1982 amid longstanding grievances over marginalization. Bassène’s interest in the uprising was personal: his family was displaced from their village on the frontline.

Through hundreds of interviews with separatists and soldiers alike, and across three books, Bassène shed light on the roots and drivers of the conflict.

In his message to CPJ, Badiate recalled that Bassène had interviewed him for a radio show, “Carrefour de la paix” (Crossroads of peace), on local Zig FM, which focuses on resolving the conflict — one of many encounters between the two men.

MFDC leader César Atoute Badiate (right) is seen in an undated photo.
MFDC leader César Atoute Badiate (right) is seen in an undated photo. (Screenshot: Groupe Médias du Sud/YouTube)

While Bassène has spent the last eight years behind bars, Badiate has met freely with Senegalese authorities. Despite an international arrest warrant for his 2022 conviction in absentia on the same charges, Badiate met government officials to sign a peace agreement in August 2022 and a follow-up seven-point plan in February 2025.

“His absence, facilitated by Senegal’s unwillingness to bring him to trial, deprived me of a unique opportunity to prove my innocence,” Bassène told CPJ from his prison in Senegal’s capital, Dakar.

The MFDC has denied involvement in the massacre — one of the most violent incidents since the signing of peace deals in 2004 and 2014 — for which no group has claimed responsibility.

MFDC members Louis Tendeng and Samba Goudiaby, who introduced Bassène to Badiate, also told CPJ that the journalist never belonged to the movement. Instead, he sought their help in interviewing MFDC members as part of his research.

Boulware: ‘I never felt him taking sides’

Ambassador Boulware, a career diplomat appointed in 2014 by the Obama administration as a special representative for Casamance, described Bassène as an “invaluable resource” in his work to bolster the peace process.

René Capain Bassène speaks at a conference in this undated photo.
René Capain Bassène speaks at a conference in this undated photo. (Photo: Courtesy of René Capain Bassène’s family)

“René was completely independent, a real journalist who wanted to describe what he saw and inform the public about the stakes of the conflict. I never felt him taking sides,” he told CPJ. “He was among the most informed about the conflict, with a perfect mastery of the actors and the different issues … The accusation of being the mastermind of such an operation seemed laughable to me. It didn’t make sense.”

Similarly, Diédhiou, a professor of sociology at the University of Ziguinchor, told CPJ that the smearing of Bassène’s reputation after his arrest was completely unjustified.   

“It is regrettable because he was the victim of demonization in the media. He was highly objective; when you read his work, it is impossible to say that he favors one side over another,” said Diédhiou. “René’s work — and I hope he is continuing to write from where he is — is part of Senegal’s history, which will disappear if these testimonies are not preserved.”

Bassène’s 2013 book profiled the rebellion’s late founder Augustin Diamacoune Senghor, while his second included testimonies from over 200 local people, from fighters to civilians. His third book, “Casamance: When will there be peace?,” published in 2017, highlighted the intransigence of both government and rebel negotiating positions. 

“His works helped me a lot because I had sketched in my work the rarely studied problem of the individual motivations of the rebels. This is a blind spot in academic research that René has tried to highlight,” said Diédhiou.

Bassène: ‘My life is under greater threat than ever’

Men pray next to a coffin during a burial in a cemetery in the regional capital Ziguinchor, southern Senegal on January 7, 2018 following an attack by armed men in the Bayotte forest. A ministerial fact-finding mission was headed to Casamance in southern Senegal on January 7, after 13 youths were killed in the first upsurge in violence in the isolated region in years. The youths were collecting wood in the Bayotte forest, 20 kilometres (12 miles) from the regional capital Ziguinchor, "when they were attacked by an armed band of 15 people", army spokesman Abdou Ndiaye told AFP. A source in Ziguinchor said that 13 were killed and two were able to escape, with Ndiaye adding that seven others were injured in the attack. (Photo by SEYLLOU / AFP)
Men pray next to a coffin in Ziguinchor on January 7, 2018, following the forest attack that Bassène was accused of masterminding. (Photo: AFP/ Seyllou)

In the introduction to his 2017 book, Bassène revealed that he was facing intensifying threats. 

“Since 2004, I have hesitated to include, in my various writings and statements, certain facts related to the war,” he wrote. “But now that my life is under greater threat than ever from all sides, I have no choice but to publish certain accounts,” he said, referring to a section of the book detailing violent abuses against civilians.

Such reputational attacks are common to local war reporters whose work challenges official narratives. 

Ibrahima Gassama, presenter of the Zig FM show where Bassène once interviewed Badiate, has also been harassed for trying to report the story fairly from all sides. He was one of six journalists working for Sud FM who were detained in 2005 after broadcasting an interview with an MFDC leader.

“Covering the conflict is like being between a rock and a hard place, especially for us who are on the ground in Ziguinchor, watched as much by the army as by the MFDC,” said Gassama, who regularly invited Bassène on the show and said they carried out “journalistic missions together” to the field. 

CPJ’s letters requesting comment from the gendarmerie and Defense Minister Birame Diop’s offices in mid-April, as well as text messages and phone calls to presidential spokesperson, Ousseynou Ly, and government spokesperson, Marie Rose Khady Fatou Faye, did not receive any replies.

Read the full article here

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using AI-powered analysis and real-time sources.

Get Your Fact Check Report

Enter your email to receive detailed fact-checking analysis

5 free reports remaining

Continue with Full Access

You've used your 5 free reports. Sign up for unlimited access!

Already have an account? Sign in here

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email Telegram Copy Link
News Room
  • Website
  • Facebook
  • X (Twitter)
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn

The FSNN News Room is the voice of our in-house journalists, editors, and researchers. We deliver timely, unbiased reporting at the crossroads of finance, cryptocurrency, and global politics, providing clear, fact-driven analysis free from agendas.

Related Articles

Global Free Speech

New CPJ podcast reveals torture, coerced testimony in case of jailed Senegalese journalist René Capain Bassène

3 hours ago
Global Free Speech

People attend the funeral of Lebanese journalist Amal Khalil in Baissariyeh, Lebanon, April 23, 2026. Photo: AAli Hashisho/Xinhua/Alamy This Sunday is World Press Freedom Day. Like International Women’s Day, every day should really be World Press Freedom Day. Journalists are powerful watchdogs and protecting them should be a baseline requirement for a free society. But given how woeful the state of media freedom is right now – the number of murdered journalists being at a record high – a day of focus is clearly much needed. So too is a monument. The UK will have its first one dedicated to journalists killed in conflict zones next year, the design of which has just been revealed. Former Index trustee Sarah Sands spoke to us about it. Meanwhile, the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ), run by Jodie Ginsberg who used to to work at Index, is calling for an independent global body to support investigations into attacks on the media. Veteran foreign correspondent Christina Lamb echoed these calls, speaking days after Lebanese journalist Amal Khalil was killed in an Israeli airstrike. That there are many people working hard to address the dire situation is welcome. At Index these threats impact us on several levels. They feed into our campaigning programmes, while the editorial team work with people very much at the coal face. I joined the organisation in 2017 and one of the first articles I edited featured an interview with a Mexican journalist called Javier Valdez. A few months later Valdez was dead, shot 12 times by an unidentified gunman in broad daylight. That same year, and for several years after, I was in regular email correspondence with Andrei Aleksandrau, a former Index colleague and journalist from Belarus. In 2021 he was arrested in Minsk. A year later, another one of our contributors, Larysa Shchyrakova, was arrested. Fortunately Shchyrakova is out of jail and you can read about her experiences here. Aleksandrau is still being held. We also published Victoria Roschyna from Ukraine who was killed in 2024. I could list many similar examples, suffice to say the Index archive is a treasure trove, but it’s also a space where the words of the murdered and the wrongfully detained stand still, ossified, a sad and damning testament to the perils of simply observing. As I said, World Press Freedom Day should be every day and we work on media freedom issues 24/7. Still, we have commissioned a trilogy of pieces this week with the date in mind: Oren Persico writes from Israel on the media ecosystem there; Nedim Turfent, a former political prisoner in Turkey, talks about the threats directed at exiled media in Europe; and Dahlia Kholaif speaks to people on the ground in the Gulf about how the Iran war has amplified the ugly authoritarian reality of these states. Are journalists the canary in the coalmine, the first to be attacked during a democratic backslide? Perhaps, though I’ve heard artists and minority groups claim the same. What’s true is that journalists are the much needed fourth estate. They are a vital check on governments and the powerful. Journalists risk their lives to inform ordinary citizens about what is happening – and they’re now under unprecedented attack around the world. That fact should shame us all. READ MORE

2 days ago
Global Free Speech

There have been calls for pro-Palestine protests to be banned following attacks on Jewish communities. Photo: orlando britain/Alamy Since the shocking attacks on members of the Jewish community in Golders Green, north London on Wednesday, there have been calls to ban future marches in support of Palestinians, including from Jonathan Hall KC, the independent reviewer on terrorism legislation. It sounds like a reasonable demand. There have been expressions of antisemitism on these marches and political slogans are often chanted that many believe to be antisemitic, such as “From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free” as well as the phrase “Globalise the intifada”, which has led to arrests for stirring up racial hatred and which the prime minister described as “extreme racism”  following the attacks. However, this proposal is unwise for a number of reasons. The Jewish community needs protection, but so does the right to protest. It was significantly eroded by the last Conservative administration and Keir Starmer’s Labour government has already displayed an authoritarian zeal to limit free speech, including new powers that will allow police to put conditions on repeat protests, which became law in April. While this demand for a ban may appear to be targeting hate speech, and in this case specifically antisemitism, it would prevent legitimate and necessary protest. More than 70,000 Palestinians have been killed in Gaza since 7 October 2023 and settler attacks in the West Bank have resulted in multiple deaths and thousands of Palestinians being displaced from their homes. Protest is an essential means of demonstrating public outrage at these events and solidarity with Palestinians. Nor will banning marches diminish the alarming growth in antisemitism, which has become normalised since 7 October. I have myself witnessed a new licence in disparaging Jews and Judaism in public life to a degree that I have never previously observed. It is as if a taboo has been broken. No distinction is made between the actions of Israel and a diaspora minority – not only by the individuals who commit these acts of violence, but even by apparently peace-loving people who would consider themselves to be opposed to racism. This attitude towards Jews has a long history. The belief that the Jewish people are intrinsically evil and out to undermine society dates back to medieval times in England, when they were the most visible minority in the country. That connection between Jews and wrongdoing is so deeply ingrained in our culture (from Chaucer through to Shakespeare, Dickens and Roald Dahl) that anti-Jewish feeling is easily triggered. So, when the Jewish state commits war crimes, it’s the ancient, irrational charges that surface once again: Jews as bloodthirsty child killers seeking to control the world. That’s why the distinction between Jews and Israel is so readily blurred. You don’t stamp out that deep cultural antipathy by banning a march. Instead, you marginalise Palestinians, who are in essential need of international support. You undermine a fundamental democratic right and you fail to address the root causes of antisemitism. You also deny the possibility for a nuanced discussion. I have sympathy with fellow Jews who feel that the chants on marches are hostile and racist. But “Globalise the intifada” and “From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free” are political slogans open to interpretation. The Arabic word intifada, or shaking off, is an expression of rebellion against Israeli occupation that dates back nearly 40 years. After nearly 60 years of oppression, supporters of Palestinians have every right to call for it in solidarity. Likewise, “From the river to the sea” could be interpreted as a legitimate call for self-determination or for a one-state solution, which an increasing number of Jews are now calling for too since there is no possibility of a two-state solution in sight. We need to have the courage and vision to support the Jewish community without destroying a fundamental and necessary right. It is Jews who will ultimately be harmed too, as members of the UK population, if the right to protest is further eroded. READ MORE

3 days ago
Global Free Speech

Zambian President Hakainde Hichilemamet Chinese President Xi Jinping in Beijing in 2024. Photo: Yin Bogu/Xinhua/Alamy Live News Also read our CEO Jemimah Steinfeld’s view on the reasons for RightsCon’s cancellation The cancellation of RightsCon, due to be held this weekend in Lusaka, Zambia has come as a shock. The global conference would have brought together thousands of advocates, technologists, academics, policymakers and others concerned with issues at the intersection of human rights and technology. However, for those Zambians who are abreast of the political direction their country is taking, it is not very surprising. Daniel Sikazwe, the secretary general of Zambian PEN, had feared that it could happen given the fact that the conference was to happen just three months before the general elections on 13 August 2026. “The conference was going to show the world the state of human rights violations in Zambia at a time when the regime in power does not want this information known by the electorate,” he said, adding that since President Hakainde Hichilema assumed office in 2021, the human rights situation in the country has deteriorated. Hichilema’s government has enacted laws like the Cyber Security Act (2025) and the Cyber Crimes Act (2025) which human rights experts consider hostile to perceived dissent, criticism and political opposition. In fact, the Law Association of Zambia has petitioned the high court to declare provisions of the Cyber Crimes Act unconstitutional since it infringes on freedom of expression, speech, conscience, and association. The Ministry of Information’s press release stating that the conference’s postponement was “necessitated by the need for a comprehensive disclosure of the critical information relating to key thematic issues proposed for discussion” suggests that the government was apprehensive about the direction that some of the conference sessions would take. Charles Mafa, managing partner and editor at the Center of Investigative Journalism in Lusaka, Zambia attributed the postponement to China’s influence in the mining sector in Zambia. “On 18 February 2025, there was a major environmental disaster in Zambia: a tailings dam owned by a Chinese state-owned enterprise collapsed, releasing close to 50 million litres of highly toxic waste into the Kafue River ecosystem. This disaster and how investigations into it have been frustrated by the government was bound to be one of the big talking points at the conference to the discomfort of the ruling party,” he said. David Ngwenyama, a well-known Zambian ecologist, reiterates Mafa’s point. “This is the same government that has done public relations work for the Chinese mining company, claiming that pollution has been neutralised and the conditions are back to normal,” he said, adding, “I would not be surprised if the postponement of the conference is yet another performance of Chinese power in Zambia.” The fact that the venue where the conference was to be held – the Mulungushi International Conference Center – was partly built with Chinese funds has also made people wonder if China could have had a hand in the postponement of the event. There were also representatives from Taiwan due to speak at the conference. If all this is true, it raises serious questions about Zambia’s sovereignty. For an African journalist like me, having RightsCon in southern Africa would have been a megaphone for human rights defenders and journalists to showcase the deterioration of human rights observance on the African continent and to put this on record. It was also an opportunity for human rights defenders and journalists to come together as a family that shares the same values and dilemmas. There is immense power in this kind of gathering because it sends the powerful message: you are not alone in this work you are doing – everywhere in the world, there are people who are fighting for human rights observance  as you are, and paying the price as you are, sometimes the ultimate price. Finally, in the past, before the world changed in the Donald Trump direction where business and financial deals matter more than human life and human rights, resolutions made at these conferences had serious consequences for the nations labelled human rights violators, particularly in terms of isolating them as pariah nations (think of Iran, North Korea, Russia, after the invasion of Ukraine and the killing of Alexei Navalny –  and the killing of more than 50,000 people in the Gaza war. These days, unfortunately, none of this seems to matter: Mighty nations can attack weaker nations at will, assassinate the entire cabinet, and turn this into a joke on social media. Bombing “for fun”. Sad. READ MORE

3 days ago
Global Free Speech

CPJ, partners condemn Ecuador court’s order to remove press freedom NGO’s content

4 days ago
Global Free Speech

CPJ welcomes Brazilian Supreme Court ruling in favor of journalist blinded by rubber bullet

4 days ago
Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Editors Picks

Just "Felonious Peccadillos"; I'm "Overqualified for Oklahoma"; Bar Association, "Bring It on Bitch": Surprisingly Ineffective in Fighting Disbarment

17 minutes ago

Kraken parent Payward closes $550 million Bitnomial deal, securing full CFTC derivatives stack

35 minutes ago

GameStop Proposes $55B eBay Takeover Deal

42 minutes ago

Today in Supreme Court History: May 4, 1942

1 hour ago
Latest Posts

Senegal rebel leader rejects prosecution claims against journalist René Capain Bassène

2 hours ago

Bitcoin stalls near $80,000. Stocks and ETF inflows still point to a breakout: Crypto Daily

2 hours ago

Bitcoin Trader Sees $88,000 and Higher After BTC Hits Three-Month High

2 hours ago

Subscribe to News

Get the latest news and updates directly to your inbox.

At FSNN – Free Speech News Network, we deliver unfiltered reporting and in-depth analysis on the stories that matter most. From breaking headlines to global perspectives, our mission is to keep you informed, empowered, and connected.

FSNN.net is owned and operated by GlobalBoost Media
, an independent media organization dedicated to advancing transparency, free expression, and factual journalism across the digital landscape.

Facebook X (Twitter) Discord Telegram
Latest News

Paramount Reveals Company Will Be 49.5% Owned By Foreign Investors If Warner Bros Merger Approved

15 minutes ago

Just "Felonious Peccadillos"; I'm "Overqualified for Oklahoma"; Bar Association, "Bring It on Bitch": Surprisingly Ineffective in Fighting Disbarment

17 minutes ago

Kraken parent Payward closes $550 million Bitnomial deal, securing full CFTC derivatives stack

35 minutes ago

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest news and updates directly to your inbox.

© 2026 GlobalBoost Media. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Our Authors
  • Contact

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

🍪

Cookies

We and our selected partners wish to use cookies to collect information about you for functional purposes and statistical marketing. You may not give us your consent for certain purposes by selecting an option and you can withdraw your consent at any time via the cookie icon.

Cookie Preferences

Manage Cookies

Cookies are small text that can be used by websites to make the user experience more efficient. The law states that we may store cookies on your device if they are strictly necessary for the operation of this site. For all other types of cookies, we need your permission. This site uses various types of cookies. Some cookies are placed by third party services that appear on our pages.

Your permission applies to the following domains:

  • https://fsnn.net
Necessary
Necessary cookies help make a website usable by enabling basic functions like page navigation and access to secure areas of the website. The website cannot function properly without these cookies.
Statistic
Statistic cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
Preferences
Preference cookies enable a website to remember information that changes the way the website behaves or looks, like your preferred language or the region that you are in.
Marketing
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.