FSNN | Decentralized News Aggregation for Free Speech

In this segment of Free Media, Reason Senior Editor Robby Soave and Daily Caller Editor in Chief Amber Duke discuss President Donald Trump’s comments on data centers and how Vice President J.D. Vance seemed to defend Trump’s stance, even though it is in direct conflict with their Republican base of support. If you enjoy this kind of content and want more, subscribe to Soave’s newsletter, Free Media. Read the full article here

Hut 8's Texas power site sits inside Anthropic’s $35 billion AI deal

3 hours ago

Federalism Will Save the Data Centers

4 hours ago3 Views

Bitcoin’s Next Move: Bullish Bets Run Up Against a Historical Wall

5 hours ago3 Views

X Kills Nitter And Xcancel, The Last Ways To Read Tweets Without Elon Watching

5 hours ago2 Views

Kalshi Says It’s a Prediction Market. The 9th Circuit Says It’s Gambling.

5 hours ago3 Views

Bitcoin enters ‘Rektember’ as rate-hike risk combines with seasonality to threaten rally

5 hours ago3 Views

SEC Proposes New Standards for US Transfer Agents

6 hours ago2 Views

Cathie Wood’s Ark Invest Buys $37 Million in Bitcoin and Payments Firm Block

6 hours ago2 Views

Cryptocurrency & Free Speech Finance

Does Bitcoin’s Rally Mean We Haven’t Wasted Our Lives in Crypto?

Sentiment in crypto has dived lower than a snailfish in the Mariana Trench in recent months. Miners are capitulating to AI, cold wallets are getting exploited, and you can hardly fire up LinkedIn without reading another message from a newly unemployed crypto journalist searching for new opportunities. Even for an industry that’s endured nation-state bans, exchange blowups, and years of regulatory pressure, morale has rarely felt this low. With business models failing and public interest dropping, many long term crypto fans have begun to question whether we’ve all wasted a decade of our lives on a pipe dream.Source: Ash CryptoUntil…

Ethena Expands USDe into Global Payments with New App

Dropbox Security Breach: Hackers Access Accounts Through Authentication Flaw

Free Speech Unmuted: The Process Is The Punishment: ABC v. FCC with Stuart Benjamin

AI & Crypto

Politics

2,400 Baseball Games for the Price of 1

Media & Culture 7 hours ago

Hello and welcome to another edition of Free Agent! Jason has been placed on the PUP (physically unable to publish) list this week, so I’ve been called up for a spot start. Real football doesn’t start for another week (and…

The Biggest Revelation In Recent NYT Expose Is Justice Scalia Wasn’t Planning on Dying

8 hours ago

Is This the Supreme Court’s Next Sports Betting Case?

9 hours ago

Media & Culture

School Can Control What Flags Schoolteachers Hang on Classroom Walls

Media & Culture

No Second Amendment Right to Carry Gun on Your Government Job

Media & Culture

Today in Supreme Court History: September 1, 1823

The Reason Prison Essay Experiment

J.D. Vance and the Politics of Victimhood

Brickbat: Ask Questions Later

Today in Supreme Court History: August 31, 1995

Making Sense Of The Chief Justice’s Tango In The Ballroom Case

Supreme Court Allows White House Ballroom Construction to Go Forward, at Least for Now

Learned Hand’s Reflections On His Professors

Don't Miss!

Robinhood's new crypto network is printing cash, and it's sending Arbitrum's token soaring

21 Financial Giants Form Venture for G7 Stablecoins

X Data Breach? Users Are Getting Flooded With Password Reset Emails Nobody Requested

CPJ urges Benin’s president to strengthen press freedom

Gal Gadot Defends AI Use in Bitcoin Film: ‘Work With It or Be Out of the Game’

9 hours ago1 Views

Firelight raises $8 million, expands beyond XRP as it aims to make DeFi less scary for fintechs

9 hours ago1 Views

Fake Claude app spreads RevStealer crypto malware

10 hours ago1 Views

South Korea Arrests Four Over Crypto Payments to Syrian Terror Group

10 hours ago0 Views

UK’s crime agency freezes Premier League $13.5 million account in crypto crime probe

11 hours ago2 Views

Lazarus Group-linked addresses move $30M through Hyperliquid

11 hours ago3 Views

Morning Minute: Saylor’s Back Buying Bitcoin

11 hours ago3 Views

Trump Demands FCC Punish Media Companies For His Sagging Polling

11 hours ago2 Views

Editor's Picks

Guidance on public photography should be shared with everyone in the UK not just asylum seekers. Photo: Getty Images for Unsplash+ Asylum seekers in the UK are being misled by the Home Office over laws about photographing people in public places and are being threatened that their asylum claims might be refused and could be kicked out of the country. On 19 August, the Home Office issued a poster entitled “Do not photograph or film people in public” as part of a series of guidance over consequences of behaviour for those seeking asylum. The poster is part of a nine-page booklet that aims to help asylum seekers understand what is expected of them when living in the UK and covers issues such as sexual consent and domestic abuse. The release of the booklet is controversial because the guidance it contains applies to everyone in the UK and not just asylum seekers. Its publication now could be seen as a politically motivated sop to those who want to crack down on all immigration, even though Britain is legally bound to admit genuine refugees. In the introduction, the Home Office says, “We understand that coming to a new country can be difficult, and that laws and customs here may be different from your home country.” The poster says, “In the UK, you should not take pictures or videos of someone without their permission. This includes taking pictures or videos in public spaces, like streets of parks, or in private spaces, like at home.” However, the poster is misleading. There is a common misconception that photographing people in public places without their consent is illegal. It is not. There are some situations where there are restrictions, for example where photography is restricted by law, such as outside military facilities where photography is prohibited because of national security concerns. Photography is also not permitted where an individual has a reasonable expectation of privacy, such as in the changing room of a clothes shop. Many commercial, privately owned spaces also have rules regarding photography. Sheffield’s Meadowhall shopping centre, for example, says filming and photography is not permitted unless authorised. Where there are no restrictions, consent is not required by law but many legitimate street photographers follow codes of conduct where they might seek consent. The Royal Society of Photographers, for example, recommends that “particular care should be taken when photographing children and vulnerable people, with consideration given to consent, safeguarding, privacy and the potential impact of making or sharing an image”. It adds, “Photographers should also consider how images of identifiable people are subsequently used, especially where their use could imply endorsement or raise concerns about commercial exploitation.” Repeated photography of a person without their consent could be illegal if it crosses into harassing behaviour that is likely to cause alarm or intimidation. This is banned by the Protection from Harassment Act 1997. Photographers must also not share pictures of a sexual nature, for example upskirting, without the subject’s permission. This is banned under the Criminal Justice and Courts Act 2015. When asked about the poster, a Home Office spokesperson said: “We expect everyone who comes to the UK to abide by our laws. If they do not, they will face consequences, including the refusal of their asylum claim and removal from the UK.” They added, “These resources were produced for asylum seekers so there can be no possible misunderstanding of what we expect. The poster is designed to communicate two separate messages: Firstly, that individuals should not take photographs of others without their consent. Secondly, that sharing photographs or videos of a sexual nature without someone’s permission is a serious criminal offence.” There are subtle indications that the Home Office knew that what it was publishing was incorrect. Looking at the poster closely, it appears that the word “should” has been added later, suggesting that it previously said “must” – the font used is subtly different (see below). The information contained in a new Home Office poster is incorrect The Home Office did not respond to our request for comment when we asked about this. The spokeperson said of the poster, “It does not suggest that you can go to prison for taking someone’s photo in public.” There are nuances of English grammar at play here. One person who commented on the BPPA’s statement on Instagram said, “It doesn’t say there’s a legal requirement not to? It says you shouldn’t which to be quite frank is good, if simplified, advice for asylum speakers for whom English is not a first language.” However the heading of the poster is unequivocal. It says, “Do not”. Anyone, even those using English as a second language, would be unlikely to misconstrue that. The original wording still appears to be on the Home Office website. In the booklet’s introduction it says: “In the UK, we respect people’s privacy. This means you must not take photographs or videos of someone without their consent.” (emphasis mine). Photographers and photojournalists and their unions have been quick to call on the Home Office to clarify the poster. The British Press Photographers’ Association (BPPA) has commented on the document. It said, “Recently issued Home Office guidance that states permission is needed to photograph people in public is incorrect and harmful. There is no legal requirement to seek permission when photographing in public. The BPPA hopes an immediate correction will be issued.” Séamus Dooley, NUJ assistant general secretary, said: “This communication not only runs the risk of misleading asylum seekers, it could also have serious consequences for our members – particularly photographers and videographers who regularly carry out their work in public places. It also spreads public confusion that could serve to inhibit public interest journalism. Press photographers and other lens-based journalists perform a legitimate and important function in reporting and recording events in public spaces. “The union is very concerned that the spread of inaccurate information around the right to photograph and film people in public without permission could expose our members to increased hostility and harassment as well as wrongful accusations of criminality and unjustifiable stops by the police. This would undermine journalists’ right to report and the public’s right to know. READ MORE

Global Free Speech 6 hours ago

Citi, Goldman, other global banks and asset managers team up on stablecoin venture

Cryptocurrency & Free Speech Finance 7 hours ago

Bitcoin Holds Steady Near $78,000 as Global Bond Yields Surge to Multi-Decade Highs

Cryptocurrency & Free Speech Finance 8 hours ago

Musk’s X hit by wave of unsolicited password reset emails

Cryptocurrency & Free Speech Finance 8 hours ago

U.S. looks to influence Japan's monetary policy. It couldn't do that with bitcoin

Cryptocurrency & Free Speech Finance 12 hours ago

London Stock Exchange Partners with Kraken Parent for Tokenized UK Stocks

Cryptocurrency & Free Speech Finance 12 hours ago

Saylor Urges MSCI to Drop ‘Discriminatory’ Rule That Would Delete Strategy

Cryptocurrency & Free Speech Finance 12 hours ago

Singapore proposes 100% reserves and a ban on yields for stablecoin issuers

Cryptocurrency & Free Speech Finance 13 hours ago

Opinions & Debates

Debates

Locker Room Nudity and America’s Fear of Being Naked

News Room

I lived in Reykjavík for a year in 2011, doing fieldwork for my PhD. The best thing about living there—better than the Northern Lights, better than the glaciers and volcanoes, better even than the fact that nobody locks their doors—was the public pools. They’re geothermally heated and open all winter, with ice coating the decks and steam rising off the water like the River Styx with lap lanes. The smell of sulphur rises with the steam. It seeps up from where the Mid-Atlantic Ridge is slowly splitting the island in two.The Icelanders don’t put any chemicals in their pools. So…

Debates