Close Menu
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
  • Home
  • News
    • Politics
    • Legal & Courts
    • Tech & Big Tech
    • Campus & Education
    • Media & Culture
    • Global Free Speech
  • Opinions
    • Debates
  • Video/Live
  • Community
  • Freedom Index
  • About
    • Mission
    • Contact
    • Support
Trending

Trump Surrenders To Iran On Virtually Every Point

24 minutes ago

Supreme Court Rules Government Cannot Bar Marijuana Users From Owning Guns

28 minutes ago

Why bitcoin investors should trade the cycle, not dollar-cost average

48 minutes ago
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Discord Telegram
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
Market Data Newsletter
Thursday, June 18
  • Home
  • News
    • Politics
    • Legal & Courts
    • Tech & Big Tech
    • Campus & Education
    • Media & Culture
    • Global Free Speech
  • Opinions
    • Debates
  • Video/Live
  • Community
  • Freedom Index
  • About
    • Mission
    • Contact
    • Support
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
Home»News»Global Free Speech»No justice, over month after 15 men beat Nigerian journalist investigating phone scam
Global Free Speech

No justice, over month after 15 men beat Nigerian journalist investigating phone scam

News RoomBy News Room3 weeks agoNo Comments3 Mins Read822 Views
Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest Copy Link LinkedIn Tumblr Email VKontakte Telegram
No justice, over month after 15 men beat Nigerian journalist investigating phone scam
Share
Facebook Twitter Pinterest Email Copy Link

Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

Key Takeaways

Playback Speed

Select a Voice

Abuja, May 28, 2026—The Committee to Protect Journalists calls on Nigerian authorities to swiftly identify and hold to account at least 15 men who assaulted journalist Allwell Ene as he was investigating an alleged phone scam in the southern city of Port Harcourt.

Police spokesperson Blessing Agabe’s announced on World Press Freedom Day, May 3, that 13 suspects had been arrested for beating Ene, head of news at MegaLectrics media group, on April 13.

Ene told CPJ that he went to the station to identify the suspects on May 4, but the detainees were not the men who had attacked him. Although the police promised to investigate further, Ene said he has heard nothing since.

On May 27, Agabe told CPJ that investigations were ongoing.

“Nigerian authorities should move quickly to successfully conclude their investigation into the attack on journalist Allwell Ene. The delay in delivering justice is a grim reminder of the impunity that has characterized dozens of attacks on journalists in Nigeria,” said CPJ Africa Director Angela Quintal. “Authorities cannot continue to turn a blind eye to the dangers facing the press.”

Ene and his MegaLectrics colleague, Daniel Whyte, told CPJ that the journalist was following up on a tip off by a member of the public who came to their office to complain he had not been given a phone that he had paid for.

Ene said he accompanied the man to the shopping complex and started questioning the vendor. Another man identified Ene as a journalist, asked why he was investigating the allegation, and punched him in the face. Ene said at least 15 people surrounded him, punching and slapping his face, head, stomach, and back for about 10 minutes, tore his shirt, and stole money from his back pocket. The assailants also snatched his phone and formatted it to delete all his data.

More than six weeks later, Ene said his left eye was still painful and he was due to return to a hospital for a review on May 29. For two days after the assault, he could not see with that eye, which was red with blood, and his stomach and back were painful, he said.

Ene told CPJ he received a call three days after the incident from the state commissioner of police, Olugbenga Adepoju Adewole, promising to hold the attackers accountable.

CPJ’s calls and text messages to Adewole were not answered.

Read the full article here

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using AI-powered analysis and real-time sources.

Get Your Fact Check Report

Enter your email to receive detailed fact-checking analysis

5 free reports remaining

Continue with Full Access

You've used your 5 free reports. Sign up for unlimited access!

Already have an account? Sign in here

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email Telegram Copy Link
News Room
  • Website
  • Facebook
  • X (Twitter)
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn

The FSNN News Room is the voice of our in-house journalists, editors, and researchers. We deliver timely, unbiased reporting at the crossroads of finance, cryptocurrency, and global politics, providing clear, fact-driven analysis free from agendas.

Related Articles

Global Free Speech

World Refugee Day 2026: Supporting journalists in exile amid transnational repression

3 hours ago
Global Free Speech

On Tuesday 16 June, Baroness Tina Stowell introduced her anti-SLAPP Bill in the House of Lords. Photo: Parliament TV The UK Anti-SLAPP Coalition, which is co-chaired by Index on Censorship, had a significant campaign success this week when coordinated Bills were introduced in both the House of Lords and the House of Commons. On Tuesday 16 June, Baroness Tina Stowell introduced her anti-SLAPP Bill in the House of Lords. The next day, Sir John Whittingdale MP introduced a parallel bill in the Commons. Remind me: what is a SLAPP? SLAPP stands for strategic lawsuit against public participation. The term describes legal threats and actions that are used to intimidate and harass journalists, whistleblowers, campaigners, academics, and survivors of abuse (among others) by burdening them with time-consuming and costly litigation. Anyone who speaks out on an issue of public interest is at risk. Even if a defendant has every chance of succeeding at trial, the lengthy process of preparing a legal defence is so prohibitively expensive that they are forced to quietly submit to the claimant’s demands. This means they are silenced. SLAPPs threaten our right to freedom of expression and our democracy by preventing ordinary people from being able to hold power to account. They also remove information from the public domain, which means that SLAPPs have an impact on all of us. We have published case studies of a small number of the SLAPPs that have crossed our desks in the UK Anti-SLAPP Coalition. From cosmetic surgery patients to environmentalists, abuse survivors and campaigners, you can read them here. So, what would the new bills actually do? The proposal is simple: Anyone who believes that they are facing a SLAPP would be able to ask a judge to examine the case at an early stage. If the court concludes that the claim is being used to suppress public-interest speech, it could be dismissed before huge legal costs begin to accumulate. This “early dismissal” mechanism would shift the balance away from wealthy claimants who can use litigation as a pressure tactic, and towards defendants who currently face years of stress, uncertainty and expense. What these bills definitely won’t do is to protect public-interest speech across the UK. This is a devolved issue, and legislation passed in Westminster will only cover England and Wales. Separate anti-SLAPP bills will need to be passed in Scotland and Northern Ireland to ensure that everyone in the UK is protected from SLAPPs. Why now? Successive governments have acknowledged the problem of SLAPPs, but have failed to bring forward comprehensive legislation. Anti-SLAPP measures were, yet again, left out of this year’s King’s Speech despite repeated and widespread calls for their inclusion. Even after the speech, Deputy Prime Minister David Lammy confirmed that the government would bring forward legislation “as soon as time allows”. The introduction of parallel Private Members’ Bills is therefore as much a political signal as a legislative exercise: Parliament is being asked to show that the issue has not gone away. Will these Bills become law? The honest answer is that we don’t know. The second reading for Whittingdale’s bill is scheduled for late November, and no date has yet been set for Stowell’s bill. However, the impact is immediate as it keeps anti-SLAPP reform firmly on Parliament’s agenda, providing a ready-made legislative blueprint to show that legislation to stamp out SLAPPs can be done effectively and easily within the existing legal framework. In other words, the real question is not whether Stowell’s or Whittingdale’s bills become law exactly as drafted. It is whether the government will finally listen to mounting pressure to back these bills, and put their weight behind ensuring comprehensive anti-SLAPP legislation that will protect anyone who speaks out in the public interest. But I heard that anti-SLAPP legislation has already been enacted. Why then is the UK Anti-SLAPP Coalition pushing for more legislation? Because the UK’s existing anti-SLAPP protections are very limited. The Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act (ECCTA) introduced anti-SLAPP provisions in 2023, but they apply only to cases linked to economic crime. Many abusive cases fall outside that definition. It also depends on a subjective test, forcing the court to undertake a time-intensive process by which the intentions of the SLAPP filer have been identified. That’s why we need a broader law that can protect anyone facing a SLAPP, regardless of the subject matter. What can I do to support the UK Anti-SLAPP Coalition as they continue to call on the government to enact comprehensive anti-SLAPP legislation? You can support the work of the Coalition by writing to your MP, by posting your support for action on SLAPPs using the hashtag #StopSLAPPs, and by signing up to the newsletter of the Anti-SLAPP Coalition here. READ MORE

3 hours ago
Global Free Speech

Mozambique’s Estacio Valoi faces ‘clear intimidation’ over environmental reporting

1 day ago
Global Free Speech

News leader Maritza Félix on covering immigration in Arizona

1 day ago
Global Free Speech

These 6 foreign journalists have been denied entry by Israel 

1 day ago
Global Free Speech

In Mali, 2 more journalists arrested under cybercrime law for criticizing authorities

2 days ago
Add A Comment

Comments are closed.

Editors Picks

Supreme Court Rules Government Cannot Bar Marijuana Users From Owning Guns

28 minutes ago

Why bitcoin investors should trade the cycle, not dollar-cost average

48 minutes ago

Ledn Launches Tether Gold-Backed Loans With XAUt Collateral

50 minutes ago

Everyday Savers Bet Big on Bitcoin Giant Strategy’s STRC—Now It’s Falling

55 minutes ago
Latest Posts

A Slow Thursday At The Court

1 hour ago

Foundation loses another key leader as Hsiao-Wei Wang resigns

2 hours ago

What happens when ChatGPT becomes the front door to crypto

2 hours ago

Subscribe to News

Get the latest news and updates directly to your inbox.

At FSNN – Free Speech News Network, we deliver unfiltered reporting and in-depth analysis on the stories that matter most. From breaking headlines to global perspectives, our mission is to keep you informed, empowered, and connected.

FSNN.net is owned and operated by GlobalBoost Media
, an independent media organization dedicated to advancing transparency, free expression, and factual journalism across the digital landscape.

Facebook X (Twitter) Discord Telegram
Latest News

Trump Surrenders To Iran On Virtually Every Point

24 minutes ago

Supreme Court Rules Government Cannot Bar Marijuana Users From Owning Guns

28 minutes ago

Why bitcoin investors should trade the cycle, not dollar-cost average

48 minutes ago

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest news and updates directly to your inbox.

© 2026 GlobalBoost Media. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Our Authors
  • Contact

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

🍪

Cookies

We and our selected partners wish to use cookies to collect information about you for functional purposes and statistical marketing. You may not give us your consent for certain purposes by selecting an option and you can withdraw your consent at any time via the cookie icon.

Cookie Preferences

Manage Cookies

Cookies are small text that can be used by websites to make the user experience more efficient. The law states that we may store cookies on your device if they are strictly necessary for the operation of this site. For all other types of cookies, we need your permission. This site uses various types of cookies. Some cookies are placed by third party services that appear on our pages.

Your permission applies to the following domains:

  • https://fsnn.net
Necessary
Necessary cookies help make a website usable by enabling basic functions like page navigation and access to secure areas of the website. The website cannot function properly without these cookies.
Statistic
Statistic cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
Preferences
Preference cookies enable a website to remember information that changes the way the website behaves or looks, like your preferred language or the region that you are in.
Marketing
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.