Close Menu
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
  • Home
  • News
    • Politics
    • Legal & Courts
    • Tech & Big Tech
    • Campus & Education
    • Media & Culture
    • Global Free Speech
  • Opinions
    • Debates
  • Video/Live
  • Community
  • Freedom Index
  • About
    • Mission
    • Contact
    • Support
Trending

Worldcoin Falls 13% as World Expands Iris-Scanning Tech

10 minutes ago

Bitcoin, Stocks Surge as Iran Says Strait of Hormuz Is ‘Completely Open’

12 minutes ago

Jury Finds Live Nation and Ticketmaster To Be Monopolists Over $1.72 Concert Ticket Price Increase

46 minutes ago
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Discord Telegram
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
Market Data Newsletter
Saturday, April 18
  • Home
  • News
    • Politics
    • Legal & Courts
    • Tech & Big Tech
    • Campus & Education
    • Media & Culture
    • Global Free Speech
  • Opinions
    • Debates
  • Video/Live
  • Community
  • Freedom Index
  • About
    • Mission
    • Contact
    • Support
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
Home»Opinions»Debates»How It All Went Wrong
Debates

How It All Went Wrong

News RoomBy News Room2 hours agoNo Comments6 Mins Read999 Views
Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest Copy Link LinkedIn Tumblr Email VKontakte Telegram
How It All Went Wrong
Share
Facebook Twitter Pinterest Email Copy Link

Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

Key Takeaways

Playback Speed

Select a Voice

Good men can make terrible kings … but bad men cannot make good kings.
~Brandon Sanderson, The Well of Ascension

The Middle East makes fools of everybody. US president George W. Bush’s decision to invade Iraq in 2003 seemed like a good idea to a lot of us at the time; a supermajority in Congress—including many Democrats—voted to authorise it. Demolishing Saddam Hussein’s totalitarian regime went smoothly as far as wars go, but Iraq didn’t actually possess the weapons of mass destruction we’d been told to fear, and a rogue’s gallery of Ba’ath Party insurgents, radical Sunni Islamists, and Iranian-backed militias unleashed a civil war that took two years to control before Iraq stabilised to become the precariously democratic country it is today. 

President Obama’s far-more restrained air-power campaign over Libya in 2011 also seemed reasonable at the time. Europe took the lead in that instance, thereby mollifying critics around the world who’d denounced Bush as a unilateral cowboy. The tyrannical Moammar Qaddafi was gearing up to massacre vast numbers of people, but protecting the rebels and engineering his downfall led to a power vacuum, a failed state, and rampant warlordism. The same US administration’s 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (better known as the Iran nuclear deal) managed to slow Iran’s pursuit of a nuclear-weapons capability. But sanctions were lifted as part of the package, and Iran used that money to pour guns, missiles, and military advisors into Syria, Lebanon, and Gaza, feeding a slew of destructive wars.

Hardly anyone—besides a diminishing number of liberal interventionists and neoconservative foreign-policy hawks—gave Obama a hard time for staying out of Syria during the uprising against Bashar al-Assad. After Iraq and Afghanistan, almost nobody wanted to go in there, not even just to crater the runways used by Assad’s air force. Not liberals, not progressives, and not those now calling themselves America First. But then the uprising metastasised into a civil war that lasted seven times as long as Iraq’s, killing between 200,000 and 300,000 people. The Russians stepped in as the regional power, and Syria haemorrhaged so many refugees into the West that it triggered the xenophobic backlash fuelling Brexit in the United Kingdom, the election of Donald Trump in the United States, and a smorgasbord of nativist parties—some of which have pedigrees that trace back to the Nazis—across Europe from Poland to France.

Foreign policy in the Middle East is what podcasters Jennifer Welch and Angie Sullivan call a lazy susan of shit sandwiches: all the available options are terrible. If you’re the decision-maker faced with a Middle East crisis, you are condemned to make terrible decisions no matter what you decide, whether it’s a big war, a small war, diplomacy, or nothing at all. So let’s start by offering at least some grace to everyone burdened with this thankless and frankly traumatising job.


Deciding what to do—if anything—about Iran’s nuclear program is the mother of all terrible jobs. Do nothing, and Iran will obtain apocalyptic weaponry. On Quds Day in 2017, the regime installed a digital clock in Tehran’s Palestine Square that began counting down the number of days until “the annihilation of Israel.” The countdown’s conclusion was timed to coincide with the 25-year expiration date of Obama’s nuclear deal, at which point the Islamic Republic would be free to finish what Hitler started. No people on earth would sit patiently awaiting the moment when genocidal fascists decide to erase them from the map. The Jews, in particular, are in no mood to be phlegmatic after what happened the last time somebody tried this kind of thing.

Israel already has nuclear weapons, so a nuclear conflagration between Israel and Iran threatens the genocide of two ancient peoples in the Middle East, not just one, plus however many Palestinians, Lebanese, Iraqis, Kurds, Azerbaijanis, and Gulf Arabs might be blown to pieces in the blast radius and irradiated by nuclear fallout. And if you don’t care about human life, well, there’s always the collapse of the global energy market and the economy to worry about. It ought to go without saying that the most destructive war in the history of our species would be the worst possible outcome.

The US could have decided to stick with the nuclear deal, buy time, and hope that the Iranian regime imploded or was overthrown before the agreement expired. But the ayatollahs are nothing like reformist Soviet premier Mikhail Gorbachev in the waning days of the Cold War. They negotiate in bad faith and use the money from sanctions relief to unleash a vast swath of murder, arson, and mayhem even without nuclear weapons. An Iraq-style air-and-ground invasion, on the other hand, would almost certainly topple the Islamic Republic, although that would involve a bloody ground war followed by a long, perilous, and ruinously expensive aftermath. South Carolina Senator Lindsey Graham might be happy to sign up for this, but hardly anyone else would.

So, having torn up the Iran deal in his first term, Donald Trump opted for regime-change-by-limited-air-war in his second, hoping to get the best possible result for the lowest possible cost. He went to war with the Israelis, and with much quieter support from America’s Arab allies in the Persian Gulf, who had been menaced and attacked by Iran for decades. We can hardly blame them for finally hitting back at a regime weakened by the destruction of its allies in Syria, Gaza, and Lebanon. The blowback was inevitable, like gravity pulling a tennis ball back down to earth. Shoot at me, and I will shoot back. Hold my head underwater, and I will gouge out your eyes.

Trump was not as daunted by the prospect of a war with Iran as his predecessors, but that’s mostly because he had no idea what he was getting into and didn’t bother to find out. He seemed to believe that only cowardice and fecklessness had prevented his predecessors from solving a problem that could be rapidly resolved with some guts and a massive application of force. Operation Epic Fury would be another Venezuela cakewalk. Warnings that the Iranians might close the Strait of Hormuz and produce a global energy shock were waved away. The US and the Israelis would decapitate the regime, and whoever emerged from the rubble would come crawling before Trump begging for mercy. At which point, Trump could install some hapless stooge whom he could boss around, the US could freewheel through its target list, confiscate Iran’s stocks of highly enriched uranium (HEU), and then everyone could go home with as many barrels of Iranian oil as they could carry.

But Trump’s war is not going to plan. The US and the Israelis did decapitate the regime, but Iran did not immediately sue for peace, and they did close the Strait of Hormuz. The Islamic Republic now exercises a stranglehold over a vital trade chokepoint, a state of affairs feared for nearly a half century but which never actually materialised until now.



Read the full article here

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using AI-powered analysis and real-time sources.

Get Your Fact Check Report

Enter your email to receive detailed fact-checking analysis

5 free reports remaining

Continue with Full Access

You've used your 5 free reports. Sign up for unlimited access!

Already have an account? Sign in here

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email Telegram Copy Link
News Room
  • Website
  • Facebook
  • X (Twitter)
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn

The FSNN News Room is the voice of our in-house journalists, editors, and researchers. We deliver timely, unbiased reporting at the crossroads of finance, cryptocurrency, and global politics, providing clear, fact-driven analysis free from agendas.

Related Articles

Cryptocurrency & Free Speech Finance

Bitcoin, Stocks Surge as Iran Says Strait of Hormuz Is ‘Completely Open’

12 minutes ago
Media & Culture

Jury Finds Live Nation and Ticketmaster To Be Monopolists Over $1.72 Concert Ticket Price Increase

46 minutes ago
Cryptocurrency & Free Speech Finance

Strategy Shares Pop as Bitcoin Holdings Flip Green, Near $61 Billion

1 hour ago
Media & Culture

Alabama Supreme Court to Cops: It’s OK To Force a Pastor Watering Flowers To Show His ID

2 hours ago
Cryptocurrency & Free Speech Finance

Crypto Trader Turns $2,500 Into $500K on Skyrocketing Ethereum Meme Coin

2 hours ago
Media & Culture

Virginia’s Unconstitutional Effort to Strip Property Tax Exemptions From Pro-Confederate Groups

3 hours ago
Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Editors Picks

Bitcoin, Stocks Surge as Iran Says Strait of Hormuz Is ‘Completely Open’

12 minutes ago

Jury Finds Live Nation and Ticketmaster To Be Monopolists Over $1.72 Concert Ticket Price Increase

46 minutes ago

Singapore Gulf Bank Adds Fiat-to-Stablecoin Conversion Feature

1 hour ago

Strategy Shares Pop as Bitcoin Holdings Flip Green, Near $61 Billion

1 hour ago
Latest Posts

Alabama Supreme Court to Cops: It’s OK To Force a Pastor Watering Flowers To Show His ID

2 hours ago

How It All Went Wrong

2 hours ago

Payward To Acquire CFTC-Regulated Crypto Derivatives Platform Bitnomial

2 hours ago

Subscribe to News

Get the latest news and updates directly to your inbox.

At FSNN – Free Speech News Network, we deliver unfiltered reporting and in-depth analysis on the stories that matter most. From breaking headlines to global perspectives, our mission is to keep you informed, empowered, and connected.

FSNN.net is owned and operated by GlobalBoost Media
, an independent media organization dedicated to advancing transparency, free expression, and factual journalism across the digital landscape.

Facebook X (Twitter) Discord Telegram
Latest News

Worldcoin Falls 13% as World Expands Iris-Scanning Tech

10 minutes ago

Bitcoin, Stocks Surge as Iran Says Strait of Hormuz Is ‘Completely Open’

12 minutes ago

Jury Finds Live Nation and Ticketmaster To Be Monopolists Over $1.72 Concert Ticket Price Increase

46 minutes ago

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest news and updates directly to your inbox.

© 2026 GlobalBoost Media. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Our Authors
  • Contact

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

🍪

Cookies

We and our selected partners wish to use cookies to collect information about you for functional purposes and statistical marketing. You may not give us your consent for certain purposes by selecting an option and you can withdraw your consent at any time via the cookie icon.

Cookie Preferences

Manage Cookies

Cookies are small text that can be used by websites to make the user experience more efficient. The law states that we may store cookies on your device if they are strictly necessary for the operation of this site. For all other types of cookies, we need your permission. This site uses various types of cookies. Some cookies are placed by third party services that appear on our pages.

Your permission applies to the following domains:

  • https://fsnn.net
Necessary
Necessary cookies help make a website usable by enabling basic functions like page navigation and access to secure areas of the website. The website cannot function properly without these cookies.
Statistic
Statistic cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
Preferences
Preference cookies enable a website to remember information that changes the way the website behaves or looks, like your preferred language or the region that you are in.
Marketing
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.