Close Menu
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
  • Home
  • News
    • Politics
    • Legal & Courts
    • Tech & Big Tech
    • Campus & Education
    • Media & Culture
    • Global Free Speech
  • Opinions
    • Debates
  • Video/Live
  • Community
  • Freedom Index
  • About
    • Mission
    • Contact
    • Support
Trending

New Essay: “The Establishment Clause At The Second Founding”

3 minutes ago

KuCoin, BitMart, and MEXC blocked in South Korea as regulators target web access

21 minutes ago

Sberbank Secures Russia’s Approval for Crypto Trading

32 minutes ago
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Discord Telegram
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
Market Data Newsletter
Tuesday, October 13
  • Home
  • News
    • Politics
    • Legal & Courts
    • Tech & Big Tech
    • Campus & Education
    • Media & Culture
    • Global Free Speech
  • Opinions
    • Debates
  • Video/Live
  • Community
  • Freedom Index
  • About
    • Mission
    • Contact
    • Support
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
Home»News»Global Free Speech»CPJ demands Israel halt escalating violations against journalists
Global Free Speech

CPJ demands Israel halt escalating violations against journalists

News RoomBy News Room1 hour agoNo Comments3 Mins Read5 Views
Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest Copy Link LinkedIn Tumblr Email VKontakte Telegram
CPJ demands Israel halt escalating violations against journalists
Share
Facebook Twitter Pinterest Email Copy Link

Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

Key Takeaways

Playback Speed

Select a Voice

Beirut, October 13, 2026 — The Committee to Protect Journalists is deeply alarmed by a recent wave of violations committed by Israeli authorities against the press in Israel and the occupied Palestinian territory. Recent incidents include a local reporter shot with rubber bullets, a Portuguese journalist detained and deported, and the barring of German and British reporters. CPJ demands that Israeli authorities allow the press to operate freely without intimidation or harassment.

Israeli forces in the occupied West Bank targeted two journalists documenting the Palestinian olive harvest. On October 8, 2026, a Portuguese correspondent for the independent outlet Fumaça was arrested in Rantis, northwest of Ramallah, and deported the following day.

Ribeiro told CPJ that upon his detention, he identified himself as a journalist, showing his press credentials to the soldiers. He was then taken to a military base where he was threatened with physical assault, and blindfolded. He said that international journalists were removed so that Israeli authorities could continue what he described as an “ethnic cleansing project.”

Two days later near Ramallah, Israeli troops fired rubber bullets during clashes involving settlers, striking Palestinian photojournalist Issam al-Rimawi. Al-Rimawi told CPJ that he was wearing an identifiable “Press” vest when the incident occurred.

This attack follows similar incidents against Palestinian journalists covering the olive harvest in the West Bank; Israeli settlers attacked Agence France-Presse photographer Jaafar Ashtiyeh on October 6, and Israeli authorities detained journalists Mohammad Abed and Mohammad Atiq later that day.

On October 11, British journalist Secunder Kermani, working with Channel 4, said he was denied entry into Israel and briefly detained by immigration authorities before the decision was reversed, and he was allowed to enter.

Israel also reportedly rejected a work visa application for German journalist Serena Bilanceri, who was set to become Die Tageszeitung’s correspondent there. According to Israeli media, the application was denied due to her “anti-Zionist” views and past reporting  calling for sanctions against Israel. Bilanceri told CPJ that the rejection hinders her ability to report from the region.

In June, CPJ recorded at least six other cases where journalists were denied entry into Israel, some for expressing opinions critical to the country, and warning of heightened  censorship. 

“Israel’s actions against Palestinian, and foreign journalists are increasing in frequency, demonstrating a clear lack of internal and external accountability,” said Sara Qudah, CPJ regional director. “These repeated incidents of intimidation, detention, deportation, and refusal of entry reveal that Israel continues to operate with complete disregard for international laws preventing retaliation against journalists.”

The Israeli Population and Immigration Authority did not immediately respond to CPJ’s request for comment on why the foreign journalists were barred and deported. The Israeli military did not respond toCPJ’s request for comment on the shooting and injury of Issam al-Rimawi.

Read the full article here

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using AI-powered analysis and real-time sources.

Get Your Fact Check Report

Enter your email to receive detailed fact-checking analysis

5 free reports remaining

Continue with Full Access

You've used your 5 free reports. Sign up for unlimited access!

Already have an account? Sign in here

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email Telegram Copy Link
News Room
  • Website
  • Facebook
  • X (Twitter)
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn

The FSNN News Room is the voice of our in-house journalists, editors, and researchers. We deliver timely, unbiased reporting at the crossroads of finance, cryptocurrency, and global politics, providing clear, fact-driven analysis free from agendas.

Related Articles

Global Free Speech

Concern over safety of Ugandan journalist Eria Jengo, missing for over a month

2 hours ago
Global Free Speech

‘I do not feel safe’: The cost of 3 years of Israeli impunity for journalists in Lebanon

4 hours ago
Global Free Speech

At least 37 journalists detained, several assaulted, while covering protests against India’s election chief

16 hours ago
Global Free Speech

Turkey: 4 more journalists arrested for ‘spreading disinformation’ as media crackdown intensifies

20 hours ago
Global Free Speech

Screenshot of silhouette in NAZA film (The Guardian/JW Films) NAZA, the new documentary film by Yuval Abraham and Rachel Szor, is not the first filmabout Israel, by Israelis, to speak out of turn. But the unrestrained response to it in Israel,following the film being awarded the Special Jury Prize at the Venice Film Festival lastmonth, is unprecedented. Israel’s minister of culture declared that he would take steps to have the filmmakers’citizenship revoked; angry protesters have demonstrated outside the homes of one of thefilmmakers’ parents; the offices of +972 Publications (the work builds on some of Abraham’s work for the news outlet) were evacuated after staff received credible threats of violence. Most tellingly, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu declared that people who “slandered” the country and Israel Defence Forces (IDF) at a time of war were “traitors”. Allthis before the film’s official release, scheduled for 14 October, and for a film that, as of thetime of writing, has not been seen by very many Israelis – and, almost certainly, not byanyone voicing their opprobrium in the public sphere. This speaks of one thing: censorship. Yuval Abraham (right) and an interviewee seen during the NAZA documentary (The Guardian/JW Films) On 7 October 2023, Hamas launched a multi-pronged attack on Israel, killing more than1200 people in one day and taking another 300 hostage. In the three years since, Israel haswaged an unrelenting and pitiless war against the two million residents of the Gaza Strip,killing at least 74,000 people and laying to waste much of the territory. NAZA is the acronym in Hebrew for nezek agavi – collateral damage, a horrible euphemism that has bounced about since at least the Vietnam War. It is also, according to the film that carries this name, a protocol that has been deployed by the IDF over the course of the war. Israel’s minister of culture declared that he would take steps to have the filmmakers’ citizenship revoked When actualising remote strikes against Hamas targets, the protocol determines how many civilian deaths constitute an acceptable trade-off vis-à-vis the elimination (yes, anothereuphemism) of an identified Hamas target? NAZA, the documentary is underpinned by a simple premise. 24 men and women, theiridentities disguised, are interviewed by Abraham on Tel Aviv rooftops about theirknowledge of the protocol, about the wider prosecution of the ongoing war, and about theirfeelings concerning how the war is being waged – the manner in which Gaza and Gazans have been laid to waste by the tools that they themselves have operated. The documentary unpicks NAZA’s methodology, how this reduces human life to a mathematical calculation. One information source for the NAZA protocol is Lavender, an AI tool that extrapolates from telephone network data the likelihood that any given individual is a “Hamas operative” – and thus a target whose elimination becomes attached to a NAZA number. Concerning Lavender, one interviewee says that the AI tool has an 85% accuracy rate. The life of a target, and of the people around that target, hinges on a tool with a 15% error rate. This alone casts into stark relief the IDF claim that its war is against Hamas alone. The impression one develops across the course of the film is that for some of theinterviewees, the depersonalisation created by NAZA helps in distancing oneself from theemotional and psychological implications of waging this particular war. It is, I think, a sentiment being replicated across Israel as a whole. Of the war in Gaza and how it is beingprosecuted, even now there is remarkably little debate in the public sphere. Very littlereflection, in the media or in the wider public discourse, about the consequences of waginga war in a manner that has ignited revulsion across the world. NAZA’s principal audience, despite the rhetoric of “traitors”, is Israelis. There is no single reason for this. One of the interview subjects talks of a “hormonal rush”,presumably connected to a primal wish for vengeance after 7 October. Several, with varying degrees of reflection, express some regret. One references all he had been taught about the Nazis and the Holocaust, then pauses. It is difficult, he continues, not to see parallels between that set of atrocities and these. One says that they – the people operating the NAZA protocol – “do not hate Arabs”. Abraham then reminds him of the number of people that NAZA potentially anonymises, then erases. He first obfuscates, then falls silent. Another talks about how hard it was for him to calculate a NAZA for a target – a target he believed to be legitimate – knowing that they would include his two daughters: “toddlers, one three [years old] the second not more than six.” He knew this because he had access to the target’s picture library on his phone. The target in question was not killed in the subsequent targeted strike. The daughters, part of the approved NAZA collateral damage calculation, were. NAZA’s principal audience, despite the rhetoric of “traitors”, is Israelis. Contextual prods across the film are reminders of this. A single casual reference to the IDF’s elite 8200 cyber warfare unit, for instance, carries a lot of shorthand that would not be evident to non-Israelis. The rooftop settings for the interviews would be identifiable for many Tel Avivians, sometimes down to the very street. The point being driven home is that the people behind NAZA are relatable, part of the quotidian fabric of everyday life. A bifurcated life, though. One interviewee says that after selecting targets in HaKirya, the IDF’s central Tel Aviv headquarters, he may head off to meet friends on nearby Ibn Gvirol Street. Israel and many Israelis live in the shadow of the 7 October attacks but remain detached from the reality of the war being waged in their name in Gaza. Whether Israelis will get to see NAZA remains an open question. Abraham and Szor have said that they are open to discussing distribution terms with Israeli cinemas; the likelihood of any of them taking this up is slim. Whether or not the government will censor the film – quite plausible, given the rhetoric from above – is a moot point. In today’s Israel, I doubt that anyone will touch it with a barge pole. This weekend, Prime Minister Netanyahu wrote to his attorney-general and the heads of the IDF and the internal security agency, instructing that they “act urgently to uncover the identity of all those who are involved or appear in the libel film”, so that they may be prosecuted “for serious information security offenses, criminal defamation, and harming Israel’s diplomatic and security interests.” Making the film is being framed as treason; distributing it could easily be framed as much the same. NAZA will be made available to stream, for free, after its international theatrical run. Whether Israelis will choose to watch it, even in private, is a question I can’t answer. One thing that must be said, though. That the film was made at all says something about a capacity for self-reflection that did exist in Israel once, even if it was often mocked or dismissed or taken for granted. But that was before 7 October 2023. NAZA is not the first film about Israel, by Israelis, to speak out of turn. I’m not at all sure whether it won’t be the last. READ MORE

21 hours ago
Global Free Speech

As book bans continue to escalate across the United States and signs of similar pressures emerge in the UK, what can librarians, publishers and free expression advocates do now to prepare for the years ahead? For this year’s Banned Books Week UK, Index on Censorship and Pan Macmillan brought together leading voices from publishing and free expression for a timely transatlantic conversation on the future of the freedom to read. Rather than looking back, this conversation asks a more urgent question: what will the next five years demand of us, and how can we prepare? Designed primarily for librarians, this session bridges the gap between US and UK experiences, offering a proactive roadmap for challenging censorship and protecting diverse collections. While book censorship is often framed as a North American crisis, this session serves as both a strategic warning and a tactical guide for the UK. READ MORE

22 hours ago
Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Editors Picks

KuCoin, BitMart, and MEXC blocked in South Korea as regulators target web access

21 minutes ago

Sberbank Secures Russia’s Approval for Crypto Trading

32 minutes ago

Ledger Finds LTE Implant That Stole Recovery Phrases in Suspected $86M Drain

33 minutes ago

Someone Trying to Vanish Articles About Forged U.K. Court Order Aimed at Vanishing Article About Businessman Mason Soiza

1 hour ago
Latest Posts

CPJ demands Israel halt escalating violations against journalists

1 hour ago

Bitcoin layer-2 token STX has surged by 50% in four weeks: Crypto Daily

1 hour ago

ENS Proposes Moving Ethereum Domain Registrations to Upgraded System

2 hours ago

Subscribe to News

Get the latest news and updates directly to your inbox.

At FSNN – Free Speech News Network, we deliver unfiltered reporting and in-depth analysis on the stories that matter most. From breaking headlines to global perspectives, our mission is to keep you informed, empowered, and connected.

FSNN.net is owned and operated by GlobalBoost Media
, an independent media organization dedicated to advancing transparency, free expression, and factual journalism across the digital landscape.

Facebook X (Twitter) Discord Telegram
Latest News

New Essay: “The Establishment Clause At The Second Founding”

3 minutes ago

KuCoin, BitMart, and MEXC blocked in South Korea as regulators target web access

21 minutes ago

Sberbank Secures Russia’s Approval for Crypto Trading

32 minutes ago

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest news and updates directly to your inbox.

© 2026 GlobalBoost Media. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Our Authors
  • Contact

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

🍪

Cookies

We and our selected partners wish to use cookies to collect information about you for functional purposes and statistical marketing. You may not give us your consent for certain purposes by selecting an option and you can withdraw your consent at any time via the cookie icon.

Cookie Preferences

Manage Cookies

Cookies are small text that can be used by websites to make the user experience more efficient. The law states that we may store cookies on your device if they are strictly necessary for the operation of this site. For all other types of cookies, we need your permission. This site uses various types of cookies. Some cookies are placed by third party services that appear on our pages.

Your permission applies to the following domains:

  • https://fsnn.net
Necessary
Necessary cookies help make a website usable by enabling basic functions like page navigation and access to secure areas of the website. The website cannot function properly without these cookies.
Statistic
Statistic cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
Preferences
Preference cookies enable a website to remember information that changes the way the website behaves or looks, like your preferred language or the region that you are in.
Marketing
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.