Close Menu
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
  • Home
  • News
    • Politics
    • Legal & Courts
    • Tech & Big Tech
    • Campus & Education
    • Media & Culture
    • Global Free Speech
  • Opinions
    • Debates
  • Video/Live
  • Community
  • Freedom Index
  • About
    • Mission
    • Contact
    • Support
Trending

FTX-Tied Crypto Mining Venture to be Used for AI After Acquisition

3 seconds ago

Standard Chartered Will Hold Ripple’s Stablecoin in Dubai—And Let Clients Trade With It Without Moving It

5 minutes ago

Thinking of Sending a Nude Shrek Pic to an Ohio Official? You Could Be Found Guilty of Harassment.

34 minutes ago
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Discord Telegram
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
Market Data Newsletter
Monday, October 12
  • Home
  • News
    • Politics
    • Legal & Courts
    • Tech & Big Tech
    • Campus & Education
    • Media & Culture
    • Global Free Speech
  • Opinions
    • Debates
  • Video/Live
  • Community
  • Freedom Index
  • About
    • Mission
    • Contact
    • Support
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
Home»News»Global Free Speech»At least 37 journalists detained, several assaulted, while covering protests against India’s election chief
Global Free Speech

At least 37 journalists detained, several assaulted, while covering protests against India’s election chief

News RoomBy News Room40 minutes agoNo Comments6 Mins Read1 Views
Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest Copy Link LinkedIn Tumblr Email VKontakte Telegram
At least 37 journalists detained, several assaulted, while covering protests against India’s election chief
Share
Facebook Twitter Pinterest Email Copy Link

Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

Key Takeaways

Playback Speed

Select a Voice

New Delhi, October 12, 2026 — More than three dozen journalists were temporarily detained, and in some cases assaulted, while they were covering protests against the country’s chief election commissioner over allegations of voter-list manipulation in New Delhi, Ahmedabad, and Pune on October 10 and 11.

In New Delhi, where the main protests broke out, at least 35 journalists were detained over the course of the next two days, according to CPJ’s review of news reports, direct interviews, and verified social media posts by editors, journalists, and their newsrooms. Two more journalists were detained while covering solidarity protests in other cities on October 10, including Alt News correspondent Kinjal in Ahmedabad and Scroll’s Divya Aslesha in Pune.

Police continued detaining journalists even after Supreme Court justices won assurances from Solicitor-General Tushar Mehta on October 11 that lawyers, journalists, and other professionals would not be impeded in their professional duties. The court, which is due to hear the matter again on October 13, also directed that no one be detained except by procedure established by law.

“CPJ’s research shows that, on October 10 and 11, Indian police detained at least 37 journalists while they were covering protests against the chief election commissioner — with several also being assaulted, heckled, or obstructed in their work,” said Kunal Majumder, CPJ’s Asia-Pacific program coordinator. “These incidents are deeply troubling and a blot on India’s democratic traditions. They violate international standards on press freedom and journalists’ constitutional rights, and also contradict the government’s assurance to the Supreme Court that journalists would not be impeded in their work. As the world’s largest democracy, India has a special responsibility to uphold press freedom, protect journalists from interference, and hold police officers accountable for assaulting or obstructing them.”

The protests were called by the Cockroach Janta Party, a youth-led political movement, together with student groups and opposition parties, to demand the resignation of India’s chief election commissioner, Gyanesh Kumar. Protesters allege that a nationwide revision of voter rolls has wrongly removed eligible voters, allegations that the Election Commission and the government deny.

Delhi Police denied permission for the demonstration, citing inadequate notice and law-and-order concerns, and a prohibitory order barred gatherings in central New Delhi. Police also restricted access to dozens of metro stations, canceled some train services, and suspended internet services within about four kilometers (two and a half miles) of the Janpath–Kartavya Path area and around makeshift detention centers. Days before the protest, Delhi Police had issued guidelines for journalists asking them to display press cards prominently.

Indian authorities deployed about 23,000 paramilitary personnel for the protests, including forces withdrawn from Jammu and Kashmir, West Bengal, and Chhattisgarh, along with at least 15,000 Delhi Police officers.

In addition to detaining journalists, police dragged some reporters by their clothes and shoved others into buses, despite their display of press cards. Authorities also seized at least five phones, pressured at least one journalist to delete footage, and drove some to holding sites up to 65 kilometers (40 miles) away.

At least five journalists were struck by police, according to their own accounts or their outlets’. On October 10, prominent Indian journalist Rana Ayyub posted on X that police threatened to detain her when she asked whether they were facilitating a man who was shouting abuse at protesters in their presence. Ayyub, a columnist for The Washington Post, told CPJ that, despite knowing she was a journalist, police beat her with a lathi (baton), resulting in injuries that are still causing her pain.

The following journalists were detained over the two days, most while displaying press cards:

  • On October 10, Delhi Police temporarily detained Scroll’s Ayush Tiwari and Shoaib Daniyal; Business Standard’s Anushka Bhardwaj; Newslaundry reporters Ashwine Kumar Singh, Astha Savyasachi, and Anmol Pritam and intern Anshu; Reuters’ Saurabh Sharma; Navbharat Times’ Hritik Joshi and Rahul Charas; BOOM’s Jagriti Trisha; Shivang Shukla of Mo, India Today’s digital video platform; Molitics’ Neeraj Jha; The Quint’s Sarthak Jaiswal; Reporter TV’s Roshni Rajan and Farza TM; independent journalists Shrishti Khanna and Prashant Pundir; No Noise Stories’ Vivek Gupta; and Alt News intern Agniva Ray.
  • On October 11, police detained Indian Express Hindi reporters Shashwat, Siya, and Vijay; Hindustan’s Ashish Singh; Nayab World’s Nitin Katiyar; Ulta Chasma founder Pragya Mishra; and independent journalists Nidhi Suresh and M. Rajshekhar.
  • Several journalists also were detained while covering protests at Connaught Place that day. Despite wearing press cards, Peek TV journalists Vedanta Agarwal and Sara Khan were filming  police detaining protesters when officers dragged them away and detained them. Khan said that a male police officer grabbed her by the neck and pushed her toward a female officer. Police detained independent journalist Shyam Meera Singh after he was heckled and abused by Hindu rightwing activists. Shortly afterward, Singh’s X account, where he had been posting short videos of the protests, was withheld in India “in response to a legal demand,” according to the platform’s notice. The account remains visible outside India.
  • Police also detained at least three journalists from Malayalam-language news channels on October 11 and released them hours later. Asianet News reporter Sajin A was detained and released after about half an hour, the outlet’s Delhi head, Prashanth Raghuvamsam, confirmed to CPJ. Police grabbed 24 News reporter Suhail Mohammed by the neck and forced him into a police vehicle while he was filming. The outlet reported that its video journalist V.S. Rahul was also detained by police, who snatched his camera and threw away the microphone.
  • That evening, police dragged The Caravan’s assistant multimedia producer Ryan Thomas into a detention bus on Janpath Road as he filmed a detention with his press card visible, hit him repeatedly on the head when he refused to delete his footage, slapped him, and prodded him in the stomach with a gun butt in a police car before letting him go at Connaught Place.
  • CPJ has not yet confirmed the names of several other journalists detained on October 11, including a reporter with The Hindu, who was pushed onto a bus and released after mentioning that she was a reporter, as well as a PTI agency journalist. A news agency photojournalist told the media that police dragged them by the neck into a van.
  • Also that day, a group of men wearing press cards surrounded Maktoob Media reporter Fida Fathima, editorial intern Nada Saeeda, and contributor Aktarista Ansari at Connaught Place in the presence of uniformed police. Maktoob Media editor Aslah Kayyalakkath told CPJ the men accused the journalists of insulting Prime Minister Narendra Modi and hurled Islamophobic slurs at them. When Fathima asked the men to show their own press identification, they refused.

A senior Delhi Police officer told The Hindu that some journalists may have been detained because they were working close to protesters and did not move away during detention operations. CPJ emailed Delhi Police for comment but did not immediately receive a response.



Read the full article here

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using AI-powered analysis and real-time sources.

Get Your Fact Check Report

Enter your email to receive detailed fact-checking analysis

5 free reports remaining

Continue with Full Access

You've used your 5 free reports. Sign up for unlimited access!

Already have an account? Sign in here

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email Telegram Copy Link
News Room
  • Website
  • Facebook
  • X (Twitter)
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn

The FSNN News Room is the voice of our in-house journalists, editors, and researchers. We deliver timely, unbiased reporting at the crossroads of finance, cryptocurrency, and global politics, providing clear, fact-driven analysis free from agendas.

Related Articles

Global Free Speech

Turkey: 4 more journalists arrested for ‘spreading disinformation’ as media crackdown intensifies

4 hours ago
Global Free Speech

Screenshot of silhouette in NAZA film (The Guardian/JW Films) NAZA, the new documentary film by Yuval Abraham and Rachel Szor, is not the first filmabout Israel, by Israelis, to speak out of turn. But the unrestrained response to it in Israel,following the film being awarded the Special Jury Prize at the Venice Film Festival lastmonth, is unprecedented. Israel’s minister of culture declared that he would take steps to have the filmmakers’citizenship revoked; angry protesters have demonstrated outside the homes of one of thefilmmakers’ parents; the offices of +972 Publications (the work builds on some of Abraham’s work for the news outlet) were evacuated after staff received credible threats of violence. Most tellingly, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu declared that people who “slandered” the country and Israel Defence Forces (IDF) at a time of war were “traitors”. Allthis before the film’s official release, scheduled for 14 October, and for a film that, as of thetime of writing, has not been seen by very many Israelis – and, almost certainly, not byanyone voicing their opprobrium in the public sphere. This speaks of one thing: censorship. Yuval Abraham (right) and an interviewee seen during the NAZA documentary (The Guardian/JW Films) On 7 October 2023, Hamas launched a multi-pronged attack on Israel, killing more than1200 people in one day and taking another 300 hostage. In the three years since, Israel haswaged an unrelenting and pitiless war against the two million residents of the Gaza Strip,killing at least 74,000 people and laying to waste much of the territory. NAZA is the acronym in Hebrew for nezek agavi – collateral damage, a horrible euphemism that has bounced about since at least the Vietnam War. It is also, according to the film that carries this name, a protocol that has been deployed by the IDF over the course of the war. Israel’s minister of culture declared that he would take steps to have the filmmakers’ citizenship revoked When actualising remote strikes against Hamas targets, the protocol determines how many civilian deaths constitute an acceptable trade-off vis-à-vis the elimination (yes, anothereuphemism) of an identified Hamas target? NAZA, the documentary is underpinned by a simple premise. 24 men and women, theiridentities disguised, are interviewed by Abraham on Tel Aviv rooftops about theirknowledge of the protocol, about the wider prosecution of the ongoing war, and about theirfeelings concerning how the war is being waged – the manner in which Gaza and Gazans have been laid to waste by the tools that they themselves have operated. The documentary unpicks NAZA’s methodology, how this reduces human life to a mathematical calculation. One information source for the NAZA protocol is Lavender, an AI tool that extrapolates from telephone network data the likelihood that any given individual is a “Hamas operative” – and thus a target whose elimination becomes attached to a NAZA number. Concerning Lavender, one interviewee says that the AI tool has an 85% accuracy rate. The life of a target, and of the people around that target, hinges on a tool with a 15% error rate. This alone casts into stark relief the IDF claim that its war is against Hamas alone. The impression one develops across the course of the film is that for some of theinterviewees, the depersonalisation created by NAZA helps in distancing oneself from theemotional and psychological implications of waging this particular war. It is, I think, a sentiment being replicated across Israel as a whole. Of the war in Gaza and how it is beingprosecuted, even now there is remarkably little debate in the public sphere. Very littlereflection, in the media or in the wider public discourse, about the consequences of waginga war in a manner that has ignited revulsion across the world. NAZA’s principal audience, despite the rhetoric of “traitors”, is Israelis. There is no single reason for this. One of the interview subjects talks of a “hormonal rush”,presumably connected to a primal wish for vengeance after 7 October. Several, with varying degrees of reflection, express some regret. One references all he had been taught about the Nazis and the Holocaust, then pauses. It is difficult, he continues, not to see parallels between that set of atrocities and these. One says that they – the people operating the NAZA protocol – “do not hate Arabs”. Abraham then reminds him of the number of people that NAZA potentially anonymises, then erases. He first obfuscates, then falls silent. Another talks about how hard it was for him to calculate a NAZA for a target – a target he believed to be legitimate – knowing that they would include his two daughters: “toddlers, one three [years old] the second not more than six.” He knew this because he had access to the target’s picture library on his phone. The target in question was not killed in the subsequent targeted strike. The daughters, part of the approved NAZA collateral damage calculation, were. NAZA’s principal audience, despite the rhetoric of “traitors”, is Israelis. Contextual prods across the film are reminders of this. A single casual reference to the IDF’s elite 8200 cyber warfare unit, for instance, carries a lot of shorthand that would not be evident to non-Israelis. The rooftop settings for the interviews would be identifiable for many Tel Avivians, sometimes down to the very street. The point being driven home is that the people behind NAZA are relatable, part of the quotidian fabric of everyday life. A bifurcated life, though. One interviewee says that after selecting targets in HaKirya, the IDF’s central Tel Aviv headquarters, he may head off to meet friends on nearby Ibn Gvirol Street. Israel and many Israelis live in the shadow of the 7 October attacks but remain detached from the reality of the war being waged in their name in Gaza. Whether Israelis will get to see NAZA remains an open question. Abraham and Szor have said that they are open to discussing distribution terms with Israeli cinemas; the likelihood of any of them taking this up is slim. Whether or not the government will censor the film – quite plausible, given the rhetoric from above – is a moot point. In today’s Israel, I doubt that anyone will touch it with a barge pole. This weekend, Prime Minister Netanyahu wrote to his attorney-general and the heads of the IDF and the internal security agency, instructing that they “act urgently to uncover the identity of all those who are involved or appear in the libel film”, so that they may be prosecuted “for serious information security offenses, criminal defamation, and harming Israel’s diplomatic and security interests.” Making the film is being framed as treason; distributing it could easily be framed as much the same. NAZA will be made available to stream, for free, after its international theatrical run. Whether Israelis will choose to watch it, even in private, is a question I can’t answer. One thing that must be said, though. That the film was made at all says something about a capacity for self-reflection that did exist in Israel once, even if it was often mocked or dismissed or taken for granted. But that was before 7 October 2023. NAZA is not the first film about Israel, by Israelis, to speak out of turn. I’m not at all sure whether it won’t be the last. READ MORE

5 hours ago
Global Free Speech

As book bans continue to escalate across the United States and signs of similar pressures emerge in the UK, what can librarians, publishers and free expression advocates do now to prepare for the years ahead? For this year’s Banned Books Week UK, Index on Censorship and Pan Macmillan brought together leading voices from publishing and free expression for a timely transatlantic conversation on the future of the freedom to read. Rather than looking back, this conversation asks a more urgent question: what will the next five years demand of us, and how can we prepare? Designed primarily for librarians, this session bridges the gap between US and UK experiences, offering a proactive roadmap for challenging censorship and protecting diverse collections. While book censorship is often framed as a North American crisis, this session serves as both a strategic warning and a tactical guide for the UK. READ MORE

6 hours ago
Global Free Speech

CPJ, partners ask Turkey and social media platforms to halt online crackdown on journalists and rights defenders

9 hours ago
Global Free Speech

Ukrainian journalists detained in Austria; authorities must urgently explain why

3 days ago
Global Free Speech

South African journalist faces death threats after anti-migrant activist publishes his number

3 days ago
Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Editors Picks

Standard Chartered Will Hold Ripple’s Stablecoin in Dubai—And Let Clients Trade With It Without Moving It

5 minutes ago

Thinking of Sending a Nude Shrek Pic to an Ohio Official? You Could Be Found Guilty of Harassment.

34 minutes ago

At least 37 journalists detained, several assaulted, while covering protests against India’s election chief

40 minutes ago

Bitcoin (BTC) price steadies near Sunday’s high as smaller tokens do the heavy lifting

55 minutes ago
Latest Posts

FASB Proposal Could Boost Corporate Stablecoin Adoption

1 hour ago

From GTA V on iPhone to Free Photoshop: This AI Tool Is Upending Software

1 hour ago

DHS Searched Ilhan Omar’s Home as Part of Immigration Fraud Investigation

2 hours ago

Subscribe to News

Get the latest news and updates directly to your inbox.

At FSNN – Free Speech News Network, we deliver unfiltered reporting and in-depth analysis on the stories that matter most. From breaking headlines to global perspectives, our mission is to keep you informed, empowered, and connected.

FSNN.net is owned and operated by GlobalBoost Media
, an independent media organization dedicated to advancing transparency, free expression, and factual journalism across the digital landscape.

Facebook X (Twitter) Discord Telegram
Latest News

FTX-Tied Crypto Mining Venture to be Used for AI After Acquisition

3 seconds ago

Standard Chartered Will Hold Ripple’s Stablecoin in Dubai—And Let Clients Trade With It Without Moving It

5 minutes ago

Thinking of Sending a Nude Shrek Pic to an Ohio Official? You Could Be Found Guilty of Harassment.

34 minutes ago

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest news and updates directly to your inbox.

© 2026 GlobalBoost Media. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Our Authors
  • Contact

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

🍪

Cookies

We and our selected partners wish to use cookies to collect information about you for functional purposes and statistical marketing. You may not give us your consent for certain purposes by selecting an option and you can withdraw your consent at any time via the cookie icon.

Cookie Preferences

Manage Cookies

Cookies are small text that can be used by websites to make the user experience more efficient. The law states that we may store cookies on your device if they are strictly necessary for the operation of this site. For all other types of cookies, we need your permission. This site uses various types of cookies. Some cookies are placed by third party services that appear on our pages.

Your permission applies to the following domains:

  • https://fsnn.net
Necessary
Necessary cookies help make a website usable by enabling basic functions like page navigation and access to secure areas of the website. The website cannot function properly without these cookies.
Statistic
Statistic cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
Preferences
Preference cookies enable a website to remember information that changes the way the website behaves or looks, like your preferred language or the region that you are in.
Marketing
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.