Close Menu
Market Data Newsletter
Sunday, September 6
Global Free Speech

Bangladesh war crimes tribunal issues fresh warrants for 3 journalists over press conference questions

News RoomBy No Comments3 Mins Read7 Views
Bangladesh war crimes tribunal issues fresh warrants for 3 journalists over press conference questions

Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

New Delhi, August 18, 2026—The Committee to Protect Journalists calls on Bangladeshi authorities to drop their new crimes against humanity case against journalists Shyamal Dutta, Mozammel Babu, and Farzana Rupa, and stop criminalizing news reporting. 

Bangladesh’s International Crimes Tribunal (ICT) on Monday ordered prison authorities to produce the journalists, who have been detained since 2024 on separate charges, before the domestic war crimes court on August 24, according to news reports.

Prosecutors allege the journalists incited the suppression of student demonstrators during a July 2024 uprising that ousted former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina. They say that the journalists asked Hasina provocative questions at a press conference on July 14, 2024 that led her to make disparaging remarks about the demonstrators before launching a bloody crackdown, the reports said. 

“Launching a crimes-against-humanity case against journalists Shyamal Dutta, Mozammel Babu, and Farzana Rupa for simply asking questions at a press conference is outrageous and deeply troubling,” said Kunal Majumder, CPJ’s Asia-Pacific Program Coordinator. “Editorial decisions may be partisan or ethically questionable, but they cannot be criminalized. Criminalizing editorial judgment sets a dangerous precedent and undermines Bangladesh’s reputation as a democracy. Authorities must immediately release the three journalists and drop the charges.”

Babu, founder and former editor-in-chief of the privately owned Ekattor TV, and Rupa, the channel’s former principal correspondent, were arrested in May this year in a separate ICT case over the 2013 security crackdown on Hefajat-e-Islam activists at Shapla Chatta. They were named in a formal charge sheet on July 27 alongside Hasina and 39 others. 

Dutta, editor of the privately owned Bhorer Kagoj and a former general secretary of the Jatiya Press Club, has been detained since September 2024 and faces multiple murder cases in retaliation for his journalism.

If found guilty, the journalists could face the death penalty because the ICT, which was founded in 2010 under a 1973 law to try crimes committed during Bangladesh’s 1971 Liberation War, does not have sentencing guidelines for specific offenses.

During the Awami League government, Hasina used the tribunal to prosecute her political opponents. Since the political transition of August 2024, the interim government and new administration of Prime Minister Tarique Rahman, who was sworn in on February 17, have reconstituted the tribunal and amended the law to prosecute figures linked to the Awami League government, including Hasina.

Bangladesh’s Ministry of Law and the Office of the Chief Prosecutor did not reply to CPJ’s emailed request for comment.

Read the full article here

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using AI-powered analysis and real-time sources.

Share.

The FSNN News Room is the voice of our in-house journalists, editors, and researchers. We deliver timely, unbiased reporting at the crossroads of finance, cryptocurrency, and global politics, providing clear, fact-driven analysis free from agendas.

Related Articles

Global Free Speech

Maltese tycoon Yorgen Fenech, accused of being the mastermind behind the murder of investigative journalist Daphne Caruana Galizia in 2017, was cleared of charges of complicity and criminal conspiracy. Index’s CEO Jemimah Steinfeld gives her reaction, as Daphne’s family continue to call for justice. Malta Daphne Caruana Galizia was murdered by a bomb planted under her car on 16 October 2017. She was 53. I was relatively new to Index at the time, and I remember the day well. It isn’t every day that a journalist is brutally murdered in Europe. Thus began years of protests, first outside Malta’s High Commission in London then online following Covid restrictions, ultimately morphing into a sustained campaign for justice for Daphne and her family. In the years since, I have had the privilege of meeting several members of her family. I’ve always been struck, humbled even, by their unwavering determination in their quest for justice – the energy and fortitude this demands – and by their ability to get on with life, refusing to let Daphne’s murder define them. Yorgen Fenech leaves the courthouse following his acquittal (AP Photo/Kevin Schembri Orland) Daphne was a daughter, a sister, a wife and a mother, and so many future memories were stolen from her and her family on that fateful day in 2017. Daphne was also a fearless journalist. She was killed because she asked uncomfortable questions, because she dared to expose and confront abuses of power and authority in Malta. Yesterday, when Maltese businessman Yorgen Fenech was acquitted of complicity in Daphne’s murder, that message rang throughout the court and beyond. She was killed because she was seeking out the truth. We at Index are all devastated for her and her family. They have spent years in search of answers, and thought they would get this, finally, after nine long years. They didn’t. Daphne was not the only one denied justice this week. Another face familiar to us at Index is that of Joshua Wong, the Hong Kong democracy leader who has been in prison since 2020. Reader, what were you doing in your 20s? Joshua, who turns 30 next month, was first arrested when he was 17 and has spent a large chunk of his 20s in jail. And he might remain imprisoned for longer. He was due to be released in January 2027, after serving out his most recent term of imprisonment, for subversion. But this week he pleaded guilty to collusion with foreign entities – which could lead to a life sentence under China’s National Security Law. Hong Kong Joshua’s friend and fellow protester Frances Hui wrote about him for Index. She reminded us of the person, not the name. “He was sharp, stubborn, and unapologetic. Most importantly to those of us who were younger, he seemed entirely unconvinced by the idea that being young meant we should remain quiet.” She added that Hong Kong’s government have done all they can to make Joshua “disappear from everyday life”. The authorities in Hong Kong and Malta would rather that these names disappeared, that we move on and forget about the past. But we can’t, and we won’t. Not until we’ve achieved justice for Daphne and freedom for Joshua.   READ MORE

Add A Comment

Comments are closed.