Close Menu
Market Data Newsletter
Monday, September 28
Global Free Speech

Azerbaijan: CPJ condemns shocking sentences handed down in Toplum TV case

News RoomBy No Comments4 Mins Read7 Views
Azerbaijan: CPJ condemns shocking sentences handed down in Toplum TV case

Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

New York, July 28, 2026 – The Committee to Protect Journalists condemns the extremely harsh prison sentences of up to 15 years handed down on July 27 to journalists and other individuals associated with leading Azerbaijani news outlet Toplum TV on charges related to receipt and use of foreign funds.

“The shockingly heavy sentences meted out to nine individuals linked to Toplum TV are a textbook example of how an absence of international accountability emboldens autocrats like Azerbaijan’s President Ilham Aliyev,” said Fiona O’Brien, CPJ’s Europe and Central Asia regional director. “More than two dozen journalists and media workers are now unjustly jailed in Azerbaijan, victims of a relentless crackdown on independent journalism. European states in particular must wake up to the fact that their increasingly warm ties with Aliyev’s regime – and their failure to hold it to international human rights standards – not only have devastating consequences inside Azerbaijan but also undermine their claims to stand for media freedom.”

The Serious Crimes Court in the capital, Baku, found the nine individuals — who include journalists, a journalist trainer, project managers, and the founders of media outlets — guilty of acting as an “organized criminal group” to commit multiple financial crimes connected to the receipt and use of Western donor funds, in violation of Azerbaijani legislation, by four connected organizations: Toplum TV; the nonprofit Institute for Democratic Initiatives (IDI); Fakt Yoxla, a fact-checking platform run by IDI; and Third Republic Platform, a political group.

The court delivered the following sentences, and ordered Toplum TV journalist Elmir Abbasov, who was the only defendant to remain free pending trial, to be taken into custody in the courtroom:

  • Akif Gurbanov, Toplum TV co-founder, IDI chairperson, and Third Republic Platform spokesperson – 15 years
  • Alasgar Mammadli, Toplum TV co-founder and media lawyer – 14 years
  • Mushfig Jabbar, Toplum TV video editor – 13 years 
  • Farid Ismayilov, Toplum TV reporter – 12 years
  • Elmir Abbasov, Toplum TV social media manager – 12 years
  • Ruslan Izzetli, Third Republic Platform co-founder – 15 years
  • Ali Zeynal, IDI journalist trainer – 14 years
  • Ilkin Amrahov, IDI project coordinator – 14 years
  • Ramil Babayev, IDI project coordinator – 13 years

The accused are among dozens of journalists and right defenders arrested in a major crackdown on the press and civil society following Azerbaijan’s military recapture of the Nagorno-Karabakh region in 2023. Most of the journalists have been charged over alleged receipt of Western funding, amid a decline in relations with the West following that military campaign.

Police raided the offices of Toplum TV and IDI and arrested most of those listed above in March 2024. In a separate case, Toplum TV presenter Shahnaz Baylargizi is under a travel ban pending investigation on similar charges.

In June last year, authorities sentenced six journalists and media workers from Abzas Media, Azerbaijan’s leading anti-corruption investigative outlet, and one from U.S. Congress-funded broadcaster Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty’s Azerbaijani service to prison terms of between seven and a half and nine years on similar funding allegations. Twelve journalists and media workers remain on trial in a case against Germany-based Meydan TV.

Azerbaijani law requires civil society groups to obtain state approval for foreign grants and authorities say the targeted outlets failed to comply.

In rulings on similar cases, the European Court of Human Rights stressed that such an omission was punishable under Azerbaijani law by fines, not criminal sanctions. Independent experts say that authorities refuse to register independent organizations seeking foreign grants, making it impossible to legally receive the funding.

Azerbaijan was the world’s sixth-worst jailer of journalists in 2025, according to CPJ’s prison census. At present, at least 25 journalists are being held in reprisal for their work. Authorities have also heavily restricted international media and sentenced exiled journalists to lengthy prison terms in absentia.

CPJ emailed the Office of the Prosecutor-General of Azerbaijan for comment but did not immediately receive a reply.

Read the full article here

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using AI-powered analysis and real-time sources.

Share.

The FSNN News Room is the voice of our in-house journalists, editors, and researchers. We deliver timely, unbiased reporting at the crossroads of finance, cryptocurrency, and global politics, providing clear, fact-driven analysis free from agendas.

Related Articles

Global Free Speech

The BBC clearly sees the value of television series That Mitchell and Webb Look. Marking the 20th anniversary of its original screening, the Beeb has re-released the series on iPlayer. But – and there is very often a “but” with these things – they’ve removed around 11 sketches from the BAFTA award-winning show. The official word is that these sketches don’t “work today”, which is polite speak for “they may cause offence”. The episodes singled out include scenes featuring a battle reenactment with characters in blackface, a contestant on a show wearing a burka and a lost tribe” in a garden centre. These sketches set out to challenge stereotypes, not to reinforce them; but 20 years on, this distinction seems to have been lost along the way. I’m a bit uncomfortable about this. I find it infantilising, to say the least. Can’t we trust audiences to make up their own minds, to switch off if they find the sketches in question unpalatable? Does the BBC think that we are just passive consumers, unable to disaggregate the mocking of racism from racism itself? These sketches set out to challenge stereotypes, not to reinforce them This act of censorship is distorting – of the shows, whose narratives and rhythms were built to include these sketches, and more broadly too. Conversations we were having 20 years ago have been erased, as if to suggest that they never happened. But they did! And with this erasure, the opportunity for thoughtful engagement and learning from our past is gone. “Let’s just pretend we were all lovely 20 years ago. It’s better that way” seems to be the message. Speaking as a minority myself, I find that knowing the nasty stuff that people said before – and indeed, still say today – is much more useful than pretending it never happened. This approach, I think, is also inconsistent. What it reveals is a cherry-picking (intended or not) of the groups that we can mock, and those that we can’t. Let’s face it, gender stereotypes are rarely deemed to have aged beyond the pale – if that were the case, we would have to wave goodbye to half the television made before the mid-2010s. Suppression like this sends a bad message to artists, namely that what they’re creating today may hold less value tomorrow. Or, even worse, that future audiences may deem them bigots – that Sword of Damocles hovering over the heads of any creative paying attention to the discourse of the moment. Suppression like this sends a bad message to artists The BBC’s decision reaffirms a broader trend. In 2020, Little Britain was removed from the iPlayer platform for similar reasons. It has since been reinstated – minus some sketches. Meanwhile, the UK’s arts space more broadly is seeing a retreat to the land of “safe”, as Index recently revealed in a year-long investigation into self-censorship in UK theatre. The BBC, it must be said, does remarkable stuff. The ongoing podcast investigation into the disappearance of US journalist Austin Tice is just one example. But this does not mean, however, that they don’t sometimes get it wrong. Chopping at That Mitchell and Webb Look is one example. Sure, the removal of the material isn’t the life-or-death story that Index often works on. Sure, Mitchell and Webb aren’t the faces of persecuted artists – they have huge platforms and agreed to the changes themselves. Still, one can’t help but think that the decision came from a place of conservatism, perhaps even fear. This is weak and dispiriting, indeed the very opposite of what enables creativity in the arts. We shouldn’t be encouraging this cultural timidity. Rather, we should harness culture and creativity as the starting points of a conversation about our here and now. That’s what the arts are for, after all. READ MORE

Add A Comment

Comments are closed.