Close Menu
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
  • Home
  • News
    • Politics
    • Legal & Courts
    • Tech & Big Tech
    • Campus & Education
    • Media & Culture
    • Global Free Speech
  • Opinions
    • Debates
  • Video/Live
  • Community
  • Freedom Index
  • About
    • Mission
    • Contact
    • Support
Trending

That $17B Meta settlement comes with a catch: Your online speech rights

18 minutes ago

Daily Deal: Raspberry Pi Pico With Ultimate Starter Kit

24 minutes ago

A Tale of Two Tech Panics

26 minutes ago
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Discord Telegram
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
Market Data Newsletter
Friday, August 28
  • Home
  • News
    • Politics
    • Legal & Courts
    • Tech & Big Tech
    • Campus & Education
    • Media & Culture
    • Global Free Speech
  • Opinions
    • Debates
  • Video/Live
  • Community
  • Freedom Index
  • About
    • Mission
    • Contact
    • Support
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
Home»Cryptocurrency & Free Speech Finance»Solana Will Now Print Less SOL as Disinflation Vote Passes in Dramatic Fashion
Cryptocurrency & Free Speech Finance

Solana Will Now Print Less SOL as Disinflation Vote Passes in Dramatic Fashion

News RoomBy News Room2 hours agoNo Comments5 Mins Read3 Views
Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest Copy Link LinkedIn Tumblr Email VKontakte Telegram
Solana Will Now Print Less SOL as Disinflation Vote Passes in Dramatic Fashion
Share
Facebook Twitter Pinterest Email Copy Link

Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

Key Takeaways

Playback Speed

Select a Voice

In brief

  • Solana closed its first binding on-chain governance vote, passing SGP-0002 to double the network’s disinflation rate from 15% to 30%, hitting the 1.5% issuance floor by 2029 instead of 2032.
  • The vote came down to the wire, passing 67.0% to 66.67% required, after Kraken opposed it through the count before flipping at the last minute.
  • Validators also ratified SGP-0001, the Solana Constitution, with 86% support, but rejected SGP-0003, a “Resource and Inclusion Fee” that would have burned up to 14x more SOL daily.

The Solana network will soon print a lot less SOL on a yearly basis, as network validators today voted to double the rate of disinflation for the token.

It’s music to the ears of Solana investors, who expect the outcome of today’s vote to be bullish for the price of SOL going forward. But it didn’t come without some drama.

Myriad: Solana’s next price move? Click to make your prediction.

Solana validators today closed out the network’s first-ever binding governance vote, a stake-weighted ballot run through the new Solana Governance Proposal system, otherwise known as SPGs, that lets validators and their delegators vote on-chain for the first time.

The package today bundled three proposals, and they did not all land the same way.

The most consequential of the trio was SGP-0002, the “Double Disinflation” proposal, which only passed by a hair—67.0% for (176.29M SOL) against 66.19M against, on 1,326 votes, with 60.7% quorum.

The proposal tracks SIMD-550, filed by engineers at infrastructure firm Helius. The proposal, now passed, doubles Solana’s disinflation rate—the yearly pace at which new-token issuance shrinks—from 15% to 30%.

Solana’s inflation already declines a bit every year on its way to a fixed 1.5% floor. SIMD-550 just gets there faster, hitting that floor by 2029 instead of 2032, which works out to roughly 18.9 million fewer SOL created over the next six years.

What it means, ultimately, is less SOL in circulation on a yearly basis, which could prove bullish for the token long-term if an increase in demand coincides with the supply crunch.

It doesn’t come without some drawbacks, though, since the rate of inflation (i.e. new token issuance) is what pays stakers—the people and companies who lock up SOL to help secure the network—through rewards called yield. As 21Shares put it, if you cut that issuance, then staking yield falls from around 5.25% today to about 2.25% within three years.

That’s likely why some staking providers, such as cryptocurrency exchange Kraken, initially voted against the disinflation proposal today, while others like Galaxy initially abstained (effectively standing against) before changing their votes in the final hour.

Kraken, for its part, nearly sank SGP-0002. The exchange, whose voting power stood at 8.92 million SOL, voted against the double-disinflation proposal through the count, then took back its stance at the last minute. “Custodians should be conduits, not voices,” Kraken’s Co-CEO Arjun Sethi, wrote in a reply to Helius CEO Mert Mumtaz.

Mumtaz, who lobbied hard for Kraken and others to vote for the proposal, welcomed the change of stance once Kraken moved. With 67.0% against a 66.67% requirement, a few million SOL one way or the other was the difference between a pass and a fail.

The other Solana proposals

Other than the disinflation debate, Solana validators had some more things to consider today that will shape the future of the network.

SGP-0001, the Solana Constitution, was the easy one. It formalizes how this voting system works going forward, and it passed with 86.0% of participating stake in favor—193.65 million SOL for against 4.63 million against, across 1,153 votes, with quorum met at 52.0% participation.

The other economic fight was SGP-0003, the “Resource and Inclusion Fee,” which failed.

It landed at 53.9% for—142.84M SOL for against 50.15M against, with a heavy 72.03M SOL abstaining—well short of the two-thirds bar. The proposal tracks SIMD-553, from R&D firm Temporal, which would have split Solana’s transaction fee in two: a base “inclusion fee” that still pays validators, and a new “resource fee” tied to a transaction’s compute use that would be destroyed outright.

That change would have lifted daily SOL burns from about 650 SOL (roughly $48,000) to as much as 9,000 SOL (around $668,000), a 12-to-14x jump. It had already cleared code review from Solana’s two client teams, Anza and Firedancer, on July 20; the vote was about turning it on, not whether it was ready.

Solana Company, the Nasdaq-listed treasury firm (HSDT), backed the constitution but voted against both economic changes, arguing the timing was wrong for institutional stakers who want predictable yield. DeFi Development Corp voted all three the other way and bought 19,000 SOL for $1.86 million afterward.

SOL had spent the week pricing in a supply squeeze, up roughly 44% on the month into the vote. The chart turned once SGP-0003 missed. The Aug. 28 daily candle on Coinbase opened at $109.18, hit a high of $110.14, sold off to a low of $103.63, and closed at $105.00—a 3.83% drop from the open, and about 5.4% off the recent swing high near $111.

Daily Debrief Newsletter

Start every day with the top news stories right now, plus original features, a podcast, videos and more.

Read the full article here

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using AI-powered analysis and real-time sources.

Get Your Fact Check Report

Enter your email to receive detailed fact-checking analysis

5 free reports remaining

Continue with Full Access

You've used your 5 free reports. Sign up for unlimited access!

Already have an account? Sign in here

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email Telegram Copy Link
News Room
  • Website
  • Facebook
  • X (Twitter)
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn

The FSNN News Room is the voice of our in-house journalists, editors, and researchers. We deliver timely, unbiased reporting at the crossroads of finance, cryptocurrency, and global politics, providing clear, fact-driven analysis free from agendas.

Related Articles

Media & Culture

Daily Deal: Raspberry Pi Pico With Ultimate Starter Kit

24 minutes ago
Media & Culture

A Tale of Two Tech Panics

26 minutes ago
Cryptocurrency & Free Speech Finance

Circle's USDC takes over Chelsea's jersey in Premier League first sponsorship deal

46 minutes ago
Cryptocurrency & Free Speech Finance

Polish Olympic chief charged in Zondacrypto probe, justice minister says

47 minutes ago
Cryptocurrency & Free Speech Finance

Fed Chair Warsh Calls AI a ‘Hinge Point in History’—4 Key Things He Said

50 minutes ago
Media & Culture

Pete Hegseth And His Department Of Unconstitutional Revenge Lose Again In California

1 hour ago
Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Editors Picks

Daily Deal: Raspberry Pi Pico With Ultimate Starter Kit

24 minutes ago

A Tale of Two Tech Panics

26 minutes ago

London’s Africa Centre faces closure Earlier this month, I was saddened to learn that The Africa Centre in London may once again be shutting its doors. It won’t be the first time the centre has had to close – but it may be the last time, although the chief executive is still hopeful he can raise the millions of pounds needed to save it. There’s no point dwelling on the reasons, speculative or factual, behind its current crisis. I did though, looking through a list of its recent events, feel a pang of guilt. I could have done more to support The Africa Centre – turning up, talking to people about it, taking cognisance of the real value it has added over the years to London’s political and social life. When the Africa Centre was founded in 1961, its primary objective was to “educate about, connect to and [advocate] for Africa and its diaspora through arts, innovation, culture, thought leadership and education”. In 1964 it found a home in London’s Covent Garden – the Catholic church purchased an old tomato warehouse on King Street and gifted it “to the people of Africa in perpetuity”. When my parents emigrated to the United Kingdom in the mid-1960s, The Africa Centre was one of the very few places where people like them could find space to negotiate the cultural and social differences between them and the unfamiliar wider world. This process of cultural pollination process worked both ways, mind. Intellectuals, activists and dissidents from across the continent spoke at King Street about the political challenges faced by post-colonial African countries, educating curious audiences who wanted to learn more about a part of the world that for many was at best a construct of the imagination, if even that. For two days last June, the London Archives presented to the public a cross-section of documents, photographs and ephemera from its Africa Centre Collection. The archives were a revealing and at times startling record of political and social openness and curiosity. On one table, a poster from 1968 announced a talk about The Future of the Portuguese Territories – long before Angola and Mozambique became proxy battlegrounds for the Cold War between the Soviets and the West. From 1970, an invitation to a talk by Mrs Lydia Osiyemi, “sociology student and mother”, about The African mother and child in Britain. Judging from the poster (left), I fancy that Mrs Osiyemi’s talk was proposing African solutions to a dilemma that remains very real today – to London’s new arrivals and veterans alike. And then, from the early 1990s, in the centre’s guest book (below right), a tribute from a vanguard of democracy. “I pay tribute to those who founded this institution, and those who run it,” the scrawly script read. “This is …  a major cultural shop-window for Africa of which every African should be proud.” The author: “M.K.O. Abiola of Africa.” The Nigeria I grew up in the 1980s and 1990s, after my parents moved back there for a while, was defined by the ever-present cloud of military dictatorship. I can say that now, in hindsight; it’s strange how one normalises the abnormal when we have nothing to compare it against. When Abiola, a business magnate and politician, ran for president in Nigeria in 1993 for a short while it seemed that the country would escape its history of ethnic strife. But then the military snatched victory from him and imprisoned him, extending their malign grip on the country for another half decade. The BAFTA-winning My Father’s Son is set against the backdrop of that very period. A generation before this, the Africa at the Pictures film festival curated by the centre had offered London similar context to political and social concerns across the continent. Abiola’s entry reminded me that it was in the London, on King Street, that I first began to think more clearly about the right to free expression and what happens when this is curtailed. When Chinua Achebe’s Anthills of the Savannah, an acerbic observation on life under military dictatorship in a fictional west African country, was shortlisted for the Booker in 1987 it couldn’t be bought in Nigeria. I got hold of my copy in London – in the Africa Centre’s cramped and musty bookshop, stuffed with books on and from the continent. It wasn’t all high-minded intellectualism on King Street. The Africa Centre was home to one of the few restaurants in London featuring cuisine from here and there across the continent – Mauritian lamb curry, Algerian couscous, fried plantain and boiled yam. Cost? Dishes were, according to a caption, “between 20p and £3”. Happy days. (An early menu is shown below left). In 2012, the Africa Centre left Covent Garden. Maintaining the Grade II-listed building proved too expensive, some said. Perhaps more to the point, it was no longer a good fit for the commercialised ambience that had sprung up around Covent Garden. The historic building on King Street was sold, and with the support of the Mayor of London and the Arts Council, the Centre relocated itself across the river in 2022, to new premises in Southwark. The last time I was there, in the summer of 2023, was to see a fascinating multi-floor exhibition about Nigeria’s Fuji music. Once again, I was surprised and delighted to learn in the Africa Centre something new about my childhood home, so very far away from it. London of the 1980s and 1990s was nothing like the crucible of cultures that it is today. While migrant communities were not quite silenced, they certainly did not have the right to a voice in the public sphere such as they do today. We complain, correctly, about febrile attempts to exclude inconvenient minority voices from the general discourse today. But we don’t, unfortunately, acknowledge enough the real contribution that physical community spaces, big and small, have made over the years to give London the cultural texture and viscera that makes the challenging and contradictory but still very charming city that it is. I’m going to miss the Africa Centre when it’s gone, and places like it, that helped shaped a city where the right to free expression is still, on the whole, seen to be a good thing. READ MORE

37 minutes ago

Circle's USDC takes over Chelsea's jersey in Premier League first sponsorship deal

46 minutes ago
Latest Posts

Polish Olympic chief charged in Zondacrypto probe, justice minister says

47 minutes ago

Fed Chair Warsh Calls AI a ‘Hinge Point in History’—4 Key Things He Said

50 minutes ago

Pete Hegseth And His Department Of Unconstitutional Revenge Lose Again In California

1 hour ago

Subscribe to News

Get the latest news and updates directly to your inbox.

At FSNN – Free Speech News Network, we deliver unfiltered reporting and in-depth analysis on the stories that matter most. From breaking headlines to global perspectives, our mission is to keep you informed, empowered, and connected.

FSNN.net is owned and operated by GlobalBoost Media
, an independent media organization dedicated to advancing transparency, free expression, and factual journalism across the digital landscape.

Facebook X (Twitter) Discord Telegram
Latest News

That $17B Meta settlement comes with a catch: Your online speech rights

18 minutes ago

Daily Deal: Raspberry Pi Pico With Ultimate Starter Kit

24 minutes ago

A Tale of Two Tech Panics

26 minutes ago

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest news and updates directly to your inbox.

© 2026 GlobalBoost Media. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Our Authors
  • Contact

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

🍪

Cookies

We and our selected partners wish to use cookies to collect information about you for functional purposes and statistical marketing. You may not give us your consent for certain purposes by selecting an option and you can withdraw your consent at any time via the cookie icon.

Cookie Preferences

Manage Cookies

Cookies are small text that can be used by websites to make the user experience more efficient. The law states that we may store cookies on your device if they are strictly necessary for the operation of this site. For all other types of cookies, we need your permission. This site uses various types of cookies. Some cookies are placed by third party services that appear on our pages.

Your permission applies to the following domains:

  • https://fsnn.net
Necessary
Necessary cookies help make a website usable by enabling basic functions like page navigation and access to secure areas of the website. The website cannot function properly without these cookies.
Statistic
Statistic cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
Preferences
Preference cookies enable a website to remember information that changes the way the website behaves or looks, like your preferred language or the region that you are in.
Marketing
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.