Close Menu
Market Data Newsletter
Monday, September 28
Global Free Speech

Multiple journalists detained or arrested in Turkey ahead of NATO summit

News RoomBy No Comments4 Mins Read7 Views
Multiple journalists detained or arrested in Turkey ahead of NATO summit

Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

Istanbul, July 8, 2026—Turkey should put an end to arbitrary detentions and arrests of journalists following the recent detaining of at least 11 members of the press ahead of the NATO summit in Ankara, the Committee to Protect Journalists said Wednesday.

Three of the journalists who were taken into police custody in Turkey between June 23 and July 7 remained behind bars at the time of publishing, with two of them having been arrested. Some were apprehended in the scope of sweeping preliminary police operations ahead of the July 7-8 summit, while others appear to be isolated cases.

“Whether or not the NATO summit is being used as an excuse, the detention or arrest in Turkey of nearly a dozen journalists in the past two weeks is unacceptable and unexplainable,” said Özgür Öğret, CPJ’s Turkey representative. “Turkish authorities should release all remaining journalists behind bars who were imprisoned for doing their jobs, reform the disinformation law, and stop these arbitrary detentions and arrests.”

The 2022 disinformation law dictates that anyone found guilty of publicly spreading false information in order to cause concern, fear, or panic will face a sentence of one to three years in prison. While supporters of the legislation at the time it was introduced offered reassurances that the law would not be used against journalists, it has since become one of the most frequently used laws against the media.

The detentions and arrests include:

  • Doğa Baskan, a reporter for the leftist daily Evrensel, was arrested by a court in Ankara on June 25 with the suspicion of “publicly spreading disinformation,” due to a story that was published online without editorial approval and immediately taken down. She was released pending trial on June 26.
  • Ali Çağatay, a radio host for Sputnik Turkey, the Turkish arm of Russian state-funded news outlet Sputnik, was detained on June 25 and arrested pending trial in Istanbul on June 27, with the suspicion of “publicly spreading disinformation” due to a post on social media platform X alleging corruption among the police.
  • Yıldız Tar, editor-in-chief for the LGBTQ+ news website Kaos GL, was among those who were detained in the sweeping NATO-related operations on June 23 and was arrested on June 25 on suspicion of membership in a terrorist organization.
  • At least three other journalists were taken into police custody on July 5 in the scope of the pre-summit operations. Buse Söğütlü, foreign news editor for the independent news website T24, and Ceren Erdoğdu, an editor for the left-wing nationalist news website Odatv, were detained in Ankara. They were released by an Ankara court on July 8. Abbas Vural, a reporter for the Kurdish news website Niha+, was detained in the western province of Kocaeli and beaten during a raid at his home.
  • Müberra Ünsal, a reporter for the leftist news website Muzır.org, was taken into police custody while following a LGBTQ+ march in Istanbul on June 28 and released that evening.
  • Gülnur Saydam, a reporter for the opposition daily Cumhuriyet, was taken from her home in Istanbul by the police on July 1 and questioned about her reporting for four hours with the suspicion of “publicly spreading disinformation,” before being released.
  • Berfin Ay, editor for the Kurdish-language daily Azadiya Welat, was detained at a border point in the southeastern province of Şırnak and held in police custody from July 5 to July 7 based on a false tip-off about an alleged theft and an expired foreign travel ban.
  • Kayhan Ayhan, a court reporter for the leftist daily BirGün who has covered the multiple trials of imprisoned Istanbul Mayor Ekrem İmamoğlu, was taken into custody by the police from his home in Istanbul and questioned about his work with the suspicion of “publicly spreading disinformation” and released on July 7.
  • Hazar Dost, a reporter for the investigative journalism platform Ortak, was detained by the police in Istanbul on July 6 regarding testimony he had given in 2018 and released the next day. Dost said he was mistreated in custody.

CPJ’s email to the Justice Ministry of Turkey requesting comment did not receive an immediate reply.

Read the full article here

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using AI-powered analysis and real-time sources.

Share.

The FSNN News Room is the voice of our in-house journalists, editors, and researchers. We deliver timely, unbiased reporting at the crossroads of finance, cryptocurrency, and global politics, providing clear, fact-driven analysis free from agendas.

Related Articles

Global Free Speech

The BBC clearly sees the value of television series That Mitchell and Webb Look. Marking the 20th anniversary of its original screening, the Beeb has re-released the series on iPlayer. But – and there is very often a “but” with these things – they’ve removed around 11 sketches from the BAFTA award-winning show. The official word is that these sketches don’t “work today”, which is polite speak for “they may cause offence”. The episodes singled out include scenes featuring a battle reenactment with characters in blackface, a contestant on a show wearing a burka and a lost tribe” in a garden centre. These sketches set out to challenge stereotypes, not to reinforce them; but 20 years on, this distinction seems to have been lost along the way. I’m a bit uncomfortable about this. I find it infantilising, to say the least. Can’t we trust audiences to make up their own minds, to switch off if they find the sketches in question unpalatable? Does the BBC think that we are just passive consumers, unable to disaggregate the mocking of racism from racism itself? These sketches set out to challenge stereotypes, not to reinforce them This act of censorship is distorting – of the shows, whose narratives and rhythms were built to include these sketches, and more broadly too. Conversations we were having 20 years ago have been erased, as if to suggest that they never happened. But they did! And with this erasure, the opportunity for thoughtful engagement and learning from our past is gone. “Let’s just pretend we were all lovely 20 years ago. It’s better that way” seems to be the message. Speaking as a minority myself, I find that knowing the nasty stuff that people said before – and indeed, still say today – is much more useful than pretending it never happened. This approach, I think, is also inconsistent. What it reveals is a cherry-picking (intended or not) of the groups that we can mock, and those that we can’t. Let’s face it, gender stereotypes are rarely deemed to have aged beyond the pale – if that were the case, we would have to wave goodbye to half the television made before the mid-2010s. Suppression like this sends a bad message to artists, namely that what they’re creating today may hold less value tomorrow. Or, even worse, that future audiences may deem them bigots – that Sword of Damocles hovering over the heads of any creative paying attention to the discourse of the moment. Suppression like this sends a bad message to artists The BBC’s decision reaffirms a broader trend. In 2020, Little Britain was removed from the iPlayer platform for similar reasons. It has since been reinstated – minus some sketches. Meanwhile, the UK’s arts space more broadly is seeing a retreat to the land of “safe”, as Index recently revealed in a year-long investigation into self-censorship in UK theatre. The BBC, it must be said, does remarkable stuff. The ongoing podcast investigation into the disappearance of US journalist Austin Tice is just one example. But this does not mean, however, that they don’t sometimes get it wrong. Chopping at That Mitchell and Webb Look is one example. Sure, the removal of the material isn’t the life-or-death story that Index often works on. Sure, Mitchell and Webb aren’t the faces of persecuted artists – they have huge platforms and agreed to the changes themselves. Still, one can’t help but think that the decision came from a place of conservatism, perhaps even fear. This is weak and dispiriting, indeed the very opposite of what enables creativity in the arts. We shouldn’t be encouraging this cultural timidity. Rather, we should harness culture and creativity as the starting points of a conversation about our here and now. That’s what the arts are for, after all. READ MORE

Add A Comment

Comments are closed.