Close Menu
Market Data Newsletter
Monday, September 28
Global Free Speech

Journalist Syed Farhad Ali Shah detained without charge over Kashmir protest coverage

News RoomBy No Comments2 Mins Read5 Views
Journalist Syed Farhad Ali Shah detained without charge over Kashmir protest coverage

Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

New York, July 8, 2026—Authorities in Pakistan-administered Kashmir must immediately and unconditionally release journalist Syed Farhad Ali Shah, who was detained by police after covering demonstrations called ​by a recently banned alliance of civil society groups, the Committee to Protect Journalists said Wednesday.

Ali Shah, who reports for the social media-focused outlet Times of Kashmir, was taken into custody on June 20 in Bagh district under the Maintenance of Public Order Ordinance, a colonial-era law that allows detention without charge for up to six months, according to news reports and a family member, who spoke to CPJ on the condition of anonymity for fear of reprisal. Ali Shah was detained in Rawalakot after reporting on protests by the Joint Awami Action Committee (JAAC).

No first information report, which initiates a police investigation, has been filed against Ali Shah, nor has he appeared in court, the family member said.

“The detention of Syed Farhad Ali Shah under a broad and vaguely worded preventive detention law is an attempt to silence journalists covering matters of public interest,” said CPJ’s Afghanistan-Pakistan Representative Waliullah Rahmani. “Reporting on protests and political developments is not a crime, and detaining journalists without charge or due process sends a chilling message to the press ahead of regional elections in Kashmir.” 

The detention of Ali Shah is particularly concerning because, on June 5, authorities in Pakistan-administered Kashmir banned the JAAC under anti-terrorism laws, according to media reports.

Ahead of July 27 elections in the region, JAAC had called for protests against 12 legislative seats reserved for refugees who migrated to Pakistan from Indian-administered Kashmir decades ago. The issue sparked large-scale demonstrations, followed by a security crackdown that killed at least 15 people, led to arrests, and prompted government-imposed internet disruptions.

In May 2024, Ali Shah, who has more than 100,000 followers on X, was detained at his home in Islamabad and held for two weeks before appearing in court. He was released on bail about a month later. Before his detention, Ali Shah had reported critically on protests over rising prices in Pakistan-administered Kashmir.

Pakistan administrated-Kashmir’s Central Police Office in Chatter, Muzaffarabad, did not respond to CPJ’s emailed request for comment.

Read the full article here

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using AI-powered analysis and real-time sources.

Share.

The FSNN News Room is the voice of our in-house journalists, editors, and researchers. We deliver timely, unbiased reporting at the crossroads of finance, cryptocurrency, and global politics, providing clear, fact-driven analysis free from agendas.

Related Articles

Global Free Speech

The BBC clearly sees the value of television series That Mitchell and Webb Look. Marking the 20th anniversary of its original screening, the Beeb has re-released the series on iPlayer. But – and there is very often a “but” with these things – they’ve removed around 11 sketches from the BAFTA award-winning show. The official word is that these sketches don’t “work today”, which is polite speak for “they may cause offence”. The episodes singled out include scenes featuring a battle reenactment with characters in blackface, a contestant on a show wearing a burka and a lost tribe” in a garden centre. These sketches set out to challenge stereotypes, not to reinforce them; but 20 years on, this distinction seems to have been lost along the way. I’m a bit uncomfortable about this. I find it infantilising, to say the least. Can’t we trust audiences to make up their own minds, to switch off if they find the sketches in question unpalatable? Does the BBC think that we are just passive consumers, unable to disaggregate the mocking of racism from racism itself? These sketches set out to challenge stereotypes, not to reinforce them This act of censorship is distorting – of the shows, whose narratives and rhythms were built to include these sketches, and more broadly too. Conversations we were having 20 years ago have been erased, as if to suggest that they never happened. But they did! And with this erasure, the opportunity for thoughtful engagement and learning from our past is gone. “Let’s just pretend we were all lovely 20 years ago. It’s better that way” seems to be the message. Speaking as a minority myself, I find that knowing the nasty stuff that people said before – and indeed, still say today – is much more useful than pretending it never happened. This approach, I think, is also inconsistent. What it reveals is a cherry-picking (intended or not) of the groups that we can mock, and those that we can’t. Let’s face it, gender stereotypes are rarely deemed to have aged beyond the pale – if that were the case, we would have to wave goodbye to half the television made before the mid-2010s. Suppression like this sends a bad message to artists, namely that what they’re creating today may hold less value tomorrow. Or, even worse, that future audiences may deem them bigots – that Sword of Damocles hovering over the heads of any creative paying attention to the discourse of the moment. Suppression like this sends a bad message to artists The BBC’s decision reaffirms a broader trend. In 2020, Little Britain was removed from the iPlayer platform for similar reasons. It has since been reinstated – minus some sketches. Meanwhile, the UK’s arts space more broadly is seeing a retreat to the land of “safe”, as Index recently revealed in a year-long investigation into self-censorship in UK theatre. The BBC, it must be said, does remarkable stuff. The ongoing podcast investigation into the disappearance of US journalist Austin Tice is just one example. But this does not mean, however, that they don’t sometimes get it wrong. Chopping at That Mitchell and Webb Look is one example. Sure, the removal of the material isn’t the life-or-death story that Index often works on. Sure, Mitchell and Webb aren’t the faces of persecuted artists – they have huge platforms and agreed to the changes themselves. Still, one can’t help but think that the decision came from a place of conservatism, perhaps even fear. This is weak and dispiriting, indeed the very opposite of what enables creativity in the arts. We shouldn’t be encouraging this cultural timidity. Rather, we should harness culture and creativity as the starting points of a conversation about our here and now. That’s what the arts are for, after all. READ MORE

Add A Comment

Comments are closed.