Close Menu
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
  • Home
  • News
    • Politics
    • Legal & Courts
    • Tech & Big Tech
    • Campus & Education
    • Media & Culture
    • Global Free Speech
  • Opinions
    • Debates
  • Video/Live
  • Community
  • Freedom Index
  • About
    • Mission
    • Contact
    • Support
Trending

How to Limit What Apple’s New Siri AI Can Access in iOS 27

2 minutes ago

The ‘Strange Death’ of Libertarianism Is Greatly Exaggerated

4 minutes ago

Quiz Yourself: Can You Spot Voting Misinformation?

17 minutes ago
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Discord Telegram
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
Market Data Newsletter
Wednesday, September 23
  • Home
  • News
    • Politics
    • Legal & Courts
    • Tech & Big Tech
    • Campus & Education
    • Media & Culture
    • Global Free Speech
  • Opinions
    • Debates
  • Video/Live
  • Community
  • Freedom Index
  • About
    • Mission
    • Contact
    • Support
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
Home»News»Media & Culture»Brendan Carr Says Destroying Consumer Protection, Media Consolidation Rules, And Corporate Oversight Will Be Great For Everyone
Media & Culture

Brendan Carr Says Destroying Consumer Protection, Media Consolidation Rules, And Corporate Oversight Will Be Great For Everyone

News RoomBy News Room9 months agoNo Comments6 Mins Read2 Views
Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest Copy Link LinkedIn Tumblr Email VKontakte Telegram
Brendan Carr Says Destroying Consumer Protection, Media Consolidation Rules, And Corporate Oversight Will Be Great For Everyone
Share
Facebook Twitter Pinterest Email Copy Link

Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

Key Takeaways

Playback Speed

Select a Voice

from the this-is-why-we-can’t-have-nice-things dept

Trump FCC boss Brendan Carr was recently hauled before Congress to discuss his numerous, often illegal abuses of FCC authority. The hearing mostly fixated on Carr’s failed, clumsy attempt to censor a comedian, and clumsy lie that the FCC now serves exclusively at the whims of our mad, idiot king.

Which are certainly important things to discuss, given that Carr’s actions are extremist, illegal, and dangerous.

But what struck me reading the transcript is how little time was actually spent pressing Carr on the numerous other problematic behaviors he’s been engaged in, including Carr’s baseless attacks on public media, his dismantling of media consolidation rules, or his effort to destroy consumer protection.

These are things that will cause generational harm to markets, consumers, and the public interest. We’ve discussed at length about how Carr’s “leadership” has involved the complete decimation of corporate oversight as part of his cutesy-named “delete, delete, delete” agenda, which attempts to disguise regulatory capture and wholesale corruption as a government efficiency initiative.

These “reforms” have involved making life easier on robocallers and scammers, making it easier for prison telecom monopolies to rip off inmate families, making it easier for your local cable and phone monopolies to rip you off with bogus surcharges, making it easier for right-wing propaganda operations posing as local news (Sinclair) to dominate dying local media, making it harder to switch wireless phone carriers, and generally just doing whatever America’s biggest, shittiest companies tell him to, including doing significant harm to national security and telecom cybersecurity oversight.

When this stuff was fleetingly mentioned at the hearing, it was by the likes of men like Ted Cruz, who helped prop up the lazy idea that Carr’s just “clearing regulatory underbrush:”

“On day one of the new administration, the FCC, under Chairman Carr, hit the ground running and already has an impressive list of accomplishments to show. These include the Delete, Delete, Delete docket, which continues to clear out the regulatory underbrush.”

The stuff Carr is doing is the stuff consolidated industry lobbyists asked him to do. Virtually none of it is actually in the public interest. We’ve had corrupt revolving door FCC leaders many times before, but never to the level of Carr’s extremism. To her credit, a tiny portion of this stuff was brought up by Senator Maria Cantwell, but it was clearly a hearing afterthought with no serious follow up.

In his responses, Carr was repeated allowed to take a page from Elon Musk’s playbook and pretend that his dismantling of oversight of shitty broadband monopolies and large media conglomerates is an act of modernized efficiency:

“…the FCC is now pursuing the largest deregulatory effort in the agency’s history. To date, we’ve teed up for removal over 1000 rules or regulations and terminated a record 2000 inactive proceedings. Eliminating those costly regulations is part of our affordability work too. For instance, we shut down a Biden era plan that could have spiked the price of internet for millions of Americans living in apartments by up to 50%.”

That last bit? Where Carr claims to have lowered broadband costs for apartment dwellers? He’s actually referring to a Trump FCC action at the beginning of the year to kill rules preventing your landlord and your local ISP from colluding to strike predatory deals that block other competitors from doing business in your building, driving up broadband access costs. It was a complete lie, with no follow up.

Carr is, as we’ve well covered, a shameless opportunist and liar who’ll do whatever he’s told by industry or Donald Trump. If Donald Trump was a brony, you’d see Carr immediately prancing around in a velour zebra onesie. It’s not actually clear Carr believes in much of anything outside of a general disdain for corporate oversight and his post-FCC revolving door career opportunities, which likely involve being a telecom sector lobbyist so he can continue basically doing the same “work.”

Carr’s juggling two jobs at the moment; one involving keeping the party’s radical authoritarians happy with censorship and a frontal assault on what’s left of U.S. journalism and public media. But his primary job, the one he’s been groomed for by industry for decades, is in destroying whatever’s left of the FCC’s ability to rein in unchecked corporate power in all of its various forms.

In some ways, the more headline grabbing (and genuinely problematic) authoritarian censorship operates as cover for corruption. While the former role gets oodles of attention, the latter gets summarily downplayed if not outright ignored. There were no serious congressional follow up questions about Carr’s efforts to destroy functional consumer protection. It was generally congressional oversight kayfabe.

I was also struck by press coverage of Carr’s testimony. More specifically, how literally none of the press coverage could be bothered to mention any aspect of Carr’s brutal destruction of what’s left of U.S. consumer protection. Even in passing.

As a life long consumer protection reporter, it often feels like I’m Roddy Piper living in the 1988 film They Live, facing a broad, existential threat while the public and press (and even many policy folks) stumble around obliviously drinking cappuccino.

Again the harms here are generational. Whether it’s letting predatory telecom monopolies run amok and off the public, or it’s scaling back robocall protections because they might upset a “legit” telemarketer, Carr is doing generational, lasting damage to the public interest, and even in the rare instance we feign to hold him accountable before Congress, it’s treated as some kind of distant afterthought.

This has been generally true beyond the confines of the FCC as well. The Trump-loaded Supreme Court, 5th Circuit, and 6th Circuit in particular have put a generational bullet in the head of consumer protection, public safety, labor protection, and corporate oversight, making it largely impossible to hold corporate giants accountable for literally anything.

The implications and scope of this corruption are incalculable. Yet you’ll notice, across the vast majority of the consolidated corporate press (and even many policy circles), the decimation of consumer protection and corporate oversight is treated as a distant, boring, anecdotal tangent if not outright ignored completely.

Filed Under: brendan carr, broadband, corruption, cybersecurity, fcc, labor, oversight, public safety, regulatory capture, revolving door, robocallers

Read the full article here

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using AI-powered analysis and real-time sources.

Get Your Fact Check Report

Enter your email to receive detailed fact-checking analysis

5 free reports remaining

Continue with Full Access

You've used your 5 free reports. Sign up for unlimited access!

Already have an account? Sign in here

#DigitalCulture #DigitalMedia #DigitalTransformation #MediaNews #OnlineMedia #TechIndustry
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email Telegram Copy Link
News Room
  • Website
  • Facebook
  • X (Twitter)
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn

The FSNN News Room is the voice of our in-house journalists, editors, and researchers. We deliver timely, unbiased reporting at the crossroads of finance, cryptocurrency, and global politics, providing clear, fact-driven analysis free from agendas.

Related Articles

AI & Censorship

How to Limit What Apple’s New Siri AI Can Access in iOS 27

2 minutes ago
Media & Culture

The ‘Strange Death’ of Libertarianism Is Greatly Exaggerated

4 minutes ago
Debates

How Therapy Culture Made Us Fragile

24 minutes ago
Cryptocurrency & Free Speech Finance

CME Expands Crypto Futures Lineup With Bitcoin Cash and Uniswap

38 minutes ago
AI & Censorship

EFF Statement on California Governor’s Executive Order on AI

1 hour ago
Media & Culture

Trump Says Arch Must Be Built Because We Need Somewhere To Store Our Precious ‘Sniper Ammo’

1 hour ago
Add A Comment

Comments are closed.

Editors Picks

The ‘Strange Death’ of Libertarianism Is Greatly Exaggerated

4 minutes ago

Quiz Yourself: Can You Spot Voting Misinformation?

17 minutes ago

Journalists attacked while covering violent farmers’ protest in Romania

19 minutes ago

Republic Square, Belgrade (lmeao/WikiCommons) The Media Freedom Rapid Response (MFRR), press freedom and free expression partners express our firm support for our colleague Massimo Moratti, the Senior Research Affiliate for the Osservatorio Balcani Caucaso Transeuropa (OBCT), as he faces expulsion from Serbia in apparent connection with his human rights work. We urge Serbian authorities to immediately withdraw the expulsion order and allow our colleague to remain in the country with his family and continue his work. On 4 September, Serbian authorities denied Moratti’s request for temporary residence on grounds of “unacceptable security risks for the country”, ordering him to leave the country within 15 days and imposing an entry ban of one year. Serbian authorities did not provide any additional information regarding the grounds for the decision.  An Italian citizen, Moratti is an experienced human rights advocate who has spent more than 20 years in the region and has been living in Serbia continuously since 2022, when he moved to Belgrade following his partner’s assignment in the country.  Moratti has served as a correspondent for the OBCT media outlet in Sarajevo and later in Belgrade since 2005. From 2011 to 2018, he worked in Serbia on multiple EU projects assisting displaced persons and refugees, as well as potential asylum seekers, while later moving to London to serve as Deputy Director of Amnesty International’s European Regional Office. After relocating back to Belgrade with his family, he joined the MFRR team, playing a crucial role in shaping the consortium’s media freedom advocacy efforts in the Western Balkans. In late January, Moratti and his family submitted a request for temporary residence to Serbian authorities. In May his partner was granted temporary residence. In June, a formal meeting was scheduled with the Serbian State Security and Information Agency, which questioned him about his current and past professional activities in the country. On 3 September, his partner received a call from the police that notified that the following day Moratti was expected at the premises of the foreign citizens’ department, where he was eventually handed the expulsion order.  With the assistance of his lawyer, Moratti filed an appeal against the Office’s decision on 10 September, and subsequently requested an interim measure from the Administrative Court to suspend the enforcement proceedings, asking the Court to take into account the forced family separation that his expulsion would entail.  While there has been no specific explanation given for the justification of this decision by Serbian authorities, there are grounds to suspect that the removal order is connected to his different roles as a human rights and media freedom advocate, for his reporting for OBCT on the social and political tensions that have been rising in Serbia over the past few years, or for his work within the MFRR consortium.  In the last few years, the MFRR and OBCT have documented the deepening slide into what we and others have called a media freedom crisis in Serbia, including escalating physical violence against journalists and the attempt by Serbian authorities to censor or silence independent journalism and critical voices. In this context, the MFRR together with the Council of Europe’s Safety of Journalists Platform conducted its last visit in the country in March 2026, an advocacy mission which was joined by Moratti on behalf of OBCT, and published the mission’s final report in July 2026. This timeline overlaps with the administrative backlash of which Moratti has been the target.  Our organisations consider his permit of stay denial and the expulsion order that was subsequently issued to be a form of administrative harassment intended to intimidate him in retaliation for his work, and for supporting journalists in the country and the broader region. This permit rejection measure follows a worrying trend. Over the past two years, there have been multiple documented cases in which foreign civil society activists, journalists and human rights advocates in Serbia have had their residence permits refused, revoked, or were expelled and banned from re‑entry, or denied entry in the first instance, often on similarly vague “security risk” grounds. This trend has been documented in the European Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law Country chapter. The undersigned organisations stand firm in solidarity with our colleague and urge the Serbian authorities to immediately revoke the expulsion order targeting him and to refrain from further forms of administrative harassment, allowing Moratti to live with his family and continue his work in support of media freedom. As this is a crucial case involving a human rights advocate standing up for media freedom in the country amid a dramatic deterioration in press freedom, the undersigned MFRR partners and free expression organisations will closely monitor the proceedings. Signed: Osservatorio Balcani Caucaso Transeuropa (OBCT) European Federation of Journalists (EFJ) European Centre for Press and Media Freedom (ECPMF) Free Press Unlimited (FPU) ARTICLE 19 Europe International Press Institute (IPI) Index on Censorship Reporters Without Borders (RSF) Balkan Free Media Initiative (BFMI) International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) READ MORE

23 minutes ago
Latest Posts

How Therapy Culture Made Us Fragile

24 minutes ago

Crypto market structure can’t wait for shot at post-election Clarity Act surge: White House

35 minutes ago

Republican Senator Calls for Probe into US Presidents’ Sons, Citing Crypto Ventures

36 minutes ago

Subscribe to News

Get the latest news and updates directly to your inbox.

At FSNN – Free Speech News Network, we deliver unfiltered reporting and in-depth analysis on the stories that matter most. From breaking headlines to global perspectives, our mission is to keep you informed, empowered, and connected.

FSNN.net is owned and operated by GlobalBoost Media
, an independent media organization dedicated to advancing transparency, free expression, and factual journalism across the digital landscape.

Facebook X (Twitter) Discord Telegram
Latest News

How to Limit What Apple’s New Siri AI Can Access in iOS 27

2 minutes ago

The ‘Strange Death’ of Libertarianism Is Greatly Exaggerated

4 minutes ago

Quiz Yourself: Can You Spot Voting Misinformation?

17 minutes ago

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest news and updates directly to your inbox.

© 2026 GlobalBoost Media. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Our Authors
  • Contact

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

🍪

Cookies

We and our selected partners wish to use cookies to collect information about you for functional purposes and statistical marketing. You may not give us your consent for certain purposes by selecting an option and you can withdraw your consent at any time via the cookie icon.

Cookie Preferences

Manage Cookies

Cookies are small text that can be used by websites to make the user experience more efficient. The law states that we may store cookies on your device if they are strictly necessary for the operation of this site. For all other types of cookies, we need your permission. This site uses various types of cookies. Some cookies are placed by third party services that appear on our pages.

Your permission applies to the following domains:

  • https://fsnn.net
Necessary
Necessary cookies help make a website usable by enabling basic functions like page navigation and access to secure areas of the website. The website cannot function properly without these cookies.
Statistic
Statistic cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
Preferences
Preference cookies enable a website to remember information that changes the way the website behaves or looks, like your preferred language or the region that you are in.
Marketing
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.