Close Menu
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
  • Home
  • News
    • Politics
    • Legal & Courts
    • Tech & Big Tech
    • Campus & Education
    • Media & Culture
    • Global Free Speech
  • Opinions
    • Debates
  • Video/Live
  • Community
  • Freedom Index
  • About
    • Mission
    • Contact
    • Support
Trending

Review: When Banks Do the Government’s Bidding

2 minutes ago

New York sues Kalshi, will seek damages, alleging it offers gambling platform

22 minutes ago

Aave Proposal Targets 50 Reserves in Six-Market Wind-Down

24 minutes ago
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Discord Telegram
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
Market Data Newsletter
Friday, July 31
  • Home
  • News
    • Politics
    • Legal & Courts
    • Tech & Big Tech
    • Campus & Education
    • Media & Culture
    • Global Free Speech
  • Opinions
    • Debates
  • Video/Live
  • Community
  • Freedom Index
  • About
    • Mission
    • Contact
    • Support
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
Home»News»Media & Culture»Washington’s Millionaire Tax Is Economic Suicide
Media & Culture

Washington’s Millionaire Tax Is Economic Suicide

News RoomBy News Room5 months agoNo Comments5 Mins Read1,478 Views
Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest Copy Link LinkedIn Tumblr Email VKontakte Telegram
Washington’s Millionaire Tax Is Economic Suicide
Share
Facebook Twitter Pinterest Email Copy Link

Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

Key Takeaways

Playback Speed

Select a Voice

The state of Washington is contemplating passing a 9.9 percent tax on earned income over $1 million, which would remove it from the short list of states that do not have an income tax. Washington has enjoyed decades of spectacular economic growth and is home to some of the world’s largest tech companies (including Microsoft and Amazon) as a direct result of the absence of state income taxes. The new measure threatens to change all that.

The state constitution currently prohibits an income tax. It treats income as “property,” and the rules of taxation on property dictate that it must be applied evenly and capped at 1 percent (like traditional property taxes), unless voters approve it by supermajority at the ballot box. Washington passed a 7 percent tax on long-term capital gains above $250,000 in 2021, an action that was made possible by the strained legal argument that sales of securities constitute an excise on the exchange of capital assets. It’s worth noting that the capital gains tax was really a bill of attainder aimed at one person: Jeff Bezos, and the Amazon founder escaped the taxes by changing his residency to Florida before the tax went into effect. The new proposed income tax, Senate Bill 6346, will treat capital gains as income, subjecting them to both the capital gains tax and the income tax.

To get around the unconstitutionality of the tax, which was established in a state Supreme Court case in 1933 (Culliton v. Chase), the state Supreme Court will have to overturn that case or re-characterize the millionaires’ tax as an excise-based property tax. The latter was actually made more difficult with the passage of the capital gains tax, which was specifically based on transactions. The bill includes an “anti-referendum clause“ that states that the tax is “necessary for the support of the state government and its existing public institutions,” making the chance for repeal at the ballot box an uphill climb. It should also be pointed out that three state Supreme Court justices recently retired, allowing Democratic Gov. Bob Ferguson to significantly shape the court that will decide on the tax’s constitutionality.

In fairness to the bill’s architects, the tax is actually not a progressive tax, in the sense that there are brackets with successively higher tax rates. It is a flat tax that kicks in at $1 million of income. This tax is being framed as one that will only affect the rich, but without question, successive governments will introduce taxes at lower levels of income. The tax will facilitate a truly massive expansion of state government, as most new income taxes do, and will eventually touch virtually all Washington taxpayers, as all income taxes do. A 9.9 percent rate would be one of the highest in the country, below California and New York City, but comparable to New Jersey, Minnesota, and Hawaii. It will go from being a low-tax state to a punitively high-tax state overnight.

Georgia, Mississippi, Oklahoma, and Arkansas are all working toward reducing state income taxes with the goal of eliminating them entirely. Not coincidentally, these are Republican-dominated states. Rhode Island is in the process of raising income taxes, as are Virginia and, now, Washington. Not coincidentally, these are Democrat-dominated states. Red states are cutting taxes, and blue states are raising them. There is a saying in the financial world: Capital flows to where it is treated best. What we have seen since the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act in 2017 is a massive migration of people and capital to low-tax jurisdictions, after limitations were imposed on the deductibility of state and local income taxes. There is a reason why skyscrapers are going up in Nashville, Miami, and Austin. There is a reason why Florida, Texas, and much of the South have been on the receiving end of in-migration.

Another saying: There are no controlled experiments in finance. But there actually are: East and West Germany, North and South Korea, Chile and Argentina, and recently, Poland and the rest of Europe—low taxes, the rule of law, and property rights allow for economic growth and human flourishing. We have a controlled experiment playing out in real-time in the U.S. with the red and blue states. On a static basis, the blue states still have higher gross domestic product per capita, but the red states have higher growth rates and are catching up, while the blue states slowly lose their economic advantage. If New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani gets his way and raises marginal tax rates to 16.8 percent in the city, the capital flight will accelerate, and it’s possible that in 20 years, Miami will be the new financial center of the world.

As for Washington, the purpose of the millionaire tax is two-fold: as retributive justice, and a revenue grab. If it passes, it will succeed on both counts. Taxpayers with the means to relocate will, the tax will raise far less revenue than expected, and Washington will no longer be a sought-after destination for hungry entrepreneurs. It’s not easy watching states commit economic suicide, but that’s the benefit of America’s system of governance: The states are free to compete for people, money, and resources.

Read the full article here

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using AI-powered analysis and real-time sources.

Get Your Fact Check Report

Enter your email to receive detailed fact-checking analysis

5 free reports remaining

Continue with Full Access

You've used your 5 free reports. Sign up for unlimited access!

Already have an account? Sign in here

#MediaEthics #OpenDebate #PoliticalMedia #PoliticalNews #PressFreedom
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email Telegram Copy Link
News Room
  • Website
  • Facebook
  • X (Twitter)
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn

The FSNN News Room is the voice of our in-house journalists, editors, and researchers. We deliver timely, unbiased reporting at the crossroads of finance, cryptocurrency, and global politics, providing clear, fact-driven analysis free from agendas.

Related Articles

Media & Culture

Review: When Banks Do the Government’s Bidding

2 minutes ago
Cryptocurrency & Free Speech Finance

$38M in Bitcoin Drained by Coldcard Key Flaw Its Maker Thinks AI Found

26 minutes ago
Media & Culture

Some Tentative Thoughts on Substack

1 hour ago
Media & Culture

Brickbat: Apples and Oranges

2 hours ago
Media & Culture

Trump’s Boat Strikes Killed 221 People, but Didn’t Win the War on Drugs

3 hours ago
Media & Culture

Drones Over Egypt

4 hours ago
Add A Comment

Comments are closed.

Editors Picks

New York sues Kalshi, will seek damages, alleging it offers gambling platform

22 minutes ago

Aave Proposal Targets 50 Reserves in Six-Market Wind-Down

24 minutes ago

$38M in Bitcoin Drained by Coldcard Key Flaw Its Maker Thinks AI Found

26 minutes ago

Some Tentative Thoughts on Substack

1 hour ago
Latest Posts

Our report with the University of Essex The weaponisation of travel bans to Silence Speech and Dissent is published today. Photo: Curated Lifestyle/Unsplash+ When we think of state censorship, we often picture prison cells, violent police crackdowns or control of newsrooms. However, our report titled The weaponisation of travel bans to silence speech and dissent published today by Index on Censorship reveals a quieter, less visible tool of state repression that is devastating civil society across the world. We found that rather than protecting public safety, governments are increasingly manipulating “national security” or “public order” exemptions to trap journalists, fracture families and exile critics. Our research shows that these bans are highly adaptable tools that occur around politically sensitive events such as protests, elections and crackdowns on democratic activity. Their shared, devastating objective is to control narratives, block external scrutiny and create a chilling effect on free expression. As we researched this topic, we strongly felt that to understand the severity of this crisis, the spotlight must remain entirely on the impacted individuals. The victims of this widespread authoritarian trend pay with their lives and livelihoods being upended by arbitrary and undemocratic measures. Our analysis highlights that in authoritarian contexts, travel bans act as overt tools of absolute repression. In Saudi Arabia, they function as a form of “quasi-detention”, ensuring that prisoners of conscience remain silenced long after they are physically released from their cells. Take the example of Salma Al-Shehab, a doctoral student at Leeds University, who was imprisoned simply for tweeting in support of women’s rights. Upon her release, she was handed an eight-year travel ban, effectively destroying her academic career by barring her return to the United Kingdom. Similarly, in Algeria, our research shows how journalists like Mustapha Bendjama find themselves trapped in a bureaucratic nightmare. Extrajudicial travel bans, known as ISTNs, are routinely issued by security agencies without formal judicial oversight, leaving targets in a legal vacuum with no clear avenues for appeal. Bendjama shared with us that this forced isolation acts as a “mental imprisonment” that has dried up his sources and severely compromised his ability to conduct rigorous journalism. One of our most troubled findings was that the chilling effect of these restrictions extends well beyond authoritarian states, creeping into hybrid democracies. In India, administrative tools like “Look Out Circulars” are deployed to trap critical voices within the country’s borders. Sanna Irshad Mattoo, a Pulitzer Prize-winning photojournalist, was prevented from travelling to New York to accept her award, sending a clear message that international recognition offers no immunity from state retaliation. In Georgia, foreign journalists who report critically on the country’s democratic backsliding have been arbitrarily denied re-entry at the border using generic legislative clauses. French journalist Clément Giradot was refused entry after reporting on political demonstrations, a decision that suddenly separated him from his home, his Georgian wife and his young child without any concrete legal justification. It became clear to us that these are not isolated administrative errors. We believe they are part of a coordinated assault on international human rights. Whether it is Nicaragua arbitrarily revoking citizenship to render critics stateless, Belarus forcing exiled dissidents into jeopardy by refusing to renew passports abroad or the United States deploying visa revocations and social media screenings against lawfully present critics, the goal appears to be one: to enforce widespread self-censorship and fear. The international community can no longer treat these administrative traps as routine border control measures. We urgently recommend taking action. States must do away with these opaque directives, end the use of secondary travel bans as a form of collective punishment against families and align their domestic laws with international human rights standards. Furthermore, democratic host nations must step in to provide secure legal status and alternative travel documents for exiled dissidents while applying sustained diplomatic pressure to demand the lifting of these arbitrary restrictions globally. Respecting and protecting freedom of speech should not know any ideological boundaries or state borders. With this report, we express our solidarity with the brave ones who raised their voices and with many more who were silenced and never known. While researching and interviewing participants at the front lines of this injustice, we were reminded of the importance of academia’s role as both a sanctuary for freedom of expression and a service to society at large. window.option_df_140795 = {“outline”:[],”autoEnableOutline”:”false”,”autoEnableThumbnail”:”false”,”overwritePDFOutline”:”false”,”direction”:”1″,”pageSize”:”0″,”source”:”https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/travel-bans-report.pdf”,”wpOptions”:”true”}; if(window.DFLIP && window.DFLIP.parseBooks){window.DFLIP.parseBooks();}   READ MORE

1 hour ago

Quantum Solutions, Hyperscale Data tap crypto treasuries to fund AI data centers

1 hour ago

RWA Perpetual Futures Near Bitcoin Volume on Hyperliquid, Binance

1 hour ago

Subscribe to News

Get the latest news and updates directly to your inbox.

At FSNN – Free Speech News Network, we deliver unfiltered reporting and in-depth analysis on the stories that matter most. From breaking headlines to global perspectives, our mission is to keep you informed, empowered, and connected.

FSNN.net is owned and operated by GlobalBoost Media
, an independent media organization dedicated to advancing transparency, free expression, and factual journalism across the digital landscape.

Facebook X (Twitter) Discord Telegram
Latest News

Review: When Banks Do the Government’s Bidding

2 minutes ago

New York sues Kalshi, will seek damages, alleging it offers gambling platform

22 minutes ago

Aave Proposal Targets 50 Reserves in Six-Market Wind-Down

24 minutes ago

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest news and updates directly to your inbox.

© 2026 GlobalBoost Media. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Our Authors
  • Contact

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

🍪

Cookies

We and our selected partners wish to use cookies to collect information about you for functional purposes and statistical marketing. You may not give us your consent for certain purposes by selecting an option and you can withdraw your consent at any time via the cookie icon.

Cookie Preferences

Manage Cookies

Cookies are small text that can be used by websites to make the user experience more efficient. The law states that we may store cookies on your device if they are strictly necessary for the operation of this site. For all other types of cookies, we need your permission. This site uses various types of cookies. Some cookies are placed by third party services that appear on our pages.

Your permission applies to the following domains:

  • https://fsnn.net
Necessary
Necessary cookies help make a website usable by enabling basic functions like page navigation and access to secure areas of the website. The website cannot function properly without these cookies.
Statistic
Statistic cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
Preferences
Preference cookies enable a website to remember information that changes the way the website behaves or looks, like your preferred language or the region that you are in.
Marketing
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.