Close Menu
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
  • Home
  • News
    • Politics
    • Legal & Courts
    • Tech & Big Tech
    • Campus & Education
    • Media & Culture
    • Global Free Speech
  • Opinions
    • Debates
  • Video/Live
  • Community
  • Freedom Index
  • About
    • Mission
    • Contact
    • Support
Trending

The Next AI Success Story Might Be Nepal

20 minutes ago

Stalin’s Plot in New Book Review

36 minutes ago

Soft core inflation gave crypto a bounce, but only bitcoin held up on the week

39 minutes ago
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Discord Telegram
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
Market Data Newsletter
Thursday, June 11
  • Home
  • News
    • Politics
    • Legal & Courts
    • Tech & Big Tech
    • Campus & Education
    • Media & Culture
    • Global Free Speech
  • Opinions
    • Debates
  • Video/Live
  • Community
  • Freedom Index
  • About
    • Mission
    • Contact
    • Support
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
Home»News»Global Free Speech»Two journalists, two attacks, a fight for justice as Bolivia enters new era
Global Free Speech

Two journalists, two attacks, a fight for justice as Bolivia enters new era

News RoomBy News Room8 months agoNo Comments7 Mins Read1,932 Views
Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest Copy Link LinkedIn Tumblr Email VKontakte Telegram
Two journalists, two attacks, a fight for justice as Bolivia enters new era
Share
Facebook Twitter Pinterest Email Copy Link

Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

Key Takeaways

Playback Speed

Select a Voice

A barrage of bullets was waiting for ATB cameraman Percy Suárez and six other journalists when they arrived at the Las Londras ranch in Bolivia’s Guarayos province October 28, 2021, around 852 kilometers outside of the capital, La Paz. The journalists, flown in by a local farmer association, came to cover a land dispute at the center of a violent confrontation between landowners and rural movements when armed men ambushed their motorcade and took them hostage.

“Anyone who moved was kicked, beaten with rifle butts or threatened with being set on fire,” Suarez recounted of the incident to CPJ.

The men — identified as leaders of a pro-government rural movement known as the “interculturals” — smashed their phones, seized equipment, and directed the journalists to lie face down on a gravel road scorched by the sun. But Suárez — clinging to his camera, dented and pierced by a bullet — didn’t stop filming. Nearly four years later, the viral footage is the only evidence Suárez has in his hope to bring his attackers to justice in a long-stalled case.

Men identified as leaders of a pro-government rural movement known as the “interculturals” ambushed ATB cameraman Percy Suárez along with six other journalists as they arrived to Las Londras ranch in Bolivia’s Guarayos province. (Screenshot: Página Siete/ YouTube)

After two decades of Movimiento al Socialismo (MAS) governments marked by smear campaigns and public attacks against the press under former President Evo Morales and successor Luis Arce, Bolivia’s political landscape has entered a new chapter with Christian Democratic Party leader Rodrigo Paz clinching victory in the country’s October 19 runoff election, becoming the first leader outside MAS in 20 years.

As Paz inherits a country where impunity for attacks against journalists remains widespread — including his vice president’s attacks on the media — the incoming president’s has an opportunity to shift institutional reform and renew respect for democratic values. Yet during a June 2025 research mission to Bolivia, press advocates told CPJ there is cautious optimism and growing skepticism about whether Paz’s administration will truly change how power treats the press when it takes office November 8.

Newly elected Bolivian President Rodrigo Paz of the Christian Democratic Party (PDC) attends a press conference on October 20 following his victory in the country’s presidential runoff. (Photo: Reuters/Claudia Morales)

Caught in the crossfire

Journalist Percy Suárez’s attack was not an isolated incident. Land conflicts in eastern Bolivia have simmered for decades, fueled by agribusiness and shifting political alliances, with journalists often caught in the crossfire.

On May 3, 2025, Ángela Ninoska Mamani of Canal 35 Televisión Tunari was attacked while reporting outside the Cotapachi military barracks in Quillacollo, near Cochabamba, where residents had blocked a road to oppose plans to dump the city’s garbage on a land plot in their town.

By midday, a group of around 30 masked counter-protesters arrived and launched a violent attack against the protestors. They then went after the press.

Canal 35 Televisión Tunari’s Ángela Ninoska Mamani and her son, cameraman Dahan Joaquín Vedia, were attacked May 3, 2025 while reporting outside the Cotapachi military barracks in Quillacollo, near Cochabamba. (Photo: Dánae Vílchez)
Canal 35 Televisión Tunari’s Ángela Ninoska Mamani and her son, cameraman Dahan Joaquín Vedia, were attacked May 3, 2025 while reporting outside the Cotapachi military barracks in Quillacollo, near Cochabamba. (Photo: Dánae Vílchez)

“One man kicked me, another cut my leg with something sharp,” Mamani told CPJ. Her son and cameraman,Dahan Joaquín Vedia, was thrown to the ground and kicked repeatedly. “They kept shouting that we were liars, that we were against them,” Vedia added.

As her attackers closed in, Mamani recognized the group’s leader as district official Lucio Padilla and pleaded for him to help her as a journalist. Instead, Mamani said that Padilla ordered the attackers to strike harder. Neighbors who attempted to help her were beaten.

On May 4, 2025, Mamani filed a complaint against Padilla and reported that her attackers stole cameras, microphones, her wallet, and Vedia’s phone. Police then required her to attend a mediation session with Padilla in which he denied everything and later threatened to rape her if she did not drop the case, the journalist told CPJ.

“They wanted us to stop showing what was happening,” Mamani said, “but I cannot stay silent. If they silence us, they silence the community.”

Impunity as a rule

Although Suárez and Mamani’s attacks happened in different contexts, both reflect what journalist advocates say is an alarming pattern where violence against journalists goes unchecked and legal cases seeking justice stall until they are forgotten.

Suárez had video evidence and multiple testimonies; Mamani had multiple eyewitnesses. Still, justice has proven elusive for them both. Hearings were delayed, charges reduced, and Bolivian authorities often downplayed the incidents as isolated disputes — journalists, lawyers and press freedom groups told CPJ.

“We journalists do not want privileges. We demand that the law be enforced,” said Jorge Medina Monasterio, president of the Association of Journalists of Cochabamba. “If it were enforced, we could function as a minimally mature society.”

For journalists hoping the protection of the law would allow them to do their jobs, the pain is compounded by the silence that follows such attacks. 

“What hurts most is not the blows we received, but the abandonment afterward. Only some organizations still support us,” Suárez told CPJ.

Still fighting for justice

The prosecutor’s office has not set a date for Mamani’s trial after she rejected mediation and opted to move forward with the case. Although she believes the process may face delays, she remains determined to pursue justice.

“I was beaten, humiliated, and robbed, but I’m still standing,” she told CPJ.

Suárez and his colleagues were released after nearly seven hours at the ranch after a camera operator with another outlet escaped and gave news of the situation to local media. Bruised and shaken, Suárez was met by his wife, his son, and a colleague when he arrived back home in Santa Cruz, but no one from ATB.

“I felt abandoned by the station,” he said.

When Suárez’s footage was made public in a news report, it contradicted another report shared by pro-government news outlets in which the settlers were seen welcoming then-regional director of National Agrarian Reform Institute, Adalberto Rojas, and praising the government’s agrarian reform process.

Suárez’s footage contradicted a report shared by pro-government news outlets in which the settlers were seen welcoming then-regional director of National Agrarian Reform Institute, Adalberto Rojas. (Screenshot: Tele Pais Meridiano/YouTube)
Suárez’s footage contradicted a report shared by pro-government news outlets in which the settlers were seen welcoming then-regional director of National Agrarian Reform Institute, Adalberto Rojas. (Screenshot: Tele Pais Meridiano/YouTube)

Rojas denied any connections to the settlers and told media that they had no knowledge of violence at the ranch.

Suárez’s assault case has stalled after two suspects in his attack asked for the case to be managed in the Indigenous jurisdiction and were released under precautionary measures, according to a review of the judicial file made by CPJ. Three of Suárez’s attackers — Nicolás Ramírez Taboada, Martín Tejerina Villalobos, and Heber Sixto Canaza Sacaca — were declared fugitives.

Suárez’s lawyer, Raquel Guerrero, told CPJ that his case has repeatedly changed since it was filed in 2022, and at least two prosecutors and one investigator were reassigned.

“The goal is that there be a ruling, favorable or not, so that this case is not forgotten,” Suárez said, but authorities have blocked the process many times, according to Guerrero. After a July 9 hearing, she said now they are waiting for the Constitutional Court to decide whether Suárez’s two attackers will be tried in the main court or under Indigenous justice.

Journalist Percy Suárez’s assault case has stalled after two suspects in his attack asked for the case to be managed in the Indigenous jurisdiction and were released under precautionary measures. (Photo: Dánae Vílchez)
Journalist Percy Suárez’s assault case has stalled after two suspects in his attack asked for the case to be managed in the Indigenous jurisdiction and were released under precautionary measures. (Photo: Dánae Vílchez)

After the pause was announced, Suárez condemned the move in a July interview with the independent TV station RTP. 

 “I will not give up. I will keep pushing forward,” Suárez told CPJ. “The video that I have, the images give me the strength to continue, and I will stay firm in this fight.”

CPJ sent messages to the Intercultural Movement, the Ministry of Justice and Transparency, and the Supreme Court of Justice of Bolivia, but did not receive any response.

Read the full article here

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using AI-powered analysis and real-time sources.

Get Your Fact Check Report

Enter your email to receive detailed fact-checking analysis

5 free reports remaining

Continue with Full Access

You've used your 5 free reports. Sign up for unlimited access!

Already have an account? Sign in here

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email Telegram Copy Link
News Room
  • Website
  • Facebook
  • X (Twitter)
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn

The FSNN News Room is the voice of our in-house journalists, editors, and researchers. We deliver timely, unbiased reporting at the crossroads of finance, cryptocurrency, and global politics, providing clear, fact-driven analysis free from agendas.

Related Articles

Global Free Speech

Azerbaijani prosecutors seek up to 16 years in prison for defendants in Toplum TV case

13 hours ago
Global Free Speech

In Comoros, journalist arrested for report on jailed ex-president’s health

14 hours ago
Global Free Speech

Hungary’s Sziget festival is known as a safe place to express yourself freely. Photo: Sandor Csudai/www.facebook.com/csudaisandor This article first appeared in the Spring 2026 issue of Index on Censorship, The monster unleashed: How Hungary’s illiberal vision is seducing the Western world published on 2 April 2026. Crossing Budapest’s brutalist K-Bridge across the Danube to Óbuda Island on a grey spring day feels like the last journey of a condemned prisoner. The steel truss bridge was built as a temporary measure in 1955, a year before the uprising in which university students and ordinary citizens took to the streets to protest against the Stalinist government of Mátyás Rákosi. The single set of railway tracks suggests a one-way journey. It was built to give access to Budapest’s great Ganz Danubius shipyard. The shipyard was finally closed in 2000, after years of decline. These days, the bridge acts more like a rabbit hole from Orbán’s Hungary into Wonderland. Every summer, hundreds of thousands of people young and old cross to the leafy island to be entertained by music, theatre and dance, and to be challenged by debate, art and film – the joyous week-long celebration of free expression that is the Sziget Festival. Sziget was born from the ashes of Communism. In 1993, four years after the fall of the Iron Curtain, Károly Gerendai was just 22. Thin and sporting a shock of long hair like a Hungarian David Gilmour, Gerendai had become interested in the music industry whilst in high school. As a student, he earned money fly-posting and as a tour manager. Later, he managed bands and worked for record labels. That year, he was in charge of Sziámi, one of the best-known alt-rock bands in the Hungarian underground scene. On the tour bus after a concert, he fell into conversation with Péter Müller, the band’s frontman. “We talked about how, after the political transition, the big youth events had disappeared,” Gerendai told Index. “Before the political transition of 1989–90, there were state-organised youth events, but we quickly realised that they mainly served as a way for the state to control young people. Although we could meet and have fun together, we always felt the state’s watchful eye on us.” State control extended beyond the audience and on to the stage. “In the music industry, strong state selection was also in place: there were supported, tolerated, and banned bands, so not everyone was allowed to be heard.” This is where the seed of something new was born. Post Iron Curtain Co-founder Károly Gerendai. Photo: Sziget Festival “We thought it would be great to organise a multi-day event where young people could be together – something like a holiday combined with concerts, various cultural programmes, and community activities,” he said. Gerendai and Müller approached Gábor Demszky, mayor of Budapest at the time and first of the post-Communist era, for help. “He supported the concept but told us to organise it ourselves,” Gerendai told Index. “Even though we had no experience with anything like this, we boldly jumped into the organisation.” This make-it-up-as-you-go-along approach was typical in post-Soviet eastern Europe. The mayor suggested three possible venues for the festival, one of which was Óbuda Island. The island punctuates the Danube like a giant green exclamation mark between the city’s two halves, Buda and Pest. “Two iconic music events had previously been held there, both attracting huge interest,” said Gerendai. “One was the 1980 Black Sheep concert, a rare occasion when both tolerated and banned bands were allowed to perform. Then in 1991, it was one of the venues for the ‘Goodbye, Ivan!’ event celebrating the withdrawal of Soviet troops. I had worked on that event, which is how I got to know the subcontractors we later invited to help organise our festival.” Hungary’s youth were ready for a party. After only a few months’ preparation, the festival – initially called Diáksziget, Student Island in Hungarian – attracted 43,000 visitors over seven days. “We organised the first festival with the slogan ‘We need a week together’, referring to a carefree, shared community experience. Another slogan was ‘Everything is allowed, but nothing is mandatory’, which was meant to help us leave the past behind, celebrate freedom in every sense, and express that we never again wanted to live in a dictatorship,” said Gerendai. A wobbly start The line-up for the first festival was largely made up of Hungarian artists, such as alt-rock band Kispál és a Borz, punk band Tankcsapda, and singer János Bródy. In all, 200 bands performed on the festival’s two stages, alongside open-air movies and theatre productions. Yet, as was often the case after the fall of Communism, things didn’t work out as planned. Despite receiving sponsorship from Pepsi, the country’s Nagykanizsa brewery, and some support from the city of Budapest, the festival lost money. Lots of it. “It didn’t go smoothly,” admitted Gerendai. “We faced numerous problems during the process and made serious financial miscalculations.” By the end of the festival, it had run up a huge deficit, and only survived thanks to a bailout by the city council. But after this first turbulent year, Sziget not only survived but thrived. The following year saw the number of festivalgoers – or Szitizens as they are usually known – increase to 143,000. International acts like Jethro Tull, The Birds, and Jefferson Starship started to appear on the line-up. “Sziget outgrew Hungary’s borders early on, and we consciously developed the programme lineup, services, and visual identity so that we would be seen as a unique festival on the international scene as well,” said Gerendai. A beacon of light Chappell Roan on stage at Sziget. Photo: Sziget Festival By 2019, the festival was attracting more than half a million visitors to the Hungarian capital every year. The festival’s reputation was such that it was bringing in some of the world’s biggest music acts, including Arctic Monkeys, Kendrick Lamar, Kings of Leon, P!nk, Rihanna, Muse and David Guetta. Óbuda Island has remained the home of the festival. “It’s a great location: close to downtown Budapest, yet also a green, nature-filled area. It’s also symbolic – an island surrounded by a river, where once you cross the bridge, you can leave everyday problems behind,” Gerendai told Index. “It’s the origin of the nickname given by visitors: the Island of Freedom.” This nickname comes from the festival’s commitment to allowing artists and festival goers to speak their views – and was easy to pull off in a liberal city like Budapest keen to attract to hordes of young foreign tourists to boost the economy. In Gerendai’s opinion, freedom of expression was one of the major achievements of Hungary’s political transition in the 1990s. “I believe freedom of expression is a broader concept than simply who we agree or disagree with; it’s not fundamentally our role to judge other people’s views. At Sziget, we have always provided space for differences of opinion and we respect artistic freedom of expression on stage as well. At the same time, we do set limits: we do not allow hate-inciting or human-dignity violating expressions, and we also do not give space to extremist productions whose audiences could potentially endanger the safety of festival visitors.” As well as music, the festival is a thriving forum for circus, street theatre, film, visual arts and cabaret. At the heart of the festival is an area called Think for Tomorrow. The zone addresses pressing social issues that have an impact on the lives of young people, from their own perspective. “NGOs and organisations that play an important role in social and cultural life have also had their own dedicated space at Sziget since the early days,” said Gerendai. “These groups are worth introducing to the festival audience, and their work aligns with Sziget’s core values, such as sustainability, the protection of human rights, and acceptance.” Stepping back Magic Mirror at Sziget. Photo: Kristóf Hölvényi /Rockstar Photographers www.instagram.com/kristofholvenyi/ Eight years ago, after running 25 Sziget festivals, Gerendai decided to step back and sell his interest in the festival to promoter Superstruct, owned by American private equity company KKR. “I decided to pass the baton and from then on followed the festival only as a guest,” he said. During his time at its helm, the values of the Sziget festival had grown increasingly at odds with those of Viktor Orbán’s Fidesz government. There is a huge LGBTQ+ presence at Sziget, both in visitors and artists, with the Magic Mirror venue on the site hosting themed content exploring the LGBTQ+ experience. After the Orbán government introduced anti-LGBTQ+ legislation in 2021, the festival’s new organisers came under pressure over its stance, and there were calls for them to ban under-18s from Magic Mirror. The organisers refused. Sziget’s audience has made itself heard on [former Hungarian prime minister] Orbán over the past few years. At the 2023 festival, during Hungarian rapper Krúbi’s performance the audience started chanting Mocskos Fidesz (Filthy Fidesz). This chant has since become popular common at the festival and at other music events. The Kneecap ban Friction between the festival and Orbán burst into the open in 2025 after Irish rappers Kneecap, who were due to perform at the festival that summer, were banned from the country for being a national security threat. Kneecap are outspoken critics of right-wing political ideology and are particularly scathing about the Israel-Gaza War. Kneecap (along with Bob Vylan) had performed inflammatory sets at Glastonbury the month before and Orbán, for his part, has been strengthening his strategic alliance with Israel, going so far as to declare that “Jewish communities are safer in Budapest than anywhere else in Europe”. Orbán told state broadcaster Kossuth Radio that he was angry that the band had been invited to play at Sziget. He claimed that the organisers’ decision was motivated by financial gain. “Is this damn money really that important?” Orbán asked the radio presenter. Even though they were unable to perform, Kneecap shared a message with festivalgoers gathering at the stage on which they were due to perform. The message read: “We wish we could be there with you at one of the best festivals in the world and the first European festival Kneecap ever played,” the message read. “We can’t because of one hate filled man. Viktor Orbán.” When this part of the message was displayed, a huge crowd who had been told on social media to expect something from the band started booing and chanting “Fuck Orbán”. The message continued: “We have been convicted of zero crimes in any country ever. But we will call out oppression. For calling out Israel’s genocidal campaign Viktor has banned us from your beautiful country for three years. Israel is committing a genocide against the Palestinian people. Viktor Orbán and his government support it. Viktor Orbán and his government tried to shut down Pride in Budapest. They failed. We must stand together. Oppose Orbán. Oppose Israel. Oppose genocide.” The festival’s robust stance in favour of LGBTQ+ rights has won it the European Festival Awards Take a Stand prize twice, in 2023 and 2026 (for 2025). The award recognises festivals that stand up for peaceful dialogue, humanism, tolerance, and mutual understanding – activities that do not necessarily chime with the profit imperative. Stepping forward again It is true, though, that since the Covid pandemic money has been a big problem for the Sziget festival. Like many other European music festivals, Sziget had struggled thanks to two years of cancellations, the spiralling cost of living, and sharply rising artist fees. The festival lost $5.6 million in 2023, and almost $12 million in 2024. In 2025, the company running the festival (without Gerendai) sent a letter to Budapest mayor Gergely Karácsony calling for the agreement between the festival and the city, as the island’s landowner, to be terminated. The festival seemed to be doomed. But the return of a familiar figure saved it at the last minute – its co-founder, Gerendai. “The new owner decided that they no longer wished to finance the festival, which had found itself in a difficult situation in the post-pandemic years due to economic conditions and, in my view, certain conceptual decisions as well,” said Gerendai. “They offered that if I took Sziget back, we could continue organising it under my leadership. So it was either I return – or there would be no Sziget.” “It caused me several sleepless nights, since in the meantime I had been working on completely different things,” Gerendai told Index. “But in the end, I felt that a festival that has become a cultural institution in Hungary and is also significant on the international scene simply cannot end abruptly. Besides, this is my child – I couldn’t abandon it.” Superstruct has come under huge pressure from activists and artists since its acquisition by KKR in June 2024. KKR has significant investments in Israeli companies, including some operating in the West Bank. In May 2025, a number of artists pulled out of the UK’s Field Day festival because of its Superstruct ownership. The transfer of the licence from Superstruct back to Gerendai almost didn’t happen. Budapest City Council initially blocked the transfer, with councillors from Fidesz and Péter Magyar’s opposition Tisza party abstaining from the vote. However, Hungary’s Index newspaper reports that Magyar, reacting to negative sentiment from potential voters over the news that Sziget might fold, quickly arranged a meeting with Gerendai. On 30 October, Magyar posted a picture of himself and Gerendai on Facebook, announcing that the pair would meet again at the 2026 festival after agreeing on two amendments to the proposals: first, that the costs of using the island would be paid back to the city by 2030 rather than 2035, and second, that all Hungarians under the age of 25 would get discounted tickets to the festival – a potential vote-winner among this demographic. Gerendai himself won’t be drawn on his politics. The 2026 Sziget festival is now set to go ahead from 11 to 15 August 2026, featuring Florence + The Machine, Lewis Capaldi, Sombr, Twenty One Pilots, Biffy Clyro and Underworld as well as hundreds of others including Hungarian rapper Sisi on the line-up. Gerendai said, “Many large music festivals operate primarily as business ventures focused on who is performing. In recent years, Sziget had also started to move in this direction, but I believe a festival should stand for more than that. Cultural diversity must be emphasised, as well as a commitment to core values. Reaffirming this ambition can be the key to long-term success – and this is what we aim for in the future.” The future for music festivals remains uncertain but, for now, the legendary island of freedom looks safe back in Gerendai’s hands. READ MORE

17 hours ago
Global Free Speech

CPJ welcomes conviction of 2 men for attack on Iran International journalist in London

2 days ago
Global Free Speech

CPJ welcomes Polish prosecutors’ renewed commitment to Ziętara murder case

2 days ago
Global Free Speech

Journalist, press freedom advocate Cristian Herrera Nariño killed in northern Colombia

2 days ago
Add A Comment

Comments are closed.

Editors Picks

Stalin’s Plot in New Book Review

36 minutes ago

Soft core inflation gave crypto a bounce, but only bitcoin held up on the week

39 minutes ago

US Inflation Hits 3-Year High, Pressuring Bitcoin and Gold

44 minutes ago

Myriad Taps Chainlink to Power FIFA World Cup Prediction Markets

48 minutes ago
Latest Posts

Should ICE Deport All Illegal Aliens?

1 hour ago

Ripple-linked token above $1.10 as ETF inflows rise

2 hours ago

Crypto ATM Bans Advance in Delaware, New Jersey

2 hours ago

Subscribe to News

Get the latest news and updates directly to your inbox.

At FSNN – Free Speech News Network, we deliver unfiltered reporting and in-depth analysis on the stories that matter most. From breaking headlines to global perspectives, our mission is to keep you informed, empowered, and connected.

FSNN.net is owned and operated by GlobalBoost Media
, an independent media organization dedicated to advancing transparency, free expression, and factual journalism across the digital landscape.

Facebook X (Twitter) Discord Telegram
Latest News

The Next AI Success Story Might Be Nepal

20 minutes ago

Stalin’s Plot in New Book Review

36 minutes ago

Soft core inflation gave crypto a bounce, but only bitcoin held up on the week

39 minutes ago

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest news and updates directly to your inbox.

© 2026 GlobalBoost Media. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Our Authors
  • Contact

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

🍪

Cookies

We and our selected partners wish to use cookies to collect information about you for functional purposes and statistical marketing. You may not give us your consent for certain purposes by selecting an option and you can withdraw your consent at any time via the cookie icon.

Cookie Preferences

Manage Cookies

Cookies are small text that can be used by websites to make the user experience more efficient. The law states that we may store cookies on your device if they are strictly necessary for the operation of this site. For all other types of cookies, we need your permission. This site uses various types of cookies. Some cookies are placed by third party services that appear on our pages.

Your permission applies to the following domains:

  • https://fsnn.net
Necessary
Necessary cookies help make a website usable by enabling basic functions like page navigation and access to secure areas of the website. The website cannot function properly without these cookies.
Statistic
Statistic cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
Preferences
Preference cookies enable a website to remember information that changes the way the website behaves or looks, like your preferred language or the region that you are in.
Marketing
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.