Close Menu
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
  • Home
  • News
    • Politics
    • Legal & Courts
    • Tech & Big Tech
    • Campus & Education
    • Media & Culture
    • Global Free Speech
  • Opinions
    • Debates
  • Video/Live
  • Community
  • Freedom Index
  • About
    • Mission
    • Contact
    • Support
Trending

EBay rejects GameStop’s $56 billion bid as bitcoin exposure back in focus

14 minutes ago

Istanbul Blockchain Week returns in June 2026 amid surging crypto adoption in Türkiye

30 minutes ago

North Korean Crypto Hackers Stole $2.1B in 2025, 60% of All Losses: CertiK

32 minutes ago
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Discord Telegram
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
Market Data Newsletter
Tuesday, May 12
  • Home
  • News
    • Politics
    • Legal & Courts
    • Tech & Big Tech
    • Campus & Education
    • Media & Culture
    • Global Free Speech
  • Opinions
    • Debates
  • Video/Live
  • Community
  • Freedom Index
  • About
    • Mission
    • Contact
    • Support
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
Home»News»Media & Culture»Trump’s Bumblefuck DOJ Continues Revenge Tour With Semi-Botched Indictment Of James Comey
Media & Culture

Trump’s Bumblefuck DOJ Continues Revenge Tour With Semi-Botched Indictment Of James Comey

News RoomBy News Room7 months agoNo Comments8 Mins Read1,150 Views
Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest Copy Link LinkedIn Tumblr Email VKontakte Telegram
Trump’s Bumblefuck DOJ Continues Revenge Tour With Semi-Botched Indictment Of James Comey
Share
Facebook Twitter Pinterest Email Copy Link

Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

Key Takeaways

Playback Speed

Select a Voice

from the underqualified-and-overpowered dept

Pretty much everyone who was willing to put justice ahead of Trump is long gone from the DOJ, either having been fired or resigning ahead of an expected firing. Trump has stocked the DOJ with incredibly under-qualified loyalists, overseen by the under-qualified loyalist holding the top spot in the Department, AG Pam Bondi.

Bondi has been told to do only what Trump wants her to do, which basically means turning the Department of Justice into the personification of Trump’s politically motivated vengeance. Bondi, like pretty much every Cabinet official, was informed of this via a Truth Social post — one that first looked like it should have been a direct message rather than a blast on main.

Whatever the means, the ends are the same: Trump’s punishment of anyone Democratic/disloyal enough to have earned the always-angry manchild’s ire. Bondi’s DOJ has earned plenty of ire from Trump with its inability to convince grand juries to convict anti-ICE protesters. This time, Trump is going after people who somehow allegedly prevented him from claiming the Oval Office in 2020, despite (in this case) the person in question last holding office in early 2017.

That means it’s James Comey being charged with federal crimes by Trump’s DOJ, more than eight years after the fact. According to the fully compromised DOJ, Comey violated the law by lying to the Senate during testimony given in 2020. The three-count indictment was presented to a grand jury by newly appointed US District Attorney Lindsey Halligan, an insurance lawyer who’s best known for litigating on behalf of Donald Trump in several cases and who apparently has no conflict of interest when representing the United States in Trump’s revenge prosecution of the former FBI director who was fired by Trump after he refused to pledge sole allegiance to the semi-successful property owner now infesting the White House.

Here’s the indictment that was signed by the grand jury, which only forwarded one of the charges for prosecution. The indictment [PDF], signed by DA Halligan, contains three counts and her signature. It also, for reasons Halligan certainly can’t explain, claims two different charges are “Count Two.” (The first is a different form of lying to Congress. The second “Count Two” is an obstruction charge.) Considering the document runs three pages and likely contains fewer than 300 words, it’s inexplicable how this double-heading managed to avoid being corrected before being handed to a grand jury, much less a judge.

But that’s only the beginning of the bad news for Trump’s hand-picked, fully compromised, mostly incompetent US DA for the Eastern District of Virginia. Here’s how the charging presentation hearing went for DA Halligan, as reported by CBS News:

“So this has never happened before. I’ve been handed two documents that are in the Mr. Comey case that are inconsistent with one another,” [Judge Lindsey] Vaala said to Halligan. “There seems to be a discrepancy. They’re both signed by the (grand jury) foreperson.” 

And she noted that one document did not clearly indicate what the grand jury had decided.

“The one that says it’s a failure to concur in an indictment, it doesn’t say with respect to one count,” Vaala said. “It looks like they failed to concur across all three counts, so I’m a little confused as to why I was handed two things with the same case number that are inconsistent.”

Halligan initially responded that she hadn’t seen that version of the indictment.

“So I only reviewed the one with the two counts that our office redrafted when we found out about the two — two counts that were true billed, and I signed that one. I did not see the other one. I don’t know where that came from,” Halligan told the judge.

Yeah, not a great way to make your debut, especially when Trump is heavily breathing down your neck while splashing his revenge fantasies across Truth Social every few hours. If you’re wondering about the bold print, well… that’s not the end of the embarrassment for the new DA. And it’s apparently just the beginning of her inability to lie effectively enough to avoid being unceremoniously shit-canned when this abomination gets laughed out of court once it goes to trial:

Vaala responded, “You didn’t see it?” And Halligan again told her, “I did not see that one.”

Vaala seemed surprised: “So your office didn’t prepare the indictment that they —”

Halligan then replied, “No, no, no — I — no, I prepared three counts. I only signed the one — the two-count (indictment). I don’t know which one with three counts you have in your hands.”

“Okay. It has your signature on it,” Vaala told Halligan, who responded, “Okay. Well.”

“Okay. Well.” Touché… I guess? Halligan fits right in with the Trump administration. It moves fast and breaks things — not because it’s trying to innovate, but because it’s big, brutish, and dangerously stupid. Halligan took a promotion and a case without being qualified to do either thing and showed her entire ass on her first day in federal court as a prosecutor.

The DOJ’s statement is a bit more legible and cleanly edited, but it says almost nothing while using fewer words:

The indictment alleges that Comey obstructed a congressional investigation into the disclosure of sensitive information in violation of 18 USC 1505.

The indictment also alleges that Comey made a false statement in violation of 18 USC 1001. Comey stated that he did not authorize someone at the FBI to be an anonymous source. According to the indictment that statement was false.

This is followed by some dumb stuff about no one being above the law (LOL) from AG Pam Bondi and long, rambling statement from Kash Patel about how federal law enforcement has been “weaponized” to engage in political attacks in the past and that it will definitely not be happening under his watch (however long that lasts with Captain Moody helming the USS United States of America) even as it definitely is happening under what could graciously be referred to as his “watch.”

Meanwhile, the Gray Lady is doing whatever it can to make someone dangerously unqualified to be a regular US District Attorney (much less one completely obliged to be the attack surface for politically motivated prosecutions) feel better about being absolutely as bad at her new job as any reasonable person would expect her to be, given her dearth of relevant experience:

The first few days in any new job are always hard, but Thursday was especially tough for Lindsey Halligan, the newly installed U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia.

She had to navigate an unfamiliar courthouse, make her first-ever appearance in a criminal case and, on top of all that, indict one of President Trump’s enemies.

Don’t do this. Don’t humanize people who have done nothing but dehumanize a vast majority of the US population, starting with immigrants and continuing on through [checks list] women, anyone who isn’t a member of the GOP, public employees, LGBTQ+ people, non-whites, journalists, judges who rule against the administration, medical professionals, scientists, protesters, former political allies, entire states and their entire governments, victims of natural disasters, college students, teachers… the list gets longer the longer Trump remains in power.

This is what being willing to appease Trump’s desires gets you: a sympathetic pat on the head from a press outfit that should have led off with this, rather than the “you did your best” lead-in it chose to use:

Ms. Halligan, who took over on Monday after her predecessor quit rather than prosecute James B. Comey with what he believed was insufficient evidence, had a little trouble with the first two tasks. At one point, she entered the wrong courtroom. When she found the right one, she stood on the wrong side of the judge, then appeared confused about the paperwork she just had signed.

This is the lede. The stuff above it is unearned empathy. This person would probably be thrilled if the New York Times suddenly ceased to exist, despite it having plenty of experience in its field. A rookie elevated solely for their perceived loyalty should be made to feel every bit of the shame accepting an unearned position should generate. And when you suck during your debut, you should be reminded incessantly that you’re not here because you’re good at your job. You’re here because the president knows you’ll never push back against his demands. You should be made to feel that failure and that willingness to choose sycophancy over any sense of professionalism or personal pride.

I don’t think this prosecution will go anywhere. There’s no one competent enough left in the DOJ to guide this manufactured case against Comey to completion. We’ll at least get to enjoy another round of firings and resignations, which will no doubt be accompanied by randomly capitalized rage on Truth Social. But even if this falls apart, the DOJ has made it clear it’s here to engage in political prosecutions, rather than serve the nation and the ideals of justice. It’s now just another part of the Trump legal team, which will certainly make Lindsey Halligan feel more welcome, but will never turn any of the DOJ’s fully compromised prosecutors into anything more than the rudimentary tools they’ve chosen to be.

Filed Under: doj, donald trump, james comey, lindsey halligan, pam bondi, trump administration

Read the full article here

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using AI-powered analysis and real-time sources.

Get Your Fact Check Report

Enter your email to receive detailed fact-checking analysis

5 free reports remaining

Continue with Full Access

You've used your 5 free reports. Sign up for unlimited access!

Already have an account? Sign in here

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email Telegram Copy Link
News Room
  • Website
  • Facebook
  • X (Twitter)
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn

The FSNN News Room is the voice of our in-house journalists, editors, and researchers. We deliver timely, unbiased reporting at the crossroads of finance, cryptocurrency, and global politics, providing clear, fact-driven analysis free from agendas.

Related Articles

Cryptocurrency & Free Speech Finance

North Korean Crypto Hackers Stole $2.1B in 2025, 60% of All Losses: CertiK

32 minutes ago
Media & Culture

ABC Shows A Backbone In FCC Fight, Shows FCC Manufactured A Controversy Surrounding James Talarico

48 minutes ago
Media & Culture

Lawsuit Against UW Social Work School Over Retaliation for Allegedly Anti-Trans Essay Can Go Forward

48 minutes ago
Cryptocurrency & Free Speech Finance

Morning Minute: Circle Stock Soars After Q1 Beat, $222M Arc Raise

2 hours ago
Media & Culture

Today in Supreme Court History: May 12, 1790

2 hours ago
Cryptocurrency & Free Speech Finance

Is This Bitcoin Bear Market Different? Analysts Weigh In

3 hours ago
Add A Comment

Comments are closed.

Editors Picks

Istanbul Blockchain Week returns in June 2026 amid surging crypto adoption in Türkiye

30 minutes ago

North Korean Crypto Hackers Stole $2.1B in 2025, 60% of All Losses: CertiK

32 minutes ago

ABC Shows A Backbone In FCC Fight, Shows FCC Manufactured A Controversy Surrounding James Talarico

48 minutes ago

Lawsuit Against UW Social Work School Over Retaliation for Allegedly Anti-Trans Essay Can Go Forward

48 minutes ago
Latest Posts

Sarah Wynn-Williams delivers her acceptance speech at the British Book Awards 2026 Index on Censorship last night honoured two women at the British Book Awards in London who showed bravery in standing up to rich and powerful people. Both authors refused to be silenced despite legal threats and went on to write international bestsellers. The first was Virginia Giuffre’s book Nobody’s Girl: A Memoir of Surviving Abuse and Fighting for Justice and the second Sarah Wynn-Williams’ Careless People: A Cautionary Tale of Power, Greed and Lost Idealism. Co-presenting the award with Index was Yulia Navalnya, the activist, publisher and wife of the late Alexei Navalny. The Freedom to Publish Award has been supported by Index for the last four years. CEO Jemimah Steinfeld not only praised both women but also the tenacious publishers Transworld and Pan Macmillan. She said: “This year’s freedom to publish award will honour two different books and authors. These books are not the same story. They are not the same abuses. What happened to them is not morally comparable,” she said, adding: “But both books experienced a series of legal hurdles before they were published. Both authors were silenced, repeatedly. Both authors continued still to speak up because they believed their stories were of public interest. And both authors were fortunate to find tenacious publishers who refused to back down.” Yulia Navalnya said: “History knows one thing: a forbidden word does not disappear. It always returns.” Giuffre began work on her book, a testimony of her abuse at the hands of Jeffrey Epstein, his partner Ghislaine Maxwell and others, with journalist Amy Wallace in 2020 and it was published posthumously, following her death in April 2025. Legal teams in the US and UK worked extremely hard to build a defence for publication that would stand up in court. Go ahead was only given six weeks before publication. Giuffre’s editor and publisher at Transworld, Susanna Wadeson, said: “Virginia’s book puts their victims back at the centre of our concerns. It was essential that we find a way to publish it and give her a platform – perhaps even more so after she had died.” The publication of Wynn-Williams’ book was equally challenging. An account of her time at Facebook, the book makes allegations about the company’s internal culture and practices. Meta dispute the claims. They secured a ruling on the eve of publication to stop her from publicising the book. She runs the risk of a US$50,000 fine if she does so, a figure that apparently represents damages Wynn-Williams has to pay for breaching the separation agreement she signed with Meta in 2017. Joanna Prior OBE, CEO, Pan Macmillan, said: “Sarah Wynn William’s courage is extraordinary and Pan Macmillan is proud to stand with her and ensure her voice is heard. We believe the book remains the ultimate authenticated record – a vital weapon against those who use power and money to silence inconvenient stories. Careless People speaks for everyone who cares about the safety of our children and the transparency of the global platforms that shape our lives. No individual should be silenced by corporate tactics, especially when the public interest is this high.” The Freedom to Publish award serves a double purpose – to highlight censorious practices impacting the book industry and to celebrate those who fight back. Arabella Pike, a publishing director at HarperCollins UK, was the inaugural winner of the prize in 2022 for her work defending Catherine Belton’s book Putin’s People and Tom Burgis’s Kleptopia from SLAPP libel actions. Since then, it has been awarded to Salman Rushdie following his brutal attack, Margaret Atwood whose books are constantly the subject of book challenges in the USA, and Boris Akunin, Russia’s bestseller writer who was labelled a “terrorist” by Vladimir Putin, which led to his books being pulled from distribution across Russia. Philip Jones, editor of The Bookseller and chair of The British Book Awards, said of last night’s winners: “The Freedom to Publish Award acts as our response to those who would silence the truth, and this year recognises the bravest of people, Virginia Roberts Giuffre and Sarah Wynn-Williams. READ MORE

57 minutes ago

CleanSpark stock slides 9% as quarterly earnings miss estimates on bitcoin holdings loss

1 hour ago

Wells Fargo Boosts Strategy Stake in Q1 2026

2 hours ago

Subscribe to News

Get the latest news and updates directly to your inbox.

At FSNN – Free Speech News Network, we deliver unfiltered reporting and in-depth analysis on the stories that matter most. From breaking headlines to global perspectives, our mission is to keep you informed, empowered, and connected.

FSNN.net is owned and operated by GlobalBoost Media
, an independent media organization dedicated to advancing transparency, free expression, and factual journalism across the digital landscape.

Facebook X (Twitter) Discord Telegram
Latest News

EBay rejects GameStop’s $56 billion bid as bitcoin exposure back in focus

14 minutes ago

Istanbul Blockchain Week returns in June 2026 amid surging crypto adoption in Türkiye

30 minutes ago

North Korean Crypto Hackers Stole $2.1B in 2025, 60% of All Losses: CertiK

32 minutes ago

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest news and updates directly to your inbox.

© 2026 GlobalBoost Media. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Our Authors
  • Contact

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

🍪

Cookies

We and our selected partners wish to use cookies to collect information about you for functional purposes and statistical marketing. You may not give us your consent for certain purposes by selecting an option and you can withdraw your consent at any time via the cookie icon.

Cookie Preferences

Manage Cookies

Cookies are small text that can be used by websites to make the user experience more efficient. The law states that we may store cookies on your device if they are strictly necessary for the operation of this site. For all other types of cookies, we need your permission. This site uses various types of cookies. Some cookies are placed by third party services that appear on our pages.

Your permission applies to the following domains:

  • https://fsnn.net
Necessary
Necessary cookies help make a website usable by enabling basic functions like page navigation and access to secure areas of the website. The website cannot function properly without these cookies.
Statistic
Statistic cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
Preferences
Preference cookies enable a website to remember information that changes the way the website behaves or looks, like your preferred language or the region that you are in.
Marketing
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.