Close Menu
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
  • Home
  • News
    • Politics
    • Legal & Courts
    • Tech & Big Tech
    • Campus & Education
    • Media & Culture
    • Global Free Speech
  • Opinions
    • Debates
  • Video/Live
  • Community
  • Freedom Index
  • About
    • Mission
    • Contact
    • Support
Trending

Tether downplays impact of US seizure at banking partner EQIBank

22 minutes ago

Strategy Proposes Daily Dividends for STRC, Preferred Stocks

25 minutes ago

Magic Eden Warns Old Ethereum NFT Listings Are Exposed to Payment Processor Exploit

28 minutes ago
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Discord Telegram
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
Market Data Newsletter
Friday, September 25
  • Home
  • News
    • Politics
    • Legal & Courts
    • Tech & Big Tech
    • Campus & Education
    • Media & Culture
    • Global Free Speech
  • Opinions
    • Debates
  • Video/Live
  • Community
  • Freedom Index
  • About
    • Mission
    • Contact
    • Support
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
Home»News»Media & Culture»The Toxicology Report on 2 Dead Students Isn’t Back. But the Kratom Panic Is Already Here.
Media & Culture

The Toxicology Report on 2 Dead Students Isn’t Back. But the Kratom Panic Is Already Here.

News RoomBy News Room59 minutes agoNo Comments4 Mins Read1 Views
Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest Copy Link LinkedIn Tumblr Email VKontakte Telegram
The Toxicology Report on 2 Dead Students Isn’t Back. But the Kratom Panic Is Already Here.
Share
Facebook Twitter Pinterest Email Copy Link

Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

Key Takeaways

Playback Speed

Select a Voice

Two University of Mississippi students are dead, and investigators found packages of kratom at both scenes. Toxicology results are still pending, and authorities have not determined whether kratom contributed to either death. That hasn’t stopped news outlets from blaming the deaths on “kratom overdoses.”

A September 23 headline from KGW8 in Portland, Oregon, read “2 Ole Miss students found dead in suspected kratom overdose.” The same day, WKYT in Lexington, Kentucky, published a story headlined “Kratom concerns after deaths of Ole Miss students.” ABC News was a bit more careful, stating, “Police investigating 2 Ole Miss students’ deaths after kratom found,” and “School officials urged students not to speculate as the probe continues.” We don’t yet know what killed these two young men. But the rush to blame kratom illustrates how anecdotes can harden into drug policy before the evidence arrives.

The two students, now identified as Aidan Hamilton, 18, and Robert Strang, 20, were found dead Monday in separate locations, one on campus and one off campus.

Lafayette County Metro Narcotics explicitly stated that it has “no confirmed information” that kratom was a contributing factor in either death. The county coroner said toxicology studies can take up to two weeks to complete.

Reporters repeatedly emphasize that these products are sold at—wait for it— gas stations, as if the location where someone buys a product tells us how dangerous it is. Beer, soft drinks, cigarettes, acetaminophen, and caffeine are sold at gas stations too.

For generations, people throughout Southeast Asia have used kratom, derived from the leaves of Mitragyna speciosa, to help manage pain and fatigue. In the United States, many people use traditional kratom products as an alternative to prescription opioids or to ease opioid withdrawal symptoms. The principal alkaloid in kratom is mitragynine. 7-Hydroxymitragynine (7-OH), a much more potent naturally occurring alkaloid, is present only in trace amounts in the natural leaf.

In recent years, manufacturers have marketed concentrated—and in some cases semi-synthetic—7-OH products, often sold separately through smoke shops, vape stores, convenience stores, and online retailers. Many users report that these products allow them to manage chronic pain, anxiety, and PTSD, or avoid more dangerous opioids.

As with alcohol, nicotine, cannabis, and prescription opioids, repeated use of kratom or concentrated 7-OH may lead to dependence. But fatal overdoses involving these products appear to be rare, and when kratom shows up in overdose deaths, other drugs are usually involved. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recently reported 233 kratom-associated deaths reported to poison centers from 2015 through 2025. Nearly four out of five involved multiple substances. Opioids were involved in 62 percent, while benzodiazepines and stimulants each appeared in 20 percent and alcohol in 19 percent. The CDC explicitly cautions that it could not determine which substance caused the clinical outcome or death. For broader context, approximately 887,000 Americans died from drug overdoses during that period, according to CDC National Center for Health Statistics mortality data.

Nevertheless, lawmakers and some in the press continue to cite anecdotes about “kratom-associated” overdoses (the CDC has not yet separated kratom from 7-OH overdoses), fueling legislation aimed at banning 7-OH or the less potent kratom, even when toxicology reports later show the deaths involved multiple drugs. In August, The Wall Street Journal ran a lengthy report containing such anecdotes. 

The Journal reported that the CDC recorded more than 5,200 fatal overdoses from 2020 through 2024 in which kratom was detected. However, detection does not establish causation. The CDC’s overdose surveillance system distinguishes drugs detected in postmortem toxicology from those determined to have contributed to death—an important distinction given the prevalence of polysubstance use.

Meanwhile, state lawmakers are rushing to ban 7-OH, kratom, or both. And the Drug Enforcement Administration announced this summer that it intends to temporarily classify 7-OH above a certain concentration threshold as Schedule I (“no currently accepted medical use, and a high potential for abuse”) under its schedule of controlled substances. A recent study by the University of Michigan and Texas State University finds that more people are using these products.

Banning kratom or concentrated 7-OH products is unlikely to eliminate demand. Instead, it will likely shift the market underground. There, consumers may be less confident about the dosage or purity of the product they are buying, or even whether it is the product the seller claims it is.

Policymakers may reasonably consider measures such as age restrictions or laws against driving while impaired, but criminalizing peaceful adults who choose to self-medicate neither respects individual liberty nor is likely to make them safer.

Read the full article here

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using AI-powered analysis and real-time sources.

Get Your Fact Check Report

Enter your email to receive detailed fact-checking analysis

5 free reports remaining

Continue with Full Access

You've used your 5 free reports. Sign up for unlimited access!

Already have an account? Sign in here

#Democracy #MediaEthics #NarrativeControl #PoliticalMedia #PublicDiscourse
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email Telegram Copy Link
News Room
  • Website
  • Facebook
  • X (Twitter)
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn

The FSNN News Room is the voice of our in-house journalists, editors, and researchers. We deliver timely, unbiased reporting at the crossroads of finance, cryptocurrency, and global politics, providing clear, fact-driven analysis free from agendas.

Related Articles

Cryptocurrency & Free Speech Finance

Magic Eden Warns Old Ethereum NFT Listings Are Exposed to Payment Processor Exploit

28 minutes ago
Cryptocurrency & Free Speech Finance

Morning Minute: BlackRock Leans Deeper Into Tokenization with Ondo

1 hour ago
Media & Culture

Banning Flock Won’t Be Enough Without Police Reform

2 hours ago
Cryptocurrency & Free Speech Finance

Morgan Stanley Joins NEXTPredict as Prediction Markets Bet on ‘More Institutional’ Play

3 hours ago
Media & Culture

Hinojosa Hates the Culture War

3 hours ago
Cryptocurrency & Free Speech Finance

Strategy Wants Its Preferred Stock Dividends to Accrue 365 Days a Year

4 hours ago
Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Editors Picks

Strategy Proposes Daily Dividends for STRC, Preferred Stocks

25 minutes ago

Magic Eden Warns Old Ethereum NFT Listings Are Exposed to Payment Processor Exploit

28 minutes ago

The Toxicology Report on 2 Dead Students Isn’t Back. But the Kratom Panic Is Already Here.

59 minutes ago

The BBC clearly sees the value of television series That Mitchell and Webb Look. Marking the 20th anniversary of its original screening, the Beeb has re-released the series on iPlayer. But – and there is very often a “but” with these things – they’ve removed around 11 sketches from the BAFTA award-winning show. The official word is that these sketches don’t “work today”, which is polite speak for “they may cause offence”. The episodes singled out include scenes featuring a battle reenactment with characters in blackface, a contestant on a show wearing a burka and a lost tribe” in a garden centre. These sketches set out to challenge stereotypes, not to reinforce them; but 20 years on, this distinction seems to have been lost along the way. I’m a bit uncomfortable about this. I find it infantilising, to say the least. Can’t we trust audiences to make up their own minds, to switch off if they find the sketches in question unpalatable? Does the BBC think that we are just passive consumers, unable to disaggregate the mocking of racism from racism itself? These sketches set out to challenge stereotypes, not to reinforce them This act of censorship is distorting – of the shows, whose narratives and rhythms were built to include these sketches, and more broadly too. Conversations we were having 20 years ago have been erased, as if to suggest that they never happened. But they did! And with this erasure, the opportunity for thoughtful engagement and learning from our past is gone. “Let’s just pretend we were all lovely 20 years ago. It’s better that way” seems to be the message. Speaking as a minority myself, I find that knowing the nasty stuff that people said before – and indeed, still say today – is much more useful than pretending it never happened. This approach, I think, is also inconsistent. What it reveals is a cherry-picking (intended or not) of the groups that we can mock, and those that we can’t. Let’s face it, gender stereotypes are rarely deemed to have aged beyond the pale – if that were the case, we would have to wave goodbye to half the television made before the mid-2010s. Suppression like this sends a bad message to artists, namely that what they’re creating today may hold less value tomorrow. Or, even worse, that future audiences may deem them bigots – that Sword of Damocles hovering over the heads of any creative paying attention to the discourse of the moment. Suppression like this sends a bad message to artists The BBC’s decision reaffirms a broader trend. In 2020, Little Britain was removed from the iPlayer platform for similar reasons. It has since been reinstated – minus some sketches. Meanwhile, the UK’s arts space more broadly is seeing a retreat to the land of “safe”, as Index recently revealed in a year-long investigation into self-censorship in UK theatre. The BBC, it must be said, does remarkable stuff. The ongoing podcast investigation into the disappearance of US journalist Austin Tice is just one example. But this does not mean, however, that they don’t sometimes get it wrong. Chopping at That Mitchell and Webb Look is one example. Sure, the removal of the material isn’t the life-or-death story that Index often works on. Sure, Mitchell and Webb aren’t the faces of persecuted artists – they have huge platforms and agreed to the changes themselves. Still, one can’t help but think that the decision came from a place of conservatism, perhaps even fear. This is weak and dispiriting, indeed the very opposite of what enables creativity in the arts. We shouldn’t be encouraging this cultural timidity. Rather, we should harness culture and creativity as the starting points of a conversation about our here and now. That’s what the arts are for, after all. READ MORE

1 hour ago
Latest Posts

Tokenization is moving faster than Washington

1 hour ago

Morning Minute: BlackRock Leans Deeper Into Tokenization with Ondo

1 hour ago

Banning Flock Won’t Be Enough Without Police Reform

2 hours ago

Subscribe to News

Get the latest news and updates directly to your inbox.

At FSNN – Free Speech News Network, we deliver unfiltered reporting and in-depth analysis on the stories that matter most. From breaking headlines to global perspectives, our mission is to keep you informed, empowered, and connected.

FSNN.net is owned and operated by GlobalBoost Media
, an independent media organization dedicated to advancing transparency, free expression, and factual journalism across the digital landscape.

Facebook X (Twitter) Discord Telegram
Latest News

Tether downplays impact of US seizure at banking partner EQIBank

22 minutes ago

Strategy Proposes Daily Dividends for STRC, Preferred Stocks

25 minutes ago

Magic Eden Warns Old Ethereum NFT Listings Are Exposed to Payment Processor Exploit

28 minutes ago

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest news and updates directly to your inbox.

© 2026 GlobalBoost Media. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Our Authors
  • Contact

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

🍪

Cookies

We and our selected partners wish to use cookies to collect information about you for functional purposes and statistical marketing. You may not give us your consent for certain purposes by selecting an option and you can withdraw your consent at any time via the cookie icon.

Cookie Preferences

Manage Cookies

Cookies are small text that can be used by websites to make the user experience more efficient. The law states that we may store cookies on your device if they are strictly necessary for the operation of this site. For all other types of cookies, we need your permission. This site uses various types of cookies. Some cookies are placed by third party services that appear on our pages.

Your permission applies to the following domains:

  • https://fsnn.net
Necessary
Necessary cookies help make a website usable by enabling basic functions like page navigation and access to secure areas of the website. The website cannot function properly without these cookies.
Statistic
Statistic cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
Preferences
Preference cookies enable a website to remember information that changes the way the website behaves or looks, like your preferred language or the region that you are in.
Marketing
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.