Close Menu
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
  • Home
  • News
    • Politics
    • Legal & Courts
    • Tech & Big Tech
    • Campus & Education
    • Media & Culture
    • Global Free Speech
  • Opinions
    • Debates
  • Video/Live
  • Community
  • Freedom Index
  • About
    • Mission
    • Contact
    • Support
Trending

Maryland Court Rules Against Unconstitutional Stop-and-Frisk in Victory for State’s Gun Owners

30 minutes ago

Ethiopia expels French journalist Augustine Passilly after reporting trip to Tigray

36 minutes ago

SpaceX opens at $162 in blockbuster Nasdaq debut

43 minutes ago
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Discord Telegram
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
Market Data Newsletter
Friday, June 12
  • Home
  • News
    • Politics
    • Legal & Courts
    • Tech & Big Tech
    • Campus & Education
    • Media & Culture
    • Global Free Speech
  • Opinions
    • Debates
  • Video/Live
  • Community
  • Freedom Index
  • About
    • Mission
    • Contact
    • Support
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
Home»News»Media & Culture»Steven Spielberg’s Disclosure Day Has Some Strange Assumptions About the Media
Media & Culture

Steven Spielberg’s Disclosure Day Has Some Strange Assumptions About the Media

News RoomBy News Room2 hours agoNo Comments6 Mins Read173 Views
Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest Copy Link LinkedIn Tumblr Email VKontakte Telegram
Steven Spielberg’s Disclosure Day Has Some Strange Assumptions About the Media
Share
Facebook Twitter Pinterest Email Copy Link

Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

Key Takeaways

Playback Speed

Select a Voice

Given the recent success of Backrooms, a movie based on a YouTube series that was itself based on a meme, it’s tempting to view Steven Spielberg’s often crackling but frequently frustrating Disclosure Day in the same light. This is the beard’s riff on the old “ancient aliens” meme, the popular-on-the-internet History Channel freeze frame featuring a zap-haired “expert” who somehow always seemed to be conveying the same amusingly crazy idea: I’m not saying it was ancient aliens—but it was ancient aliens. 

History Channel/Know Your Meme

Spoiler alert: In Spielberg’s movie, the aliens aren’t quite ancient; they’ve only been around since the 1940s, at least as far as the United States government and its sinister corporate tentacles know. But this isn’t much of a spoiler, given the trailers and the fact that the basics of alien existence are revealed to the viewer by the end of the first act. 

Indeed, that’s the setup, rather than the resolution: aliens exist, there is copious archival footage to prove it, and shadowy forces have been engaged in a massive cover-up in order to gain power over alien technology and cow the public. The movie, then, is about the quest to release the evidence to the world. 

That quest starts with the hacker Daniel Kellner, played with quiet intensity by the increasingly excellent Josh O’Connor, who makes off with a cache of drives containing classified footage depicting alien contact and technology as the movie opens. It expands quickly to a consortium of aliens-are-real devotees led by Hugo Wakefield (Colman Domingo), as well as Margaret Fairchild (a marvelous Emily Blunt), a scatterbrained local TV weather woman who finds herself speaking in foreign, even alien, tongues. Kellner and Fairchild are connected by a kind of psychic alien destiny, like Elliot and E.T. in Spielberg’s kiddie-alien classic, and Wakefield is something like a John the Baptist figure, preparing the way for the prophets of the stars. 

The challenge they face is that the secret of alien existence has been hidden by Wardex, a nefarious corporation with ties to the U.S. military that has been hiding the revealing footage. The corporation’s central figure is Noah Scanlon (Colin Firth), who has appropriated some alien tech for himself in the form of a little stone obelisk that, when clutched, allows him to create a psychic connection with others, including Kellner’s girlfriend Jane Blankenship (Eve Hewson). The scenes where he burrows into her mind, like a hacker pwning a network, are electric, and nearly make up for the fact that none of this makes even a single alien blood droplet of sense. 

The movie’s problems start with the fact that everyone speaks in breathless riddles and oblique teases, as if they are background characters on some late-breaking spinoff of Lost, rather than explaining themselves in clear language to each other. But the bigger problem is the nature of the disclosure itself. 

Spielberg wants viewers to take for granted that aliens are real, and that the video proof, contained on what amounts to a bunch of thumb drives, would simply and instantly convince everyone who sees it. The videos themselves look like what they are—Hollywood fakes made using a combination of computer effects, costumes, and puppetry. Often, they are just seconds long. Sometimes they are shot in the grainy, blurry style of real-world, official UFO footage, which as we know proves little and fails to convince many people. Sometimes they are a good bit clearer, but in a way that makes them look like high-end Hollywood frauds. 

The movie simply assumes that broadcasting this footage to the world will convince the general public that aliens are real. Most of the movie’s second act is organized around the mad dash to get the footage out, which turns out to mean playing it on a local NBC News affiliate. (The movie is distributed by Universal, part of the same media conglomerate that owns NBC.) By the very end, the movie conveniently hopscotches this problem, but it does so in a way that renders the quest to broadcast the footage, which is to say most of the movie’s narrative, completely unnecessary.

For most of the movie’s runtime, however, the plan is simply for a hacker and a local TV weather reporter to release the footage. I know Blunt’s character is just a fun-loving weather personality, but surely she has some sense of journalistic values? Has anyone in this movie heard of verification? Asking for comment? This is why no one trusts the media.  

Indeed, this is part of what makes this movie so odd: It’s set in a contemporary United States, in which it’s assumed that essentially everyone does trust the media. There are iPhones and internet connections, but we see no podcasters, no YouTubers, not even any skeptical mainstream media pundits, let alone the sort of sketchy, attention-seeking politicians who would want to turn this headline news event into fodder for self-aggrandizement. Aliens are real, and that’s why we must tax billionaires and oligarchs, now please donate to my campaign, said no one in this movie. 

From Close Encounters of the Third Kind to E.T. to that one Indiana Jones movie that we’ve all tried to forget about, Spielberg has long been obsessed with aliens. Here, he wants to hammer home a grand, heartwarming idea about how radical empathy is what connects people, animals, and perhaps even big-eyed mystical space aliens, but the movie is almost shockingly naive about the willingness of the masses to peacefully and productively converge around a controversial belief. In the movie’s dramatic scheme, the only significant barrier to their acceptance of alien life is a villainous corporate entity with an impressively large collection of tactical vests and black vehicles.

The good news is that on a scene-by-scene basis, Disclosure Day is taught, thrilling, and worth arguing with, which is to say it’s a Steven Spielberg movie. The bad news is that it exists in an unrecognizable parallel universe—and not because of the beings from outer space. The world of Disclosure Day is a world without ancient aliens-obsessed wacko experts, without memespeak nihilism, without paranoiacs and grifting conspiracy mongers, without partisan argument or propaganda or meaningful skepticism of any kind. This movie isn’t actually a meme, but it probably should have had more of them. 

Read the full article here

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using AI-powered analysis and real-time sources.

Get Your Fact Check Report

Enter your email to receive detailed fact-checking analysis

5 free reports remaining

Continue with Full Access

You've used your 5 free reports. Sign up for unlimited access!

Already have an account? Sign in here

#IndependentMedia #InformationWar #Journalism #NarrativeControl #PublicDiscourse
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email Telegram Copy Link
News Room
  • Website
  • Facebook
  • X (Twitter)
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn

The FSNN News Room is the voice of our in-house journalists, editors, and researchers. We deliver timely, unbiased reporting at the crossroads of finance, cryptocurrency, and global politics, providing clear, fact-driven analysis free from agendas.

Related Articles

Media & Culture

Maryland Court Rules Against Unconstitutional Stop-and-Frisk in Victory for State’s Gun Owners

30 minutes ago
Cryptocurrency & Free Speech Finance

Tennessee Man Indicted for Alleged Crypto Ponzi Scheme That Stole Millions From Investors

45 minutes ago
Media & Culture

Bill Introduced That Would Codify The Right To Record Federal Law Enforcement Officers

1 hour ago
Cryptocurrency & Free Speech Finance

Sam Bankman-Fried Loses Appeal as Federal Court Upholds ‘Robust’ Fraud Conviction

2 hours ago
Media & Culture

Large Libel Models Ruling in Germany, Allowing Liability Against Google AI

3 hours ago
Cryptocurrency & Free Speech Finance

‘Winter Is Over’: Standard Chartered Calls Crypto Bottom as Bitcoin Recovers From $60K Fall

3 hours ago
Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Editors Picks

Ethiopia expels French journalist Augustine Passilly after reporting trip to Tigray

36 minutes ago

SpaceX opens at $162 in blockbuster Nasdaq debut

43 minutes ago

Sam Bankman-Fried Loses Appeal as Trump Pardon Bid Continues

44 minutes ago

Tennessee Man Indicted for Alleged Crypto Ponzi Scheme That Stole Millions From Investors

45 minutes ago
Latest Posts

Bill Introduced That Would Codify The Right To Record Federal Law Enforcement Officers

1 hour ago

Steven Spielberg’s Disclosure Day Has Some Strange Assumptions About the Media

2 hours ago

President Donald Trump and FIFA President Gianni Infantino at the White House for the World Cup 2025 draw. Photo: White House “We don’t live on the moon, we live on planet Earth. We have to respect that we are not kings of the world, who can rule over governments and police forces.” These were the words of FIFA president Gianni Infantino at a press conference ahead of the World Cup which has started this week. Infantino was responding to criticism of FIFA’s organisation of football’s greatest tournament, which is being held in the USA, Mexico and Canada. Historically, FIFA has sought to present football as neutral territory, distant from ideological and partisan disputes. The World Cup started out as a symbol of global unity, a celebration of diversity, dialogue between cultures, and football’s ability to bring people together in an increasingly polarised world. However, neutrality can also be interpreted as a way of silencing certain debates. Whenever the organisation decides to limit the free expression of athletes, fans, or host cities, accusations arise that it is privileging a specific view of what can or cannot be said within the sporting environment. The World Cup of today is a money-making juggernaut. The 2026 event is likely to see $11.5 billion pour into FIFA’s coffers and questions over the organisation’s propriety are never far away. As the tournament begins, a series of events has highlighted a debate that goes far beyond the pitch: to what extent is freedom of expression being respected at the world’s biggest sporting event and how much influence do the host countries have in who can do or say what? One of the highest profile incidents related to Somali referee Omar Artan. Selected to officiate at the World Cup, Artan would have become the first Somali referee to participate in the tournament. However, he was not allowed entry into the USA by immigration authorities, preventing his participation in the competition. Somalia is one of the many countries on a travel ban list issued by Trump’s government. The referee’s banning provoked an international reaction and was met with indignation in his country of origin, where the referee was treated as a hero upon his return. Addressing crowds in Mogadishu on his return, Artan said, “Somalia belongs to all of us. Whether times are good or difficult, I want to tell our youth not to lose hope in our country.” For many observers, the case symbolised the conflict between the sometimes harsh immigration policies of individual countries and the principles of universality that should guide a global event like the World Cup. While governments have the sovereign right to control their borders, critics argue that preventing the presence of professionals accredited by FIFA itself contradicts the spirit of inclusion that the organisation claims to uphold. The participation of Iran, at war with the USA, is also proving a tricky challenge for FIFA. The Iranian Football Federation reported problems involving fans who had bought tickets for World Cup matches but subsequently had their travel permits revoked or faced obstacles entering the host country. The federation said: “This incident raises serious questions about the influence of non-sporting and political considerations on the organisation of the world’s biggest football event.” In a tournament presented as a global celebration, the possibility that political and diplomatic factors could interfere with fan attendance has reignited concerns about indirect discrimination. The issue is not just about the right to watch a match. Modern football is also a space for cultural expression and collective identity. When certain groups face additional barriers to attend the event, it seems the voices of some fans are considered to be worth listening to more than others. The challenges of running a global event with participation from countries with vastly differing social attitudes is also a prickly problem for FIFA. Seattle is one of the host cities of the competition and six matches will be played at the city’s main stadium. As the tournament coincides with Pride month, one of the matches – between Egypt and Iran – has been designated a Pride match. Seattle’s mayor-elect Kate Wilson wrote on Instagram, “With matches on Juneteenth and Pride, we get to show the world that in Seattle, everyone is welcome…What an incredible honor!” Iran and Egypt are not quite so impressed. Homosexuality is banned in Iran with LGBTQ+ individuals sometimes facing the death penalty. It is not explicitly banned in Egypt but people are frequently detained and prosecuted under morality laws. The Egyptian football federation made an official complaint, saying it “categorically rejects the holding of any activities related to supporting homosexuality”. The Iranians chipped in, saying, “It is an unreasonable and illogical thing [for a match between the two teams] to support a specific group.” The episode laid bare another challenge faced by FIFA in the 21st century: how to reconcile profoundly different cultures, beliefs, and worldviews within the same event? In a globalised environment, what for some represents a legitimate expression of identity may be seen by others as an inappropriate political message. The line separating individual expression and political positioning becomes increasingly difficult to define. Infantino has tried to shrug off the criticism of these items as well as absurdly high ticket prices (despite which more than six million tickets have been sold). At the pre-tournament press conference Infantino called on fans to “chill and relax” in face of the problems faced by some. He also stated that he should be given credit for Iran being allowed to participate at all, given the USA is at war with the country. Infantino’s supporters believe that the leader seeks to prevent external issues from dominating the World Cup narrative, his critics argue that this stance ignores legitimate problems related to rights, inclusion, and transparency. Interestingly, these controversies contrast with the institutional message promoted by FIFA itself. On several occasions, Infantino has highlighted football’s role as a tool for peace and international dialogue. The organisation frequently emphasises that the sport has the unique ability to unite people regardless of nationality, religion, origin, or political stance. However, recent events demonstrate how complex this mission becomes when confronted with migration policies, diplomatic interests, and cultural disputes. Another important aspect of the debate involves the press. Major sporting events usually attract journalists from all over the world, responsible not only for covering the matches, but also for investigating social, economic, and political issues related to the tournament. Press freedom organisations warn that access to information and the possibility of reporting on sensitive topics without restrictions are fundamental elements for ensuring transparency. When certain issues generate discomfort for governments or organisers, the risk of indirect pressure on journalistic coverage arises. The 2026 World Cup demonstrates that discussions about censorship and freedom of expression are no longer limited to the explicit prohibition of speech. Today, they appear in more subtle issues: who is authorised to enter the country, what symbols are allowed in stadiums, what demonstrations are considered acceptable, and what topics can be discussed without generating reprisals. In a world marked by geopolitical tensions, debates about identity, and security concerns, the promise of a football capable of uniting all peoples is put to the test. The 2026 World Cup will be remembered for the goals, the misses and the champions. But it may also be remembered as a milestone in an increasingly relevant discussion: how to balance security, diversity, and freedom of expression in a truly global event. The answer to this question may be as important for the future of football as any result achieved on the field. READ MORE

2 hours ago

Subscribe to News

Get the latest news and updates directly to your inbox.

At FSNN – Free Speech News Network, we deliver unfiltered reporting and in-depth analysis on the stories that matter most. From breaking headlines to global perspectives, our mission is to keep you informed, empowered, and connected.

FSNN.net is owned and operated by GlobalBoost Media
, an independent media organization dedicated to advancing transparency, free expression, and factual journalism across the digital landscape.

Facebook X (Twitter) Discord Telegram
Latest News

Maryland Court Rules Against Unconstitutional Stop-and-Frisk in Victory for State’s Gun Owners

30 minutes ago

Ethiopia expels French journalist Augustine Passilly after reporting trip to Tigray

36 minutes ago

SpaceX opens at $162 in blockbuster Nasdaq debut

43 minutes ago

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest news and updates directly to your inbox.

© 2026 GlobalBoost Media. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Our Authors
  • Contact

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

🍪

Cookies

We and our selected partners wish to use cookies to collect information about you for functional purposes and statistical marketing. You may not give us your consent for certain purposes by selecting an option and you can withdraw your consent at any time via the cookie icon.

Cookie Preferences

Manage Cookies

Cookies are small text that can be used by websites to make the user experience more efficient. The law states that we may store cookies on your device if they are strictly necessary for the operation of this site. For all other types of cookies, we need your permission. This site uses various types of cookies. Some cookies are placed by third party services that appear on our pages.

Your permission applies to the following domains:

  • https://fsnn.net
Necessary
Necessary cookies help make a website usable by enabling basic functions like page navigation and access to secure areas of the website. The website cannot function properly without these cookies.
Statistic
Statistic cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
Preferences
Preference cookies enable a website to remember information that changes the way the website behaves or looks, like your preferred language or the region that you are in.
Marketing
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.