Close Menu
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
  • Home
  • News
    • Politics
    • Legal & Courts
    • Tech & Big Tech
    • Campus & Education
    • Media & Culture
    • Global Free Speech
  • Opinions
    • Debates
  • Video/Live
  • Community
  • Freedom Index
  • About
    • Mission
    • Contact
    • Support
Trending

Why So Many People Feel Lost

56 seconds ago

Prediction markets get first U.S. rule proposal as CFTC pursues contract reviews

23 minutes ago

Pyth Launches 24/7 Pricing Indices for Stocks and Commodities

26 minutes ago
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Discord Telegram
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
Market Data Newsletter
Wednesday, June 10
  • Home
  • News
    • Politics
    • Legal & Courts
    • Tech & Big Tech
    • Campus & Education
    • Media & Culture
    • Global Free Speech
  • Opinions
    • Debates
  • Video/Live
  • Community
  • Freedom Index
  • About
    • Mission
    • Contact
    • Support
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
Home»Cryptocurrency & Free Speech Finance»Rethinking Crypto Investing: Looking Beyond Digital Assets
Cryptocurrency & Free Speech Finance

Rethinking Crypto Investing: Looking Beyond Digital Assets

News RoomBy News Room9 months agoNo Comments7 Mins Read810 Views
Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest Copy Link LinkedIn Tumblr Email VKontakte Telegram
Rethinking Crypto Investing: Looking Beyond Digital Assets
Share
Facebook Twitter Pinterest Email Copy Link

Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

Key Takeaways

Playback Speed

Select a Voice

In today’s “Crypto for Advisors” newsletter, Kevin O’Leary, entrepreneur and investor, shares both his opinion and crypto investment thesis and how they’ve both changed over time.

Then, Leo Mindyuk, CEO of MLTech answers questions about how everyday investors can access these investments in “Ask an Expert.”

– Sarah Morton


Rethinking Crypto Investing: Looking Beyond Digital Assets

From Garbage to Gold: Why Crypto?
In 2019, I made headlines by calling bitcoin “garbage”. Back then, there was no regulation or oversight. It was chaos. Governments were hostile and unsure how to approach crypto. Now, the landscape has changed entirely.

In the days before regulatory bodies started coming on board, crypto pioneers –cowboys–made tons of money on crypto’s early volatility. Even in this high-risk landscape, the crypto market proved incredibly productive.

Today, the market has grown to use BTC$109,694.70 and others as stores of value, digital payment systems or stablecoins. However, we’re still early — crypto adoption isn’t anywhere near its potential.

Talking Regulation

In the post-Wild West landscape, everyone’s looking for the next big event to drive price discovery. It’s obvious that institutional investment has this potential. Almost no major financial institutions, sovereign funds, etc., have adopted crypto. Any of these bodies weighting BTC at 1% would send price discovery to the moon. The roadblock is regulation.

Regulation began with bitcoin ETFs. First available in Canada, then the U.S. and Europe, they’re now Wall Street’s gateway to crypto. Another key regulation was the GENIUS Act in the United States, which guaranteed stablecoins against USD. Collectively, this legislation shows growing institutional faith in crypto.

The U.S. Senate’s digital asset market structure bill and the U.S. House’s clarity act are two upcoming pieces of regulation to watch; both create crypto regulation frameworks. Many investors anticipate a bullish market if this legislation passes and the regulatory trend continues. Current price levels of BTC are perhaps indicative of this anticipatory mindset: we’re waiting for the floodgates to open.

Own the Picks and Shovels

When considering crypto assets, it’s easy to overlook the infrastructure needed to scale institutional adoption. I’m very vocal about my “picks and shovels” strategy. If you’re in the crypto market, you should own its supporting infrastructure and tap into the returns associated with crypto without caring much about coin price.

Specifically, I see exchanges and data centers booming in the case of broader, institutional adoption. I’m an investor in Bitzero, a data center company that provides clean energy for BTC mining. My investment there is a power play — it’s the cheapest power I’ve seen. They mine BTC at a low breakeven, allowing me to profit regardless of its volatility.

Exchanges are similar. I invested heavily in WonderFi, which became the largest in Canada. I’m also a Robinhood and Coinbase shareholder. Platforms like this are where price discovery occurs, and they earn per transaction.

Building Your Crypto Portfolio

Buying into this space today can range from an infrastructure play to a stablecoin. I own the currencies, exchanges and the energy powering them. Collectively, crypto-related investments are about 20% of my portfolio. I recommend building a diverse crypto portfolio, not through token variety but by investing in companies supporting digital assets.

Where Coins Belong

At one point I had 27 crypto positions. Now, I’m confident that I only need three: BTC, ETH$3,960.01, and stablecoins. BTC and ETH are the gold standard, and together they’re around 90% of my coin holdings. I’m weighting each at 2.5% and wrapping ETH around my BTC, because I like a monthly yield.

Many of my other investments, like stocks and bonds, pay dividends or interest — I can see the income. That’s what my wrapping strategy replicates, while still acknowledging BTC as digital gold: the underlying point is long-term price appreciation. ETH, on the other hand, is where a lot of Wall Street’s stablecoins are trading.

Treasuries and Leverage

We’ve recently seen public companies’ treasuries buy BTC with massive leverage. I stay conservative. Call it boring, but I hardly leverage my coins: at most 30%. To me, it’s not worth the risk of getting burned if BTC drops 50% overnight.

The Crypto Investor’s Mindset

If there’s one thing to understand about crypto investing, it’s that volatility is baked in. Your mindset must be to take advantage of the volatility and productivity by owning both the crypto and its infrastructure: believe in the whole crypto space. This way, you’ll avoid predicting token prices and make money regardless.

– Kevin O’Leary, Entrepreneur and Investor


Ask an Expert

Making Sense of Crypto Investment Models: What Access Means in Today’s Market

Q: What does “access” really mean in crypto investing—and why is it important?

A: Access refers to how an investor engages with the crypto ecosystem. In traditional markets, access is relatively uniform. Most investors use a brokerage account to buy stocks or ETFs. In crypto, the landscape is far more fragmented and dynamic. You can buy tokens on centralized exchanges, interact with decentralized protocols, invest in structured products, or allocate capital to professionally managed strategies.

Each access model comes with distinct implications around ownership, custody, execution, transparency, and risk. For example, holding tokens in a private wallet means you control your assets. However, it also requires technical know-how. On the other hand, managed accounts or index-like products offer simplicity and professional oversight, but often at the cost of reduced control.

Understanding your access model is foundational. It shapes your entire experience and exposure to digital assets.

Q: What strategy types are available besides just buying and holding tokens?

A: Beyond buy-and-hold, digital assets support a range of sophisticated strategies:

• Delta-Neutral: Balances long and short positions (e.g. spot vs. futures) to eliminate directional exposure. Focused on yield generation, these strategies typically experience minimal drawdowns, making them appealing for steady returns.

• Market-Neutral: Keeps net dollar exposure near zero by exploiting mispricings across assets. Methods such as statistical arbitrage, pairs trading, or baskets aim for uncorrelated returns, often with drawdowns of less than 10%.

• Long-Short Quantitative: Uses systematic signals such as momentum, mean reversion, or factor models to take directional bets. Designed for higher return targets, these strategies accept greater volatility and drawdowns in the 10–20% range.

• Smart Beta: Rules-based frameworks that replicate factor exposures such as momentum, value, or volatility. Often implemented through regulated futures, they provide scalable and transparent access to systematic styles commonly found in traditional finance.

Together, these approaches broaden investor options beyond passive exposure, enabling more precise control over portfolio risk, return, and diversification.

Q: How should someone choose the right approach to enter the crypto market?

A: Begin with your investment objectives: are you seeking long-term growth, diversification, income generation, or capital preservation? From there, assess both your risk tolerance and your preferred level of engagement.

  • Hands-on investors comfortable with technology may consider direct token exposure or DeFi protocols.
  • Allocators seeking structure and oversight may prefer managed strategies, where AI-driven portfolio construction, real-time risk analytics, and automated execution provide a data-driven alternative.

Infrastructure is equally critical, such as custody, liquidity, and transparency, which define the durability of any investment approach. For example, a non-custodial architecture combined with a real-time performance and risk dashboard helps ensure security, transparency, and control.

Today’s digital asset ecosystem encompasses a diverse range of participants, from high-conviction traders to passive investors. The key is not simply whether to engage, but how to engage — aligning your method of access with your objectives, while fully understanding the trade-offs. In this way, investors can participate intelligently, securely, and at scale.

– Leo Mindyuk, CEO & CIO, ML Tech


Keep Reading



Read the full article here

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using AI-powered analysis and real-time sources.

Get Your Fact Check Report

Enter your email to receive detailed fact-checking analysis

5 free reports remaining

Continue with Full Access

You've used your 5 free reports. Sign up for unlimited access!

Already have an account? Sign in here

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email Telegram Copy Link
News Room
  • Website
  • Facebook
  • X (Twitter)
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn

The FSNN News Room is the voice of our in-house journalists, editors, and researchers. We deliver timely, unbiased reporting at the crossroads of finance, cryptocurrency, and global politics, providing clear, fact-driven analysis free from agendas.

Related Articles

Cryptocurrency & Free Speech Finance

Prediction markets get first U.S. rule proposal as CFTC pursues contract reviews

23 minutes ago
Cryptocurrency & Free Speech Finance

Pyth Launches 24/7 Pricing Indices for Stocks and Commodities

26 minutes ago
Cryptocurrency & Free Speech Finance

Paradigm, Hyperliquid Policy Center Push Back on GENIUS Act Stablecoin AML Rule

30 minutes ago
Cryptocurrency & Free Speech Finance

CoinDesk 20 index drops 1.4% as all constituents decline

1 hour ago
Cryptocurrency & Free Speech Finance

Equipment Finance Platform Trad.Fi to Bring $650M in Private Credit Onchain

1 hour ago
Cryptocurrency & Free Speech Finance

Solana Sponsors the World Series of Poker, Enabling Crypto Entry Fees and Payouts

2 hours ago
Add A Comment

Comments are closed.

Editors Picks

Prediction markets get first U.S. rule proposal as CFTC pursues contract reviews

23 minutes ago

Pyth Launches 24/7 Pricing Indices for Stocks and Commodities

26 minutes ago

Paradigm, Hyperliquid Policy Center Push Back on GENIUS Act Stablecoin AML Rule

30 minutes ago

‘CBS news is on fire’

1 hour ago
Latest Posts

Hungary’s Sziget festival is known as a safe place to express yourself freely. Photo: Sandor Csudai/www.facebook.com/csudaisandor This article first appeared in the Spring 2026 issue of Index on Censorship, The monster unleashed: How Hungary’s illiberal vision is seducing the Western world published on 2 April 2026. Crossing Budapest’s brutalist K-Bridge across the Danube to Óbuda Island on a grey spring day feels like the last journey of a condemned prisoner. The steel truss bridge was built as a temporary measure in 1955, a year before the uprising in which university students and ordinary citizens took to the streets to protest against the Stalinist government of Mátyás Rákosi. The single set of railway tracks suggests a one-way journey. It was built to give access to Budapest’s great Ganz Danubius shipyard. The shipyard was finally closed in 2000, after years of decline. These days, the bridge acts more like a rabbit hole from Orbán’s Hungary into Wonderland. Every summer, hundreds of thousands of people young and old cross to the leafy island to be entertained by music, theatre and dance, and to be challenged by debate, art and film – the joyous week-long celebration of free expression that is the Sziget Festival. Sziget was born from the ashes of Communism. In 1993, four years after the fall of the Iron Curtain, Károly Gerendai was just 22. Thin and sporting a shock of long hair like a Hungarian David Gilmour, Gerendai had become interested in the music industry whilst in high school. As a student, he earned money fly-posting and as a tour manager. Later, he managed bands and worked for record labels. That year, he was in charge of Sziámi, one of the best-known alt-rock bands in the Hungarian underground scene. On the tour bus after a concert, he fell into conversation with Péter Müller, the band’s frontman. “We talked about how, after the political transition, the big youth events had disappeared,” Gerendai told Index. “Before the political transition of 1989–90, there were state-organised youth events, but we quickly realised that they mainly served as a way for the state to control young people. Although we could meet and have fun together, we always felt the state’s watchful eye on us.” State control extended beyond the audience and on to the stage. “In the music industry, strong state selection was also in place: there were supported, tolerated, and banned bands, so not everyone was allowed to be heard.” This is where the seed of something new was born. Post Iron Curtain Co-founder Károly Gerendai. Photo: Sziget Festival “We thought it would be great to organise a multi-day event where young people could be together – something like a holiday combined with concerts, various cultural programmes, and community activities,” he said. Gerendai and Müller approached Gábor Demszky, mayor of Budapest at the time and first of the post-Communist era, for help. “He supported the concept but told us to organise it ourselves,” Gerendai told Index. “Even though we had no experience with anything like this, we boldly jumped into the organisation.” This make-it-up-as-you-go-along approach was typical in post-Soviet eastern Europe. The mayor suggested three possible venues for the festival, one of which was Óbuda Island. The island punctuates the Danube like a giant green exclamation mark between the city’s two halves, Buda and Pest. “Two iconic music events had previously been held there, both attracting huge interest,” said Gerendai. “One was the 1980 Black Sheep concert, a rare occasion when both tolerated and banned bands were allowed to perform. Then in 1991, it was one of the venues for the ‘Goodbye, Ivan!’ event celebrating the withdrawal of Soviet troops. I had worked on that event, which is how I got to know the subcontractors we later invited to help organise our festival.” Hungary’s youth were ready for a party. After only a few months’ preparation, the festival – initially called Diáksziget, Student Island in Hungarian – attracted 43,000 visitors over seven days. “We organised the first festival with the slogan ‘We need a week together’, referring to a carefree, shared community experience. Another slogan was ‘Everything is allowed, but nothing is mandatory’, which was meant to help us leave the past behind, celebrate freedom in every sense, and express that we never again wanted to live in a dictatorship,” said Gerendai. A wobbly start The line-up for the first festival was largely made up of Hungarian artists, such as alt-rock band Kispál és a Borz, punk band Tankcsapda, and singer János Bródy. In all, 200 bands performed on the festival’s two stages, alongside open-air movies and theatre productions. Yet, as was often the case after the fall of Communism, things didn’t work out as planned. Despite receiving sponsorship from Pepsi, the country’s Nagykanizsa brewery, and some support from the city of Budapest, the festival lost money. Lots of it. “It didn’t go smoothly,” admitted Gerendai. “We faced numerous problems during the process and made serious financial miscalculations.” By the end of the festival, it had run up a huge deficit, and only survived thanks to a bailout by the city council. But after this first turbulent year, Sziget not only survived but thrived. The following year saw the number of festivalgoers – or Szitizens as they are usually known – increase to 143,000. International acts like Jethro Tull, The Birds, and Jefferson Starship started to appear on the line-up. “Sziget outgrew Hungary’s borders early on, and we consciously developed the programme lineup, services, and visual identity so that we would be seen as a unique festival on the international scene as well,” said Gerendai. A beacon of light Chappell Roan on stage at Sziget. Photo: Sziget Festival By 2019, the festival was attracting more than half a million visitors to the Hungarian capital every year. The festival’s reputation was such that it was bringing in some of the world’s biggest music acts, including Arctic Monkeys, Kendrick Lamar, Kings of Leon, P!nk, Rihanna, Muse and David Guetta. Óbuda Island has remained the home of the festival. “It’s a great location: close to downtown Budapest, yet also a green, nature-filled area. It’s also symbolic – an island surrounded by a river, where once you cross the bridge, you can leave everyday problems behind,” Gerendai told Index. “It’s the origin of the nickname given by visitors: the Island of Freedom.” This nickname comes from the festival’s commitment to allowing artists and festival goers to speak their views – and was easy to pull off in a liberal city like Budapest keen to attract to hordes of young foreign tourists to boost the economy. In Gerendai’s opinion, freedom of expression was one of the major achievements of Hungary’s political transition in the 1990s. “I believe freedom of expression is a broader concept than simply who we agree or disagree with; it’s not fundamentally our role to judge other people’s views. At Sziget, we have always provided space for differences of opinion and we respect artistic freedom of expression on stage as well. At the same time, we do set limits: we do not allow hate-inciting or human-dignity violating expressions, and we also do not give space to extremist productions whose audiences could potentially endanger the safety of festival visitors.” As well as music, the festival is a thriving forum for circus, street theatre, film, visual arts and cabaret. At the heart of the festival is an area called Think for Tomorrow. The zone addresses pressing social issues that have an impact on the lives of young people, from their own perspective. “NGOs and organisations that play an important role in social and cultural life have also had their own dedicated space at Sziget since the early days,” said Gerendai. “These groups are worth introducing to the festival audience, and their work aligns with Sziget’s core values, such as sustainability, the protection of human rights, and acceptance.” Stepping back Magic Mirror at Sziget. Photo: Kristóf Hölvényi /Rockstar Photographers www.instagram.com/kristofholvenyi/ Eight years ago, after running 25 Sziget festivals, Gerendai decided to step back and sell his interest in the festival to promoter Superstruct, owned by American private equity company KKR. “I decided to pass the baton and from then on followed the festival only as a guest,” he said. During his time at its helm, the values of the Sziget festival had grown increasingly at odds with those of Viktor Orbán’s Fidesz government. There is a huge LGBTQ+ presence at Sziget, both in visitors and artists, with the Magic Mirror venue on the site hosting themed content exploring the LGBTQ+ experience. After the Orbán government introduced anti-LGBTQ+ legislation in 2021, the festival’s new organisers came under pressure over its stance, and there were calls for them to ban under-18s from Magic Mirror. The organisers refused. Sziget’s audience has made itself heard on [former Hungarian prime minister] Orbán over the past few years. At the 2023 festival, during Hungarian rapper Krúbi’s performance the audience started chanting Mocskos Fidesz (Filthy Fidesz). This chant has since become popular common at the festival and at other music events. The Kneecap ban Friction between the festival and Orbán burst into the open in 2025 after Irish rappers Kneecap, who were due to perform at the festival that summer, were banned from the country for being a national security threat. Kneecap are outspoken critics of right-wing political ideology and are particularly scathing about the Israel-Gaza War. Kneecap (along with Bob Vylan) had performed inflammatory sets at Glastonbury the month before and Orbán, for his part, has been strengthening his strategic alliance with Israel, going so far as to declare that “Jewish communities are safer in Budapest than anywhere else in Europe”. Orbán told state broadcaster Kossuth Radio that he was angry that the band had been invited to play at Sziget. He claimed that the organisers’ decision was motivated by financial gain. “Is this damn money really that important?” Orbán asked the radio presenter. Even though they were unable to perform, Kneecap shared a message with festivalgoers gathering at the stage on which they were due to perform. The message read: “We wish we could be there with you at one of the best festivals in the world and the first European festival Kneecap ever played,” the message read. “We can’t because of one hate filled man. Viktor Orbán.” When this part of the message was displayed, a huge crowd who had been told on social media to expect something from the band started booing and chanting “Fuck Orbán”. The message continued: “We have been convicted of zero crimes in any country ever. But we will call out oppression. For calling out Israel’s genocidal campaign Viktor has banned us from your beautiful country for three years. Israel is committing a genocide against the Palestinian people. Viktor Orbán and his government support it. Viktor Orbán and his government tried to shut down Pride in Budapest. They failed. We must stand together. Oppose Orbán. Oppose Israel. Oppose genocide.” The festival’s robust stance in favour of LGBTQ+ rights has won it the European Festival Awards Take a Stand prize twice, in 2023 and 2026 (for 2025). The award recognises festivals that stand up for peaceful dialogue, humanism, tolerance, and mutual understanding – activities that do not necessarily chime with the profit imperative. Stepping forward again It is true, though, that since the Covid pandemic money has been a big problem for the Sziget festival. Like many other European music festivals, Sziget had struggled thanks to two years of cancellations, the spiralling cost of living, and sharply rising artist fees. The festival lost $5.6 million in 2023, and almost $12 million in 2024. In 2025, the company running the festival (without Gerendai) sent a letter to Budapest mayor Gergely Karácsony calling for the agreement between the festival and the city, as the island’s landowner, to be terminated. The festival seemed to be doomed. But the return of a familiar figure saved it at the last minute – its co-founder, Gerendai. “The new owner decided that they no longer wished to finance the festival, which had found itself in a difficult situation in the post-pandemic years due to economic conditions and, in my view, certain conceptual decisions as well,” said Gerendai. “They offered that if I took Sziget back, we could continue organising it under my leadership. So it was either I return – or there would be no Sziget.” “It caused me several sleepless nights, since in the meantime I had been working on completely different things,” Gerendai told Index. “But in the end, I felt that a festival that has become a cultural institution in Hungary and is also significant on the international scene simply cannot end abruptly. Besides, this is my child – I couldn’t abandon it.” Superstruct has come under huge pressure from activists and artists since its acquisition by KKR in June 2024. KKR has significant investments in Israeli companies, including some operating in the West Bank. In May 2025, a number of artists pulled out of the UK’s Field Day festival because of its Superstruct ownership. The transfer of the licence from Superstruct back to Gerendai almost didn’t happen. Budapest City Council initially blocked the transfer, with councillors from Fidesz and Péter Magyar’s opposition Tisza party abstaining from the vote. However, Hungary’s Index newspaper reports that Magyar, reacting to negative sentiment from potential voters over the news that Sziget might fold, quickly arranged a meeting with Gerendai. On 30 October, Magyar posted a picture of himself and Gerendai on Facebook, announcing that the pair would meet again at the 2026 festival after agreeing on two amendments to the proposals: first, that the costs of using the island would be paid back to the city by 2030 rather than 2035, and second, that all Hungarians under the age of 25 would get discounted tickets to the festival – a potential vote-winner among this demographic. Gerendai himself won’t be drawn on his politics. The 2026 Sziget festival is now set to go ahead from 11 to 15 August 2026, featuring Florence + The Machine, Lewis Capaldi, Sombr, Twenty One Pilots, Biffy Clyro and Underworld as well as hundreds of others including Hungarian rapper Sisi on the line-up. Gerendai said, “Many large music festivals operate primarily as business ventures focused on who is performing. In recent years, Sziget had also started to move in this direction, but I believe a festival should stand for more than that. Cultural diversity must be emphasised, as well as a commitment to core values. Reaffirming this ambition can be the key to long-term success – and this is what we aim for in the future.” The future for music festivals remains uncertain but, for now, the legendary island of freedom looks safe back in Gerendai’s hands. READ MORE

1 hour ago

CoinDesk 20 index drops 1.4% as all constituents decline

1 hour ago

Equipment Finance Platform Trad.Fi to Bring $650M in Private Credit Onchain

1 hour ago

Subscribe to News

Get the latest news and updates directly to your inbox.

At FSNN – Free Speech News Network, we deliver unfiltered reporting and in-depth analysis on the stories that matter most. From breaking headlines to global perspectives, our mission is to keep you informed, empowered, and connected.

FSNN.net is owned and operated by GlobalBoost Media
, an independent media organization dedicated to advancing transparency, free expression, and factual journalism across the digital landscape.

Facebook X (Twitter) Discord Telegram
Latest News

Why So Many People Feel Lost

57 seconds ago

Prediction markets get first U.S. rule proposal as CFTC pursues contract reviews

23 minutes ago

Pyth Launches 24/7 Pricing Indices for Stocks and Commodities

26 minutes ago

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest news and updates directly to your inbox.

© 2026 GlobalBoost Media. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Our Authors
  • Contact

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

🍪

Cookies

We and our selected partners wish to use cookies to collect information about you for functional purposes and statistical marketing. You may not give us your consent for certain purposes by selecting an option and you can withdraw your consent at any time via the cookie icon.

Cookie Preferences

Manage Cookies

Cookies are small text that can be used by websites to make the user experience more efficient. The law states that we may store cookies on your device if they are strictly necessary for the operation of this site. For all other types of cookies, we need your permission. This site uses various types of cookies. Some cookies are placed by third party services that appear on our pages.

Your permission applies to the following domains:

  • https://fsnn.net
Necessary
Necessary cookies help make a website usable by enabling basic functions like page navigation and access to secure areas of the website. The website cannot function properly without these cookies.
Statistic
Statistic cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
Preferences
Preference cookies enable a website to remember information that changes the way the website behaves or looks, like your preferred language or the region that you are in.
Marketing
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.