FSNN | Decentralized News Aggregation for Free Speech

from the from-a-concerned-citizen dept I think we can all agree that nobody seems to be taking the business of governing ourselves terribly seriously. I say we can all agree on this because I think we all know that Donald Trump is a deranged, narcissistic criminal. We know this. Even those of you who nominally support him — because you have convinced yourself that he is the only thing standing between you and everything you hold dear, however you define that. For some of you, I think the answer is quite pathetic, if we are being honest. The relationships you have…

Politicians Want To Fix the Economy. So Why Do They Keep Making It Worse?

3 hours ago

Google Sets 2029 Deadline to Deal With Quantum Threat—Is It a Problem for Bitcoin?

3 hours ago0 Views

Bitcoin Tests Key Level as Compression Builds Toward $80K

4 hours ago0 Views

$15 Billion in Bitcoin Options Expire Friday as Trump’s Iran Deadline Looms

4 hours ago0 Views

Judge Rejects Government’s Weak Attempt To Memory-Hole DOGE Deposition Videos

5 hours ago0 Views

Article Reporting on Jan. 6 as “Insurrection” Not Defamatory + Pardon Isn’t “Acquittal”

5 hours ago0 Views

BitGo, ZKsync build tokenized deposit infrastructure to bring banks onchain

5 hours ago0 Views

Bulls Aim To Regain Control Of Bitcoin, Altcoins: Are Charts Bullish?

5 hours ago0 Views

AI & Censorship

EFF Sues for Answers About Medicare’s AI Experiment

SAN FRANCISCO – The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) today filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) seeking records about a multi-state program that is using AI to evaluate requests for medical care. “Tasking an algorithm with making determinations about treatment can create unwarranted—and even discriminatory—delays or denials of necessary medical care,” said Kit Walsh, EFF’s Director of AI and Access-to-Knowledge Legal Projects. “Given these serious risks, the public requires transparency that it hasn’t gotten. We’re suing to get badly needed answers about how Medicare’s AI experiment works.” Announced by CMS Administrator Dr.…

AI agents to help investigators unearth crypto criminals, according to new TRM program

Ether Supply Tightens as Staked ETH Reaches New 38M High

F1 Champion McLaren Racing Joins Hedera Council to Help Govern Network

AI & Crypto

Politics

Brief Challenging California Law Banning Publication of Information About Sealed Arrests

Media & Culture 6 hours ago

From the Introduction to an amicus brief filed by Gill Sperlein and Ronnie London (the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression) on behalf of FIRE, the First Amendment Coalition, and me in Blackman v. Substack, Inc.: The trial court correctly…

The Iran War Has Already Hurt Oil Production More Than the ’70s Energy Crisis Did

7 hours ago

FCC Bans Nearly All Wireless Routers Sold in the U.S.

8 hours ago

Media & Culture

On Scholarly Engagement

Media & Culture

Adam Carolla: Why No One Under 30 Trusts Legacy Media

Media & Culture

Facebook Guilty

Utah Court of Appeals Upholds Dismissal of Child Sexual Abuse Accusations

Grant of Mental Health Pretrial Diversion for Man Accused of Attempted Murder Reversed

Today in Supreme Court History: March 25, 2014

Mail-In Ballots, the 2026 Election, and the Supreme Court

Brickbat: Triage

How Not To Write About Space Exploration

Divided Ninth Circuit Upholds California Exclusion of Religious Curricula from Parent-Designed Charter School “Independent Study Programs”

Don't Miss!

Prediction Markets Don’t Just Forecast Power

Bitmine Launches MAVAN Ethereum Staking Platform for Institutions

Circle Selloff ‘Looks Overdone’ Analysts Say as Shares Rise After Cathie Wood Buys the Dip

Gov’t Admits More Than 100 Asylum Seekers Were Deported In Violation Of A Single Court Order

SBI, Sony back Startale’s $63 million push to expand Japan’s tokenized finance stack

8 hours ago0 Views

These 4 Bitcoin Onchain Metrics Point to ‘Weaker Demand’ for BTC

8 hours ago0 Views

Visa Becomes First Major Payments Company to Join Canton Network as Super Validator

8 hours ago0 Views

👓 Who’s Really Watching What Smartglasses See? | EFFector 38.6

9 hours ago0 Views

AI Might Be Our Best Shot At Taking Back The Open Web

9 hours ago0 Views

Ethereum roadmap updates so far in 2026

9 hours ago0 Views

Decentralized Crowdfunding Can Boost Artists During Market Downturn

9 hours ago0 Views

Tom Lee’s Ethereum Treasury Firm BitMine Launches ‘Made in America’ Staking Network

9 hours ago0 Views

Editor's Picks

Daily Deal: Geekey Multi-Tool

Media & Culture 6 hours ago

U.S. lawmakers dig into tokenizing securities as Trump ties muddy waters

Cryptocurrency & Free Speech Finance 7 hours ago

Coinbase Co-founder and Tech Leaders to Join Trump‘s Advisory Council

Cryptocurrency & Free Speech Finance 7 hours ago

Franklin Templeton, Ondo Finance Bring 24/7 Tokenized ETF Trading to Crypto Users

Cryptocurrency & Free Speech Finance 7 hours ago

‘From the river to the sea’ is now a criminal offense for millions of Australians. Arrests are underway.

Campus & Education 10 hours ago

UK government freezes crypto donations

Cryptocurrency & Free Speech Finance 10 hours ago

Company Partnering with Marshall Islands to Boose Digital Sovereign Bond

Cryptocurrency & Free Speech Finance 10 hours ago

Cipher Digital Stock Pops as Firm Bolsters Shift From Bitcoin Mining With 15-Year Data Center Deal

Cryptocurrency & Free Speech Finance 10 hours ago

Opinions & Debates

Debates

Iran War Tests Trump — and a Vulnerable China

News Room

“Tonight,” said Donald Trump to the people of Iran on 28 February, “bombs will be dropping everywhere. … When we are finished, take over your government.” These words seemed to evoke a single apocalyptic night, after which the Iranian people would emerge from their shelters, blinking in the light of a new day, to discover that the IRGC, the Artesh, the Basij, and the hated morality police were all buried under the rubble, America’s planes had departed, and Iran was free at last.Four weeks was the President’s actual timeline, but that’s looking doubtful now. Trump was warned that the Iranian…

Debates

The UAE’s Case for Sovereignty Over Ideology

Debates

Meanwhile, in Sudan While Iran, Israel, and Gaza have dominated headlines, a bloody power struggle among Sudanese warlords grinds on.

Debates

Nick Cave at The Domain, Sydney: Review

Debates

A Critical Review of Naoise Mac Sweeney’s New Book

Debates

Too Vague to Restrict Immigration

Debates

Grace Tame’s Selective Compassion

Latest News

Global Free Speech

CPJ, partners call for release of Turkish journalist İsmail Arı

The Committee to Protect Journalists joined eight other local and international press freedom and human rights organizations in calling on Turkish authorities to release…

Cryptocurrency & Free Speech Finance

CoinDesk 20 performance update: Stellar (XLM) gains 6% as all constituents rise

Aave (AAVE), up 5.8% from Tuesday, joined Stellar (XLM) as a top performer. Read the full article here

Cryptocurrency & Free Speech Finance

Bitcoin Rallies After Iran Strikes but Safe Haven Role Unproven

Before the Iran war broke out, Bitcoin spent months trading sideways while gold rallied to record levels.At the time, gold was seen as the…

Cryptocurrency & Free Speech Finance

Morning Minute: Circle Plunges 20% Over Clarity Act Yield Changes

Morning Minute is a daily newsletter written by Tyler Warner. The analysis and opinions expressed are his own and do not necessarily reflect those of…

Malak Mattar is a Gazan artist based in London This article first appeared in the Winter 2025 issue of Index on Censorship, Gen Z is revolting: Why the world’s youth will not be silenced, published on 18 December 2025. The tortuous process that led to the signing of the 1993 Oslo Accords only came about after sustained Palestinian resistance to Israel’s occupation of the West Bank and Gaza, beginning with the First Intifada of 1987-91. This pushed the international community into action, the subsequent negotiations including several Arab countries alongside Israel and representatives of the Palestinian nation. But the Oslo Accords did not live up to their promise, and did not end the conflict between Israel and Palestine. Thirty-two years on, and two years into Israel’s genocidal war in Gaza, President Trump’s 20-point peace plan similarly seeks to bring about a new Middle East. The cessation of hostilities presents an opportunity for comparing the two plans, and to ask a crucial question: Will this new initiative fare any better in bringing peace, justice and security to the region? Two groups were opposed to the Oslo Accords from the start: Israel’s right wing, and the Islamic resistance group Hamas. Today, the two groups are in control of their respective territories. Hamas holds sway in Gaza, and the ultra-nationalist religious parties have held the Israeli government hostage since the last parliamentary elections in 2022. In 1991, as the International Peace Conference that ultimately led to the Oslo Accords convened in Madrid, I was visiting Geneva, attending a meeting of the Palestinian Welfare Association. In different ways, many of us living in the Occupied Territories had struggled to bring an end to Israel’s occupation of our land. I took the path of human rights, exposing Israel’s repeated violations of international law. The Intifada of 1987-91 was Palestine’s war of liberation; collectively, we were proud of our success in bringing Israel to negotiate with the Palestinians. After my meetings in Geneva, I travelled to the town of Brunnen, to begin a three-day walk around Lake Lucerne. I needed to be by myself and to have some time to reflect. I was expecting that we were at the cusp of a period of peace and an end to our long-lasting struggle. I wanted to think about where this would leave us. Passing through the attractive city of Lausanne, I recalled visiting there with my parents in 1971, when I was 20. My father had often mentioned visiting the city in 1949, when he took part in the conference of the UN Palestine Conciliation Commission. Of the conference itself I knew very little, and I didn’t think to ask him more. As we entered the city, I could tell that my father was wistful, yet I still did not try to inquire what was going on in his mind. How I regret this, especially as the struggle for the right of return of Palestinian refugees forced out of their homes between 1948 and 1949 is still continuing. I was more interested in visiting the prison dungeon in the Château de Chillon, near Montreux on Lake Geneva. It was more than half a century before I learned fully about my father’s role while writing my book, We Could Have Been Friends, My Father and I. I left on the nine o’clock boat from Brunnen to Treib, and then started my hike. The Swiss, I had heard, would be doing their traditional annual walk around the lake, this year commemorating the 700th anniversary of their federation. I expected to find many walkers along the path but soon realised that those who had wanted to walk the route had already done so and gone. I was the only one hiking, and so I had the path to myself. Forty-two years after my father’s participation in the conference at Lausanne, another conference was taking place, this time in Madrid. Perhaps because the earlier conference in Lausanne had failed, the organisers of this new initiative wanted it to take place somewhere else. Spain, with its famous history of Arabs and Jews producing a rich civilisation together, was certainly a more auspicious venue. I did not know what one could reasonably expect from Madrid. James Baker, US Secretary of State, had consumed public attention with his lengthy deliberations about the procedure to be followed. At the time, it was claimed that Baker did not show the list of Palestinian participants to Israel in advance of the conference. A small gesture, but enough for Faisal Husseini, a recognised local leader, to claim a meaningful victory. We, he said, had the final say about our representatives, not Israel. But these were hollow words. Israel had, after all, excluded the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) and Palestinians from Jerusalem. But somehow, it was deemed good for morale if the Palestinians believed that Israel had not chosen their delegation for them. I hoped that this was not indicative of what was to come. On the eve of the Madrid conference, Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir addressed the European Parliament. Highlights from his speech were broadcast on Israeli television’s evening news programme. It was not Palestinian self-determination that was an obstacle to peace, he told the parliamentarians, but rather the refusal of the Arab states to recognise Israel. Benjamin Netanyahu, more recently, has repeated similar claims. The broadcast then cut to Yigal Karmon, an adviser to Shamir on counter-terrorism affairs. No one – no one – would get to Madrid without Israel’s approval, he declared. “It is man by man,” he added, in his bad English. Karmon’s depressing words notwithstanding, the conference did take place. The floodgates of hope were ready to burst, and Israeli intransigence could not stop this. After Saddam Hussein’s defeat in the First Gulf War, a massive defence mechanism against the very notion of hope had emerged. And yet. The Palestinian Land Registration Department was packed with people buying land. Palestinians who were living in Kuwait were in Amman, waiting for the return. Before the selection of delegates, we had felt a long way from the march of events. Everything seemed to be happening above our heads. It is much the same today, the disillusion that has emerged from negotiations over Trump’s plan seeming very much like it did in 1991. But then, every peace conference must seem like a letdown. What war has ever brought satisfaction to everyone? Peace conferences, at best, are compromise agreements. Thereafter, everything depends on what the parties are able to make of them. Even so, there were objective indicators in the Oslo Accords pointing to disaster. First, the illegal Jewish settlements on our land were to remain in place, with no agreement on freezing their expansion. And then, there were no guarantees concerning the creation of an independent Palestinian state at the end of the process. Trump’s plan echoes these uncertainties. The withdrawal of the Israeli Defence Force (IDF) from Gaza is to be “based on standards, milestones, and timeframes linked to demilitarisation”, to be agreed upon by the IDF and the International Stabilisation Force created for Gaza. What does this mean in fact? That “Israel will retain security responsibility, including a security perimeter for the foreseeable future”. It also means that as of now, there is no end envisaged to the siege of Gaza. This means, amongst other things, that Gaza will not be able to import machinery required for reconstruction. The other problematic area in the plan relates to Palestinian statehood. The plan states that “while Gaza re-development advances and when the PA reform program is faithfully carried out, the conditions may finally be in place for a credible pathway to Palestinian self-determination and statehood”. Translation: even if the Palestinian Authority carried out the prescribed reforms, there is no guarantee that these will be followed by a Palestinian state. Palestinian interests, once again, were being determined without the input of Palestinians themselves. Back to 1991 and Lake Lucerne. Having reached the top of the first ascent, I began the descent. The lake was framed by steep cliffs, and the walk was not as easy as I had anticipated. But at least I had no worries about finding the path, as this was well marked. A refreshing wind blew as I walked and breathed in the crisp clean air. How different it was, I thought, to walk in this Swiss terrain rather than the familiar hills of Ramallah. Around Lake Lucerne, nature is washed and rejuvenated regularly. The rains collect in streams and waterfalls, or remain on the peaks in the form of snow or glaciers. I remembered, on my first visit to the region with my parents, being impressed with the rushing water. I was nervous, but also emboldened, by the powerful thrust of the water, gushing down forcefully. In Ramallah, where the rains are far less frequent, everything remains in place for years. A thin layer of lichen grows on rocks, giving them a leaden and ancient presence. But the most striking difference between Lake Lucerne and Ramallah is that their mountains are majestic: imposing, remote, safe from human domination. Ours are mere hills, easily reached, vulnerable to the greed of jealous suitors. As I continued my descent, the words of Haidar Abdul Shafi, head of the Palestinian delegation to Madrid, came back to me. In his speech he was addressing, “the Israeli people with whom we have had a prolonged exchange of pain.” What a brilliant way to put it. The tragedy, as I felt it, was that even if peace should be reached it would be impossible to undo the pain that had been inflicted and suffered up to this point. Before the whole world, Haider had pronounced: “We, the people of Palestine, stand before you in the fullness of our pain.” He was offering our adversary hope, by declaring that the Palestinian nation was willing to live side by side with them in peace, sharing the land as equals. Now that my wife Penny and I are older, I no longer think that everything is possible. Time has become a pivotal factor in my life. Sometimes one succeeds, and sometimes not. I have had my share of both. Either way, I have had to learn how to accept failure as failure, rather than as a temporary setback that I may still get a second chance to rectify. Will the wheels finally turn, I wondered? Abdul Shafi had indeed said what the Israelis claimed that they were hoping to hear. I wanted to believe that peace, in some form, was on its way. I was already beginning to think about what would come next.But while Abdul Shafi was speaking, Yitzhak Shamir had looked on with cold eyes. Most of what Abdul Shafi had said was forward-looking. The deeply-felt pain of the Palestinians had been given ample expression, but he had also paid recognition to the solidarity of those Israelis who had shared our pain with us. There was a reaching-out for the Israelis, and for the world, to accept our aspirations for self-determination, to correct the injustices caused to generations of Palestinians. But all the while Shamir looked on with a deadpan face, unimpressed and unmoved. But while Abdul Shafi was speaking, Yitzhak Shamir had looked on with cold eyes. Most of what Abdul Shafi had said was forward-looking. The deeply-felt pain of the Palestinians had been given ample expression, but he had also paid recognition to the solidarity of those Israelis who had shared our pain with us. There was a reaching-out for the Israelis, and for the world, to accept our aspirations for self-determination, to correct the injustices caused to generations of Palestinians. But all the while Shamir looked on with a deadpan face, unimpressed and unmoved. When it was his turn to speak, the Israeli prime minister began by decrying the attempts of others to re-write history. But then, he went on to do exactly that. He repeated the famous Zionist claim, that “hundreds of thousands of Arabs who lived in Mandatory Palestine were encouraged by their own leaders to flee from their homes.” He did not even deign to call us Palestinians. And then to what he deemed to be the “root cause of the conflict”: “Arab refusal to recognise the legitimacy of the State of Israel”. Shamir denied the Occupation, refused to acknowledge either the fundamental rights of the Palestinian nation or their suffering. The West Bank, for Shamir, was Judea and Samaria; he belittled our aspirations for a nation, declaring that while “the Arab nations” controlled a landmass of 14 million square kilometres, Israel (in his estimation including the Occupied Territories) controlled a mere 28,000 square kilometres. “The issue is not territory but our existence,” Shamir concluded There was nothing new in Shamir’s speech. If anything, it merely served as proof of Israel’s intransigence, the only difference being that it was now being proclaimed from the podium at the opening of the historic peace conference. This did not bode well for the future. Today, this same Israeli intransigence persists, Shamir’s rhetoric replaced with Netanyahu’s bluster.After my return from Switzerland that winter of 1991, a third snow of the year fell on Ramallah. I decided to take a walk on a street behind the Evangelical Home, on a path that ran parallel to Tireh Road. The hill ahead seemed colossal, as though the houses on it were perched atop a huge edifice. It was engulfed in fog, permitting only a blurred view of the limestone houses and the dark rock of the gardens behind. Towards the east, the sun (which I could see blurred like a shiny chalk ball in the west) was reflected in the clearing sky. Beneath that clear cap, the clouds and the fog below were still thick. The features of the familiar landscape were altered, the horizon redefined as a line slicing the eastern sky into thick stratus clouds and the clear sky. Beneath, one could spot here and there the hills behind, covered by a shimmering sheath of fog, milky white clouds shrouding the familiar hills in mystery. On my way back, I could not resist walking down towards the wadi. Every level I reached opened up the view, the fog receding. But the mystery ahead remained, elusive and out of reach. What, I wondered, would be the future of these hills if Israel were to get its way? What would happen if negotiations could not stop the Israeli intentions that even then I knew so well? Twenty-five years on, I now know this future. The hills where I had once enjoyed walking have now been militarised, with Israeli settlements perched atop. Armed settlers in balaclavas brandish machine guns, attacking farmers and peaceful villagers in their homes. There is nothing in Trump’s plan that is likely to alter any of this depressing reality. Apartheid has only been given a boost, and the new initiative will not bring peace to the Middle East. The Trump plan has been described as “sugar-coated neocolonialism” – not only a moral atrocity but a policy one, too. Like the earlier experiment of the Oslo Accords, the 20-point Trump peace plan is likely to only mark another dismal failure. And so, we will continue to suffer war after war, without hope of reprieve. All illustrations by Malak Mattar, a Gazan artist based in London READ MORE

12 hours ago

Trending

Popular

BROWSE OUR EDITOR'S HAND PICKED NEWS!

The News Roundup

AI & Crypto

Politics

Don't Miss!

Editor's Picks

Subscribe to Updates

Opinions & Debates

Latest News

Subscribe to Updates

Cookies

Manage Cookies

Your permission applies to the following domains: