Close Menu
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
  • Home
  • News
    • Politics
    • Legal & Courts
    • Tech & Big Tech
    • Campus & Education
    • Media & Culture
    • Global Free Speech
  • Opinions
    • Debates
  • Video/Live
  • Community
  • Freedom Index
  • About
    • Mission
    • Contact
    • Support
Trending

FBI Raids Offices Of Ohio Voter Registration Group That Fought GOP Redistricting Efforts

7 minutes ago

Even an AI-Sparked Economic Miracle Will Not Save the Federal Budget

8 minutes ago

Coinbase joins tokenized stock race with onchain shares and dividend payments

26 minutes ago
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Discord Telegram
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
Market Data Newsletter
Tuesday, June 16
  • Home
  • News
    • Politics
    • Legal & Courts
    • Tech & Big Tech
    • Campus & Education
    • Media & Culture
    • Global Free Speech
  • Opinions
    • Debates
  • Video/Live
  • Community
  • Freedom Index
  • About
    • Mission
    • Contact
    • Support
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
Home»Cryptocurrency & Free Speech Finance»Nvidia’s $20B Bond Sale Strengthens Bitcoin Miners’ AI Pivot
Cryptocurrency & Free Speech Finance

Nvidia’s $20B Bond Sale Strengthens Bitcoin Miners’ AI Pivot

News RoomBy News Room19 hours agoNo Comments3 Mins Read616 Views
Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest Copy Link LinkedIn Tumblr Email VKontakte Telegram
Nvidia’s B Bond Sale Strengthens Bitcoin Miners’ AI Pivot
Share
Facebook Twitter Pinterest Email Copy Link

Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

Key Takeaways

Playback Speed

Select a Voice

Chipmaker Nvidia has reportedly become the latest company to tap the AI debt boom with a planned $20 billion bond offering, underscoring the relentless demand for AI infrastructure and data centers that has also created new opportunities for Bitcoin miners diversifying beyond crypto.

On Monday, Bloomberg reported that Nvidia is seeking to raise at least $20 billion through a multi-part bond sale to help finance AI-related investments and refinance existing debt.

Citing people familiar with the matter, the report said Nvidia plans to issue notes across seven maturities ranging from two to 30 years, with the longest-dated bonds expected to yield roughly 0.9 percentage points above comparable US Treasury securities.

The offering highlights investors’ continued appetite for financing AI expansion and signals that one of the industry’s most influential companies expects demand for AI infrastructure to remain strong.

Source: Cointelegraph

As the dominant supplier of the GPUs that power large language models, Nvidia sits at the center of the AI ecosystem. Its chips are used extensively by hyperscalers and cloud providers, making the company’s capital spending plans a closely watched barometer for the broader industry.

The sustained AI buildout has also benefited an increasing number of Bitcoin miners, which have begun repurposing their energy-intensive facilities and power infrastructure for high-performance computing and AI hosting. 

Companies that once relied almost exclusively on Bitcoin mining revenue, including HIVE Digital, TeraWulf, Hut 8 and CleanSpark, are now positioning themselves as providers of data center capacity, leveraging internal infrastructure and existing power agreements to capitalize on growing demand for computing resources.

Related: Bitcoin mining difficulty drops 10% in 11th largest downward adjustment

BTC mining economics remain under pressure

Bitcoin miners are pursuing AI diversification as the economics of their core crypto business become increasingly challenging, especially in the wake of the April 2024 halving, which intensified margin pressures amid elevated mining difficulty and operating costs.

The industry has faced what some analysts have described as the “harshest margin environment of all time,” prompting many miners to sell portions of their Bitcoin treasuries, reduce leverage and seek new revenue streams beyond cryptocurrency mining.

According to data from TheEnergyMag, Bitcoin miners collectively sold more than 15,000 BTC between October and March.

Bitcoin mining companies’ treasury sales have accelerated since October, when BTC peaked above $126,000. Source: TheEnergyMag

Against this backdrop, analysts expect large miners to evolve into AI infrastructure providers. Bernstein, for example, recently said it expects IREN to derive the vast majority of its value from AI infrastructure, citing the rapid growth of the company’s cloud AI business.

Related: Professional investors dumped 52K BTC worth of ETFs in Q1, filings show

Read the full article here

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using AI-powered analysis and real-time sources.

Get Your Fact Check Report

Enter your email to receive detailed fact-checking analysis

5 free reports remaining

Continue with Full Access

You've used your 5 free reports. Sign up for unlimited access!

Already have an account? Sign in here

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email Telegram Copy Link
News Room
  • Website
  • Facebook
  • X (Twitter)
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn

The FSNN News Room is the voice of our in-house journalists, editors, and researchers. We deliver timely, unbiased reporting at the crossroads of finance, cryptocurrency, and global politics, providing clear, fact-driven analysis free from agendas.

Related Articles

Cryptocurrency & Free Speech Finance

Coinbase joins tokenized stock race with onchain shares and dividend payments

26 minutes ago
Cryptocurrency & Free Speech Finance

Binance Says it Considers EU License Compliant Amid Reports of Potential Rejection

29 minutes ago
Cryptocurrency & Free Speech Finance

BlackRock Debuts BITA Bitcoin ETF, Trading Partial Upside for Double-Digit Yield

31 minutes ago
Cryptocurrency & Free Speech Finance

Ripple invests in Flutterwave, bringing RLUSD and XRP Ledger to payments in Africa

1 hour ago
Cryptocurrency & Free Speech Finance

Win for Crypto Pricing, Loss for Tokenized Access

1 hour ago
Cryptocurrency & Free Speech Finance

Robinhood Trims Headcount by 10% Amid Crypto Revenue Crunch

2 hours ago
Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Editors Picks

Even an AI-Sparked Economic Miracle Will Not Save the Federal Budget

8 minutes ago

Coinbase joins tokenized stock race with onchain shares and dividend payments

26 minutes ago

Binance Says it Considers EU License Compliant Amid Reports of Potential Rejection

29 minutes ago

BlackRock Debuts BITA Bitcoin ETF, Trading Partial Upside for Double-Digit Yield

31 minutes ago
Latest Posts

Trump Sees World Cup Visitors as a Threat, But America Sees a Chance for Hospitality

1 hour ago

Trump Administration Hijacks Police Grants to Leverage Local Police For Its Authoritarian Ends

1 hour ago

The UK plans to ban under 16s from accessing social media. Photo: Nick Fancher/Unsplash The UK government has announced a ban on social media for under-16s and then some kind of social media curfew at night for children between 17 and 18. I’m pretty sympathetic to the idea that we need to hold social media companies to account for children and young people’s unfettered access to the kind of content that would be pretty bad for me as an adult if I sought it out. I know of young teenagers who have been lured into sending nude pictures to a sexy “woman” online and then told the images will be sent to all their friends unless they hand over a lot of money. And anorexic girls who find others online to compare what food they have eaten and how to outwit the doctors and parents who are trying to help them. And 14-year-old boys who are pushed vile misogynistic content from the manosphere because the algorithm has identified them as being just that, a 14-year-old boy. Most young people will have seen hardcore violent porn – stuff that my generation couldn’t have even accessed in licensed porn shops – by the age of 11 or 12. At one time a few years ago, kids regularly shared videos of beheadings in the playground. When we carried out research for our Gen Z themed issue last year, many young people said they had seen the video footage of Charlie Kirk being shot. But ban children from most social media platforms altogether? What is their right to free expression? YouTube can push you manosphere videos, but many young people use YouTube to learn: from understanding maths to grasping complicated concepts. This is important in general and especially important for dyslexic kids who have problems reading, or for children from poorer households without books. Social media – often a gateway to the internet more broadly – can open up a world that as a teenager you might never experience at home: music, books and culture. Social media often gives people the words to describe how they feel and who they are. Instagram is just as much a place to share dance routines and comedy sketches as it is to learn about politics and news. Social media is a place of protest too, and yes, even for the under-18s. We didn’t object to the revelation that youth revolts against an elderly oligarchy in Nepal were organised via the gaming site Discord, and that a viral video of a schoolboy kicked them off. In 2026 digital rights are a central part of freedom of expression, not just an add-on, and freedom of expression is not just something you get as a grown-up. This is before we consider whether a social media ban is possible. It undoubtedly isn’t. Australia which introduced a ban (although not on YouTube, gaming sites or education sites) has shown us that young people and families can very well circumvent it. At least 60% of young people are still on social media, including on many much less regulated than sites like Snapchat. VPNs make it easier to bypass all national regulation. We use VPNs at Index as an extra layer of security and privacy and we acknowledge the crucial role they play in authoritarian states. Do we want the government to ban them too – or fine children’s parents if they let them use them? How the hell do you police a curfew for 17 to 18 year olds anyway? Will neighbours report young people hanging around the streets after 9pm on their phones? Governments who introduce policies they know won’t work just discredit themselves. The thing that shocked me most about Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s announcement was that there was no mention of the trade-offs between a social media ban and free expression as if it simply wasn’t an issue. No reassurance that the government wouldn’t decide at some stage that the ban on social media and gaming might extend to adults taking part in perfectly legitimate behaviour which the government might disapprove of. Or an admission that the government itself uses social media sites freely to push its own messages (including the latest announcement). In many ways, the government’s ban on social media for children feels like an evasion. The government doesn’t want to address the deep problems social media causes for all of us: that X is a platform run by a US-based trillionaire, Elon Musk, who wants to use it to influence our national politics. Or that Mark Zuckerberg talks a good free speech game but his company, Meta, is trying to suppress a book, Sarah Wynn Williams’ Careless People, about how the company operates. Or that extremist views and racist conspiracy theories – including from bad actors which ban social media in their own countries –  are being used to cause deep societal divisions and bring huge financial rewards for the social media companies themselves. That’s before we even talk about tax evasion and the way our data (and our children’s data) is being monetised.  How social media platforms operate is untransparent, complicated and changing all the time. How children are affected – or not – is doubly complicated. Platforms have vast computing resources – and could be regulated by government to be more transparent about the way they operate without affecting free expression. Then we might all be able to decide democratically what sort of a society we want online –  for us and our children. My kids, now in their 20s, grew up in the current atmosphere. Their generation distrust many things they read online, share tips on how to avoid scams and go on regular detoxes from social media so they don’t endlessly scroll. They have vast networks of real friends online but are increasingly trying to do more things IRL (in real life). They are incredibly lucky to be living in a liberal democracy, which mostly doesn’t restrict access to social media and where the internet has opened up their minds to untold possibilities and ideas. In China, social media is accessed through government-monitored websites centred round WeChat: every interaction can be seen by the censors if they choose to. VPNs regularly get blocked. Russia is tightening its grip on cyber space and people often find the internet has been taken down by the security services. It’s a similar story in Iran, which is just coming out of a months-long internet blockade. And in these countries and others, we regularly hear of people who comment or like a social media post from a person or organisation the government doesn’t like and end up in prison or worse. It would be hyperbolic at this stage to suggest the UK is moving in the direction of China, Russia and Iran. But nor should we downplay what a paternalistic move this is. It bypasses the benefits of the internet for children without actually tackling the risks. The internet, when it started, opened up a world of free expression. Today governments should be thinking about how to protect that right to free expression for everyone including young people, not issuing unenforceable bans that will ultimately punish teenagers and their parents –  and which ministers know won’t work. Perhaps the Prime Minister and his cabinet should be looking a little carefully at the older generation’s behaviour. Recent US research showed that it is the over 65s who are most likely to spread misinformation and fake news online. Or is this the next step? Remove the internet from the teens, next the boomers and then all of us.   READ MORE

1 hour ago

Subscribe to News

Get the latest news and updates directly to your inbox.

At FSNN – Free Speech News Network, we deliver unfiltered reporting and in-depth analysis on the stories that matter most. From breaking headlines to global perspectives, our mission is to keep you informed, empowered, and connected.

FSNN.net is owned and operated by GlobalBoost Media
, an independent media organization dedicated to advancing transparency, free expression, and factual journalism across the digital landscape.

Facebook X (Twitter) Discord Telegram
Latest News

FBI Raids Offices Of Ohio Voter Registration Group That Fought GOP Redistricting Efforts

7 minutes ago

Even an AI-Sparked Economic Miracle Will Not Save the Federal Budget

8 minutes ago

Coinbase joins tokenized stock race with onchain shares and dividend payments

26 minutes ago

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest news and updates directly to your inbox.

© 2026 GlobalBoost Media. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Our Authors
  • Contact

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

🍪

Cookies

We and our selected partners wish to use cookies to collect information about you for functional purposes and statistical marketing. You may not give us your consent for certain purposes by selecting an option and you can withdraw your consent at any time via the cookie icon.

Cookie Preferences

Manage Cookies

Cookies are small text that can be used by websites to make the user experience more efficient. The law states that we may store cookies on your device if they are strictly necessary for the operation of this site. For all other types of cookies, we need your permission. This site uses various types of cookies. Some cookies are placed by third party services that appear on our pages.

Your permission applies to the following domains:

  • https://fsnn.net
Necessary
Necessary cookies help make a website usable by enabling basic functions like page navigation and access to secure areas of the website. The website cannot function properly without these cookies.
Statistic
Statistic cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
Preferences
Preference cookies enable a website to remember information that changes the way the website behaves or looks, like your preferred language or the region that you are in.
Marketing
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.