Close Menu
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
  • Home
  • News
    • Politics
    • Legal & Courts
    • Tech & Big Tech
    • Campus & Education
    • Media & Culture
    • Global Free Speech
  • Opinions
    • Debates
  • Video/Live
  • Community
  • Freedom Index
  • About
    • Mission
    • Contact
    • Support
Trending

THORChain rejects Bitget request to block hacker as $6 million moves to bitcoin

9 minutes ago

Scammers steal $2M in ETH as fake GIWA network fools DYORSWAP

13 minutes ago

Morning Minute: SEC Clears Token Buybacks for Crypto Networks

15 minutes ago
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Discord Telegram
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
Market Data Newsletter
Monday, September 28
  • Home
  • News
    • Politics
    • Legal & Courts
    • Tech & Big Tech
    • Campus & Education
    • Media & Culture
    • Global Free Speech
  • Opinions
    • Debates
  • Video/Live
  • Community
  • Freedom Index
  • About
    • Mission
    • Contact
    • Support
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
Home»News»Global Free Speech»Nigeria jails journalist for 2 months pending trial over corruption reporting  
Global Free Speech

Nigeria jails journalist for 2 months pending trial over corruption reporting  

News RoomBy News Room2 months agoNo Comments3 Mins Read8 Views
Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest Copy Link LinkedIn Tumblr Email VKontakte Telegram
Nigeria jails journalist for 2 months pending trial over corruption reporting  
Share
Facebook Twitter Pinterest Email Copy Link

Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

Key Takeaways

Playback Speed

Select a Voice

Abuja, July 15, 2026—The Committee to Protect Journalists calls on Nigerian authorities to immediately release Secret Reporters journalist Stanley Ugagbe, who was remanded to prison on Tuesday for two months of pretrial detention, and to drop the cybercrime and defamation charges against him and his publisher, Tega Oghenedoro, also known as Fejiro Oliver.

Ugagbe was seized from a taxi in the capital, Abuja, on July 1 by security officers and detained until his July 6 release, without charge, from the National Cybercrime Centre. 

When Ugagbe returned to the center to retrieve his phone and laptop on July 13, the police said they had orders to detain him, but released him into the custody of his lawyer, Adekunle Olanipekun, and instructed them to appear in court the following day, Olanipekun told CPJ.

On July 14, an Abuja court charged Ugagbe and Oliver on six counts over their June investigation into a Central Bank of Nigeria executive’s involvement in alleged corruption and infidelity, according to a copy of the charge sheet, reviewed by CPJ. It described Oliver, who is outside Nigeria, as a suspect “now at large.”

“Nigerian authorities have already subjected Stanley Ugagbe to secret detention. Now they are seeking to keep him behind bars for reporting on allegations of official corruption,” said CPJ Africa Director Angela Quintal. “Authorities must immediately release Ugagbe and drop the charges against him and Fejiro Oliver if they are serious about upholding democratic principles.”

Ugagbe pleaded not guilty and applied for bail but the judge adjourned his application until September 21, as the prosecutor requested time to respond, Olanipekun told CPJ. With Nigeria’s courts due to begin their annual one-month recess from July 27, Ugagbe was remanded to Kuje Custodial Centre, about 40 kilometers southwest of Abuja, he added.

Olanipekun said he feared Ugagbe would miss his mother’s funeral on July 30 and he was making a fresh bail application.

Ugagbe and Oliver face the following charges:

  • Aiding, abetting, conspiring, or procuring another to commit an offence, in this case cyberstalking, contrary to Section 27(1)(b) of the cybercrimes law, which is punishable by up to seven years imprisonment.
  • False publication, contrary to Section 24 (1)(b) of the same law, which is punishable by up to three years in prison or a fine of up to 7 million naira (US$ 5,074).
  • Bullying, threatening, or harassing another person, contrary to Section 24(2)(a) of the same law, which is punishable by up to 10 years in prison or a 25 million naira (US$ 18,121) fine.
  • Harming the executive’s reputation, contrary to Section 24(2)(c) of the same law, which is punishable under (c) (ii) with up to five years imprisonment or a 15 million naira (US$ 10,873) fine.
  • Defamation, contrary to Section 391 of the Penal Code, which is punishable, under Section 392, with up to two years in prison, a fine, or both.
  • False publication intended to harm the executive’s reputation, contrary to Section 393 of the same law, which is punishable by up to two years imprisonment, a fine, or both. 

National police spokesperson Anietie Okokon Edem Iniedu asked CPJ, via text message, to contact the Police Complaint Response Unit, where an official, who declined to give her name, said the police would look into the issue. 

CPJ’s calls and text messages to request comment from the Inspector-General of Police Olatunji Rilwan Disu did not receive any replies.

Read the full article here

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using AI-powered analysis and real-time sources.

Get Your Fact Check Report

Enter your email to receive detailed fact-checking analysis

5 free reports remaining

Continue with Full Access

You've used your 5 free reports. Sign up for unlimited access!

Already have an account? Sign in here

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email Telegram Copy Link
News Room
  • Website
  • Facebook
  • X (Twitter)
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn

The FSNN News Room is the voice of our in-house journalists, editors, and researchers. We deliver timely, unbiased reporting at the crossroads of finance, cryptocurrency, and global politics, providing clear, fact-driven analysis free from agendas.

Related Articles

Global Free Speech

Northern Ireland: 25 years after journalist Martin O’Hagan was murdered, CPJ and Amnesty call for new investigation

53 minutes ago
Global Free Speech

Ahead of trial, CPJ, partners demand release of detained photojournalist Hamdi al-Zaeem

2 days ago
Global Free Speech

Journalist Henry Constantín detained in Cuba on ‘disobedience’ charge

3 days ago
Global Free Speech

The BBC clearly sees the value of television series That Mitchell and Webb Look. Marking the 20th anniversary of its original screening, the Beeb has re-released the series on iPlayer. But – and there is very often a “but” with these things – they’ve removed around 11 sketches from the BAFTA award-winning show. The official word is that these sketches don’t “work today”, which is polite speak for “they may cause offence”. The episodes singled out include scenes featuring a battle reenactment with characters in blackface, a contestant on a show wearing a burka and a lost tribe” in a garden centre. These sketches set out to challenge stereotypes, not to reinforce them; but 20 years on, this distinction seems to have been lost along the way. I’m a bit uncomfortable about this. I find it infantilising, to say the least. Can’t we trust audiences to make up their own minds, to switch off if they find the sketches in question unpalatable? Does the BBC think that we are just passive consumers, unable to disaggregate the mocking of racism from racism itself? These sketches set out to challenge stereotypes, not to reinforce them This act of censorship is distorting – of the shows, whose narratives and rhythms were built to include these sketches, and more broadly too. Conversations we were having 20 years ago have been erased, as if to suggest that they never happened. But they did! And with this erasure, the opportunity for thoughtful engagement and learning from our past is gone. “Let’s just pretend we were all lovely 20 years ago. It’s better that way” seems to be the message. Speaking as a minority myself, I find that knowing the nasty stuff that people said before – and indeed, still say today – is much more useful than pretending it never happened. This approach, I think, is also inconsistent. What it reveals is a cherry-picking (intended or not) of the groups that we can mock, and those that we can’t. Let’s face it, gender stereotypes are rarely deemed to have aged beyond the pale – if that were the case, we would have to wave goodbye to half the television made before the mid-2010s. Suppression like this sends a bad message to artists, namely that what they’re creating today may hold less value tomorrow. Or, even worse, that future audiences may deem them bigots – that Sword of Damocles hovering over the heads of any creative paying attention to the discourse of the moment. Suppression like this sends a bad message to artists The BBC’s decision reaffirms a broader trend. In 2020, Little Britain was removed from the iPlayer platform for similar reasons. It has since been reinstated – minus some sketches. Meanwhile, the UK’s arts space more broadly is seeing a retreat to the land of “safe”, as Index recently revealed in a year-long investigation into self-censorship in UK theatre. The BBC, it must be said, does remarkable stuff. The ongoing podcast investigation into the disappearance of US journalist Austin Tice is just one example. But this does not mean, however, that they don’t sometimes get it wrong. Chopping at That Mitchell and Webb Look is one example. Sure, the removal of the material isn’t the life-or-death story that Index often works on. Sure, Mitchell and Webb aren’t the faces of persecuted artists – they have huge platforms and agreed to the changes themselves. Still, one can’t help but think that the decision came from a place of conservatism, perhaps even fear. This is weak and dispiriting, indeed the very opposite of what enables creativity in the arts. We shouldn’t be encouraging this cultural timidity. Rather, we should harness culture and creativity as the starting points of a conversation about our here and now. That’s what the arts are for, after all. READ MORE

3 days ago
Global Free Speech

CPJ urges US senators to seek accountability for Israel’s killing of journalist Shireen Abu Akleh

3 days ago
Global Free Speech

4 Cameroonian journalists jailed for theft of minister’s glasses – that he later found

4 days ago
Add A Comment

Comments are closed.

Editors Picks

Scammers steal $2M in ETH as fake GIWA network fools DYORSWAP

13 minutes ago

Morning Minute: SEC Clears Token Buybacks for Crypto Networks

15 minutes ago

Once Recession-Proof, D.C. Feels the Pain From Federal Workforce Reductions

50 minutes ago

Northern Ireland: 25 years after journalist Martin O’Hagan was murdered, CPJ and Amnesty call for new investigation

53 minutes ago
Latest Posts

Bitcoin drops to $83,000 as oil climbs back above $100: Crypto Markets Today

1 hour ago

Bitget Restores Bitcoin Withdrawals After $388M Hack

1 hour ago

California Bans Public Officials From Issuing Meme Coins Under New Newsom Law

1 hour ago

Subscribe to News

Get the latest news and updates directly to your inbox.

At FSNN – Free Speech News Network, we deliver unfiltered reporting and in-depth analysis on the stories that matter most. From breaking headlines to global perspectives, our mission is to keep you informed, empowered, and connected.

FSNN.net is owned and operated by GlobalBoost Media
, an independent media organization dedicated to advancing transparency, free expression, and factual journalism across the digital landscape.

Facebook X (Twitter) Discord Telegram
Latest News

THORChain rejects Bitget request to block hacker as $6 million moves to bitcoin

9 minutes ago

Scammers steal $2M in ETH as fake GIWA network fools DYORSWAP

13 minutes ago

Morning Minute: SEC Clears Token Buybacks for Crypto Networks

15 minutes ago

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest news and updates directly to your inbox.

© 2026 GlobalBoost Media. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Our Authors
  • Contact

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

🍪

Cookies

We and our selected partners wish to use cookies to collect information about you for functional purposes and statistical marketing. You may not give us your consent for certain purposes by selecting an option and you can withdraw your consent at any time via the cookie icon.

Cookie Preferences

Manage Cookies

Cookies are small text that can be used by websites to make the user experience more efficient. The law states that we may store cookies on your device if they are strictly necessary for the operation of this site. For all other types of cookies, we need your permission. This site uses various types of cookies. Some cookies are placed by third party services that appear on our pages.

Your permission applies to the following domains:

  • https://fsnn.net
Necessary
Necessary cookies help make a website usable by enabling basic functions like page navigation and access to secure areas of the website. The website cannot function properly without these cookies.
Statistic
Statistic cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
Preferences
Preference cookies enable a website to remember information that changes the way the website behaves or looks, like your preferred language or the region that you are in.
Marketing
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.