Close Menu
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
  • Home
  • News
    • Politics
    • Legal & Courts
    • Tech & Big Tech
    • Campus & Education
    • Media & Culture
    • Global Free Speech
  • Opinions
    • Debates
  • Video/Live
  • Community
  • Freedom Index
  • About
    • Mission
    • Contact
    • Support
Trending

BitGo Posts $3.8B Revenue, $60.7M Loss amid Bitcoin Decline and IPO Costs in Q1

3 minutes ago

Are Democrats Now the Party of Free Markets? Don’t Bet on It.

27 minutes ago

Niger suspends 9 French media outlets for alleged public order threat

40 minutes ago
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Discord Telegram
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
Market Data Newsletter
Thursday, May 14
  • Home
  • News
    • Politics
    • Legal & Courts
    • Tech & Big Tech
    • Campus & Education
    • Media & Culture
    • Global Free Speech
  • Opinions
    • Debates
  • Video/Live
  • Community
  • Freedom Index
  • About
    • Mission
    • Contact
    • Support
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
Home»News»Global Free Speech»Minnesota reporters recount ICE actions, community solidarity: ‘I know it’s going to be dangerous’
Global Free Speech

Minnesota reporters recount ICE actions, community solidarity: ‘I know it’s going to be dangerous’

News RoomBy News Room3 months agoNo Comments11 Mins Read1,993 Views
Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest Copy Link LinkedIn Tumblr Email VKontakte Telegram
Minnesota reporters recount ICE actions, community solidarity: ‘I know it’s going to be dangerous’
Share
Facebook Twitter Pinterest Email Copy Link

Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

Key Takeaways

Playback Speed

Select a Voice

As Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Border Patrol operations have intensified in the Minneapolis and Saint Paul areas as part of the Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) Operation Metro Surge, local journalists have provided an essential look at understanding the impact of federal agents on their community.

While DHS says the operation is aimed at apprehending undocumented immigrants and enhancing public safety, reporting on the operation contradicts this narrative, showing instead the way draconian law enforcement tactics have sown fear and outrage at a local and national scale. 

The wide-scale protests inevitably recall the 2020 protests that swept across Minneapolis following the murder of George Floyd by a local police officer during which CPJ documented an unprecedented number of targeted attacks on journalists by law enforcement. (Photo: Reuters/Shannon Stapleton)

Videos taken by journalists and bystanders— of arrests, protests, and, most notably, the fatal shootings of Alex Pretti and Renée Good — have circulated widely in recent weeks, telling the story of what’s happening on the ground.

The recent arrests by federal authorities of Don Lemon, a former CNN anchor and freelance journalist, and Georgia Fort, an Emmy-winning local reporter, in relation to their coverage of a protest against immigration operations in Minnesota also marks the increasing risks that journalists face when covering immigration operations.

The wide-scale protests inevitably recall the 2020 protests that swept across Minneapolis following the murder of George Floyd by a local police officer during which CPJ documented an unprecedented number of targeted attacks on journalists by law enforcement. 

However, in conversations this week with CPJ, journalists covering the current immigration crackdown say risks are different this time, describing a sustained climate of tension in Minneapolis where federal agents—rather than local and state law enforcement—are operating in neighborhoods, sometimes violently arresting individuals including American citizens, and regularly deploying chemical munitions at demonstrations.

CPJ spoke with five journalists to capture how this moment has challenged their ability to safely do their jobs. 
 
The following interviews have been edited for length and clarity. 

at the Star Tribune photo studio in Minneapolis, Minn. on Wednesday, Aug. 14, 2024.
Alex Kormann (Photo: Jeff Wheeler)

Alex Kormann, Photographer, Minnesota Star Tribune

You were covering the George Floyd protests in 2020 and are now covering protests against Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operations. How are the safety situations different for each?

They’re very different. In 2020 there was a lot more erratic police behavior where it felt like they were directly targeting journalists. Now, when I go to a scene, I know it’s going to be dangerous there. 

You’ve taken some powerful photographs on the ground. Can you talk about what the safety calculation was like?

I feel a kind of obligation to get as close as I can without being injured. We’ve learned a lot about risk assessments and so I’m mindful of where safe zones are, and how I can get out if I need to. 
 
What is it like, looking for ‘safe zones’ in your own community, a place where you’re usually able to relax? 

It’s a weird form of trauma. On Thursday [January 15], some other local photographers and I all decided to take a break at this place called a Vietnamese sandwich place. We [the other local photographers and I] were back there on Saturday [January 17] to cover Alex Pretti’s killing, which just happened to be two storefronts down from the restaurant.
 
It just feels different now. It’s always going to feel a little different because now I can just see and hear flash bangs and smoke and people screaming and fleeing. 
 
I just think about the fact that my children, and me, and my grandchildren will ask me about what it was like the day Alex Pretti was killed, or the day Renée Good was killed. And how did that feel. And the answer’s horrible. It felt horrible. 
 
What is it like when you hear politicians or even people you know saying that your photographs aren’t accurate representations of what’s going on? 

It’s very hard because I have plenty of people in my life that very firmly believe that what Donald Trump and the government say is the truth. I don’t know what to tell them when I was there [as a witness], and my photographs show what I saw. If you’re not going to believe your eyes, you’re not going to believe the people you personally know.
 
Do you have any advice for journalists who are traveling to Minnesota to cover the story? 

Make sure that you’re going out there for the right reasons, that you have proper training, that you know the area you’re going to, and that you remember you’re in someone’s home. If you are coming from another state, even for all the best and right reasons, you eventually will go home. These people, the ones you’re interviewing, remain. 

Mohamed Abrahim, Public Safety Reporter, Sahan Journal

What has it been like covering ICE operations in Minneapolis?

Truthfully, it’s been a bit harrowing. I started my career in 2020 here in Minneapolis at the Associated Press bureau. My first day at work was a week after George Floyd was murdered. The events right now have started to feel more and more familiar to that time almost six years ago now. But now it’s more impersonal. They’re [ICE agents] not members of our community.

What should journalists who might cover ICE operations in their communities do to prepare? 

To cover something like this, you need to have connections within your own community and have a level of trust there before things go haywire. When you’re trying to break news, that trust is essential.
 
How have intensifying ICE actions affected your normal news coverage?

That is the line that we’re trying to straddle: We report the news and put out stories about the terrible things that are happening, and we also try to highlight the community coming together. For example, early after the Renée Goodshooting there was a story about Somali women giving out food to the people at the vigil for Good, and at demonstrations. 
 

Madison McVan (Photo: Nicole Neri/ Minnesota Reformer)

Madison McVan, Reporter, Minnesota Reformer

What has it been like to report on what’s happening on the ground? 

It’s been intense. The best way to understand what’s going on is to be on the ground. For me, that means riding alongwith observers witnessing firsthand the kind of cat and mouse game that’s happening right now between these observers and ICE officers. 
 
What kind of safety precautions do you take? 

Before going out there, it’s a process of doing a risk assessment for me and my colleague, Nicole Neri. She’s a photographer, and we’ve been pairing up on these assignments and going out together. We check in with each other about what we think the most realistic threat we face could be, and then what are kind of the worst-case scenarios. 
 
We’ve seen the worst-case scenario is getting shot, or someone in our car getting shot. But we know that is a relatively small risk. The real threat that we face is being detained by ICE and being swept up with observers. Knowing this, the conversation’s about how to mitigate those risks, and then what kind of gear we need to have on us. 
 
Chemical munitions are being used constantly, so I always have a gas mask, and I usually carry my goggles and my helmet just in case of projectiles, particularly I’m going into a bigger gathering of people where I need to be prepared for possible projectiles like less lethal bullets, CS canisters, or flash bangs and pepper balls. 
 
I also weigh whether I need to bring along my bullet proof vest. Sometimes as a journalist you have to weigh the trauma that comes from putting that on your body, wearing it, and thinking about what it means and if others seeing it could escalate a situation. 
 
What role do videos from observers and bystanders play in your reporting? 

It’s a great tool for reporting that we have so many people recording. I did a story that started because a citizen sent me a video that he had recorded from his home that showed someone getting arrested at a bus stop. 

That allowed me to tell a story about these quiet arrests that are happening before anyone has time to respond. We know there are people who leave their homes, go to work, and then don’t come back, and no one saw what happened to them. But as a reporter, I struggled with how to prove something that we didn’t necessarily see. 
 
The citizen journalists or just the observers and the video they’re recording has been just a helpful tool in reporting on this. 

Liz Sawyer, Reporter, Minnesota Star Tribune

You’ve been at the Star Tribune for nearly 12 years and have covered law enforcement most of that time. How does the law enforcement action now compare to the protests following the murder of George Floyd? 
 
Right now, in Minneapolis we’re facing the largest ever immigration crackdown in U.S. history, but it’s been a slow boil since about November when we started having federal agents flood into the Twin Cities area and conduct these targeted operations. 
 
They said they were going after the worst of the worst– folks with very violent criminal histories– but we also found as the weeks went on that there was sort of a grab-bag approach happening. Even those who were legally monitoring and recording law enforcement operations would often get detained and sometimes physically brutalized while attempting to fulfill their First Amendment right to record or to protest. 
 
What role do citizen journalists play in shaping both public understanding of what is happening on the ground as well as your work as a reporter?

The fact that everybody has a smartphone, everybody has it out and is filming, is important. Citizen journalists are so vital to our democracy and [their work documenting] helps trained journalists do their jobs as well.
 
Our public service journalism would not be able to perform the same type of video analyses of the Renée Good and Alex Pretti shootings without the bystanders being willing to record and then upload their videos. 
 
I’ve interviewed many people who say, “Listen, I did not get in between law enforcement and the target of their arrest. I just hit ‘record,’” and they were either detained, had their phones ripped out of their hands or were manhandled. 
 
What do you think the American public more broadly needs to understand about what it’s like for local reporters in the Minneapolis area right now? 

I don’t think most people realize what hell this town has been through. You can go back to 2020, but in the last eight months, we had a political assassination of a state lawmaker, Melissa Hortman. We had the Annunciation Catholic Church shooting, which wounded many people and killed two young children. And now this longstanding crackdown, three people shot, two of them killed. There’s been a sustained cycle of trauma in Minnesota and specifically in the Minneapolis area. 
 
And yet people have consistently turned out. They have marched en masse, even in negative ten-degree weather. People are flooding the local food banks and churches to deliver food to folks who are too afraid to leave their homes for fear of deportation or even detainment.

Jennifer Macia, Senior News Writer and Founding Staffer, The Trace

And could you tell me a bit about the reporting that you’ve been doing around ICE and ICE actions across the country?

We really wanted to capture the whole array of how ICE was interacting with the populations of the cities that they were doing immigration enforcement in. And so suddenly our tracker of ICE shootings across the country gained steam. 
 
This and previous work on ICE has allowed us to show that there is no accountability for ICE shootings. That is something that is unchanged from through administrations. 
 
What role do citizen journalists and observers, like the ones we’ve seen on the ground in Minnesota, as well as local reporters, play in your ability to tell these stories? 

Social media has been extremely useful for documenting gunpoint incidents, so when armed officers are pointing guns, not just during raids, but during protests.
 
If it wasn’t for reporters and citizen journalists, we wouldn’t know what’s going on out there. We are not going to be able to rely on the government to tell us to, you know, let us FOIA documentation videos. Even in a sympathetic government, even in a Democratic liberal administration, these things are very hard. As Governor Tim Walz said [on January 18] please continue to record because this is how, this is now evidence in the absence of the federal government doing an investigation that, you know, brings in the local and state authorities. This is all the state has to go on. It’s vital that people are out there.

Read the full article here

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using AI-powered analysis and real-time sources.

Get Your Fact Check Report

Enter your email to receive detailed fact-checking analysis

5 free reports remaining

Continue with Full Access

You've used your 5 free reports. Sign up for unlimited access!

Already have an account? Sign in here

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email Telegram Copy Link
News Room
  • Website
  • Facebook
  • X (Twitter)
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn

The FSNN News Room is the voice of our in-house journalists, editors, and researchers. We deliver timely, unbiased reporting at the crossroads of finance, cryptocurrency, and global politics, providing clear, fact-driven analysis free from agendas.

Related Articles

Global Free Speech

Niger suspends 9 French media outlets for alleged public order threat

40 minutes ago
Global Free Speech

LEFT: Still from the film Dhurandhar which came out in India in 2025, directed by Aditya Dhar. Photo: COLLECTION CHRISTOPHEL © B62 Studios – Benetone Films – Jio Studios/Alamy This article first appeared in the Spring 2026 issue of Index on Censorship, The monster unleashed: How Hungary’s illliberal vision is seducing the Western world published on 2 April 2026.  Salim Mirza, played by one of India’s greatest actors, Balraj Sahni, stands on the wide platform of Agra railway station, as he waves goodbye to his sister and her children who are leaving for Karachi. India has been partitioned overnight but Mirza’s love for Agra, his home city, holds him back. He’s not like most of his fellow Muslims who are leaving en masse in search of a life they presume will be free from discrimination. As the story unfolds, Mirza’s small shoe manufacturing business endures spiralling losses, heightening his dilemma, but eventually Mirza decides to stay, braving the harsh realities of post-independence India. Garm Hawa (Scorching Winds), made in 1974, is one of the greatest Hindi films on Partition and the geo-politics of India and Pakistan. It was made on a shoestring budget and the director Mysore Shrinivas Sathyu borrowed three quarters of the money from his friends. In Garm Hawa, Karachi was positioned as a “land of hope” and Pakistan was not merely a land of barbaric violence. Though in reality Partition had caused enormous bloodshed on both sides of the border, resulting in the largest singular human displacement in the subcontinent’s history. Even at the time, the film struggled to be released, held back by the Censor Board which cited communal sensitivity. But Garm Hawa finally saw the light of day at the Cannes Film Festival the following year and received international recognition. The arguments for Garm Hawa’s subtle, heart-wrenching but humanist approach towards those troubled times after Partition are many. But what is most striking is the absence of hyper-nationalist discourse and “Islamophobia” from the public realm at the time. Interestingly, the term Islamophobia was only adopted later as sociological jargon. The portrayal of Muslims Hindi cinema has come a long way from the 1970s when a film could depict Muslims as real, honest people living ordinary lives and being forced to leave India for Pakistan. Now, cinema is showing Pakistan as a country of terrorists, crime, blood and gruesomeness with Karachi at the heart. The apogee of this trend is Dhurandhar which came out in 2025. The film is both a historic discourse and reflects the rise of hyper-nationalist cinema. It was a huge success at the box office, taking an extraordinary $160 million (13 billion rupees). The cinematic change hasn’t happened overnight, it is intertwined with India’s social transformation and compounded by ideology. A cursory search of films themed on India Pakistan relations throws up mostly espionage thrillers or military dramas. Some of the films were released as early as 1997, like Border set during the India-Pakistan war of 1971. In 2003, there was LOC: Kargil about the 1999 border war between India and Pakistan and the 2007 movie, 1971, was also about the Indo-Pak war. They are more nuanced in comparison with what is happening today and all came out a long time before the current batch of hyper-nationalistic cinema even got the wind in their sails; tellingly, a sequel to 1997’s Border was released on 23 January 2026. On the whole, the late 1990s films laid the groundwork for more definitive later works which showed Hindu heroism and Muslims as the enemy, like for instance The Kashmir Files, Uri The Surgical Strike, The Kerala Story, Raazi, Fighter or Gaddar 2. All are premised on the idea of “patriotism” and “bravery” as predominant emotions and they enjoy a Bollywood eco-system willing to back such projects. Patriotism is box-office gold In a typical chicken and egg scenario, a long list of producers are happy to fund money spinners. The latest “patriotic” films like Dhurandhar and Chhaava were among the highest-grossing films of the year. And as there is such massive demand for stories of Muslim “othering”, more films are getting made. Interestingly, the universe of propaganda films made in 2025 is varied, a period film, Chhaava is focused on Mughals and Marathas. Films like Sky Force and Tanvi The Great are political thrillers. Diplomat, another release, concentrates on Islamic terrorism while Sarzameen is an army thriller based in Kashmir. Dhurandhar, the most successful one of all, is significant because it shifts the film-making grammar of its predecessors and emerges as a gripping entertainer with upscaled cinematic techniques. Wickedly crafted, it is primarily a spy thriller, but it is also a gangster movie and a story of regional political conflict reflecting Pakistan’s internal politics. The genres are mixed together to churn out a brutally violent film, hitherto unseen in Hindi cinema. The screenplay deploys a smart structure with short segments leading from one to the other. This is mounted with a chartbusting techno Qawaali, (a form of Sufi devotional singing) originally used in the iconic 1960s superhit Barsaat. There are high velocity action shots either in extra close-up or from drone cameras. The film is set in the gory, trash-littered streets of a working-class neighbourhood of Karachi. And the characterisation is original. The lead character Hamza Ali Mazari (later unmasked as Indian army officer Jaskirat Singh Rangi), goes undercover as a member of Baloch mobster Rehman Dakait’s gang. Dakait is played by well-known and much-loved Bollywood actor Akshaye Khanna, Mazari by one of the highest paid younger generation actors Ranveer Singh. Dhurandhar appears to be a slick, edgy, hard-hitting movie not your typical hyper-nationalist puff. It speaks its language of bigotry differently, laced with codes of love-hate for the Muslim aesthetic, like its use of popular qawwali and ghazals (forms of music mostly associated with Islamic cultures), spliced with the portrayal of sado-masochistic Muslim men – and women – trying to break free from their “prison”. Younger audiences have lapped up Dhurandhar because they have already been weaned on the unsettling universe of Hollywood’s Kill Bill and Sin City. And the massive distribution network behind the film with 3,000 screenings worldwide, 390 in North America alone, has created a juggernaut guaranteeing the movie’s success. Such intertwinings are intricate and clever, a stark contrast to a handful of cinemas with small budgets but powered by a gritty resolve to tell a story rising from the very same geo-politics but which still manage to remain humane. Ikkis (meaning 21) was released in 2025 without much fanfare, while Dhurandhar was a crushing box office hit. Ikkis is a tenderly told true story of a young army man who died in the Indo-Pak war in 1971 and the events that follow next, when his octogenarian father travels to Lahore for a college reunion thirty years after his son’s death. No jingoism, no slogan-mongering, it casts a newcomer Agastya Nanda, together with the legendary actor Dharmendra who died a few days before the film’s release to pose some vital humanitarian questions connected to war. Ikkis was reportedly made with a budget of between $4.7 million and $7.1 million and was released on 1 January. The film was distributed by powerhouse brands – quite startling as one of them is also the distributor for Dhurandhar – yet it hasn’t been able to catch a break so far and has been a box office flop. The film got some love from a handful of audiences willing to argue for peace. So, it is much more conducive for propaganda films like Dhurandhar to be made (its sequel Dhurandhar 2 is ready for a March release). A polarised view of the world, where Pakistan and Muslims are baddies and Hindus and Indians are goodies, is driving enormous profits for Bollywood, so no wonder the movie moguls are not stopping. READ MORE

21 hours ago
Global Free Speech

DRC journalist detained since January, another in hiding after mining impact report

1 day ago
Global Free Speech

Venezuelan journalist details complicated fight for amnesty post-Maduro

2 days ago
Global Free Speech

CPJ condemns Trump’s order for DOJ to subpoena journalists

2 days ago
Global Free Speech

Maldives jails 2 journalists over documentary about President Muizzu

2 days ago
Add A Comment

Comments are closed.

Editors Picks

Are Democrats Now the Party of Free Markets? Don’t Bet on It.

27 minutes ago

Niger suspends 9 French media outlets for alleged public order threat

40 minutes ago

Moody’s puts AAA rating stamp on Fidelity and BlackRock’s tokenized money market funds

1 hour ago

New York Judge Pushes Back Hearing for Aave’s Bid to Unfreeze $71M in ETH

1 hour ago
Latest Posts

Why is bitcoin price down? BTC at $79,000 as Xi warns Trump on Taiwan conflict

2 hours ago

Trump Weighs 250 Pardons as Crypto Founders Push for Clemency

2 hours ago

Brickbat: Slow Down

2 hours ago

Subscribe to News

Get the latest news and updates directly to your inbox.

At FSNN – Free Speech News Network, we deliver unfiltered reporting and in-depth analysis on the stories that matter most. From breaking headlines to global perspectives, our mission is to keep you informed, empowered, and connected.

FSNN.net is owned and operated by GlobalBoost Media
, an independent media organization dedicated to advancing transparency, free expression, and factual journalism across the digital landscape.

Facebook X (Twitter) Discord Telegram
Latest News

BitGo Posts $3.8B Revenue, $60.7M Loss amid Bitcoin Decline and IPO Costs in Q1

3 minutes ago

Are Democrats Now the Party of Free Markets? Don’t Bet on It.

27 minutes ago

Niger suspends 9 French media outlets for alleged public order threat

40 minutes ago

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest news and updates directly to your inbox.

© 2026 GlobalBoost Media. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Our Authors
  • Contact

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

🍪

Cookies

We and our selected partners wish to use cookies to collect information about you for functional purposes and statistical marketing. You may not give us your consent for certain purposes by selecting an option and you can withdraw your consent at any time via the cookie icon.

Cookie Preferences

Manage Cookies

Cookies are small text that can be used by websites to make the user experience more efficient. The law states that we may store cookies on your device if they are strictly necessary for the operation of this site. For all other types of cookies, we need your permission. This site uses various types of cookies. Some cookies are placed by third party services that appear on our pages.

Your permission applies to the following domains:

  • https://fsnn.net
Necessary
Necessary cookies help make a website usable by enabling basic functions like page navigation and access to secure areas of the website. The website cannot function properly without these cookies.
Statistic
Statistic cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
Preferences
Preference cookies enable a website to remember information that changes the way the website behaves or looks, like your preferred language or the region that you are in.
Marketing
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.