Close Menu
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
  • Home
  • News
    • Politics
    • Legal & Courts
    • Tech & Big Tech
    • Campus & Education
    • Media & Culture
    • Global Free Speech
  • Opinions
    • Debates
  • Video/Live
  • Community
  • Freedom Index
  • About
    • Mission
    • Contact
    • Support
Trending

Restoring Childhood Says It’s Not Smartphones Making Teens Miserable. It’s School.

20 minutes ago

To ensure permanent economic innovation, we must pass the Clarity Act now

47 minutes ago

Solana Raises Maximum Transaction Size to 4,096 Bytes

48 minutes ago
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Discord Telegram
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
Market Data Newsletter
Tuesday, September 15
  • Home
  • News
    • Politics
    • Legal & Courts
    • Tech & Big Tech
    • Campus & Education
    • Media & Culture
    • Global Free Speech
  • Opinions
    • Debates
  • Video/Live
  • Community
  • Freedom Index
  • About
    • Mission
    • Contact
    • Support
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
Home»News»Global Free Speech»Hungarian elections: CPJ calls on all candidates to commit to 10 key steps to restore press freedom 
Global Free Speech

Hungarian elections: CPJ calls on all candidates to commit to 10 key steps to restore press freedom 

News RoomBy News Room5 months agoNo Comments8 Mins Read2 Views
Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest Copy Link LinkedIn Tumblr Email VKontakte Telegram
Hungarian elections: CPJ calls on all candidates to commit to 10 key steps to restore press freedom 
Share
Facebook Twitter Pinterest Email Copy Link

Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

Key Takeaways

Playback Speed

Select a Voice

Berlin, April 8, 2026—Ahead of Hungary’s parliamentary elections on April 12, the Committee to Protect Journalists is calling on all political parties to commit to restoring press freedom, starting with 10 priority issues. 

Hungary’s media landscape has declined severely in the last 16 years under the government of Prime Minister Viktor Orbán. His ruling Fidesz party — which faces a serious challenge in Sunday’s election from the opposition Tisza party, under Péter Magyar — directly or indirectly controls around 80% of the country’s media market, making it one of the most sophisticated systems of media capture seen yet within the European Union. 

“Independent journalists in Hungary operate in a deeply hostile climate characterized by systemic obstruction, political pressure, and public vilification,” said Attila Mong, CPJ’s Europe representative. “Whoever wins the election must take immediate, concrete action to reverse this authoritarian trajectory, dismantle the complex machinery of state control, and align Hungary with European standards on media freedom, transparency, and the rule of law. By committing to these 10 priorities — from scrapping the Russia-style “foreign agent” bill to ending state-sponsored smear campaigns — the incoming government can take the essential first steps toward restoring fundamental democratic norms and ensuring that the press can fulfill its vital watchdog role.”

The 10 key steps to restoring press freedom are:

1. Abolish the Sovereignty Protection Office and permanently shelve the “foreign agent” bill.  Authorities must repeal the law establishing the Sovereignty Protection Office (SPO), which has been used to harass and delegitimize independent media by labeling them as threats to national sovereignty. Hungarian authorities have increasingly used the SPO — created under the pretext of investigating undue foreign interference into domestic affairs — to launch investigations into and smear campaigns against independent media. A pending Russia-style “foreign agent” bill, which could blacklist or defund media outlets that receive foreign support, must be completely abandoned.

2. End state-sponsored smear campaigns against journalists. Independent journalists in Hungary are systematically subjected to smear campaigns orchestrated by government politicians, state-aligned media, or state bodies. By aggressively labeling critical reporters as “foreign agents,” “traitors,” or “fake news factories,” the state seeks to delegitimize their reporting and erode public trust. This institutionalized incitement fosters public hostility that endangers reporters and severely intimidates vital sources. To reverse this, the government must stop using public funds, public service media, pro-government media outlets, or other channels to smear journalists or accuse them of serving foreign interests. The incoming political leadership should make unequivocal statements in support of protecting journalists and defending media freedom.

3. Protect journalists from unlawful surveillance. Hungary’s legal framework for national security surveillance lacks independent judicial oversight, allowing the minister of justice to authorize secret surveillance in the name of national security interests without prior judicial approval. This systemic flaw enabled the 2019 deployment of military-grade Pegasus spyware against independent journalists, creating a profound chilling effect that intimidated confidential sources and forced reporters to adopt extreme security measures. The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) has repeatedly condemned Hungary’s lack of procedural safeguards for protecting journalistic sources, yet the authorities have failed to execute these judgments. To reverse this, the government must: 

  • Reopen investigations closed in June 2022 into the use of Pegasus spyware against journalists with the highest levels of transparency, accountability, and redress for the victims. 
    • Establish effective and independent judicial oversight for all surveillance procedures and ensure that targeted journalists are properly notified. 
    • Fully implement recommendations made by the European Parliament’s Committee of Inquiry on Pegasus (PEGA), in response to Hungary’s use of surveillance in breach of EU values and fundamental rights. 

4. Reform public service media to guarantee its institutional and editorial independence. Hungary’s public service media operates under a complex and opaque institutional structure primarily controlled by the state-owned Media Support and Asset Management Fund (MTVA) — a body that receives massive government funding (415 million euros, or US$485 million, in 2025) without meaningful independent oversight. The public broadcaster, overseen by the politically captured Media Council, has been transformed into a direct instrument of government propaganda, giving a majority of airtime to ruling party politicians, withholding criticism of the government and negatively reporting on the opposition. 

The incoming government must immediately introduce reforms to ensure the independence of public service media is restored, halting its use as a government mouthpiece, in line with the European Media Freedom Act (EMFA).

5. Restore meaningful access to public information. Journalists trying to hold the government to account face systemic barriers to accessing information, as state institutions, municipalities, and state-owned enterprises systematically ignore, delay, or provide meaningless replies to press inquiries. The Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) has been severely weakened by legislative amendments and judicial decisions, drastically narrowing the scope of accessible data, particularly regarding public funds. 

To resolve this, the government must end the systematic obstruction of journalistic inquiries by ensuring transparent, timely responses to FOIA requests, and strictly enforce binding court orders that mandate the disclosure of public data.

6. Guarantee equal and unhindered access to public events, politicians, and press conferences. Direct access to decision-makers and the firsthand observation of events are fundamental elements of journalism, without which the media cannot effectively fulfill its public watchdog role. Journalists in Hungary, however, face a systematic information blockade designed to give the government exclusive narrative control. Reporters are selectively denied accreditation to government press conferences, often under fabricated pretexts like “limited capacity” or “private property,” and face severe restrictions when trying to report from parliament, hospitals, refugee camps, or other public institutions. In extreme cases, independent journalists have been physically removed by police or local officials simply for attempting to ask politicians questions at public forums. 

To ensure a functioning democratic press, authorities must stop the arbitrary and discriminatory practice of barring independent journalists from government press conferences and public institutions, bringing their practices into compliance with ECtHR standards.

7. Implement safeguards against abusive lawsuits, including those resulting from the weaponization of EU data protection laws. Hungary lacks any national mechanisms to prevent or remedy abusive litigation aimed at intimidating and silencing journalists or their sources. Defamation claims, which can be filed in parallel under both civil and criminal law, are frequently used by politicians, business figures, and state-aligned actors as Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation (SLAPPs) to drain newsrooms’ time and financial resources. 

The government’s failure to adopt legislation establishing journalistic exemptions as required under Article 85 of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), is also problematic as it means journalists are treated as standard data controllers. This subjects them to obligations incompatible with investigative journalism, such as having to notify subjects before publication or conduct pre-publication data assessments. Politically connected individuals exploit this legal loophole to file abusive privacy complaints to the data protection authority or the courts.

To resolve this, the new government must introduce legislation to create safeguards for journalism. Specifically, the government should introduce:

  • Explicit legislative exemptions for the journalistic processing of personal data to prevent GDPR from being misapplied as a tool for censorship.
    • Robust procedural rules (such as early dismissal mechanisms) in line with the EU Anti-SLAPP Directive and the Council of Europe’s anti-SLAPP recommendation. This would empower judges to quickly throw out manifestly unfounded claims against the press before they deplete a newsroom’s resources.

8. Conduct a full review of national legislation affecting media pluralism and independence. 

Since 2010, the ruling party has enacted a series of media laws that have fundamentally reshaped the regulatory environment, allowing the state to capture large segments of the market and systematically obstruct independent outlets. The government has refused to implement the newly enacted EMFA and continues to ignore multiple binding ECtHR judgments concerning media freedom. 

To resolve this, the incoming government must ambitiously seek to introduce more effective legal protection of media pluralism and independence in line with European law and standards, including the EMFA. Hungary should also fully implement ECtHR judgments relating to media freedom and pluralism, and ensure better implementation of the EU’s Whistleblower Directive.

9. Ensure the fair and transparent distribution of state advertising. The state is the dominant player in the media advertising market, accounting in 2025 for roughly a third of total advertising expenditure, which is highly centralized through the National Communications Office (NKOH). 

These public funds are channeled almost exclusively into pro-government media, with the pro-government media conglomerate KESMA receiving up to 75-80% of its total revenue from state advertising. This discriminatory practice deliberately starves independent outlets of vital resources and severely distorts the market, making fair competition impossible.

To resolve this, the practice of funneling state advertising into pro-government media must be ended and replaced with transparent, equitable distribution rules.

10. Ensure the functional independence of the media regulatory authority. Hungary’s regulatory bodies (the National Media and Infocommunications Authority (NMHH) and its decision-making body, the Media Council) are entirely controlled by the ruling party, as all of their members are exclusively appointed and elected by the government’s parliamentary supermajority. This severe capture has resulted in biased, politically motivated regulatory decisions — such as blocking independent media mergers while favoring pro-government expansions — which clearly violate the independence requirements set out in the EU’s Audiovisual Media Services Directive (AVMSD). 

To resolve this, the appointment processes for the Media Council and the NMHH must be overhauled to eliminate political control, ensure transparency, and review Hungary’s current compliance with the EU’s AVMSD.

Watch our video: CPJ interviewed four leading Hungarian journalists about the challenges they have faced under Orbán’s rule and their expectations for the future. 

Read the full article here

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using AI-powered analysis and real-time sources.

Get Your Fact Check Report

Enter your email to receive detailed fact-checking analysis

5 free reports remaining

Continue with Full Access

You've used your 5 free reports. Sign up for unlimited access!

Already have an account? Sign in here

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email Telegram Copy Link
News Room
  • Website
  • Facebook
  • X (Twitter)
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn

The FSNN News Room is the voice of our in-house journalists, editors, and researchers. We deliver timely, unbiased reporting at the crossroads of finance, cryptocurrency, and global politics, providing clear, fact-driven analysis free from agendas.

Related Articles

Global Free Speech

Offices of Peruvian news site, La Noticia Clave, sprayed with bullets

16 hours ago
Global Free Speech

Bangladeshi journalists face 10-year jail terms for ‘unverified’ reporting under draft cybercrime law

1 day ago
Global Free Speech

Veteran Haitian journalist Wesly Renaud Jean abducted, ransom requested

3 days ago
Global Free Speech

Georgi Markov was a victim of transnational repression (AP via Alamy) More than four decades after Bulgarian dissident and writer Georgi Markov was assassinated in London, governments and their proxies continue to reach across borders to silence dissenting voices. Markov’s assassination on 11 September 1978, when he was attacked with a poisoned ricin pellet fired from an umbrella on Waterloo Bridge, remains one of the most notorious examples of a state extending its repression beyond its own territory. His death is a stark reminder that exile does not necessarily mean safety. Transnational repression (TNR) describes the ways in which governments and their proxies seek to intimidate, surveil, harass, threaten and harm people beyond their borders. Those targeted include human rights defenders, journalists, academics and members of diaspora communities. In recent years, the threat has taken new and increasingly sophisticated forms. Tactics can range from digital surveillance and intimidation to the misuse of international policing mechanisms, physical violence and targeted killings.  A new project supported by the Swedish Postcode Lottery Foundation, and delivered by Index on Censorship, the Foreign Policy Centre and International Partnership for Human Rights, aims to help strengthen the evidence base on transnational repression, connect organisations and communities working on the issue, and translate research and lived experience into stronger protections and more coordinated policy responses across Europe. The anniversary of Markov’s assassination provides a timely reminder of why this work matters. While the technologies and tactics used to target people abroad have changed dramatically since 1978, the underlying objective remains familiar: to silence those who challenge repression and defend fundamental rights. Andreas Eriksson, Secretary General of the Swedish Postcode Lottery Foundation, said: “No one should have to face threats and harassment for defending human rights. By strengthening support for at-risk human rights defenders and increasing awareness among decision-makers, this project helps promote stronger democracy and freedom of expression in Europe. We are proud to make this important work possible.” Jessica Ní Mhainín, Head of Policy and Campaigns at Index on Censorship, said: “Transnational repression thrives when it remains hidden and when those targeted have nowhere to turn. This project aims to help bring the issue into the light and, in so doing, to support those affected and to push for a stronger response to the issue across Europe. Index on Censorship is delighted to be working with the Foreign Policy Centre and International Partnership for Human Rights, with the support of the Swedish Postcode Lottery Foundation, to tackle transnational repression and to support those affected.” Izzy Cutts, Policy and Parliamentary Affairs Manager at the Foreign Policy Centre, said: “Protecting human rights defenders and their work from repressive actors is crucial to safeguarding our democracy and values. We welcome the recent progress on acknowledging transnational repression by European Institutions but more needs to be done to support and protect those at risk. We look forward to working with Index on Censorship and the International Partnership for Human Rights on this project and are grateful for the support of the Swedish Postcode Lottery Foundation.” READ MORE

4 days ago
Global Free Speech

A total of 31 journalists were killed in the attack (© Saddam Ahmed/IRPI Media) It has been just over a year since 31 journalists were killed by a single bomb in the Yemen capital of Sanaa. The Italian media consortium Investigative Reporting Project Italy (IRPI) has interviewed survivors and pieced together what happened Entry is permitted only to journalists, media personnel, witnesses, survivors, victims’ families, and officials authorised to access the site, located in the heart of Sanaa’s administrative district. Beyond the gate lies a mountain of wild rubble. At the centre of the site stand the scant remains of the printing presses used by the weekly newspaper 26 September, alongside a banner displaying images of the victims of 10 September 2025 massacre. Survivors find it painful to look at the wreckage. Ibrahim al-Masoudi, an illustrator and calligrapher, narrowly escaped death one year ago. He has since lost his hearing, though he retains his sight allowing him to weep for the 31 colleagues killed that afternoon by an American bomb. This weapon – a precision guided bomb with a thermal battery warhead manufactured in Missouri, the tracking of which was confirmed by our investigation for the IRPI – was dropped by the Israeli military on Sanaa, the capital of the pro-Iranian Yemeni Houthi government. Survivors find it hard to look at the devastation in Sanaa (© Saddam Ahmed/IRPI Media) Recent clashes between the Aden-based government – backed by the Saudi military – and the troops of Ansarullah (the name of the Yemeni Houthi party) have reignited the conflict between the region’s Sunni and Shia blocs on the Arabian Peninsula. Pro-Iranian militias in northern Yemen have also repeatedly struck Israel with missiles and drones and blocked Red Sea shipping following the outbreak of the war between Israel and Hamas. Yet, the memory of this massacre of journalists endures, standing as one of the gravest violations of press freedom in the last 20 years. This was, in fact, the single attack that has claimed the lives of the highest number of journalists since 2009 – occurring during the worst year on record for global press safety, with a death toll of 129 media workers according to the CPJ, primarily in Gaza.  On that day – a Thursday, the final workday of the week in Yemen – the bomb was dropped in the middle of the afternoon, just as people were returning from work and the weekly newspaper was being printed for its Friday release. The printing presses were running at full capacity. The son of Esam al-Hashidi, a journalist supporting a large family, had joined his father at work after leaving school. “The son,” reports Noria al-Harazi, a journalist who survived the attack and an editor for 26 September, “had told his mother that after school he preferred to accompany his father to work to watch and learn, so that he could support the family in the future should his father grow old or die.” Rescuers reported finding the father’s remains embracing what was left of the eleven-year-old boy. Esam’s son is one of the “collateral victims” of the massacre on 10 September 2025. On that day alone, the Yemen Data Project recorded a high number of casualties aside from the journalists: 22 men, 11 women, and 5 children killed. One reason for this is that the newspaper compound which was targeted was located in the city centre, surrounded by a bus station, heavily crowded during rush hours. Rescuers reported finding the father’s remains embracing what was left of the eleven-year-old boy  The compound housed the editorial offices of two state-owned Yemeni newspapers – 26 September  and al-Yemen which existed long before the pro-Iranian Houthi militia seized control of state institutions in 2014. Along with the two newsrooms, their staff, and all the machinery and printing presses, Yemen’s central historical archive was also incinerated; the archive had been established alongside the 26 September newspaper, which was set up following the revolution of 26 September 1962 (hence its name), the event in which republicans overthrew the imamate that had ruled the country for centuries.  “Stored here were 36 million photographic negatives and a vast number of documents from the Ottoman era, images of tourist sites, press interviews with government officials. Everything went up in smoke, burned, vanished: nothing remains,” says Nabil Shobail, head of the archive and deputy director of the photography department. Nabil bows in front of a series of black-and-white photographs scattered at the bottom of a pit – reached via a rough path leading into the hollow left by the bomb that destroyed the building housing the archive. “Look, this is Marshal Abdullah al-Sallal; he was one of Yemen’s presidents following the republican revolution of September 26th, in 1962. Twelve years of war weren’t enough. Now our history has been erased, too: who will give it back to us?” The massacre of these Yemeni journalists has garnered little international attention. There are several reasons: the difficulty the international press faced in accessing areas controlled by pro-Iranian militias; Houthi authorities’ concerns about protecting the site and the bomb evidence from potential further attacks; the dehumanisation of professionals who are allied with Iran – or who are Lebanese, Palestinian, Iraqi, Syrian, or Yemeni. Collectively, these factors have stifled efforts to determine accountability and kept details of the massacre from coming to light, within a global context where respect for international law has taken a back seat to the military objectives of the parties involved. “Everything went up in smoke, burned, vanished: nothing remains.” Killing journalists, unless they are directly involved in violence, is against international law, even if they are presenting the views of an armed group. But Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz justified the attack, claiming the compound housed the “Houthi propaganda apparatus” belonging to the public relations department of their party, Ansarullah. Today from Ukraine to Sudan, from Gaza to Lebanon and Yemen, being a doctor, paramedic, or journalist offers no protection against friendly or enemy fire; instead, it makes one a target. Reiterating that journalism is never a crime has not shielded these colleagues from death. READ MORE

4 days ago
Global Free Speech

Copyright law – which is meant to protect writers and reporters – is being used against us. In Azerbaijan, Somalia and Florida, unfounded copyright complaints have recently been deployed to make critical reporting disappear. The misuse of copyright law isn’t new, but to read three similar stories in quick succession takes it from being a tool used sporadically (and egregiously) to stifle dissent to something that feels far more calculated and embedded. I was first alerted to the trend last week when I received an email from Gunel Safarova, acting editor-in-chief of Azerbaijani outlet Abzas Media. Safarova’s email alerted the international community to the fact that Meta had recently blocked the Instagram pages of Abzas and a host of other independent media outlets and individual journalists from the country, following accusations of copyright infringement. Then I read a similar story out of Somalia, and another one again from the USA. In the case of Azerbaijan, Safarova said that even though the complainants apparently provided no evidence to show that they owned the intellectual property, Meta’s automated systems accepted the complaints regardless. Articles were removed, and in some cases entire Facebook accounts were deactivated. The Azerbaijan journalists believe the attacks are coordinated and are being carried out deliberately from the same central source. Safarova has called them a “continuation of a broader campaign of pressure and repression aimed at silencing independent media”. In Somalia, an investigation published by the Somali Journalists Syndicate listed numerous examples of independent media houses and journalists fighting coordinated fake copyright claims and content takedowns. The targeted stories were typically critical of the Somali federal government and state security agencies. Like in Azerbaijan, the online crackdown in Somalia is unfolding alongside growing restrictions on social media content and an increasingly hostile media environment (see our recent article for more). Mid-August, stories posted by the South Florida Sun Sentinel, WLRN, Florida Politics and other news outlets were removed from Google search results. The stories all concerned congressional candidate Michael Carbonara, an entrepreneur running in the Republican primary for Florida’s 22nd Congressional District last month. (He lost, to Casey Asker.) Some of the stories mentioned Carbonara’s ties to a controversial data centre in Michigan. David Schutz, managing editor at the Sun Sentinel, said: “Federal copyright law exists for an important reason: to protect original work from being stolen. It was never intended to be weaponized as a loophole to suppress reporting or hide inconvenient truths.” Schutz also highlighted the automated aspect of rights management processes, noting that systems have been created that are “far too easy for bad actors to manipulate”. This, I think, is a generous take. Copyright violations do happen, and social media platforms are right to take action against them. At the same time automated, AI-driven and anonymous complaints make processing fraudulent takedown notices easier and the job of moderators harder. (Index is running a feature about this in our forthcoming magazine, a thought experiment by contributor Kaya Genç.) A less generous take on the current state of affairs is this: tech companies are too quick and willing to trade free speech rights for access. Whatever the reason, the outcome is the same; “Page not found” are the three words that every censor loves to see. READ MORE

4 days ago
Add A Comment

Comments are closed.

Editors Picks

To ensure permanent economic innovation, we must pass the Clarity Act now

47 minutes ago

Solana Raises Maximum Transaction Size to 4,096 Bytes

48 minutes ago

Who Are You? (Lawyers, Active and Otherwise, and Law Students)

1 hour ago

Ether, solana, XRP likely to gain if Clarity Act progresses

2 hours ago
Latest Posts

Bitcoin Short-Term Holders Near One Month in Partial Profit in New Bull Signal

2 hours ago

Solana Treasury Firm DeFi Dev Corp Rolls Out $300M CHAD to Buy More SOL

2 hours ago

Today in Supreme Court History: September 15, 1857

2 hours ago

Subscribe to News

Get the latest news and updates directly to your inbox.

At FSNN – Free Speech News Network, we deliver unfiltered reporting and in-depth analysis on the stories that matter most. From breaking headlines to global perspectives, our mission is to keep you informed, empowered, and connected.

FSNN.net is owned and operated by GlobalBoost Media
, an independent media organization dedicated to advancing transparency, free expression, and factual journalism across the digital landscape.

Facebook X (Twitter) Discord Telegram
Latest News

Restoring Childhood Says It’s Not Smartphones Making Teens Miserable. It’s School.

20 minutes ago

To ensure permanent economic innovation, we must pass the Clarity Act now

47 minutes ago

Solana Raises Maximum Transaction Size to 4,096 Bytes

48 minutes ago

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest news and updates directly to your inbox.

© 2026 GlobalBoost Media. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Our Authors
  • Contact

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

🍪

Cookies

We and our selected partners wish to use cookies to collect information about you for functional purposes and statistical marketing. You may not give us your consent for certain purposes by selecting an option and you can withdraw your consent at any time via the cookie icon.

Cookie Preferences

Manage Cookies

Cookies are small text that can be used by websites to make the user experience more efficient. The law states that we may store cookies on your device if they are strictly necessary for the operation of this site. For all other types of cookies, we need your permission. This site uses various types of cookies. Some cookies are placed by third party services that appear on our pages.

Your permission applies to the following domains:

  • https://fsnn.net
Necessary
Necessary cookies help make a website usable by enabling basic functions like page navigation and access to secure areas of the website. The website cannot function properly without these cookies.
Statistic
Statistic cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
Preferences
Preference cookies enable a website to remember information that changes the way the website behaves or looks, like your preferred language or the region that you are in.
Marketing
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.