Close Menu
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
  • Home
  • News
    • Politics
    • Legal & Courts
    • Tech & Big Tech
    • Campus & Education
    • Media & Culture
    • Global Free Speech
  • Opinions
    • Debates
  • Video/Live
  • Community
  • Freedom Index
  • About
    • Mission
    • Contact
    • Support
Trending

Daily Deal: Salesforce Certification Exam Training

25 minutes ago

These Minnesota Parents Were Censored at a Public Meeting for Saying School Employees’ Job Titles

29 minutes ago

Guatemalan journalist Evelio López shot dead after denouncing threats

35 minutes ago
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Discord Telegram
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
Market Data Newsletter
Tuesday, October 6
  • Home
  • News
    • Politics
    • Legal & Courts
    • Tech & Big Tech
    • Campus & Education
    • Media & Culture
    • Global Free Speech
  • Opinions
    • Debates
  • Video/Live
  • Community
  • Freedom Index
  • About
    • Mission
    • Contact
    • Support
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
Home»News»Campus & Education»FIRE sues Los Angeles City Council over policy banning certain words during public comment
Campus & Education

FIRE sues Los Angeles City Council over policy banning certain words during public comment

News RoomBy News Room1 hour agoNo Comments5 Mins Read1 Views
Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest Copy Link LinkedIn Tumblr Email VKontakte Telegram
FIRE sues Los Angeles City Council over policy banning certain words during public comment
Share
Facebook Twitter Pinterest Email Copy Link

Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

Key Takeaways

Playback Speed

Select a Voice

LOS ANGELES, Oct. 6, 2026 — A pair of free speech groups on Tuesday filed a lawsuit on behalf of a Los Angeles resident against the city of Los Angeles after its city council banned certain words during public meetings, a violation of the First Amendment.

Last summer, the council banned the words “cunt,” “nigger,” and all of their “variations” during public comment periods — words that, however offensive one may find them, are protected speech. Tuesday’s lawsuit, filed by the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression and First Amendment Coalition, comes after the council ignored a letter from the groups that outlined the ban’s constitutional issues. 

“While the council is free to condemn speech it considers offensive, the Constitution prohibits the council from silencing it,” said FIRE attorney Zach Silver. “Giving government officials the power to decide which words people are allowed to use is exactly the kind of censorship the First Amendment is meant to prevent.”

In July 2025, the Los Angeles City Council enacted the ban in response to complaints about attendees using the words while speaking during the public-comment portion of meetings. The text of the word ban doesn’t even identify the words directly, instead going to great lengths to spell them out: 

A public speaker may not use the N-word or C-word, or any variation of either of these words, in a Council or Committee meeting. To avoid ambiguity, the N-word is spelled ‘n’ followed by ‘i’ followed by ‘g’ followed by ‘g’ followed by ‘e’ followed by ‘r.’ The C-word is spelled ‘c’ followed by ‘u’ followed by ‘n’ followed by ‘t.’ Examples of variations of these epithets include, but are not limited to, the words’ plural forms and words created by adding ‘-ish,’ ‘-y,’ ‘-ly’ or ‘-ing’ to create related adjectives, adverbs, verbs, or gerundives.

According to Council President Marqueece Harris-Dawson, the primary sponsor of the rule, the word ban is only the first step in council leadership’s plan to more broadly regulate speech it deems offensive. 

Harris-Dawson has elaborated: “This is as much a step as we can take at this moment, we believe. But we think it will open us up to take additional steps in the future.” In another instance, he said, “We’re going to try to get in all the terms.”

Recognizing that the word ban violated her free speech rights, FIRE plaintiff Stacey Bohlinger took the podium last October. Singing to the tune of the “Ghostbusters” theme song, she criticized the policy and the council for being “afraid of the word ‘cunt.’” She continued, “Kind of insane how you’re more offended by bad words than police brutalizing citizens and journalists in the streets.” The council warned her that if she used a banned word again, she would be removed. Then, in December, Stacey protested the ban again, this time singing, “Still I won’t call you a cunt,” to the tune of Adele’s “Someone Like You.” The council again warned her, then removed her from the meeting when she repeated the word.

COURTESY PHOTOS OF STACEY

In addition to prohibiting the banned words and their variations, the council adopted a separate rule banning someone who is removed from a meeting from attending future meetings through at least the end of the following business day and for up to six business days depending on their recent removal history. So, when the council removed Stacey from that December meeting, it also barred her from attending all council and committee meetings for the next two business days — six meetings in all. 

As FIRE and the First Amendment Coalition explain in today’s lawsuit, the First Amendment limits the council’s authority to restrict the public’s speech at its meetings. While the council can address actual disruption when it occurs, it can’t simply declare specific words off limits and deem their mere utterance disruptive. Nor can the council bar people from future meetings based on what happened at a past one.

“When the government can police the words people use, a list of forbidden words has a way of growing,” Silver said. “And here, the council has already told us it won’t stop at these two words. We’re taking the council to court to put an end to the list before the council adds another word to it.”

The lawsuit also alleges the speech restrictions violate the Ralph M. Brown Act, a California law that requires government meetings to be open to the public and guarantees the public’s participation absent actual disruption of a meeting.

“If the First Amendment means anything, it means the government can’t tell people how they can criticize the government,” said David Loy, the First Amendment Coalition’s legal director. “This kind of censorship is a threat to everyone’s freedom of speech.”

FIRE and FAC’s lawsuit asks the court to strike down both rules and block the council from enforcing them, restoring Angelenos’ right to speak freely to their government without censorship or exclusion from public meetings. It also seeks damages for the violation of Stacey’s First Amendment rights.


The Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE) is a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization dedicated to defending and sustaining the individual rights of all Americans to free speech and free thought — the most essential qualities of liberty. FIRE educates Americans about the importance of these inalienable rights, promotes a culture of respect for these rights, and provides the means to preserve them. 

The First Amendment Coalition protects and promotes a free press, freedom of expression, and the people’s right to know. Nonpartisan and nonprofit, FAC believes that the broadest range of engaged and informed communities is essential to the health of our democracy — that the values expressed by the First Amendment provide a blueprint for an inclusive, equitable society and a responsive, accountable government. To that end, FAC educates, advocates, and litigates to advance government transparency and First Amendment protections for all.

CONTACT
Katie Stalcup, Communications Campaign Manager, FIRE: 215-717-3473; media@thefire.org

Read the full article here

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using AI-powered analysis and real-time sources.

Get Your Fact Check Report

Enter your email to receive detailed fact-checking analysis

5 free reports remaining

Continue with Full Access

You've used your 5 free reports. Sign up for unlimited access!

Already have an account? Sign in here

#AcademicFreedom #CampusPolicy #CampusSpeech #ConstitutionalRights #FreeSpeechOnCampus #PressFreedom Angeles banning City comment Council FIRE Los policy public sues words
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email Telegram Copy Link
News Room
  • Website
  • Facebook
  • X (Twitter)
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn

The FSNN News Room is the voice of our in-house journalists, editors, and researchers. We deliver timely, unbiased reporting at the crossroads of finance, cryptocurrency, and global politics, providing clear, fact-driven analysis free from agendas.

Related Articles

Media & Culture

These Minnesota Parents Were Censored at a Public Meeting for Saying School Employees’ Job Titles

29 minutes ago
Media & Culture

Alito Talks Retirement

4 hours ago
Media & Culture

French Tantrum

5 hours ago
Media & Culture

Ask Jeeves

14 hours ago
Legal & Courts

Trump’s Deportation Agenda Is Making the Affordability Crisis Worse

22 hours ago
Media & Culture

A Response to Michael Buschbacher on Suncor Energy v. Boulder County

1 day ago
Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Editors Picks

These Minnesota Parents Were Censored at a Public Meeting for Saying School Employees’ Job Titles

29 minutes ago

Guatemalan journalist Evelio López shot dead after denouncing threats

35 minutes ago

Peter Thiel-backed Founders Fund leads a $5 million token buy in crypto collateral protocol Anvil

46 minutes ago

Bitcoin Coils Below $87,000 Ask Liquidity as Stocks Return to All-Time Highs

47 minutes ago
Latest Posts

Mistral AI Drops ‘Le Chonk’: A Massive AI Model Named After a Cat Meme

48 minutes ago

FIRE sues Los Angeles City Council over policy banning certain words during public comment

1 hour ago

Live Reason Roundtable 10th Anniversary Show!

2 hours ago

Subscribe to News

Get the latest news and updates directly to your inbox.

At FSNN – Free Speech News Network, we deliver unfiltered reporting and in-depth analysis on the stories that matter most. From breaking headlines to global perspectives, our mission is to keep you informed, empowered, and connected.

FSNN.net is owned and operated by GlobalBoost Media
, an independent media organization dedicated to advancing transparency, free expression, and factual journalism across the digital landscape.

Facebook X (Twitter) Discord Telegram
Latest News

Daily Deal: Salesforce Certification Exam Training

25 minutes ago

These Minnesota Parents Were Censored at a Public Meeting for Saying School Employees’ Job Titles

29 minutes ago

Guatemalan journalist Evelio López shot dead after denouncing threats

35 minutes ago

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest news and updates directly to your inbox.

© 2026 GlobalBoost Media. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Our Authors
  • Contact

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

🍪

Cookies

We and our selected partners wish to use cookies to collect information about you for functional purposes and statistical marketing. You may not give us your consent for certain purposes by selecting an option and you can withdraw your consent at any time via the cookie icon.

Cookie Preferences

Manage Cookies

Cookies are small text that can be used by websites to make the user experience more efficient. The law states that we may store cookies on your device if they are strictly necessary for the operation of this site. For all other types of cookies, we need your permission. This site uses various types of cookies. Some cookies are placed by third party services that appear on our pages.

Your permission applies to the following domains:

  • https://fsnn.net
Necessary
Necessary cookies help make a website usable by enabling basic functions like page navigation and access to secure areas of the website. The website cannot function properly without these cookies.
Statistic
Statistic cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
Preferences
Preference cookies enable a website to remember information that changes the way the website behaves or looks, like your preferred language or the region that you are in.
Marketing
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.