Close Menu
Market Data Newsletter
Monday, September 28
Global Free Speech

Ecuadorian TV station suspended after covering fuel subsidy public protests

News RoomBy No Comments2 Mins Read4 Views
Ecuadorian TV station suspended after covering fuel subsidy public protests

Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

Bogotá, September 26, 2025—Ecuador’s media regulator should immediately lift its suspension of community station TV MICC and ensure that media outlets can freely cover the news without fear of reprisal, the Committee to Protect Journalists said Friday.

On September 23, the state Telecommunications Regulation and Control Agency (ARCOTEL) issued a 15-day suspension against TV MICC, operated by the Indigenous and Peasant Movement of Cotopaxi in central Cotopaxi province, following its coverage of ongoing protests sparked by the government’s elimination of diesel fuel subsidies.

ARCOTEL said its decision was based on a classified document from the government’s intelligence agency, arguing “aspects” of TV MICC’s coverage would “harm national security” and a suspension would “safeguard” public order, outlets reported. The channel is currently unavailable.

“It is deeply troubling that Ecuadorian authorities have suspended TV MICC’s signal over allegations of biased coverage of the national protests,” said Cristina Zahar, CPJ’s Latin America program coordinator, in São Paulo. “Community media outlets provide a vital public service by reporting on matters of public interest. Silencing TV MICC for fulfilling this duty not only undermines press freedom but also deprives the public of essential information.”

Amid road blockages and clashes between anti-riot police and protesters, President Daniel Noboa on Wednesday cancelled his trip to the U.N. General Assembly in New York, describing the demonstrations as “acts of terrorism disguised as protests.”

Diego Vaca, TV MICC’s communications director, told CPJ that the station’s suspension amounts to government censorship. He said TV MICC closely covers Ecuador’s Indigenous communities and noted that the protests are being led by the country’s main Indigenous coalition, the Confederation of Indigenous Nationalities of Ecuador.

Vaca told CPJ, “This was a political act by an increasingly authoritarian government.”

A 2023 CPJ special report found that political turmoil and an insecurity have led to increased attacks on journalists, leading some to self-censor or leave the country.

CPJ’s text messages to ARCOTEL asking about the national security concerns of TV MICC’s protest coverage did not receive a reply.

Read the full article here

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using AI-powered analysis and real-time sources.

Share.

The FSNN News Room is the voice of our in-house journalists, editors, and researchers. We deliver timely, unbiased reporting at the crossroads of finance, cryptocurrency, and global politics, providing clear, fact-driven analysis free from agendas.

Related Articles

Global Free Speech

The BBC clearly sees the value of television series That Mitchell and Webb Look. Marking the 20th anniversary of its original screening, the Beeb has re-released the series on iPlayer. But – and there is very often a “but” with these things – they’ve removed around 11 sketches from the BAFTA award-winning show. The official word is that these sketches don’t “work today”, which is polite speak for “they may cause offence”. The episodes singled out include scenes featuring a battle reenactment with characters in blackface, a contestant on a show wearing a burka and a lost tribe” in a garden centre. These sketches set out to challenge stereotypes, not to reinforce them; but 20 years on, this distinction seems to have been lost along the way. I’m a bit uncomfortable about this. I find it infantilising, to say the least. Can’t we trust audiences to make up their own minds, to switch off if they find the sketches in question unpalatable? Does the BBC think that we are just passive consumers, unable to disaggregate the mocking of racism from racism itself? These sketches set out to challenge stereotypes, not to reinforce them This act of censorship is distorting – of the shows, whose narratives and rhythms were built to include these sketches, and more broadly too. Conversations we were having 20 years ago have been erased, as if to suggest that they never happened. But they did! And with this erasure, the opportunity for thoughtful engagement and learning from our past is gone. “Let’s just pretend we were all lovely 20 years ago. It’s better that way” seems to be the message. Speaking as a minority myself, I find that knowing the nasty stuff that people said before – and indeed, still say today – is much more useful than pretending it never happened. This approach, I think, is also inconsistent. What it reveals is a cherry-picking (intended or not) of the groups that we can mock, and those that we can’t. Let’s face it, gender stereotypes are rarely deemed to have aged beyond the pale – if that were the case, we would have to wave goodbye to half the television made before the mid-2010s. Suppression like this sends a bad message to artists, namely that what they’re creating today may hold less value tomorrow. Or, even worse, that future audiences may deem them bigots – that Sword of Damocles hovering over the heads of any creative paying attention to the discourse of the moment. Suppression like this sends a bad message to artists The BBC’s decision reaffirms a broader trend. In 2020, Little Britain was removed from the iPlayer platform for similar reasons. It has since been reinstated – minus some sketches. Meanwhile, the UK’s arts space more broadly is seeing a retreat to the land of “safe”, as Index recently revealed in a year-long investigation into self-censorship in UK theatre. The BBC, it must be said, does remarkable stuff. The ongoing podcast investigation into the disappearance of US journalist Austin Tice is just one example. But this does not mean, however, that they don’t sometimes get it wrong. Chopping at That Mitchell and Webb Look is one example. Sure, the removal of the material isn’t the life-or-death story that Index often works on. Sure, Mitchell and Webb aren’t the faces of persecuted artists – they have huge platforms and agreed to the changes themselves. Still, one can’t help but think that the decision came from a place of conservatism, perhaps even fear. This is weak and dispiriting, indeed the very opposite of what enables creativity in the arts. We shouldn’t be encouraging this cultural timidity. Rather, we should harness culture and creativity as the starting points of a conversation about our here and now. That’s what the arts are for, after all. READ MORE

Add A Comment

Comments are closed.