Close Menu
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
  • Home
  • News
    • Politics
    • Legal & Courts
    • Tech & Big Tech
    • Campus & Education
    • Media & Culture
    • Global Free Speech
  • Opinions
    • Debates
  • Video/Live
  • Community
  • Freedom Index
  • About
    • Mission
    • Contact
    • Support
Trending

Court Expresses Doubt About Lawprof’s Attempt to Block Appointment of Federal Judge as U Kentucky Law School Dean

9 minutes ago

BlackRock expands tokenized cash with new blockchain-based money market offerings

33 minutes ago

Strategy Sells 1,638 Bitcoin, Funds Dividends and Buybacks

34 minutes ago
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Discord Telegram
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
Market Data Newsletter
Monday, August 3
  • Home
  • News
    • Politics
    • Legal & Courts
    • Tech & Big Tech
    • Campus & Education
    • Media & Culture
    • Global Free Speech
  • Opinions
    • Debates
  • Video/Live
  • Community
  • Freedom Index
  • About
    • Mission
    • Contact
    • Support
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
Home»News»Global Free Speech»Drones strike radio station in rebel-held DRC, with threat to kill next time
Global Free Speech

Drones strike radio station in rebel-held DRC, with threat to kill next time

News RoomBy News Room2 months agoNo Comments6 Mins Read1,976 Views
Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest Copy Link LinkedIn Tumblr Email VKontakte Telegram
Drones strike radio station in rebel-held DRC, with threat to kill next time
Share
Facebook Twitter Pinterest Email Copy Link

Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

Key Takeaways

Playback Speed

Select a Voice

The eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo has joined a growing number of conflicts where drones are being used to target journalists, as two strikes hit a community radio station, followed by calls and messages threatening further attacks over its reporting on militia abuses.

The bombing of Radio Tuungane in South Kivu province’s rebel-controlled Minembwe commune came as the United Nations warned in March that civilians were facing additional risks from drones and clashes between the government and rebels escalated. Elsewhere in South Kivu, two journalists told CPJ they were currently unable to work due to threats and harassment.

Solar panels destroyed by a drone strike on Radio Tuungane’s roof. (Photo: Credit withheld)

On March 3 and 26, Radio Tuungane, which broadcasts from the mountainous Fizi Territory, was attacked by a military drone, three journalists from the station told CPJ, on condition of anonymity, citing fear of reprisals. Its staff escaped but the strikes damaged the building and equipment, including solar panels and batteries, they said.

The journalists said government-allied Wazalendo militia and government soldiers, who are seeking to capture Minembwe, had called the station in February and accused its staff of broadcasting news implicating their forces in atrocities against civilians.

One of the journalists said they had received death threats in February and April from the Wazalendo.

“The authors of these [text] messages and phone calls say they will kill me, including through drone attacks, as has already happened twice against our radio station in the space of a month,” the journalist told CPJ.

Over 60 journalists and media workers have been killed by drones since 2023. Journalists are considered civilians under international law and their deliberate targeting by any party to a conflict can constitute a war crime.

Both the DRC government and the rebels have carried out high-profile drone strikes this year.

Security force members stand watch as people attend the burial ceremony for victims who died in a drone strike in Masisi Territory in January.
Security forces stand watch as people attend the burial of victims of a drone strike in Masisi Territory in January. (Photo: Reuters/Arlette Bashizi)

CPJ’s call to interim government spokesperson, Lt. Col. Mak Hazukay Mongba, went unanswered. CPJ was unable to find a contact for the Wazalendo.

‘My life will be immediately in danger’

The Minembwe area is controlled by Twirwaneho, an armed group from the minority Banyamulenge community. Twirwaneho is in coalition with the M23 and the Congo River Alliance (AFC) rebel groups.

The rebels’ advance across eastern DRC in late 2024 and early 2025 forced many journalists to flee, while those who remain face a myriad of threats from both sides. Elsewhere, intelligence agents and police have also cracked down on reporting critical of local governance.

“I fear that if Minembwe falls under the control of government forces, my life will be immediately in danger because of my reporting that exposes their actions,” said the journalist, who reports for YouTube-based, Kinyarwanda-language Mukirambi TV1, as well as Radio Tuungane, which produces news in Kiswahili, French, and English on FM radio and YouTube.

The journalist said they had reported for both outlets on abuses by the militia.

Accused of collaborating with rebels

Similarly, Olivier Ramazani Alvin, who is based in South Kivu’s port city of Uvira, told CPJ that he had received multiple death threats since February from Wazalendo accusing him of collaborating with the rebels. Ramazani said that he was the only reporter in Uvira who provided footage and photos to international journalists, based some 300 kilometers north in Goma, when Uvira was occupied by the M23/AFC between December 2025 and January 2026.

Ramazani, publishing director of News Home Magazine, said he stopped working in February because of the threats, although his colleagues continue to publish on the YouTube-based site. But that did not stop the threats, he said, adding that he had received a call and a message a few days earlier on May 8.

Journalist hides after summons for ‘intelligence purposes’

Cléophas Kyembwe Babu Bumba
Cléophas Kyembwe Babu Bumba (Photo: Courtesy of Cléophas Kyembwe Babu Bumba)

Also in Uvira, journalist Cléophas Kyembwe Babu Bumba went into hiding after receiving a summons on April 27 from the National Intelligence Agency (ANR) to appear at its local headquarters the following day for “intelligence purposes.”

The next day, two ANR agents and three police officers searched for Kyembwe at his home and at privately owned Radio Lukula FM, where he holds the post of director, saying that he had shamed local authorities with his social media posts, CPJ was told by Kyembwe and another journalist, who spoke on condition of anonymity, citing fear of reprisals.

The posts by La Cloche Magazine, where Kyembwe is a reporter and cartoonist, included a cartoon about locals’ refusal to pay a sanitation tax and another about a no confidence motion against the governor of South Kivu province, Jean Jacques Purusi, for incompetence and embezzlement of public funds.

Interim Uvira mayor Kifara Kapenda Kyky told CPJ that he was unaware of Kyembwe’s situation. Contacted via messaging app, one local ANR manager declined to comment, while another did not respond.

Police brutality in Kasai-Oriental province

Press freedom is also under pressure elsewhere in the DRC.

Placide Cilewu Mukonga Bantu
Placide Cilewu Mukonga Bantu (Photo: Placide Cilewu Mukonga Bantu)

In Mbuji-Mayi, capital of central Kasai-Oriental province, about seven police officers punched and briefly detained Placide Cilewu Mukonga Bantu, a reporter with Radio Television of the Evangelical Church of Witnesses of Christ (RTEETC), on May 15, injuring his left eye and causing his left leg to swell, Cilewu told CPJ.

He said the police attacked him for interviewing, without authorization, female street sweepers demonstrating on a major avenue in the city, demanding local authorities increase their pay and improve working conditions.

Cilewu said the officers pulled him by his clothes and belt, forced him into their jeep, and detained him at a local police station for about four hours, before returning him to the protest site and releasing him unconditionally.

On May 16, the Union Nationale de la Presse du Congo in Kasai province, a journalists’ union, issued a statement, reviewed by CPJ, calling for provincial authorities to hold the perpetrators accountable and ensure Cilewu receives medical treatment.

CPJ’s call to Kasai-Oriental’s provincial police commissioner, André Mbombo Manda, went unanswered.

Read the full article here

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using AI-powered analysis and real-time sources.

Get Your Fact Check Report

Enter your email to receive detailed fact-checking analysis

5 free reports remaining

Continue with Full Access

You've used your 5 free reports. Sign up for unlimited access!

Already have an account? Sign in here

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email Telegram Copy Link
News Room
  • Website
  • Facebook
  • X (Twitter)
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn

The FSNN News Room is the voice of our in-house journalists, editors, and researchers. We deliver timely, unbiased reporting at the crossroads of finance, cryptocurrency, and global politics, providing clear, fact-driven analysis free from agendas.

Related Articles

Global Free Speech

CPJ calls on Cuban government to free media from state control

2 days ago
Global Free Speech

Supreme Court of the United Kingdom. Photo: Jay Galvin/CC BY 2.0 It was game, set and match for Bahraini dissidents Saeed Shehabi and Moosa Mohammed in their case against the Kingdom of Bahrain this week. The UK’s Supreme Court ruled in their favour, rejecting an appeal from Bahrain, which was claiming sovereign immunity from allegations it used spyware to infiltrate the computers of the pair in the UK back in 2011. We’ve been following the case and it’s hard to downplay this victory both for the men and for the broader ecosystem. The Kingdom had argued that section 5 of the State Immunity Act 1978, which creates an exemption to the act in the event of personal injuries and damage to property, was being misinterpreted and unduly broadened in this case. It said that a proper reading of the Act would afford immunity to states in cases where the actors or some of the acts causing personal injury were located outside the UK. But section 5 was enacted long before sophisticated spyware existed. The Supreme Court judges therefore rejected these arguments, stating that: “Modern technology enables acts of surveillance to be carried out in the UK remotely. Even if carried out by foreign state actors located outside the UK, such acts involve an infringement of UK territorial sovereignty.” Leigh Day, the law firm representing Shehabi and Mohammed, said that “the Supreme Court judgment has now settled the scope of section 5 of the State Immunity Act 1978. A foreign state cannot rely on state immunity to escape accountability for personal injury caused by acts within the UK, even where other causative acts take place abroad and the state’s agents are not present in this country. The court has recognised that a rigid distinction between the location of an act and its effects is artificial and unprincipled.” Shehabi said afterwards that “this is not just a victory for us, but for everyone targeted by authoritarian states beyond their own borders.” He’s right. We’ve been bleating on about transnational repression for years now because it’s prolific and getting worse. And when a dissident is attacked abroad, spyware is often a feature. This ruling makes clear that states can now be held officially accountable. As Shehabi also said after: “The hardest part of being targeted by alleged state-sponsored hacking is the feeling that nowhere is safe”. The UK arguably becomes a touch safer now. Mohammed said that the “victory changes the balance of power”. He spoke about being tortured by the Bahraini regime since he was a teenager and pursued across borders. “Today, the tables have turned,” he continued. “I am no longer the one being chased. I am chasing justice. I am chasing accountability. The era of abusing victims while hiding behind state immunity is over.” The UK has earned itself a reputation as a hunting ground for authoritarian regimes, and that’s partly because our response to counter it has been woeful. In some instances, police have told victims to keep a lower profile and that their cases are too hard to tackle because the assailants are overseas. So, it’s good to now have legal clarity on the question of proximity. Being abroad doesn’t grant you a get-out-of-jail-free card. READ MORE

3 days ago
Global Free Speech

Our report with the University of Essex The weaponisation of travel bans to Silence Speech and Dissent is published today. Photo: Curated Lifestyle/Unsplash+ When we think of state censorship, we often picture prison cells, violent police crackdowns or control of newsrooms. However, our report titled The weaponisation of travel bans to silence speech and dissent published today by Index on Censorship reveals a quieter, less visible tool of state repression that is devastating civil society across the world. We found that rather than protecting public safety, governments are increasingly manipulating “national security” or “public order” exemptions to trap journalists, fracture families and exile critics. Our research shows that these bans are highly adaptable tools that occur around politically sensitive events such as protests, elections and crackdowns on democratic activity. Their shared, devastating objective is to control narratives, block external scrutiny and create a chilling effect on free expression. As we researched this topic, we strongly felt that to understand the severity of this crisis, the spotlight must remain entirely on the impacted individuals. The victims of this widespread authoritarian trend pay with their lives and livelihoods being upended by arbitrary and undemocratic measures. Our analysis highlights that in authoritarian contexts, travel bans act as overt tools of absolute repression. In Saudi Arabia, they function as a form of “quasi-detention”, ensuring that prisoners of conscience remain silenced long after they are physically released from their cells. Take the example of Salma Al-Shehab, a doctoral student at Leeds University, who was imprisoned simply for tweeting in support of women’s rights. Upon her release, she was handed an eight-year travel ban, effectively destroying her academic career by barring her return to the United Kingdom. Similarly, in Algeria, our research shows how journalists like Mustapha Bendjama find themselves trapped in a bureaucratic nightmare. Extrajudicial travel bans, known as ISTNs, are routinely issued by security agencies without formal judicial oversight, leaving targets in a legal vacuum with no clear avenues for appeal. Bendjama shared with us that this forced isolation acts as a “mental imprisonment” that has dried up his sources and severely compromised his ability to conduct rigorous journalism. One of our most troubled findings was that the chilling effect of these restrictions extends well beyond authoritarian states, creeping into hybrid democracies. In India, administrative tools like “Look Out Circulars” are deployed to trap critical voices within the country’s borders. Sanna Irshad Mattoo, a Pulitzer Prize-winning photojournalist, was prevented from travelling to New York to accept her award, sending a clear message that international recognition offers no immunity from state retaliation. In Georgia, foreign journalists who report critically on the country’s democratic backsliding have been arbitrarily denied re-entry at the border using generic legislative clauses. French journalist Clément Giradot was refused entry after reporting on political demonstrations, a decision that suddenly separated him from his home, his Georgian wife and his young child without any concrete legal justification. It became clear to us that these are not isolated administrative errors. We believe they are part of a coordinated assault on international human rights. Whether it is Nicaragua arbitrarily revoking citizenship to render critics stateless, Belarus forcing exiled dissidents into jeopardy by refusing to renew passports abroad or the United States deploying visa revocations and social media screenings against lawfully present critics, the goal appears to be one: to enforce widespread self-censorship and fear. The international community can no longer treat these administrative traps as routine border control measures. We urgently recommend taking action. States must do away with these opaque directives, end the use of secondary travel bans as a form of collective punishment against families and align their domestic laws with international human rights standards. Furthermore, democratic host nations must step in to provide secure legal status and alternative travel documents for exiled dissidents while applying sustained diplomatic pressure to demand the lifting of these arbitrary restrictions globally. Respecting and protecting freedom of speech should not know any ideological boundaries or state borders. With this report, we express our solidarity with the brave ones who raised their voices and with many more who were silenced and never known. While researching and interviewing participants at the front lines of this injustice, we were reminded of the importance of academia’s role as both a sanctuary for freedom of expression and a service to society at large. window.option_df_140795 = {“outline”:[],”autoEnableOutline”:”false”,”autoEnableThumbnail”:”false”,”overwritePDFOutline”:”false”,”direction”:”1″,”pageSize”:”0″,”source”:”https:\/\/www.indexoncensorship.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/travel-bans-report.pdf”,”wpOptions”:”true”}; if(window.DFLIP && window.DFLIP.parseBooks){window.DFLIP.parseBooks();}   READ MORE

3 days ago
Global Free Speech

CPJ, partners urge Tunisia to end unjust imprisonment of journalists

3 days ago
Global Free Speech

CPJ urges Tanzania to commit to press freedom at UN rights review

4 days ago
Global Free Speech

Afghan journalist and director of Rukhshana Media, Zahra Joya. Photo: Associated Press / Alamy Stock Photo Nearly five years after the Taliban took control of her country and she fled Kabul, Afghan journalist Zahra Joya is telling her story. Her book The Vanishing Girl of Kabul, written with British-American journalist Amie Ferris-Rotman, is a mirror not just for Joya’s life, but for millions of other Afghan women and girls, who she describes as currently living in “home prisons”. The book tells the story of the Taliban’s brutal silencing of women and Joya’s own life of resistance. How she pretended to be a boy in the 1990s so she could go to school. How her family quickly packed up her grandfather’s handwritten Persian epic while the Taliban raided local villages for banned books. And how she feared for her life when the Taliban returned five years ago. Being a Hazara woman  – Hazaras are a persecuted minority in Afghanistan – she grew up with extreme violence levelled at her people. “It was important for me to record it, for people to understand, for the next generation and the history of Afghanistan,” Joya told Index. The day before the Taliban returned, she recounts in her book, she had the freedom to go the beauty salon. The next day offered a stark contrast. “Everything collapsed, including my own freedom,” she said. As the Taliban drew further into Kabul, she and her colleagues at the women-led publication which she had founded, Rukhshana Media, continued reporting. As Joya saw it, she was standing up for her rights and for freedom of expression, and was making sure the world knew about what was unfolding. “We never imagined that the Taliban would come to power so quickly, and everything would vanish very soon. We never thought that one day journalism would be a huge risk for the whole team,” she said. Joya had set up Rukhshana Media only a year before, and even then she was doing something courageous. In Afghanistan’s patriarchal society, the media space was dominated by men, who often held leadership positions. Now, Joya continues to run Rukhshana Media from London. Her journalists across Afghanistan work underground, protecting their identities by remaining anonymous and never meeting each other. Joya feels she has a heavy responsibility on her shoulders. Just before she spoke with Index, she received a voice message from one of her journalists describing how she wakes up every morning afraid of what she is going to lose on that particular day. Women and girls are banned from secondary and university education, and most jobs are closed to them. They must cover their bodies completely and even visiting a doctor requires a male chaperone. “The reality of Afghanistan under the Taliban regime is a complete gender apartheid system,” Joya said. Since she’s been in the UK, Joya has received a vast number of direct messages on social media from Taliban supporters, threatening her directly for her work and sending her videos of sexual abuse. But she has received supportive messages too. Now, she hopes readers of her book will reflect on the story, perhaps even take a photo of themselves with it and send her a message. Writing about her own life has been a difficult experience, and she has had to be careful around details of her relatives who are still in Afghanistan. But Joya said that remaining silent is not a solution. “It is part of my struggle against the misogyny, discrimination and injustice that is ongoing in Afghanistan,” she said. “The Vanishing Girl of Kabul. Maybe it’s me because I have had to disappear many times and find myself again, but I feel like she could just as easily be the millions of women of Afghanistan.” The Vanishing Girl of Kabul was published by Robinson on 23 July 2026 READ MORE

4 days ago
Add A Comment

Comments are closed.

Editors Picks

BlackRock expands tokenized cash with new blockchain-based money market offerings

33 minutes ago

Strategy Sells 1,638 Bitcoin, Funds Dividends and Buybacks

34 minutes ago

Morning Minute: The Coldcard Bitcoin Hack Nears $114 Million in Potential Losses

36 minutes ago

Trump’s Sloppy, Incompetent Chinese Protectionism Expanded To Robot Vacuums, Lawnmowers

1 hour ago
Latest Posts

Ex-ICC Prosecutor Khan’s Sexual Misconduct Wasn’t His Only Scandal

1 hour ago

Saylor sells more bitcoin, buys back more STRC

2 hours ago

Bithumb Sets 2028 IPO Target, Plans Internal-Control Overhaul

2 hours ago

Subscribe to News

Get the latest news and updates directly to your inbox.

At FSNN – Free Speech News Network, we deliver unfiltered reporting and in-depth analysis on the stories that matter most. From breaking headlines to global perspectives, our mission is to keep you informed, empowered, and connected.

FSNN.net is owned and operated by GlobalBoost Media
, an independent media organization dedicated to advancing transparency, free expression, and factual journalism across the digital landscape.

Facebook X (Twitter) Discord Telegram
Latest News

Court Expresses Doubt About Lawprof’s Attempt to Block Appointment of Federal Judge as U Kentucky Law School Dean

9 minutes ago

BlackRock expands tokenized cash with new blockchain-based money market offerings

33 minutes ago

Strategy Sells 1,638 Bitcoin, Funds Dividends and Buybacks

34 minutes ago

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest news and updates directly to your inbox.

© 2026 GlobalBoost Media. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Our Authors
  • Contact

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

🍪

Cookies

We and our selected partners wish to use cookies to collect information about you for functional purposes and statistical marketing. You may not give us your consent for certain purposes by selecting an option and you can withdraw your consent at any time via the cookie icon.

Cookie Preferences

Manage Cookies

Cookies are small text that can be used by websites to make the user experience more efficient. The law states that we may store cookies on your device if they are strictly necessary for the operation of this site. For all other types of cookies, we need your permission. This site uses various types of cookies. Some cookies are placed by third party services that appear on our pages.

Your permission applies to the following domains:

  • https://fsnn.net
Necessary
Necessary cookies help make a website usable by enabling basic functions like page navigation and access to secure areas of the website. The website cannot function properly without these cookies.
Statistic
Statistic cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
Preferences
Preference cookies enable a website to remember information that changes the way the website behaves or looks, like your preferred language or the region that you are in.
Marketing
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.