Close Menu
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
  • Home
  • News
    • Politics
    • Legal & Courts
    • Tech & Big Tech
    • Campus & Education
    • Media & Culture
    • Global Free Speech
  • Opinions
    • Debates
  • Video/Live
  • Community
  • Freedom Index
  • About
    • Mission
    • Contact
    • Support
Trending

Turkey: 4 more journalists arrested for ‘spreading disinformation’ as media crackdown intensifies

3 minutes ago

Tokenized catastrophe bonds target uninsured disaster gap under new Harneys-dropRWA plan

18 minutes ago

Bitcoin Miners Face Rising AI Infrastructure Funding Needs

23 minutes ago
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Discord Telegram
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
Market Data Newsletter
Monday, October 12
  • Home
  • News
    • Politics
    • Legal & Courts
    • Tech & Big Tech
    • Campus & Education
    • Media & Culture
    • Global Free Speech
  • Opinions
    • Debates
  • Video/Live
  • Community
  • Freedom Index
  • About
    • Mission
    • Contact
    • Support
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
Home»Cryptocurrency & Free Speech Finance»NEXTPredict Paid $12,000 to Hedge Its Conference on a Prediction Market
Cryptocurrency & Free Speech Finance

NEXTPredict Paid $12,000 to Hedge Its Conference on a Prediction Market

News RoomBy News Room1 hour agoNo Comments4 Mins Read1 Views
Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest Copy Link LinkedIn Tumblr Email VKontakte Telegram
NEXTPredict Paid ,000 to Hedge Its Conference on a Prediction Market
Share
Facebook Twitter Pinterest Email Copy Link

Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

Key Takeaways

Playback Speed

Select a Voice

In brief

  • NEXTPredict bought contracts on Kalshi that pay out if more than half of flights into JFK are canceled on October 21.
  • The premium was $12,000 against roughly $3 million of coverage, the organizer’s full investment in the event.
  • Susquehanna took the other side as market maker, in what the parties call the first conference hedged on a prediction market.

The organizers of a prediction markets conference have hedged the conference on a prediction market, paying a $12,000 premium for contracts that would return around $3 million if New York’s airports seize up the day before it opens.

The trade, executed through Kalshi with Susquehanna as market maker, settles on whether more than half of flights scheduled to land at John F. Kennedy International Airport are canceled on October 21, the main travel day before NEXTPredict’s October 22-23 summit at Convene in Hudson Yards. The $3 million represents the organizer’s total investment in the event.

This is me announcing a conference that never happened.

Today we hedged our next one on a prediction market. $3 million in coverage for a $12,000 premium, executed through @Kalshi with @SusquehannaSIG as market maker.

First time anyone in our event industry has done it. Here… pic.twitter.com/UtiA1xTXJw

— Pierre Lindh (@Pierreobv) July 28, 2026

The threshold was chosen as a proxy, Pierre Lindh, co-founder and managing director of NEXT.io, told Decrypt. “We had a conversation with Kalshi and Susquehanna, and we said, ‘Why don’t we use airport disruption as the vector?’ Because if there is 50% flight cancellation from JFK on the 21st of October, it means that something has happened in the world.”

The risk is all too real. Lindh opened a thread on the trade with an image of himself announcing a conference in 2020 that never took place. “A few months later the entire world locked down and we lost 100% of our revenue for the entire year,” he wrote.

Across 13 years and around 800 events the exposure has recurred. A blizzard hit New York weeks before the company’s March show there, and conflict in the Middle East escalated shortly before it opened, leaving delegates unable to travel and the company processing refunds, he said. By May, with its flagship Malta event approaching, the worry was European airports running short of fuel.

“Event insurance is focused around what happens inside the venue,” Lindh told Decrypt, describing cover for fires, rigging failures and injuries. Standard force majeure cover typically only pays out when an event is canceled. If a hurricane closes the airport, he said, “it doesn’t mean that we have to cancel our conference. It probably means that we will need to organize it but short-handed.” The costs are already sunk and the revenue is already lost, but the policy may never trigger, he told trade publication G3 Newswire. “The material financial damage has already happened, but standard event insurance might not trigger because the conference itself went ahead.”

Force majeure has historically “just been accepted as part of the deal,” he said. “You commit millions, you cross your fingers.”

Lindh’s second objection is the claim itself: insurance is slow to arrange and, he says, “when the moment comes, the insurer’s incentive is to find the reason not to pay.”

A market settles differently. Claiming on a policy means a potential argument with the insurer over whether the circumstances qualify, Lindh told the trade publication G3 Newswire, whereas on a prediction market, “Kalshi is in the middle determining whether the conditions of the contract have been met.”

Kalshi self-certified the flight cancellation contracts with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission on July 14 and built this market to order after NEXT.io approached it as an institutional customer. Retail traders cannot access it. Certain causes of disruption, including drone incidents and bomb threats, do not trigger payment.

The contracts drew criticism when they appeared, on the grounds that someone could profit by disrupting flights. Lindh addressed it directly, calling the worry fair and arguing that the hedge is the other face of the same instrument: “A business with real exposure, buying protection, on a regulated venue, with an institutional market maker taking the other side.”

Both counterparties see a larger market behind it. Kalshi chief executive Tarek Mansour called it “prediction markets moving beyond forecasting and becoming practical business infrastructure.” Joe Grubb, who heads prediction markets business development at Susquehanna, said the structure allows the transfer of institutional risk “that historically had no path for execution.”

Lindh expects company. “Our whole industry has been carrying this risk on the chin for decades because there was no instrument for it,” he wrote. “Now there is one.”

Daily Debrief Newsletter

Start every day with the top news stories right now, plus original features, a podcast, videos and more.



Read the full article here

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using AI-powered analysis and real-time sources.

Get Your Fact Check Report

Enter your email to receive detailed fact-checking analysis

5 free reports remaining

Continue with Full Access

You've used your 5 free reports. Sign up for unlimited access!

Already have an account? Sign in here

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email Telegram Copy Link
News Room
  • Website
  • Facebook
  • X (Twitter)
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn

The FSNN News Room is the voice of our in-house journalists, editors, and researchers. We deliver timely, unbiased reporting at the crossroads of finance, cryptocurrency, and global politics, providing clear, fact-driven analysis free from agendas.

Related Articles

Cryptocurrency & Free Speech Finance

Tokenized catastrophe bonds target uninsured disaster gap under new Harneys-dropRWA plan

18 minutes ago
Cryptocurrency & Free Speech Finance

Bitcoin Miners Face Rising AI Infrastructure Funding Needs

23 minutes ago
Cryptocurrency & Free Speech Finance

Bitcoin Spooked? Crypto Fear and Greed Index Drops to Pre-Rally August Lows

28 minutes ago
Media & Culture

The Government Doesn’t Know What’s Best for You. Why Let It Decide What You Should Eat?

58 minutes ago
Cryptocurrency & Free Speech Finance

Palantir’s (PLTR) Louis Mosley warns Europe is ‘missing the boat’ on AI

1 hour ago
Cryptocurrency & Free Speech Finance

Bitcoin Traders Eye $82,500 Support Zone Ahead of US CPI, PPI Data

1 hour ago
Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Editors Picks

Tokenized catastrophe bonds target uninsured disaster gap under new Harneys-dropRWA plan

18 minutes ago

Bitcoin Miners Face Rising AI Infrastructure Funding Needs

23 minutes ago

Bitcoin Spooked? Crypto Fear and Greed Index Drops to Pre-Rally August Lows

28 minutes ago

The Government Doesn’t Know What’s Best for You. Why Let It Decide What You Should Eat?

58 minutes ago
Latest Posts

Screenshot of silhouette in NAZA film (The Guardian/JW Films) NAZA, the new documentary film by Yuval Abraham and Rachel Szor, is not the first filmabout Israel, by Israelis, to speak out of turn. But the unrestrained response to it in Israel,following the film being awarded the Special Jury Prize at the Venice Film Festival lastmonth, is unprecedented. Israel’s minister of culture declared that he would take steps to have the filmmakers’citizenship revoked; angry protesters have demonstrated outside the homes of one of thefilmmakers’ parents; the offices of +972 Publications (the work builds on some of Abraham’s work for the news outlet) were evacuated after staff received credible threats of violence. Most tellingly, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu declared that people who “slandered” the country and Israel Defence Forces (IDF) at a time of war were “traitors”. Allthis before the film’s official release, scheduled for 14 October, and for a film that, as of thetime of writing, has not been seen by very many Israelis – and, almost certainly, not byanyone voicing their opprobrium in the public sphere. This speaks of one thing: censorship. Yuval Abraham (right) and an interviewee seen during the NAZA documentary (The Guardian/JW Films) On 7 October 2023, Hamas launched a multi-pronged attack on Israel, killing more than1200 people in one day and taking another 300 hostage. In the three years since, Israel haswaged an unrelenting and pitiless war against the two million residents of the Gaza Strip,killing at least 74,000 people and laying to waste much of the territory. NAZA is the acronym in Hebrew for nezek agavi – collateral damage, a horrible euphemism that has bounced about since at least the Vietnam War. It is also, according to the film that carries this name, a protocol that has been deployed by the IDF over the course of the war. Israel’s minister of culture declared that he would take steps to have the filmmakers’ citizenship revoked When actualising remote strikes against Hamas targets, the protocol determines how many civilian deaths constitute an acceptable trade-off vis-à-vis the elimination (yes, anothereuphemism) of an identified Hamas target? NAZA, the documentary is underpinned by a simple premise. 24 men and women, theiridentities disguised, are interviewed by Abraham on Tel Aviv rooftops about theirknowledge of the protocol, about the wider prosecution of the ongoing war, and about theirfeelings concerning how the war is being waged – the manner in which Gaza and Gazans have been laid to waste by the tools that they themselves have operated. The documentary unpicks NAZA’s methodology, how this reduces human life to a mathematical calculation. One information source for the NAZA protocol is Lavender, an AI tool that extrapolates from telephone network data the likelihood that any given individual is a “Hamas operative” – and thus a target whose elimination becomes attached to a NAZA number. Concerning Lavender, one interviewee says that the AI tool has an 85% accuracy rate. The life of a target, and of the people around that target, hinges on a tool with a 15% error rate. This alone casts into stark relief the IDF claim that its war is against Hamas alone. The impression one develops across the course of the film is that for some of theinterviewees, the depersonalisation created by NAZA helps in distancing oneself from theemotional and psychological implications of waging this particular war. It is, I think, a sentiment being replicated across Israel as a whole. Of the war in Gaza and how it is beingprosecuted, even now there is remarkably little debate in the public sphere. Very littlereflection, in the media or in the wider public discourse, about the consequences of waginga war in a manner that has ignited revulsion across the world. NAZA’s principal audience, despite the rhetoric of “traitors”, is Israelis. There is no single reason for this. One of the interview subjects talks of a “hormonal rush”,presumably connected to a primal wish for vengeance after 7 October. Several, with varying degrees of reflection, express some regret. One references all he had been taught about the Nazis and the Holocaust, then pauses. It is difficult, he continues, not to see parallels between that set of atrocities and these. One says that they – the people operating the NAZA protocol – “do not hate Arabs”. Abraham then reminds him of the number of people that NAZA potentially anonymises, then erases. He first obfuscates, then falls silent. Another talks about how hard it was for him to calculate a NAZA for a target – a target he believed to be legitimate – knowing that they would include his two daughters: “toddlers, one three [years old] the second not more than six.” He knew this because he had access to the target’s picture library on his phone. The target in question was not killed in the subsequent targeted strike. The daughters, part of the approved NAZA collateral damage calculation, were. NAZA’s principal audience, despite the rhetoric of “traitors”, is Israelis. Contextual prods across the film are reminders of this. A single casual reference to the IDF’s elite 8200 cyber warfare unit, for instance, carries a lot of shorthand that would not be evident to non-Israelis. The rooftop settings for the interviews would be identifiable for many Tel Avivians, sometimes down to the very street. The point being driven home is that the people behind NAZA are relatable, part of the quotidian fabric of everyday life. A bifurcated life, though. One interviewee says that after selecting targets in HaKirya, the IDF’s central Tel Aviv headquarters, he may head off to meet friends on nearby Ibn Gvirol Street. Israel and many Israelis live in the shadow of the 7 October attacks but remain detached from the reality of the war being waged in their name in Gaza. Whether Israelis will get to see NAZA remains an open question. Abraham and Szor have said that they are open to discussing distribution terms with Israeli cinemas; the likelihood of any of them taking this up is slim. Whether or not the government will censor the film – quite plausible, given the rhetoric from above – is a moot point. In today’s Israel, I doubt that anyone will touch it with a barge pole. This weekend, Prime Minister Netanyahu wrote to his attorney-general and the heads of the IDF and the internal security agency, instructing that they “act urgently to uncover the identity of all those who are involved or appear in the libel film”, so that they may be prosecuted “for serious information security offenses, criminal defamation, and harming Israel’s diplomatic and security interests.” Making the film is being framed as treason; distributing it could easily be framed as much the same. NAZA will be made available to stream, for free, after its international theatrical run. Whether Israelis will choose to watch it, even in private, is a question I can’t answer. One thing that must be said, though. That the film was made at all says something about a capacity for self-reflection that did exist in Israel once, even if it was often mocked or dismissed or taken for granted. But that was before 7 October 2023. NAZA is not the first film about Israel, by Israelis, to speak out of turn. I’m not at all sure whether it won’t be the last. READ MORE

1 hour ago

Palantir’s (PLTR) Louis Mosley warns Europe is ‘missing the boat’ on AI

1 hour ago

Bitcoin Traders Eye $82,500 Support Zone Ahead of US CPI, PPI Data

1 hour ago

Subscribe to News

Get the latest news and updates directly to your inbox.

At FSNN – Free Speech News Network, we deliver unfiltered reporting and in-depth analysis on the stories that matter most. From breaking headlines to global perspectives, our mission is to keep you informed, empowered, and connected.

FSNN.net is owned and operated by GlobalBoost Media
, an independent media organization dedicated to advancing transparency, free expression, and factual journalism across the digital landscape.

Facebook X (Twitter) Discord Telegram
Latest News

Turkey: 4 more journalists arrested for ‘spreading disinformation’ as media crackdown intensifies

3 minutes ago

Tokenized catastrophe bonds target uninsured disaster gap under new Harneys-dropRWA plan

18 minutes ago

Bitcoin Miners Face Rising AI Infrastructure Funding Needs

23 minutes ago

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest news and updates directly to your inbox.

© 2026 GlobalBoost Media. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Our Authors
  • Contact

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

🍪

Cookies

We and our selected partners wish to use cookies to collect information about you for functional purposes and statistical marketing. You may not give us your consent for certain purposes by selecting an option and you can withdraw your consent at any time via the cookie icon.

Cookie Preferences

Manage Cookies

Cookies are small text that can be used by websites to make the user experience more efficient. The law states that we may store cookies on your device if they are strictly necessary for the operation of this site. For all other types of cookies, we need your permission. This site uses various types of cookies. Some cookies are placed by third party services that appear on our pages.

Your permission applies to the following domains:

  • https://fsnn.net
Necessary
Necessary cookies help make a website usable by enabling basic functions like page navigation and access to secure areas of the website. The website cannot function properly without these cookies.
Statistic
Statistic cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
Preferences
Preference cookies enable a website to remember information that changes the way the website behaves or looks, like your preferred language or the region that you are in.
Marketing
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.