Close Menu
Market Data Newsletter
Monday, October 12
Global Free Speech

CPJ, partners ask Turkey and social media platforms to halt online crackdown on journalists and rights defenders

News RoomBy No Comments2 Mins Read0 Views
CPJ, partners ask Turkey and social media platforms to halt online crackdown on journalists and rights defenders

Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

The Committee to Protect Journalists on Monday joined 20 local and international partner organizations in a joint statement asking Turkey and social media platforms to stop censoring journalists and rights defenders online by blocking their accounts, and respect the right to free expression. 

The Freedom of Expression Association (İFÖD) found that in September alone, Turkish authorities and courts ordered the blocking of access to at least 1,270 accounts on the social media platform X, which complied with at least 90% of the orders by geo-blocking the accounts and withholding access in Turkey. 

In many cases, the accounts were blocked in the context of an ongoing and wide-ranging crackdown on associations and activists defending the rights of LGBTQ+ people. In other cases, the authorities cited unspecified “national security and public order” grounds.  

Meta has also withheld access to the Instagram and Facebook accounts of several media and civil society organisations.    

The signatories to the statement asked social media companies to “take meaningful steps immediately to uphold their human rights responsibilities and avoid contributing to the suppression of independent media” and called on Turkey to “take urgent steps to end internet censorship and uphold freedom of expression.”

Read the full statement here

Read the full article here

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using AI-powered analysis and real-time sources.

Share.

The FSNN News Room is the voice of our in-house journalists, editors, and researchers. We deliver timely, unbiased reporting at the crossroads of finance, cryptocurrency, and global politics, providing clear, fact-driven analysis free from agendas.

Related Articles

Global Free Speech

Lulwa al-Hussainan criticised Kuwait’s Minister of Interior, Fahad Al-Yousef (Main pic: Lana71/WikiCommons; alt pic: taken from Gulf Centre for Human Rights appeal) These are the poignant words of Lulwa al-Hussainan, the Kuwaiti human rights defender known for her outspoken criticism of government policies and her activism on social media. Her criticism of the Minister of Interior, Fahad Al-Yousef, put her in the crosshairs of the authorities, and after facing intimidation and trumped-up charges in connection with her activism, she was forced to flee Kuwait in December 2024. This year she also had her citizenship revoked. Al-Hussainan told Index that she had been inspired to become an activist from an early age. “From a young age I read a great deal, and that reading taught me to stand with anyone who is wronged and to support them,” she said. Her first experience of being targeted for standing up for what she believed in came in June 2021, when she was arrested and detained alongside her husband during a sit-in at Al-Erada Square. Speaking on social media after the event, al-Hussainan said: “They insulted and verbally abused me, and out of spite, they even insulted my deceased and wronged grandfather, the late Musafir Abdulkarim Mahshoum.” Musafir Abdulkarim was a 38-year-old actor born and raised in Kuwait, of Iraqi descent. He was accused of treason by the Kuwaiti authorities when Iraq invaded Kuwait and was executed in 1991. The family strongly deny he was a spy and says it was a fabricated charge. Lulwa al-Hussainan’s profile on social media – where she has built a substantial following – describes herself as a “Granddaughter of a martyr who loved the homeland”, although she made clear that her biggest call to action is through moral obligation rather than family ties. “What inspires me to stand with the oppressed is that it is the right thing to do,” she said. “In my country we used to have a measure of freedom of opinion. Now many people are in prison unjustly because of a word or a view, and they have been beaten, humiliated, and tortured.” Despite her arrest in 2021, al-Hussainan continued to speak out. Her criticism of government policies increased with a vocal campaign against Kuwait’s campaign to revoke citizenships. Authorities in the state have used citizenship as a political weapon against dissidents and critics for years, with an estimated 70,000 Kuwaitis having had their citizenship revoked since the launch of an unprecedented government campaign in March 2024. The repressive tactic has drawn criticism from the international community, condemned as a thinly-veiled attempt to silence opposition with a disproportionate impact on women and minorities. “What inspires me to stand with the oppressed is that it is the right thing to do” Although she wasn’t the only one to voice concerns around the campaign, al-Hussainan’s criticisms of the policy attracted online publicity and support, and subsequently the attention of the authorities. It was this that led to her clash with Interior Minister Al-Yousef.  “I spoke about the revocation of citizenship and defended people who were wronged,” al-Hussainan explained. “They obtained citizenship in accordance with the law, they are not forgers.” “Because of what I said and the position I took, I was summoned by State Security, and the Minister of Interior assaulted me.” According to al-Hussainan, she was reprimanded by Al-Yousef for her posts on X and for impinging on the authority of the Emir and was subjected to beatings and solitary confinement in a freezing cell during this meeting. By the time she was released, her health had severely deteriorated. She subsequently fled the country to seek refuge in the UK.  After leaving Kuwait in December 2024, al-Hussainan was sentenced twice: in March 2025 she was sentenced to three years in prison for “insulting the Emir,” a sentence overturned three months later. In January 2026, she received a second sentence from the Kuwaiti Criminal Court, this time for five years in prison on the same charge. The verdict was widely seen to be a political decision meant to undermine her criticisms of the state rather than a legitimate case.  Posting on social media in the aftermath, al-Hussainan said: “What is happening is the height of a catastrophe. Fahad Al-Yousef is using the war as a pretext to justify his injustice and tyranny, and he is wielding his power as a sword against the people.” In a terrible irony, the very policy al-Hussainan was targeted for opposing was used against her as she was stripped of her citizenship in 2026, along with several other Kuwaiti activists and dissidents residing abroad. While still living in exile, her brother Abdullah Nasser Al-Hussainan – himself a content creator who makes and posts comedic videos on YouTube – was arrested and charged in what Lulwa believes was retribution for her activism and an attempt to intimidate her into silence.  Posting CCTV footage of the arrest on X, she stated: “This video proves my brother was kidnapped right in front of the house. Fahad Al-Youssef is escalating his animosity and taking revenge on me by kidnapping my brother. Unfortunately, in Kuwait, people get kidnapped from their homes.” I was summoned by State Security, and the Minister of Interior assaulted me Al-Hussainan told Index that she misses Kuwait, but she is resigned to her fate for as long as she continues to fight for what she believes in. “I still miss my country, my family, and my friends,” she said. “But I have no choice but to remain in exile. If I return, my fate in Kuwait will be prison.” Despite her current predicament and the charges brought against her and her family by the state, she remains outspoken on social media and continues to demand a review of the mass citizenship revocations and to peacefully protest against the oppressive Kuwaiti regime. In this way, al-Hussainan is the perfect example of how not to be silent. READ MORE

Global Free Speech

One thing I learnt this week: that the plague, in its various strains, never went away, and in fact still kills people in tiny pockets of the globe. One thing I didn’t learn this week: how a 28-year-old lab technician called Daria Shipilova managed to catch, then die from, pneumonic plague. If indeed it was the plague that killed her, because Russian authorities have censored so much about the incident that the dominant story – about it leaking, infecting and killing Shipilova, who worked at an anti-plague research institute in Irkutsk and thus must have been wearing a hazmat suit precisely so she wouldn’t be exposed to the disease – doesn’t make much sense. But then, nor do any of the other theories circulating at the moment. Indeed, we may never know the truth because Putin, the Kremlin, Russia.   Over the last week, media outlets and state officials in Russia have been busy deleting or moderating reports about Shipilova’s death. Last Friday, the governor of Buryatia, which directly borders the impacted Irkutsk region, wrote that a woman in Irkutsk “had died of plague”. The statement was later edited to say she had “possibly” died of plague. On Saturday, the authorities in Baikalsk urged residents to avoid Shelekhov – home to the hospital Shipilova died in – and nearby towns because of “unofficial information about a confirmed case of plague”. The post, on Telegram, disappeared within two hours. On Monday, Russian daily Kommersant quoted a report by US media outlet Axios, about the US monitoring claims of a possible outbreak; the Kommersant article and accompanying Telegram post were deleted 25 minutes later. Speaking to the press about the situation, Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov told journalists to “stick to the official statements” and ignore “rumours and speculation”. In other words, keep quiet or expect a visit from the FSB. As it happens, FSB operatives were seen escorting ambulances taking people who had been in contact with Shipilova for medical screenings.  Igor Kobzev, governor of the Irkutsk region, insists that “everything is under control”. Control is very much the operative word. If by this he means that the Kremlin remains the arbiter of the narrative, then he’s right. There’s a lot of control going on at the moment. But if he means that the virus itself is under control, he may be woefully wrong. I am not an expert on disease and I have no doubt that the biological composition of pneumonic plague (if it is that!) differs from that of Covid-19, for better or worse.  I am an expert on censorship, though, and this I know: if China hadn’t tried to conceal what was happening in Wuhan in the early days of the Covid-19 pandemic, if they hadn’t silenced the whistleblower doctor Li Wenliang (who subsequently died of the disease), the virus may have been controlled. Millions would have been saved. The last six years would have been very different. Covid-19 was the most painfully perfect example of how censorship many thousands of miles away can still impact us all, how censorship extends into the most basic and intimate areas of everyday life. I hope that what Daria Shipilova died of was not, in fact, pneumonic plague; and if so, that it has been contained. But I’m not going to trust anything the Kremlin says on the matter. READ MORE

Add A Comment
Leave A Reply