Close Menu
Market Data Newsletter
Monday, September 28
Global Free Speech

Gabon’s online news outlet Info241 suspended for publishing allegations about president

News RoomBy No Comments2 Mins Read8 Views
Gabon’s online news outlet Info241 suspended for publishing allegations about president

Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

Dakar, August 13, 2026—The Committee to Protect Journalists calls on Gabonese authorities to reinstate the privately owned news site Info241, which was suspended by the country’s media regulator for relaying comments by an influencer about President Brice Clotaire Oligui Nguema and his entourage.

“Deciding to shut down a 13-year-old media outlet is more an act of censorship than of regulation and deprives the Gabonese public of a major source of information,” said Moussa Ngom, CPJ’s Francophone Africa representative. “Gabonese authorities must lift the indefinite suspension of Info241 and allow the outlet to resume work.”

On August 10, the High Authority for Communication (HAC), ordered Info241 be suspended until further notice over its August 9 article about a YouTube video by a Europe-based activist who publishes under the name Lanlaire and made allegations about the misuse of public funds and the sexual orientation of Gabon’s president.

“The media Info241, pretending to recognize the unfounded nature of the activist’s malicious and unproven insinuations, has chosen to publish them in defiance of the legislative and regulatory provisions in force,” the HAC said in a statement. The regulator also cited an ordinance on the regulation of digital social networks that anyone who has participated in disseminating or sharing illegal content is also liable for damage caused. 

Info241’s publishing director Cédrin Mounziégou said in a statement that “informing the public about accusations circulating in the public space does not mean taking them up or accepting them as fact.”

Mounziégou said the HAC did not appear to have followed legal procedures as Info241 did not receive notice or get a chance to defend itself and described the decision as illegal as the law does not provide for indefinite suspension.

According to Article 183 of the communication code, the regulator can suspend a media outlet for up to 30 days for a first offense, up to 12 months for a repeat offense, and permanently ban it for multiple repeated offenses.

Mounziégou told CPJ that Info241 had not been sanctioned in its 13-year history.

Separately, in February, CPJ joined the #KeepItOn coalition in asking Gabonese authorities to reverse the HAC’s ongoing shutdown of social media, which the regulator has said aims to prevent the “spread of false information.”

CPJ’s letter asking for comment, as requested by HAC spokesperson Jean-Claude Franck Mendome, did not immediately receive a response.

Read the full article here

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using AI-powered analysis and real-time sources.

Share.

The FSNN News Room is the voice of our in-house journalists, editors, and researchers. We deliver timely, unbiased reporting at the crossroads of finance, cryptocurrency, and global politics, providing clear, fact-driven analysis free from agendas.

Related Articles

Global Free Speech

The BBC clearly sees the value of television series That Mitchell and Webb Look. Marking the 20th anniversary of its original screening, the Beeb has re-released the series on iPlayer. But – and there is very often a “but” with these things – they’ve removed around 11 sketches from the BAFTA award-winning show. The official word is that these sketches don’t “work today”, which is polite speak for “they may cause offence”. The episodes singled out include scenes featuring a battle reenactment with characters in blackface, a contestant on a show wearing a burka and a lost tribe” in a garden centre. These sketches set out to challenge stereotypes, not to reinforce them; but 20 years on, this distinction seems to have been lost along the way. I’m a bit uncomfortable about this. I find it infantilising, to say the least. Can’t we trust audiences to make up their own minds, to switch off if they find the sketches in question unpalatable? Does the BBC think that we are just passive consumers, unable to disaggregate the mocking of racism from racism itself? These sketches set out to challenge stereotypes, not to reinforce them This act of censorship is distorting – of the shows, whose narratives and rhythms were built to include these sketches, and more broadly too. Conversations we were having 20 years ago have been erased, as if to suggest that they never happened. But they did! And with this erasure, the opportunity for thoughtful engagement and learning from our past is gone. “Let’s just pretend we were all lovely 20 years ago. It’s better that way” seems to be the message. Speaking as a minority myself, I find that knowing the nasty stuff that people said before – and indeed, still say today – is much more useful than pretending it never happened. This approach, I think, is also inconsistent. What it reveals is a cherry-picking (intended or not) of the groups that we can mock, and those that we can’t. Let’s face it, gender stereotypes are rarely deemed to have aged beyond the pale – if that were the case, we would have to wave goodbye to half the television made before the mid-2010s. Suppression like this sends a bad message to artists, namely that what they’re creating today may hold less value tomorrow. Or, even worse, that future audiences may deem them bigots – that Sword of Damocles hovering over the heads of any creative paying attention to the discourse of the moment. Suppression like this sends a bad message to artists The BBC’s decision reaffirms a broader trend. In 2020, Little Britain was removed from the iPlayer platform for similar reasons. It has since been reinstated – minus some sketches. Meanwhile, the UK’s arts space more broadly is seeing a retreat to the land of “safe”, as Index recently revealed in a year-long investigation into self-censorship in UK theatre. The BBC, it must be said, does remarkable stuff. The ongoing podcast investigation into the disappearance of US journalist Austin Tice is just one example. But this does not mean, however, that they don’t sometimes get it wrong. Chopping at That Mitchell and Webb Look is one example. Sure, the removal of the material isn’t the life-or-death story that Index often works on. Sure, Mitchell and Webb aren’t the faces of persecuted artists – they have huge platforms and agreed to the changes themselves. Still, one can’t help but think that the decision came from a place of conservatism, perhaps even fear. This is weak and dispiriting, indeed the very opposite of what enables creativity in the arts. We shouldn’t be encouraging this cultural timidity. Rather, we should harness culture and creativity as the starting points of a conversation about our here and now. That’s what the arts are for, after all. READ MORE

Add A Comment

Comments are closed.