Close Menu
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
  • Home
  • News
    • Politics
    • Legal & Courts
    • Tech & Big Tech
    • Campus & Education
    • Media & Culture
    • Global Free Speech
  • Opinions
    • Debates
  • Video/Live
  • Community
  • Freedom Index
  • About
    • Mission
    • Contact
    • Support
Trending

Federal Courts Are Running a Surplus Charging for Public Records

22 seconds ago

Live updates: Bitcoin sinks below $83,000 as Iran talks stall and oil climbs

24 minutes ago

Hong Kong Expands Financial Reporting Oversight to Crypto Firms

28 minutes ago
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Discord Telegram
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
Market Data Newsletter
Monday, September 28
  • Home
  • News
    • Politics
    • Legal & Courts
    • Tech & Big Tech
    • Campus & Education
    • Media & Culture
    • Global Free Speech
  • Opinions
    • Debates
  • Video/Live
  • Community
  • Freedom Index
  • About
    • Mission
    • Contact
    • Support
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
Home»News»Global Free Speech»Peruvian journalist sued by judge for defamation, ordered to pay a $14,500 fine
Global Free Speech

Peruvian journalist sued by judge for defamation, ordered to pay a $14,500 fine

News RoomBy News Room2 months agoNo Comments2 Mins Read8 Views
Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest Copy Link LinkedIn Tumblr Email VKontakte Telegram
Peruvian journalist sued by judge for defamation, ordered to pay a ,500 fine
Share
Facebook Twitter Pinterest Email Copy Link

Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

Key Takeaways

Playback Speed

Select a Voice

Bogotá, July 28, 2026—Peruvian judicial authorities must stop harassing journalist Carlos Yofré López for an old case and allow reporters to do their jobs without fear of unfounded defamation lawsuits, the Committee to Protect Journalists said on Tuesday.

On July 20, an appeals court in the Pacific coast province of Huaura upheld a lower court decision that found López guilty of civil defamation and ordered him to pay 50,000 Peruvian sols (USD $14,500) to Juana Caballero, a judge in Huaura, according to a copy of the decision obtained by CPJ.

“The abusive use of the justice system against journalists serves two purposes: to intimidate them and to strangle them financially,” said Cristina Zahar, CPJ Latin America program coordinator. “The chilling effect that this engenders is damaging to Peruvian journalists and is detrimental to press freedom in the country.”

The case stems from a 2017 report for the independent Radio Antena 9 and the Facebook-based news website Barranca Noticias in which López alleged that Caballero may have accepted a bribe to overturn the corruption conviction of a local politician and that, as a judge, her assets had increased by 600% within a year, according to Peru’s National Association of Journalists, or ANP.

Caballero denied any wrongdoing and claimed that López had damaged her reputation and filed a criminal defamation lawsuit in 2018. After numerous delays, the criminal charges were thrown out but the civil caseagainst López continued. López told CPJ that he plans to file a final appeal before Peru’s Supreme Court and that he may seek redress from the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. 

“A conviction would ruin my reputation and my finances,” López told CPJ.  

In a separate case in July 2025, an appeals court judge in Huaura upheld a lower court decision convicting López of defaming Victor Reyes, the former president of Huaura’s superior court of justice. Reyes sued López in 2019 after the journalist reported on a sexual and workplace harassment complaint against Reyes. 

The appeals court ordered López to pay Reyes 100,000 soles (USD $29,000) in civil damages but the journalist told CPJ that he has also filed a final appeal before Peru’s Supreme Court in this case.

A May 2026 special report by CPJ found that government hostility toward news media, including widespread judicial harassment, has contributed to a steady erosion of press freedom in Peru.

Read the full article here

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using AI-powered analysis and real-time sources.

Get Your Fact Check Report

Enter your email to receive detailed fact-checking analysis

5 free reports remaining

Continue with Full Access

You've used your 5 free reports. Sign up for unlimited access!

Already have an account? Sign in here

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email Telegram Copy Link
News Room
  • Website
  • Facebook
  • X (Twitter)
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn

The FSNN News Room is the voice of our in-house journalists, editors, and researchers. We deliver timely, unbiased reporting at the crossroads of finance, cryptocurrency, and global politics, providing clear, fact-driven analysis free from agendas.

Related Articles

Global Free Speech

Ahead of trial, CPJ, partners demand release of detained photojournalist Hamdi al-Zaeem

2 days ago
Global Free Speech

Journalist Henry Constantín detained in Cuba on ‘disobedience’ charge

3 days ago
Global Free Speech

The BBC clearly sees the value of television series That Mitchell and Webb Look. Marking the 20th anniversary of its original screening, the Beeb has re-released the series on iPlayer. But – and there is very often a “but” with these things – they’ve removed around 11 sketches from the BAFTA award-winning show. The official word is that these sketches don’t “work today”, which is polite speak for “they may cause offence”. The episodes singled out include scenes featuring a battle reenactment with characters in blackface, a contestant on a show wearing a burka and a lost tribe” in a garden centre. These sketches set out to challenge stereotypes, not to reinforce them; but 20 years on, this distinction seems to have been lost along the way. I’m a bit uncomfortable about this. I find it infantilising, to say the least. Can’t we trust audiences to make up their own minds, to switch off if they find the sketches in question unpalatable? Does the BBC think that we are just passive consumers, unable to disaggregate the mocking of racism from racism itself? These sketches set out to challenge stereotypes, not to reinforce them This act of censorship is distorting – of the shows, whose narratives and rhythms were built to include these sketches, and more broadly too. Conversations we were having 20 years ago have been erased, as if to suggest that they never happened. But they did! And with this erasure, the opportunity for thoughtful engagement and learning from our past is gone. “Let’s just pretend we were all lovely 20 years ago. It’s better that way” seems to be the message. Speaking as a minority myself, I find that knowing the nasty stuff that people said before – and indeed, still say today – is much more useful than pretending it never happened. This approach, I think, is also inconsistent. What it reveals is a cherry-picking (intended or not) of the groups that we can mock, and those that we can’t. Let’s face it, gender stereotypes are rarely deemed to have aged beyond the pale – if that were the case, we would have to wave goodbye to half the television made before the mid-2010s. Suppression like this sends a bad message to artists, namely that what they’re creating today may hold less value tomorrow. Or, even worse, that future audiences may deem them bigots – that Sword of Damocles hovering over the heads of any creative paying attention to the discourse of the moment. Suppression like this sends a bad message to artists The BBC’s decision reaffirms a broader trend. In 2020, Little Britain was removed from the iPlayer platform for similar reasons. It has since been reinstated – minus some sketches. Meanwhile, the UK’s arts space more broadly is seeing a retreat to the land of “safe”, as Index recently revealed in a year-long investigation into self-censorship in UK theatre. The BBC, it must be said, does remarkable stuff. The ongoing podcast investigation into the disappearance of US journalist Austin Tice is just one example. But this does not mean, however, that they don’t sometimes get it wrong. Chopping at That Mitchell and Webb Look is one example. Sure, the removal of the material isn’t the life-or-death story that Index often works on. Sure, Mitchell and Webb aren’t the faces of persecuted artists – they have huge platforms and agreed to the changes themselves. Still, one can’t help but think that the decision came from a place of conservatism, perhaps even fear. This is weak and dispiriting, indeed the very opposite of what enables creativity in the arts. We shouldn’t be encouraging this cultural timidity. Rather, we should harness culture and creativity as the starting points of a conversation about our here and now. That’s what the arts are for, after all. READ MORE

3 days ago
Global Free Speech

CPJ urges US senators to seek accountability for Israel’s killing of journalist Shireen Abu Akleh

3 days ago
Global Free Speech

4 Cameroonian journalists jailed for theft of minister’s glasses – that he later found

4 days ago
Global Free Speech

3 Tunisian journalists briefly detained as media crackdown intensifies 

4 days ago
Add A Comment

Comments are closed.

Editors Picks

Live updates: Bitcoin sinks below $83,000 as Iran talks stall and oil climbs

24 minutes ago

Hong Kong Expands Financial Reporting Oversight to Crypto Firms

28 minutes ago

Solana ETFs draw record $188 million in a week as Bitwise takes two-thirds of inflows

1 hour ago

Bitcoin ETFs draw $2.4B in biggest inflow week since October 2025

1 hour ago
Latest Posts

Brickbat: Every Step You Take

2 hours ago

Stablecoin payments firm RedotPay completes financial audit ahead of planned IPO

2 hours ago

California bans its politicians from launching memecoins

3 hours ago

Subscribe to News

Get the latest news and updates directly to your inbox.

At FSNN – Free Speech News Network, we deliver unfiltered reporting and in-depth analysis on the stories that matter most. From breaking headlines to global perspectives, our mission is to keep you informed, empowered, and connected.

FSNN.net is owned and operated by GlobalBoost Media
, an independent media organization dedicated to advancing transparency, free expression, and factual journalism across the digital landscape.

Facebook X (Twitter) Discord Telegram
Latest News

Federal Courts Are Running a Surplus Charging for Public Records

23 seconds ago

Live updates: Bitcoin sinks below $83,000 as Iran talks stall and oil climbs

24 minutes ago

Hong Kong Expands Financial Reporting Oversight to Crypto Firms

28 minutes ago

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest news and updates directly to your inbox.

© 2026 GlobalBoost Media. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Our Authors
  • Contact

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

🍪

Cookies

We and our selected partners wish to use cookies to collect information about you for functional purposes and statistical marketing. You may not give us your consent for certain purposes by selecting an option and you can withdraw your consent at any time via the cookie icon.

Cookie Preferences

Manage Cookies

Cookies are small text that can be used by websites to make the user experience more efficient. The law states that we may store cookies on your device if they are strictly necessary for the operation of this site. For all other types of cookies, we need your permission. This site uses various types of cookies. Some cookies are placed by third party services that appear on our pages.

Your permission applies to the following domains:

  • https://fsnn.net
Necessary
Necessary cookies help make a website usable by enabling basic functions like page navigation and access to secure areas of the website. The website cannot function properly without these cookies.
Statistic
Statistic cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
Preferences
Preference cookies enable a website to remember information that changes the way the website behaves or looks, like your preferred language or the region that you are in.
Marketing
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.