Tom Emmer brushes off law enforcement concerns over Clarity Act

Latest developments: Emmer joined CoinDesk’s The Policy Protocol and said the Senate’s bipartisan movement on the Clarity Act shows crypto legislation still has momentum despite growing uncertainty in Washington.

• Emmer pointed to the Senate Banking Committee’s 15-9 vote advancing the bill, arguing support extended beyond Republicans.
• He said the House has spent years refining crypto market structure legislation and described CLARITY as the fifth or sixth iteration of the effort.
• Emmer said lawmakers are trying to create clear distinctions between digital assets regulated as securities, commodities or cash equivalents.
• He predicted Congress would ultimately send the legislation to President Trump’s desk.
• CoinDesk’s The Policy Protocol is hosted by Rebecca Rettig and Renato Mariotti.

The debate: Emmer forcefully defended the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act (BRCA), which would shield some noncustodial software developers from money transmitter rules.

• Law enforcement groups have raised concerns that the provision could weaken oversight or hamper investigations involving decentralized finance tools.
• Emmer called those objections a “red herring” aimed at slowing the broader Clarity Act.
• He argued developers who do not custody customer funds should not be treated as money transmitters.
• Emmer said inconsistent state-by-state treatment of blockchain software developers is creating legal uncertainty for innovators.

What this means: Emmer argued the U.S. needs clearer crypto rules to remain competitive globally.

• He said companies want to innovate in the U.S. but need to understand “the rules of the road.”
• Emmer criticized former SEC Chair Gary Gensler’s enforcement approach under the Biden administration.
• He said the Clarity Act is designed to establish clearer distinctions between assets regulated by the SEC and the CFTC.
• Emmer argued the legislation would encourage more companies to operate inside the U.S. regulatory framework.

Reading between the lines: Emmer sought to frame crypto policy as a bipartisan issue rather than a partisan fight.

• He said “Republicans and Democrats agree on this stuff” despite ongoing Senate negotiations.
• Emmer argued some senators are using negotiations around the bill to gain leverage on unrelated issues.
• He said the crypto industry supports candidates based on policy positions rather than party affiliation.
• Emmer described crypto and digital assets as part of the future of “21st century finance.”

Worth watching: Emmer said Congress is still debating how much authority regulators like the SEC and CFTC should have over crypto markets.

• Renato Mariotti raised questions about whether the CFTC would need additional funding or staffing under a new regulatory framework.
• Emmer said he favors “light touch regulation” and less authority for federal agencies.
• He said Congress should focus on consumer protections and preventing fraud.
• Emmer argued digital assets can provide more transparency than cash-based transactions.