Close Menu
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
  • Home
  • News
    • Politics
    • Legal & Courts
    • Tech & Big Tech
    • Campus & Education
    • Media & Culture
    • Global Free Speech
  • Opinions
    • Debates
  • Video/Live
  • Community
  • Freedom Index
  • About
    • Mission
    • Contact
    • Support
Trending

Crypto steadies after selloff while derivatives flash caution signals

8 minutes ago

Robinhood Chain Testnet Hits 4M Transactions in First Week, Tenev Says

12 minutes ago

Coinbase CEO Says Quantum Computing ‘Solvable Issue’ for Crypto

14 minutes ago
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Discord Telegram
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
Market Data Newsletter
Thursday, February 19
  • Home
  • News
    • Politics
    • Legal & Courts
    • Tech & Big Tech
    • Campus & Education
    • Media & Culture
    • Global Free Speech
  • Opinions
    • Debates
  • Video/Live
  • Community
  • Freedom Index
  • About
    • Mission
    • Contact
    • Support
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
Home»News»Global Free Speech»Palestinian journalists recount abuse in Israeli prisons, CPJ report finds 
Global Free Speech

Palestinian journalists recount abuse in Israeli prisons, CPJ report finds 

News RoomBy News Room4 hours agoNo Comments5 Mins Read349 Views
Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest Copy Link LinkedIn Tumblr Email VKontakte Telegram
Palestinian journalists recount abuse in Israeli prisons, CPJ report finds 
Share
Facebook Twitter Pinterest Email Copy Link

Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

Key Takeaways

Playback Speed

Select a Voice

International community must pursue accountability for Palestinian journalists harmed in Israeli custody

Amman, February 19, 2026 — Palestinian journalists describe being systematically abused, beaten and starved in Israel prisons, according to a new report published by the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ). 

The report, ‘We returned from hell’: Palestinian journalists recount torture in Israeli prisons, documents allegations of systematic abuse of Palestinian journalists by their Israeli captors while detained by Israel between October 2023 to January 2026. Of the 59 journalists released by Israel during this period that CPJ interviewed, all but one reported being subjected to what they described as torture, abuse, or other forms of violence while in Israeli custody. CPJ also reviewed supporting evidence provided by the detainees, including photographs, medical reports, and legal documents. 

“CPJ’s reporting shows a clear pattern in how Palestinian journalists were treated in Israeli custody,” said CPJ CEO Jodie Ginsberg. “The scale and consistency of these testimonies point to something far beyond isolated misconduct. When dozens of journalists independently describe physical and psychological abuse, the international community must take action. Humanitarian law sets unequivocal standards for the treatment of detainees and there needs to be meaningful accountability for failure to meet these standards.” 

In their testimonies, journalists described beatings, some resulting in severe injuries, starvation, medical neglect, as well as sexual violence, including rape. Many also describe psychological threats, stress positions causing prolonged pain, and being subjected to prolonged exposure to high-volume sound, including continuous music. 

CPJ documented the detention of at least 94 Palestinian journalists and one media worker during the period covered by the report: 32 journalists and one media worker from Gaza, 60 from the West Bank, and two in Israel. Thirty remain in custody, as of February 17, 2026. 

More than 80 percent (48 of 58) of the Palestinian journalists interviewed were never charged with any crime and were held under Israel’s administrative detention system, which allows for an individual to be held without charge and can be renewed indefinitely. Journalists also reported not being allowed access to their lawyers, an experience broadly reflected by what other rights groups have reported. At least 21 said they were denied adequate legal representation, with 17 stating they were not allowed to speak to a lawyer at all. 

“These are not isolated incidents,” said CPJ Regional Director Sara Qudah. “Across dozens of cases, CPJ documented a recurring set of abuse – from beating to starvation, sexual violence, and medical neglect – directed at journalists because of their work. They expose a deliberate

strategy to intimidate and silence journalists, and destroy their ability to bear witness. The continued silence from the international community only enables this.” 

CPJ documented 27 accounts of medical neglect often compounding injuries during beatings or interrogations and, in several cases, the complicity of health workers in violence against detainees. In addition to unsanitary living conditions and chronic food shortages, journalists reported wounds stitched without anaesthesia, untreated fractures and eye injuries, and the deliberate neglect of serious pre-existing and newly sustained health conditions. 

Fifty-five of the 59 journalists interviewed reported extreme hunger or malnutrition. CPJ calculated an average weight loss of 23.5 kilograms (54 pounds) among the group by comparing journalists’ reported weight before and after detention. Photographs provided to CPJ as evidence show dramatic transformations, with journalists displaying gaunt faces, protruding ribs, and hollowed cheeks. 

Two of the 59 Palestinian journalists also told CPJ they were raped in detention. Descriptions of sexual violence appeared repeatedly in the testimonies, with journalists describing assaults as intended to humiliate, terrorize, and permanently scar them. 

At least 14 journalists told CPJ they were subjected to prolonged exposure to high-volume sound while in Israeli detention facilities, particularly at Sde Teiman, including continuous amplified music, resulting in sleep deprivation and sensory disorientation. 

CPJ has called for Israel to allow independent international monitors, including UN special rapporteurs, access to detention facilities and for there to be transparent, impartial investigations into all allegations. 

CPJ emailed Israel’s Ministry of National Security for comment but received no response. It sent multiple requests to the Israeli military’s press office seeking comment on specific allegations raised by journalists. An army spokesperson said “individuals detained are treated in accordance with international law,” adding that the armed forces “have never, and will never, deliberately target journalists,” and that any violations of protocol “will be looked into.” 

### 

About the Committee to Protect Journalists 

The Committee to Protect Journalists is an independent, nonprofit organization that promotes press freedom worldwide. We defend the right of journalists to report the news safely and without fear of reprisal. 

To interview a CPJ expert, please email [email protected].

CPJ interviewed 59 journalists and one media worker, starting from September 2024 to January 2026. CPJ tried to contact the remaining five released journalists, four refused to speak to CPJ and one was murdered before CPJ could interview him. 

The research conducted by CPJ was based on qualitative and interviews and structured thematic analysis of detainee testimonies, and focused on conditions of arrest, detention, interrogation, and imprisonment as described by journalists who were released from detention.

Read the full article here

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using AI-powered analysis and real-time sources.

Get Your Fact Check Report

Enter your email to receive detailed fact-checking analysis

5 free reports remaining

Continue with Full Access

You've used your 5 free reports. Sign up for unlimited access!

Already have an account? Sign in here

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email Telegram Copy Link
News Room
  • Website
  • Facebook
  • X (Twitter)
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn

The FSNN News Room is the voice of our in-house journalists, editors, and researchers. We deliver timely, unbiased reporting at the crossroads of finance, cryptocurrency, and global politics, providing clear, fact-driven analysis free from agendas.

Related Articles

Global Free Speech

Creators have only three seconds to hook users before they scroll away. Photo: Ben Iwara/Unsplash Short-form video is the medium of our time. The average teenager will spend hours a day on TikTok and Instagram reels, which are the main sources of news and entertainment for the 18-24 demographic. Adam Mosseri, head of Instagram, administers the most important algorithm in the English-speaking world. He is undoubtedly as consequential as David Zaslav or Rupert Murdoch – the CEO of Warner Bros and the owner of News Corp – but his name rarely makes headlines. On Mosseri’s Instagram, videos proven to hold users’ attention will be shown to more people. “Watch-time” is the basic currency of his algorithm. This has forced creators, many of whom earn a living on the platform, to abide by a golden formula: hook, secondary hook, payoff. The algorithm has spawned an entire coaching industry in which aspiring influencers pay veteran creators for crash courses in perfecting the formula. Each course teaches more or less the same thing: promise the viewer an answer to a question, keep promising, then answer at the end. Better yet, don’t answer it – promise to answer it in the next video. Where watch-time is the quantitative component of these algorithms, “trends” are the qualitative. If a particular word, image or sound appears to be trending among a certain data demographic, unrelated content will be algorithmically choked out of that demographic’s feed. This forces creators to cluster their content around proven trends. A trend is never a story. It is always a concept or feeling that can be immediately communicated within three seconds, because it is generally understood that creators have only three seconds to hook users before they scroll away. As influential creator coach Dominik Rieger will often remark: “The viewer must immediately know ‘This is for me’.” When Sean “Diddy” Combs trends, as he often does, it is never regarding a piece of evidence or a development in one of his trials. What is, on paper, a story about sexual coercion and exploitation of power is translated by the algorithm into a static portrait: a shame-faced Puff Daddy slick with baby oil. Searching “Diddy” will take you to a trove of baby oil related brainrot, and barely a single piece of factual reporting. Diddy’s actions did not create a story to be followed but a crude vignette to be gawked at. When US president Donald Trump’s shocking birthday letter to Jeffrey Epstein was published by The Wall Street Journal, it did not become a major trend on TikTok or Instagram because the only way to parse the story was by reading the letter itself, which takes more than three seconds. As far as the algorithm is concerned, if an event’s essence cannot be compressed into a three-second span, it may as well have never happened. The proliferation of short-form video has created a media environment structurally hostile to sequential reasoning. Young people’s attention is guided by an ever-narrowing algorithmic spotlight. Stories that are too big to be rendered by the spotlight are able to bask in pitch darkness and the people we allow to control the algorithms are not interested in changing that. In fact, Mosseri has been open about his efforts to speed up trends: “I want us to be better at trends. It takes still too long for things to pop on Instagram.” The political implications of this media environment are clear. If short-form video platforms continue to transmute real-world events into less-than-superficial spectacles, the rich and powerful need not manually censor anything. If all chains of cause and effect have found their terminus in the platform algorithms, and if public consciousness is held inert by the same three-second hooks, what will be worth censoring? READ MORE

3 hours ago
Global Free Speech

U2 supports CPJ as it launches new EP ‘Days of Ash’

18 hours ago
Global Free Speech

Funding of just 8.9 million euro would only be sufficient to cover RTK’s basic operational needs. Photo: Arianit/CC BY-SA 4.0 The undersigned international media freedom and journalist organisations today express our serious concerns about the underfunding of Kosovo’s public broadcaster, Radio Television of Kosovo (RTK), and urgently call for legal budget requirements to be met. The Assembly of Kosovo is currently discussing the RTK budget, which is anticipated to be passed in two readings on 19 and 20 February 2026. According to the draft Law on the Budget for 2026, the parliament, based on the government’s proposal, will allocate only 8.9 million euros, which is sufficient only to cover basic operational needs such as staff salaries. The Law on RTK foresees that the public broadcaster should receive 0.7 percent of the total state budget of around three billion euros. This would mean that RTK should be allocated approximately 22 million euros. If passed, the current budget would be only 40% of this legally mandated total. A budget shortfall of this scale would seriously undermine the ability of the public broadcaster to operate independently and to fulfil its mission to inform citizens on matters of public interest. If RTK were to receive the budget it is legally entitled to, it would allow it to operate independently from any interference from the government and Parliament, while also enabling investment and development of the public broadcaster. We note that Article 5 of the European Union’s European Media Freedom Act (EMFA) requires Member States – which Kosovo aspires to become – to provide sustainable and adequate funding to public service media to allow for their stable and independent operations. The proposed budgetary system, which conflicts with the existing legal framework, would, if applicable, clearly violate this EMFA provision. We take this opportunity to invite the Government and the Parliament to initiate work on the implementation of the EMFA, as well as to begin discussions on reforming the funding and governance of RTK to ensure that its editorial and functional independence is guaranteed. Ahead of the pending budgetary decision, our organisations therefore jointly ask the Prime Minister and President of Lëvizja Vetëvendosje, Albin Kurti, and the Speaker of the Kosovo assembly, Albulena Haxhiu, to ensure that the public broadcaster receives the adequate and equitable budget in accordance with the law and that it is not subjected to political pressure through budget limitations. Signed: European Centre for Press and Media Freedom (ECPMF) International Press Institute (IPI) European Federation of Journalists (EFJ) Index on Censorship Osservatorio Balcani Caucaso Transeuropa (OBCT) READ MORE

18 hours ago
Global Free Speech

Students at the University of Essex discuss self-censorship and internet shutdowns at the Index magazine launch event Each generation has its resentments and irritations with the previous one. The baby boomers rebelled against post-war austerity, and their fury fuelled the student revolutions that swept the world in 1968. In some senses, they were the lucky ones. In the UK, free higher education and cheap housing made the boomers rich and comfortable. My own peers, Generation X, sneered at their smug complacency as we were hit by recession, the Poll Tax and Thatcherism. But some also benefitted from the unleashing of the free market, or rather the housing market. The millennials that followed were the first digital natives. They were hopeful and idealistic, but they were also the first generation to be saddled with crippling student debt. These generations had little in common, but one thing they rarely felt, in the West at least, was silenced. At the launch event for our Gen Z edition of Index on Censorship at the University of Essex recently it was striking how many ways the panellists felt their voices had been muffled and contained, if not outright censored. The speakers at the event (Has Gen Z Been Silenced On and Off Campus) could not have been more diverse, but they each felt restrictions on their free expression keenly. Sariah Lake, head of editorial at Essex Student Union’s Rebel Media said while she recognised that in some parts of the world, young people’s voices were being genuinely censored, for her the key issue was the influence of social media. “We are losing focus, we are getting distracted, we are just going to repost things,” she said. “Overcoming distraction, connecting with the real world, connecting with originality is what we can do to maintain freedom of speech.” Adil Zawahir, an Indian lawyer working on a master’s degree in human rights law, said the situation was different for overseas students. “In the West, and the UK in particular, the curtailment of speech is not due to a fear of repression, it is more because of the fear of social ostracization and the anxiety you may feel after you’ve spoken out.” He added that international students have a double problem. “We share the social anxiety, but in addition to that, every time we think about speaking out, in the back of our minds is our status in this country. It is a temporary status. We are always subject to what the government decides for us.” For Yelyzabeta Buriak, a journalism student from Ukraine who has written about her experience for the latest edition of Index, her situation as a refugee from a war zone brought with it extra concerns and restrictions. She said she avoided discussing the topic of Ukraine altogether for the first year in this country. “I’ve been carrying a feeling of guilt: for being safe here while my parents and friends are still in Ukraine in a very dangerous area,” she said. “You have this feeling of guilt, and you are always careful with words. You think ten times before saying something.” Sometimes, according to Buriak, the biggest silences are not caused by the law or university policy. “Sometimes it is self-censorship, sometimes it is fear, guilt and online judgement and sometimes its is paperwork and systems.” An important reminder of the wider international context was provided by Merick Niyongabo, President of the Politics Society at Essex, who celebrated the Gen Z revolutions in Nepal, Bulgaria and Kenya but also pointed to the internet shutdowns being used across the world to silence dissent. “It’s important we raise the voices of those who are not being heard, the voices of those in Iran and Russia, who are going through repression, but not able to publish what they are writing or express their views because of censorship.” A launch event for the Index on Censorship Gen Z issue was also held at Liverpool John Moores University, where the students mainly discussed a campaign to make LJMU a “Pro-Choice Campus”. A report of the event can be found on the Mersey News Live website, which is run by students at the university. The event at University of Essex was to launch the Winter 2025 issue of Index on Censorship, Gen Z is revolting: Why the world’s youth will not be silenced, published on 18 December 2025. READ MORE

1 day ago
Global Free Speech

‘I literally felt naked’: Angolan journalist Teixeira Cândido targeted with Predator spyware

1 day ago
Global Free Speech

CPJ to release report documenting Palestinian journalists’ claims of torture in Israeli prisons

2 days ago
Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Editors Picks

Robinhood Chain Testnet Hits 4M Transactions in First Week, Tenev Says

12 minutes ago

Coinbase CEO Says Quantum Computing ‘Solvable Issue’ for Crypto

14 minutes ago

Dogecoin and Ripple-linked token holders now eligible for U.S. loans

1 hour ago

Crypto, TradFi Execs Mingle At Trump Crypto Event

1 hour ago
Latest Posts

Optimism Plunges Double Digits Amid Base’s Tech Stack Overhaul

1 hour ago

Today in Supreme Court History: February 18, 1988

2 hours ago

Crypto majors dive despite tech-led lift in Asian markets

2 hours ago

Subscribe to News

Get the latest news and updates directly to your inbox.

At FSNN – Free Speech News Network, we deliver unfiltered reporting and in-depth analysis on the stories that matter most. From breaking headlines to global perspectives, our mission is to keep you informed, empowered, and connected.

FSNN.net is owned and operated by GlobalBoost Media
, an independent media organization dedicated to advancing transparency, free expression, and factual journalism across the digital landscape.

Facebook X (Twitter) Discord Telegram
Latest News

Crypto steadies after selloff while derivatives flash caution signals

8 minutes ago

Robinhood Chain Testnet Hits 4M Transactions in First Week, Tenev Says

12 minutes ago

Coinbase CEO Says Quantum Computing ‘Solvable Issue’ for Crypto

14 minutes ago

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest news and updates directly to your inbox.

© 2026 GlobalBoost Media. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Our Authors
  • Contact

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

🍪

Cookies

We and our selected partners wish to use cookies to collect information about you for functional purposes and statistical marketing. You may not give us your consent for certain purposes by selecting an option and you can withdraw your consent at any time via the cookie icon.

Cookie Preferences

Manage Cookies

Cookies are small text that can be used by websites to make the user experience more efficient. The law states that we may store cookies on your device if they are strictly necessary for the operation of this site. For all other types of cookies, we need your permission. This site uses various types of cookies. Some cookies are placed by third party services that appear on our pages.

Your permission applies to the following domains:

  • https://fsnn.net
Necessary
Necessary cookies help make a website usable by enabling basic functions like page navigation and access to secure areas of the website. The website cannot function properly without these cookies.
Statistic
Statistic cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
Preferences
Preference cookies enable a website to remember information that changes the way the website behaves or looks, like your preferred language or the region that you are in.
Marketing
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.