Close Menu
Market Data Newsletter
Monday, May 4
Global Free Speech

CPJ and 91 global media groups press Philippine leader to free Frenchie Mae Cumpio

News RoomBy No Comments6 Mins Read1,452 Views
CPJ and 91 global media groups press Philippine leader to free Frenchie Mae Cumpio

Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

New York, February 6, 2026—The Committee to Protect Journalists and more than 90 media groups around the world have called on Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. to “right the wrong” and release jailed journalist Frenchie Mae Cumpio, as she marks six years behind bars on Saturday.

In a joint letter to Marcos coordinated by CPJ and the #FreeFrenchieMaeCumpio coalition, press clubs and media organizations from Australia to India, and Japan to the United States, condemned Cumpio’s recent conviction on the charge of financing terrorism as “unbelievable and revolting.” The 27-year-old journalist was sentenced to between 12 and 18 years in prison.

“Journalists around the world are standing together with Frenchie Mae Cumpio because an attack on one journalist is an attack on all of us,” said CPJ’s Asia-Pacific Director Beh Lih Yi. “Her conviction sets a dangerous precedent in the Philippines by using counter-terrorism laws to silence the press, putting the country — a democracy and this year’s chair of ASEAN — in the same league as countries like Russia and Myanmar.”

Irene Khan, the U.N. special rapporteur on freedom of expression and opinion, has condemned Cumpio’s prolonged detention as “a travesty of justice,” while the Media Freedom Coalition — a grouping of more than 50 countries that have pledged to protect press freedom — has called for journalists to be allowed to report “without fear of persecution” after Cumpio’s conviction in a statement signed by 16 embassies.

Before her arrest on February 7, 2020, Cumpio served as executive director of the Eastern Vista news website and worked as a radio news anchor, frequently reporting on alleged police and military abuses as well as community welfare issues.

CPJ has been advocating for Cumpio’s release for years.

CPJ and the #FreeFrenchieMaeCumpio coalition have consistently raised concerns about allegations that authorities planted the weapons that led to her 2020 arrest. The #FreeFrenchieMaeCumpio coalition includes CPJ, AlterMidya, the National Union of Journalists of the Philippines, Reporters Without Borders, and Free Press Unlimited.

About the Committee to Protect Journalists

The Committee to Protect Journalists is an independent, nonprofit organization that promotes press freedom worldwide. We defend the right of journalists to report the news safely and without fear of reprisal.

Notes to editors: For media queries or interview requests, please contact [email protected] or [email protected]

Read the full letter below:

Open letter from global journalists, press clubs and media organizations

Dear President Marcos,

The recent conviction of community journalist Frenchie Mae Cumpio of terrorism financing charges came as a shock to journalists and media freedom advocates. The court relying solely on implausible testimonies from prosecution witnesses has made the decision unbelievable and revolting.

On February 7, Cumpio and her companion, lay worker Marielle Domequil, will mark their sixth year in detention since their arrest in February 2020. UN Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Expression and Opinion Irene Khan pointed out in a statement that the arrest and criminal charges, following months of ‘red-tagging’, surveillance, intimidation and harassment, appear to have been filed in retaliation for [Cumpio’s] work as a journalist. More than 250 journalists and representatives of media organizations from 35 countries all over the world wrote in September 2025 calling on your administration to stop the persecution of Cumpio and release her immediately.

It is gravely alarming that Cumpio has been publicly labeled as a communist and terrorist by no less than the Department of Justice (DOJ) following the court decision. The labeling puts her life in danger and shows how the administration attempts to isolate Cumpio and justify her continuous detention. It is also concerning that terrorism-related charges are used systematically by the Filipino authorities to prosecute journalists and human rights defenders. This is a deeply troubling trend that should not exist in a democracy, and it brings the Philippines dangerously close to its authoritarian neighbors.

Cumpio’s case is emblematic of the multiple risks faced by Filipino journalists. Elsewhere in the world, there are other Frenchie Mae Cumpios languishing in jail for telling the truth.

We, journalist groups, press freedom watchdogs and human rights organizations, reiterate our support for Cumpio and urge your Excellency to right the wrong. With the Philippines chairing the ASEAN this year, it is imperative that your administration walk the talk. The reversal of the unjust conviction of Cumpio is necessary to prove the Philippines’ commitment to press freedom, free expression and democracy.

Signatories:

  1. AAJA-Asia – Asian American Journalists Association’s Asia Chapter
  2. Afghanistan Media Support Organisation (AMSO)
  3. Aliansi Jurnalis Independen – AJI (Indonesia)
  4. Altermidya – People’s Alternative Media Network
  5. ARTICLE 19
  6. Asia Human Rights and Labour Advocates (AHRLA)
  7. Asian American Journalists Association’s Asia Chapter
  8. Asian Institute of Journalism and Communication
  9. Association of Foreign Press Correspondents
  10. Association of Taiwan Journalists (ATJ)
  11. Atenews
  12. Bangladeshi Journalists in International Media (BJIM)
  13. Baretang Bikolnon
  14. Bulatlat
  15. Cambodian Journalists Alliance Association (Cambodia)
  16. Cari-Trans Support Group Jamaica
  17. Center for Community Journalism and Development
  18. Centre for Independent Journalism (CIJ) Malaysia
  19. Coalition For Women In Journalism (CFWIJ)
  20. College Editors Guild of the Philippines
  21. Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ)
  22. Dampig Katarungan
  23. Davao Today
  24. EMPOWERHOUSE – Denmark
  25. Filipino Freelance Journalists’ Guild
  26. Foreign Correspondents Association of the Philippines (FOCAP)
  27. Free Press Unlimited (FPU)
  28. Freedom Forum, Nepal
  29. Freedom Network (FNPK), Pakistan
  30. Freedom Now
  31. Globe International Center, Mongolia
  32. Hong Kong Journalist Association (HKJA)
  33. Hong Kong Media Overseas
  34. Indian Journalists Union
  35. Institute for Research, Advocacy and Development (IRADA), Pakistan
  36. International Association of Women in Radio & Television( IAWRT-Kenya)
  37. International Association of Women in Radio and Television – International
  38. International Association of Women in Radio and Television – Nepal
  39. International Association of Women in Radio and Television – Norway
  40. International Association of Women in Radio and Television – Philippines
  41. International Association of Women in Radio and Television – USA
  42. International Federation of Journalists (IFJ)
  43. International Women’s Media Foundation
  44. Kodao Productions
  45. Legal Initiatives for Vietnam (LIV)
  46. Media Diversity Institute (MDI)
  47. Media Entertainment and Arts Alliance (MEAA), Australia
  48. Migrante Taiwan
  49. Mizzima Media – Myanmar
  50. Movement for Media Safety Philippines
  51. National Union of Journalists of the Philippines
  52. National Union of Journalists Peninsular Malaysia
  53. Nest Center for Journalism Innovation and Development NGO, Mongolia
  54. Northern Dispatch
  55. Paghimutad Negros
  56. Pakistan Press Foundation (PPF)
  57. Palestinian Journalists Syndicate
  58. Panay Today
  59. PanaySayon
  60. PEN America
  61. Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism
  62. Philippine Collegian
  63. Prachatai
  64. PUP Campus Journalists
  65. PUP The Catalyst
  66. Reporters Without Borders (RSF)
  67. Salò of the University of the Philippines Manila – School of Health Sciences South Cotabato Campus
  68. Save Cagayan Valley
  69. Scientia – UP Diliman
  70. Serve the People Association (SPA) (Taiwan)
  71. Society of Professional Journalists
  72. Southeast Asia Freedom of Expression Network (SAFEnet)
  73. Swedish Tibet Committee
  74. Taiwan Association for Human Rights (Taiwan)
  75. Taiwan Foreign Correspondents’ Club (TFCC)
  76. The Accounts (College of Management, UP Visayas)
  77. The EyeWitness Project
  78. The Foreign Correspondents Club of Japan (FCCJ)
  79. The Journalists Association of Korea (JAK)
  80. The Manila Collegian
  81. The Media and Democracy Project
  82. The Network of Women in Media, India (NWMI)
  83. The Vietnamese Magazine
  84. The Voice of UPLB DevComSoc (UPLB Los Baños)
  85. The Warden Publication (Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Muntinlupa)
  86. Tinig ng Plaridel
  87. TomasinoWeb
  88. United for Climate Justice
  89. UP Solidaridad
  90. UPLB Perspective
  91. VERA Files
  92. World Association of Community Radio Broadcasters-Asia Pacific (AMARC-AP)

Read the full article here

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using AI-powered analysis and real-time sources.

Share.

The FSNN News Room is the voice of our in-house journalists, editors, and researchers. We deliver timely, unbiased reporting at the crossroads of finance, cryptocurrency, and global politics, providing clear, fact-driven analysis free from agendas.

Related Articles

Global Free Speech

People attend the funeral of Lebanese journalist Amal Khalil in Baissariyeh, Lebanon, April 23, 2026. Photo: AAli Hashisho/Xinhua/Alamy This Sunday is World Press Freedom Day. Like International Women’s Day, every day should really be World Press Freedom Day. Journalists are powerful watchdogs and protecting them should be a baseline requirement for a free society. But given how woeful the state of media freedom is right now – the number of murdered journalists being at a record high – a day of focus is clearly much needed. So too is a monument. The UK will have its first one dedicated to journalists killed in conflict zones next year, the design of which has just been revealed. Former Index trustee Sarah Sands spoke to us about it. Meanwhile, the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ), run by Jodie Ginsberg who used to to work at Index, is calling for an independent global body to support investigations into attacks on the media. Veteran foreign correspondent Christina Lamb echoed these calls, speaking days after Lebanese journalist Amal Khalil was killed in an Israeli airstrike. That there are many people working hard to address the dire situation is welcome. At Index these threats impact us on several levels. They feed into our campaigning programmes, while the editorial team work with people very much at the coal face. I joined the organisation in 2017 and one of the first articles I edited featured an interview with a Mexican journalist called Javier Valdez. A few months later Valdez was dead, shot 12 times by an unidentified gunman in broad daylight. That same year, and for several years after, I was in regular email correspondence with Andrei Aleksandrau, a former Index colleague and journalist from Belarus. In 2021 he was arrested in Minsk. A year later, another one of our contributors, Larysa Shchyrakova, was arrested. Fortunately Shchyrakova is out of jail and you can read about her experiences here. Aleksandrau is still being held. We also published Victoria Roschyna from Ukraine who was killed in 2024. I could list many similar examples, suffice to say the Index archive is a treasure trove, but it’s also a space where the words of the murdered and the wrongfully detained stand still, ossified, a sad and damning testament to the perils of simply observing. As I said, World Press Freedom Day should be every day and we work on media freedom issues 24/7. Still, we have commissioned a trilogy of pieces this week with the date in mind: Oren Persico writes from Israel on the media ecosystem there; Nedim Turfent, a former political prisoner in Turkey, talks about the threats directed at exiled media in Europe; and Dahlia Kholaif speaks to people on the ground in the Gulf about how the Iran war has amplified the ugly authoritarian reality of these states. Are journalists the canary in the coalmine, the first to be attacked during a democratic backslide? Perhaps, though I’ve heard artists and minority groups claim the same. What’s true is that journalists are the much needed fourth estate. They are a vital check on governments and the powerful. Journalists risk their lives to inform ordinary citizens about what is happening – and they’re now under unprecedented attack around the world. That fact should shame us all. READ MORE

Global Free Speech

There have been calls for pro-Palestine protests to be banned following attacks on Jewish communities. Photo: orlando britain/Alamy Since the shocking attacks on members of the Jewish community in Golders Green, north London on Wednesday, there have been calls to ban future marches in support of Palestinians, including from Jonathan Hall KC, the independent reviewer on terrorism legislation. It sounds like a reasonable demand. There have been expressions of antisemitism on these marches and political slogans are often chanted that many believe to be antisemitic, such as “From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free” as well as the phrase “Globalise the intifada”, which has led to arrests for stirring up racial hatred and which the prime minister described as “extreme racism”  following the attacks. However, this proposal is unwise for a number of reasons. The Jewish community needs protection, but so does the right to protest. It was significantly eroded by the last Conservative administration and Keir Starmer’s Labour government has already displayed an authoritarian zeal to limit free speech, including new powers that will allow police to put conditions on repeat protests, which became law in April. While this demand for a ban may appear to be targeting hate speech, and in this case specifically antisemitism, it would prevent legitimate and necessary protest. More than 70,000 Palestinians have been killed in Gaza since 7 October 2023 and settler attacks in the West Bank have resulted in multiple deaths and thousands of Palestinians being displaced from their homes. Protest is an essential means of demonstrating public outrage at these events and solidarity with Palestinians. Nor will banning marches diminish the alarming growth in antisemitism, which has become normalised since 7 October. I have myself witnessed a new licence in disparaging Jews and Judaism in public life to a degree that I have never previously observed. It is as if a taboo has been broken. No distinction is made between the actions of Israel and a diaspora minority – not only by the individuals who commit these acts of violence, but even by apparently peace-loving people who would consider themselves to be opposed to racism. This attitude towards Jews has a long history. The belief that the Jewish people are intrinsically evil and out to undermine society dates back to medieval times in England, when they were the most visible minority in the country. That connection between Jews and wrongdoing is so deeply ingrained in our culture (from Chaucer through to Shakespeare, Dickens and Roald Dahl) that anti-Jewish feeling is easily triggered. So, when the Jewish state commits war crimes, it’s the ancient, irrational charges that surface once again: Jews as bloodthirsty child killers seeking to control the world. That’s why the distinction between Jews and Israel is so readily blurred. You don’t stamp out that deep cultural antipathy by banning a march. Instead, you marginalise Palestinians, who are in essential need of international support. You undermine a fundamental democratic right and you fail to address the root causes of antisemitism. You also deny the possibility for a nuanced discussion. I have sympathy with fellow Jews who feel that the chants on marches are hostile and racist. But “Globalise the intifada” and “From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free” are political slogans open to interpretation. The Arabic word intifada, or shaking off, is an expression of rebellion against Israeli occupation that dates back nearly 40 years. After nearly 60 years of oppression, supporters of Palestinians have every right to call for it in solidarity. Likewise, “From the river to the sea” could be interpreted as a legitimate call for self-determination or for a one-state solution, which an increasing number of Jews are now calling for too since there is no possibility of a two-state solution in sight. We need to have the courage and vision to support the Jewish community without destroying a fundamental and necessary right. It is Jews who will ultimately be harmed too, as members of the UK population, if the right to protest is further eroded. READ MORE

Global Free Speech

Zambian President Hakainde Hichilemamet Chinese President Xi Jinping in Beijing in 2024. Photo: Yin Bogu/Xinhua/Alamy Live News Also read our CEO Jemimah Steinfeld’s view on the reasons for RightsCon’s cancellation The cancellation of RightsCon, due to be held this weekend in Lusaka, Zambia has come as a shock. The global conference would have brought together thousands of advocates, technologists, academics, policymakers and others concerned with issues at the intersection of human rights and technology. However, for those Zambians who are abreast of the political direction their country is taking, it is not very surprising. Daniel Sikazwe, the secretary general of Zambian PEN, had feared that it could happen given the fact that the conference was to happen just three months before the general elections on 13 August 2026. “The conference was going to show the world the state of human rights violations in Zambia at a time when the regime in power does not want this information known by the electorate,” he said, adding that since President Hakainde Hichilema assumed office in 2021, the human rights situation in the country has deteriorated. Hichilema’s government has enacted laws like the Cyber Security Act (2025) and the Cyber Crimes Act (2025) which human rights experts consider hostile to perceived dissent, criticism and political opposition. In fact, the Law Association of Zambia has petitioned the high court to declare provisions of the Cyber Crimes Act unconstitutional since it infringes on freedom of expression, speech, conscience, and association. The Ministry of Information’s press release stating that the conference’s postponement was “necessitated by the need for a comprehensive disclosure of the critical information relating to key thematic issues proposed for discussion” suggests that the government was apprehensive about the direction that some of the conference sessions would take. Charles Mafa, managing partner and editor at the Center of Investigative Journalism in Lusaka, Zambia attributed the postponement to China’s influence in the mining sector in Zambia. “On 18 February 2025, there was a major environmental disaster in Zambia: a tailings dam owned by a Chinese state-owned enterprise collapsed, releasing close to 50 million litres of highly toxic waste into the Kafue River ecosystem. This disaster and how investigations into it have been frustrated by the government was bound to be one of the big talking points at the conference to the discomfort of the ruling party,” he said. David Ngwenyama, a well-known Zambian ecologist, reiterates Mafa’s point. “This is the same government that has done public relations work for the Chinese mining company, claiming that pollution has been neutralised and the conditions are back to normal,” he said, adding, “I would not be surprised if the postponement of the conference is yet another performance of Chinese power in Zambia.” The fact that the venue where the conference was to be held – the Mulungushi International Conference Center – was partly built with Chinese funds has also made people wonder if China could have had a hand in the postponement of the event. There were also representatives from Taiwan due to speak at the conference. If all this is true, it raises serious questions about Zambia’s sovereignty. For an African journalist like me, having RightsCon in southern Africa would have been a megaphone for human rights defenders and journalists to showcase the deterioration of human rights observance on the African continent and to put this on record. It was also an opportunity for human rights defenders and journalists to come together as a family that shares the same values and dilemmas. There is immense power in this kind of gathering because it sends the powerful message: you are not alone in this work you are doing – everywhere in the world, there are people who are fighting for human rights observance  as you are, and paying the price as you are, sometimes the ultimate price. Finally, in the past, before the world changed in the Donald Trump direction where business and financial deals matter more than human life and human rights, resolutions made at these conferences had serious consequences for the nations labelled human rights violators, particularly in terms of isolating them as pariah nations (think of Iran, North Korea, Russia, after the invasion of Ukraine and the killing of Alexei Navalny –  and the killing of more than 50,000 people in the Gaza war. These days, unfortunately, none of this seems to matter: Mighty nations can attack weaker nations at will, assassinate the entire cabinet, and turn this into a joke on social media. Bombing “for fun”. Sad. READ MORE

Add A Comment

Comments are closed.