Close Menu
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
  • Home
  • News
    • Politics
    • Legal & Courts
    • Tech & Big Tech
    • Campus & Education
    • Media & Culture
    • Global Free Speech
  • Opinions
    • Debates
  • Video/Live
  • Community
  • Freedom Index
  • About
    • Mission
    • Contact
    • Support
Trending

Bitcoin gives back Monday's gain as Clarity Act odds fade on Polymarket

4 minutes ago

US Crypto Tax Bill Leaves Out Mining, Staking Deferral

5 minutes ago

Hong Kong crypto exchange CoinEx to cease operations after 9 years in business

1 hour ago
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Discord Telegram
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
Market Data Newsletter
Tuesday, September 15
  • Home
  • News
    • Politics
    • Legal & Courts
    • Tech & Big Tech
    • Campus & Education
    • Media & Culture
    • Global Free Speech
  • Opinions
    • Debates
  • Video/Live
  • Community
  • Freedom Index
  • About
    • Mission
    • Contact
    • Support
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
Home»News»Global Free Speech»7 exiled Belarusian media sites hit by DDoS attacks
Global Free Speech

7 exiled Belarusian media sites hit by DDoS attacks

News RoomBy News Room3 months agoNo Comments7 Mins Read9 Views
Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest Copy Link LinkedIn Tumblr Email VKontakte Telegram
7 exiled Belarusian media sites hit by DDoS attacks
Share
Facebook Twitter Pinterest Email Copy Link

Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

Key Takeaways

Playback Speed

Select a Voice

Websites of at least six exiled Belarusian news outlets and one journalists’ association have been targeted since March by distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks, which aim to overwhelm websites with floods of internet traffic. 

Staff at several of the affected outlets said the increasingly frequent attacks appear to extend a pattern of transnational repression linked to coverage of political issues.

The targeted media sites — all effectively banned from operating in Belarus after authorities labeled them “extremist” groups — include Zerkalo, Reform.news, Nasha Niva, Pozirk, Mediazona.Belarus, Euroradio, and the Belarusian Association of Journalists (BAJ), a trade group exiled since 2021. 

For years, Belarus has harassed journalists in exile with criminal cases in absentia, opaque investigations, intimidation of their families, and property seizure. At least 21 journalists remain behind bars in the country, even after four were pardoned this year. 

These repressive tactics are part of an ongoing crackdown since peaceful protests swept the country in 2020 in response to the disputed re-election of President Aleksandr Lukashenko, who has been in power since 1994. 

While it can be difficult to pinpoint those responsible for DDoS attacks, editors and journalists at the outlets targeted in the recent wave told CPJ they believed Belarusian authorities might have sought to squash reporting on particular political topics, including events linked to Belarus’ exiled opposition.

Work disrupted 

Zerkalo

For six days in late April, DDoS attacks forced staff of independent news portal Zerkalo, which was founded by the former team of the now-defunct Tut.by, to tighten access to their website. To do this, they used additional verification steps, including Completely Automated Public Turing tests (CAPTCHAs), which are designed to confirm site visit requests are from humans. 

“During this time, our technical team’s resources were directed not toward product development for Zerkalo, but toward strengthening our infrastructure,” Zerkalo Director Aliaksandra Pushkina told CPJ. 

The outlet has since invested additional resources in developing an early detection system for DDoS attacks, Pushkina added. 

Pozirk

RESIDENT.NGO, a digital security organization supporting civil society in Eastern Europe, documented two large-scale DDoS attacks against independent media outlet Pozirk in mid-May. Between May 9-10, the Pozirk website suffered a massive, 12-hour DDoS attack involving 14.38 billion requests from over 31,000 different IP addresses, according to RESIDENT.NGO. 

Although Cloudflare — a U.S.-based cybersecurity company that can mitigate DDoS attacks — blocked more than 99% of the traffic, around 41 million requests bypassed its defenses, causing a near-total outage. 

A smaller attack on May 17-18, which also knocked Pozirk offline, appeared to use a coordinated network of bots to mimic standard internet users, RESIDENT.NGO reported. The attackers sourced much of the traffic from major cloud providers, a U.S.-based hosting service, and Tor, a decentralized global privacy tool that routes internet traffic through multiple relay servers to ensure anonymity.

Around the world, CPJ has tracked the use of cheap and accessible online tools to launch DDoS attacks against news sites, while masking the identities of the perpetrators. 

Reform.news

Independent news website Reform.news has been hit frequently since March, staff said, and most recently on June 2.

“Attacks on our website cause the server to be overwhelmed by requests, resulting in the website going down,” said Editor-in-Chief Fyodar Pauluchenka.

To combat the attacks, Reform.news has enabled Cloudflare’s DDoS protection mode, which allows them to instantly restore service, Pauluchenka said. 

“So far, the attacks do not appear to be serious, and our technical capabilities allow us to fend them off,” he added.

Euroradio

Euroradio Editor-in-Chief Yauhen Kazartsau said that DDoS attacks on his outlet had become “regular” since late April.

“Each time, [DDoS attackers] use different methods,” Kazartsau told BAJ. “On June 2, the attack lasted several hours until we fixed the vulnerability on the site that they had exploited.” 

Cloudflare managed to block the “vast majority” of DDoS attacks, Kazartsau said.

Cloudflare, which offers a free cybersecurity product to certain civil society organizations, like media outlets, said in a recent annual report that DDoS attacks accounted for over 80% of malicious traffic threatening those using it globally.

Cloudflare’s press service did not respond to CPJ’s emailed request for comment on how their service is adapting to increased challenges posed by DDoS attacks against Belarusian media outlets.  

Nasha Niva

An editor at Nasha Niva, which was targeted on May 11, told CPJ on condition of anonymity for fear of reprisal that the DDoS attack had “little impact on our operations, as we face DDoS attacks all the time. … We counter them efficiently and quickly.”

BAJ

Barys Haretski, deputy chairman of BAJ, told CPJ that their website was targeted “quite often,” most recently on May 7, after they published a report on the expulsion of the Russian Union of Journalists, a pro-Kremlin association, from the International Federation of Journalists.

Russian state media regulator Roskomnadzor blocked BAJ’s website the same day. 

“Obviously, after that we lost all our Russian traffic,” Haretski said. 

CPJ reached out to Mediazona.Belarus for comment on a March DDoS attack on its website, but did not immediately receive a response.

Censorship tactic 

Journalists at several of the outlets said intensified DDoS attacks coincided with coverage of sensitive issues and political events.

Pushkina said she believes the attack in late April was “part of a coordinated attack by the Belarusian authorities” to silence, among other things, coverage of the 40th anniversary of the 1986 Chernobyl nuclear plant explosion. Parts of Belarus were heavily contaminated after that disaster, and coverage of the anniversary is “traditionally silenced at the official level,” Pushkina said.

She could not be certain that a specific report triggered that attack, but another large-scale DDoS attack in July 2025 seemed to clearly target a report about opposition leader Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya. 

Since then, Zerkalo has suffered six more attacks, with four since February 2026.

“Both the scale and frequency of attacks have increased compared to previous years,” Pushkina told CPJ. 

Editors at the targeted outlets said attackers may have wanted to smother reporting on the May elections for the Coordination Council, a non-governmental democratic opposition body operating in exile. On May 11, the Coordination Council’s online voting platform was itself targeted by a large-scale DDoS attack. 

Kazartsau said that DDoS attacks on Euroradio had become regular “roughly since the start of voting for the Coordination Council elections.” 

Pushkina and the Nasha Niva editor similarly linked recent attacks on their site to the elections, as did RESIDENT.NGO regarding the May attacks on Pozirk. 

The attacks “demonstrate that the authorities in Minsk have the means to paralyze the operation of any website,” Pauluchenka told CPJ.

Pauluchenka told CPJ that DDoS attacks on Reform.news became more frequent around Belarus’ Freedom Day on March 25, which commemorates the creation of the Belarusian People’s Republic in 1918. 

Belarusian authorities have banned celebration of the day, which is associated with opposition to Lukashenko’s government. Reform.news had published stories about it, but Pauluchenka said he did not believe a specific piece of content triggered the attacks.

“This seems more like a new tactic by the Belarusian authorities — to create constant obstacles for independent media,” Pauluchenka explained. “Perhaps they are trying to force us to spend more on hosting. We specifically moved from cloud hosting to a separate dedicated server to control costs in the event of an attack. It is easier for us to take the site offline than to spend thousands of euros on protection against attacks.” 

Belarus’ Ministry of Information, which regulates and enforces the government’s media policy, did not respond to CPJ’s email on June 15 requesting comment about the DDoS attacks.

Read the full article here

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using AI-powered analysis and real-time sources.

Get Your Fact Check Report

Enter your email to receive detailed fact-checking analysis

5 free reports remaining

Continue with Full Access

You've used your 5 free reports. Sign up for unlimited access!

Already have an account? Sign in here

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email Telegram Copy Link
News Room
  • Website
  • Facebook
  • X (Twitter)
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn

The FSNN News Room is the voice of our in-house journalists, editors, and researchers. We deliver timely, unbiased reporting at the crossroads of finance, cryptocurrency, and global politics, providing clear, fact-driven analysis free from agendas.

Related Articles

Global Free Speech

Offices of Peruvian news site, La Noticia Clave, sprayed with bullets

13 hours ago
Global Free Speech

Bangladeshi journalists face 10-year jail terms for ‘unverified’ reporting under draft cybercrime law

1 day ago
Global Free Speech

Veteran Haitian journalist Wesly Renaud Jean abducted, ransom requested

3 days ago
Global Free Speech

Georgi Markov was a victim of transnational repression (AP via Alamy) More than four decades after Bulgarian dissident and writer Georgi Markov was assassinated in London, governments and their proxies continue to reach across borders to silence dissenting voices. Markov’s assassination on 11 September 1978, when he was attacked with a poisoned ricin pellet fired from an umbrella on Waterloo Bridge, remains one of the most notorious examples of a state extending its repression beyond its own territory. His death is a stark reminder that exile does not necessarily mean safety. Transnational repression (TNR) describes the ways in which governments and their proxies seek to intimidate, surveil, harass, threaten and harm people beyond their borders. Those targeted include human rights defenders, journalists, academics and members of diaspora communities. In recent years, the threat has taken new and increasingly sophisticated forms. Tactics can range from digital surveillance and intimidation to the misuse of international policing mechanisms, physical violence and targeted killings.  A new project supported by the Swedish Postcode Lottery Foundation, and delivered by Index on Censorship, the Foreign Policy Centre and International Partnership for Human Rights, aims to help strengthen the evidence base on transnational repression, connect organisations and communities working on the issue, and translate research and lived experience into stronger protections and more coordinated policy responses across Europe. The anniversary of Markov’s assassination provides a timely reminder of why this work matters. While the technologies and tactics used to target people abroad have changed dramatically since 1978, the underlying objective remains familiar: to silence those who challenge repression and defend fundamental rights. Andreas Eriksson, Secretary General of the Swedish Postcode Lottery Foundation, said: “No one should have to face threats and harassment for defending human rights. By strengthening support for at-risk human rights defenders and increasing awareness among decision-makers, this project helps promote stronger democracy and freedom of expression in Europe. We are proud to make this important work possible.” Jessica Ní Mhainín, Head of Policy and Campaigns at Index on Censorship, said: “Transnational repression thrives when it remains hidden and when those targeted have nowhere to turn. This project aims to help bring the issue into the light and, in so doing, to support those affected and to push for a stronger response to the issue across Europe. Index on Censorship is delighted to be working with the Foreign Policy Centre and International Partnership for Human Rights, with the support of the Swedish Postcode Lottery Foundation, to tackle transnational repression and to support those affected.” Izzy Cutts, Policy and Parliamentary Affairs Manager at the Foreign Policy Centre, said: “Protecting human rights defenders and their work from repressive actors is crucial to safeguarding our democracy and values. We welcome the recent progress on acknowledging transnational repression by European Institutions but more needs to be done to support and protect those at risk. We look forward to working with Index on Censorship and the International Partnership for Human Rights on this project and are grateful for the support of the Swedish Postcode Lottery Foundation.” READ MORE

4 days ago
Global Free Speech

A total of 31 journalists were killed in the attack (© Saddam Ahmed/IRPI Media) It has been just over a year since 31 journalists were killed by a single bomb in the Yemen capital of Sanaa. The Italian media consortium Investigative Reporting Project Italy (IRPI) has interviewed survivors and pieced together what happened Entry is permitted only to journalists, media personnel, witnesses, survivors, victims’ families, and officials authorised to access the site, located in the heart of Sanaa’s administrative district. Beyond the gate lies a mountain of wild rubble. At the centre of the site stand the scant remains of the printing presses used by the weekly newspaper 26 September, alongside a banner displaying images of the victims of 10 September 2025 massacre. Survivors find it painful to look at the wreckage. Ibrahim al-Masoudi, an illustrator and calligrapher, narrowly escaped death one year ago. He has since lost his hearing, though he retains his sight allowing him to weep for the 31 colleagues killed that afternoon by an American bomb. This weapon – a precision guided bomb with a thermal battery warhead manufactured in Missouri, the tracking of which was confirmed by our investigation for the IRPI – was dropped by the Israeli military on Sanaa, the capital of the pro-Iranian Yemeni Houthi government. Survivors find it hard to look at the devastation in Sanaa (© Saddam Ahmed/IRPI Media) Recent clashes between the Aden-based government – backed by the Saudi military – and the troops of Ansarullah (the name of the Yemeni Houthi party) have reignited the conflict between the region’s Sunni and Shia blocs on the Arabian Peninsula. Pro-Iranian militias in northern Yemen have also repeatedly struck Israel with missiles and drones and blocked Red Sea shipping following the outbreak of the war between Israel and Hamas. Yet, the memory of this massacre of journalists endures, standing as one of the gravest violations of press freedom in the last 20 years. This was, in fact, the single attack that has claimed the lives of the highest number of journalists since 2009 – occurring during the worst year on record for global press safety, with a death toll of 129 media workers according to the CPJ, primarily in Gaza.  On that day – a Thursday, the final workday of the week in Yemen – the bomb was dropped in the middle of the afternoon, just as people were returning from work and the weekly newspaper was being printed for its Friday release. The printing presses were running at full capacity. The son of Esam al-Hashidi, a journalist supporting a large family, had joined his father at work after leaving school. “The son,” reports Noria al-Harazi, a journalist who survived the attack and an editor for 26 September, “had told his mother that after school he preferred to accompany his father to work to watch and learn, so that he could support the family in the future should his father grow old or die.” Rescuers reported finding the father’s remains embracing what was left of the eleven-year-old boy. Esam’s son is one of the “collateral victims” of the massacre on 10 September 2025. On that day alone, the Yemen Data Project recorded a high number of casualties aside from the journalists: 22 men, 11 women, and 5 children killed. One reason for this is that the newspaper compound which was targeted was located in the city centre, surrounded by a bus station, heavily crowded during rush hours. Rescuers reported finding the father’s remains embracing what was left of the eleven-year-old boy  The compound housed the editorial offices of two state-owned Yemeni newspapers – 26 September  and al-Yemen which existed long before the pro-Iranian Houthi militia seized control of state institutions in 2014. Along with the two newsrooms, their staff, and all the machinery and printing presses, Yemen’s central historical archive was also incinerated; the archive had been established alongside the 26 September newspaper, which was set up following the revolution of 26 September 1962 (hence its name), the event in which republicans overthrew the imamate that had ruled the country for centuries.  “Stored here were 36 million photographic negatives and a vast number of documents from the Ottoman era, images of tourist sites, press interviews with government officials. Everything went up in smoke, burned, vanished: nothing remains,” says Nabil Shobail, head of the archive and deputy director of the photography department. Nabil bows in front of a series of black-and-white photographs scattered at the bottom of a pit – reached via a rough path leading into the hollow left by the bomb that destroyed the building housing the archive. “Look, this is Marshal Abdullah al-Sallal; he was one of Yemen’s presidents following the republican revolution of September 26th, in 1962. Twelve years of war weren’t enough. Now our history has been erased, too: who will give it back to us?” The massacre of these Yemeni journalists has garnered little international attention. There are several reasons: the difficulty the international press faced in accessing areas controlled by pro-Iranian militias; Houthi authorities’ concerns about protecting the site and the bomb evidence from potential further attacks; the dehumanisation of professionals who are allied with Iran – or who are Lebanese, Palestinian, Iraqi, Syrian, or Yemeni. Collectively, these factors have stifled efforts to determine accountability and kept details of the massacre from coming to light, within a global context where respect for international law has taken a back seat to the military objectives of the parties involved. “Everything went up in smoke, burned, vanished: nothing remains.” Killing journalists, unless they are directly involved in violence, is against international law, even if they are presenting the views of an armed group. But Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz justified the attack, claiming the compound housed the “Houthi propaganda apparatus” belonging to the public relations department of their party, Ansarullah. Today from Ukraine to Sudan, from Gaza to Lebanon and Yemen, being a doctor, paramedic, or journalist offers no protection against friendly or enemy fire; instead, it makes one a target. Reiterating that journalism is never a crime has not shielded these colleagues from death. READ MORE

4 days ago
Global Free Speech

Copyright law – which is meant to protect writers and reporters – is being used against us. In Azerbaijan, Somalia and Florida, unfounded copyright complaints have recently been deployed to make critical reporting disappear. The misuse of copyright law isn’t new, but to read three similar stories in quick succession takes it from being a tool used sporadically (and egregiously) to stifle dissent to something that feels far more calculated and embedded. I was first alerted to the trend last week when I received an email from Gunel Safarova, acting editor-in-chief of Azerbaijani outlet Abzas Media. Safarova’s email alerted the international community to the fact that Meta had recently blocked the Instagram pages of Abzas and a host of other independent media outlets and individual journalists from the country, following accusations of copyright infringement. Then I read a similar story out of Somalia, and another one again from the USA. In the case of Azerbaijan, Safarova said that even though the complainants apparently provided no evidence to show that they owned the intellectual property, Meta’s automated systems accepted the complaints regardless. Articles were removed, and in some cases entire Facebook accounts were deactivated. The Azerbaijan journalists believe the attacks are coordinated and are being carried out deliberately from the same central source. Safarova has called them a “continuation of a broader campaign of pressure and repression aimed at silencing independent media”. In Somalia, an investigation published by the Somali Journalists Syndicate listed numerous examples of independent media houses and journalists fighting coordinated fake copyright claims and content takedowns. The targeted stories were typically critical of the Somali federal government and state security agencies. Like in Azerbaijan, the online crackdown in Somalia is unfolding alongside growing restrictions on social media content and an increasingly hostile media environment (see our recent article for more). Mid-August, stories posted by the South Florida Sun Sentinel, WLRN, Florida Politics and other news outlets were removed from Google search results. The stories all concerned congressional candidate Michael Carbonara, an entrepreneur running in the Republican primary for Florida’s 22nd Congressional District last month. (He lost, to Casey Asker.) Some of the stories mentioned Carbonara’s ties to a controversial data centre in Michigan. David Schutz, managing editor at the Sun Sentinel, said: “Federal copyright law exists for an important reason: to protect original work from being stolen. It was never intended to be weaponized as a loophole to suppress reporting or hide inconvenient truths.” Schutz also highlighted the automated aspect of rights management processes, noting that systems have been created that are “far too easy for bad actors to manipulate”. This, I think, is a generous take. Copyright violations do happen, and social media platforms are right to take action against them. At the same time automated, AI-driven and anonymous complaints make processing fraudulent takedown notices easier and the job of moderators harder. (Index is running a feature about this in our forthcoming magazine, a thought experiment by contributor Kaya Genç.) A less generous take on the current state of affairs is this: tech companies are too quick and willing to trade free speech rights for access. Whatever the reason, the outcome is the same; “Page not found” are the three words that every censor loves to see. READ MORE

4 days ago
Add A Comment

Comments are closed.

Editors Picks

US Crypto Tax Bill Leaves Out Mining, Staking Deferral

5 minutes ago

Hong Kong crypto exchange CoinEx to cease operations after 9 years in business

1 hour ago

Ethereum, Base Wallet Standards Collaboration Breaks Down

1 hour ago

Strive’s Bitcoin Stash Hits an Even 25,000 BTC After $36.6 Million Buy

1 hour ago
Latest Posts

Democrats send counteroffer to Republicans over Clarity Act provisions

2 hours ago

DOJ Seeks $61M USDT Forfeiture Tied to Iranian Oil Sales

2 hours ago

Brickbat: E.U. Blues

3 hours ago

Subscribe to News

Get the latest news and updates directly to your inbox.

At FSNN – Free Speech News Network, we deliver unfiltered reporting and in-depth analysis on the stories that matter most. From breaking headlines to global perspectives, our mission is to keep you informed, empowered, and connected.

FSNN.net is owned and operated by GlobalBoost Media
, an independent media organization dedicated to advancing transparency, free expression, and factual journalism across the digital landscape.

Facebook X (Twitter) Discord Telegram
Latest News

Bitcoin gives back Monday's gain as Clarity Act odds fade on Polymarket

4 minutes ago

US Crypto Tax Bill Leaves Out Mining, Staking Deferral

5 minutes ago

Hong Kong crypto exchange CoinEx to cease operations after 9 years in business

1 hour ago

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest news and updates directly to your inbox.

© 2026 GlobalBoost Media. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Our Authors
  • Contact

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

🍪

Cookies

We and our selected partners wish to use cookies to collect information about you for functional purposes and statistical marketing. You may not give us your consent for certain purposes by selecting an option and you can withdraw your consent at any time via the cookie icon.

Cookie Preferences

Manage Cookies

Cookies are small text that can be used by websites to make the user experience more efficient. The law states that we may store cookies on your device if they are strictly necessary for the operation of this site. For all other types of cookies, we need your permission. This site uses various types of cookies. Some cookies are placed by third party services that appear on our pages.

Your permission applies to the following domains:

  • https://fsnn.net
Necessary
Necessary cookies help make a website usable by enabling basic functions like page navigation and access to secure areas of the website. The website cannot function properly without these cookies.
Statistic
Statistic cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
Preferences
Preference cookies enable a website to remember information that changes the way the website behaves or looks, like your preferred language or the region that you are in.
Marketing
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.