Close Menu
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
  • Home
  • News
    • Politics
    • Legal & Courts
    • Tech & Big Tech
    • Campus & Education
    • Media & Culture
    • Global Free Speech
  • Opinions
    • Debates
  • Video/Live
  • Community
  • Freedom Index
  • About
    • Mission
    • Contact
    • Support
Trending

Pass the Clarity Act

15 minutes ago

Bitcoin Consolidates Near $77K as $90K Odds Hit 48%

19 minutes ago

Solana Just Got Faster—Is It Bullish for SOL?

20 minutes ago
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Discord Telegram
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
Market Data Newsletter
Friday, August 21
  • Home
  • News
    • Politics
    • Legal & Courts
    • Tech & Big Tech
    • Campus & Education
    • Media & Culture
    • Global Free Speech
  • Opinions
    • Debates
  • Video/Live
  • Community
  • Freedom Index
  • About
    • Mission
    • Contact
    • Support
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
Home»News»Global Free Speech»7 exiled Belarusian media sites hit by DDoS attacks
Global Free Speech

7 exiled Belarusian media sites hit by DDoS attacks

News RoomBy News Room2 months agoNo Comments7 Mins Read8 Views
Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest Copy Link LinkedIn Tumblr Email VKontakte Telegram
7 exiled Belarusian media sites hit by DDoS attacks
Share
Facebook Twitter Pinterest Email Copy Link

Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

Key Takeaways

Playback Speed

Select a Voice

Websites of at least six exiled Belarusian news outlets and one journalists’ association have been targeted since March by distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks, which aim to overwhelm websites with floods of internet traffic. 

Staff at several of the affected outlets said the increasingly frequent attacks appear to extend a pattern of transnational repression linked to coverage of political issues.

The targeted media sites — all effectively banned from operating in Belarus after authorities labeled them “extremist” groups — include Zerkalo, Reform.news, Nasha Niva, Pozirk, Mediazona.Belarus, Euroradio, and the Belarusian Association of Journalists (BAJ), a trade group exiled since 2021. 

For years, Belarus has harassed journalists in exile with criminal cases in absentia, opaque investigations, intimidation of their families, and property seizure. At least 21 journalists remain behind bars in the country, even after four were pardoned this year. 

These repressive tactics are part of an ongoing crackdown since peaceful protests swept the country in 2020 in response to the disputed re-election of President Aleksandr Lukashenko, who has been in power since 1994. 

While it can be difficult to pinpoint those responsible for DDoS attacks, editors and journalists at the outlets targeted in the recent wave told CPJ they believed Belarusian authorities might have sought to squash reporting on particular political topics, including events linked to Belarus’ exiled opposition.

Work disrupted 

Zerkalo

For six days in late April, DDoS attacks forced staff of independent news portal Zerkalo, which was founded by the former team of the now-defunct Tut.by, to tighten access to their website. To do this, they used additional verification steps, including Completely Automated Public Turing tests (CAPTCHAs), which are designed to confirm site visit requests are from humans. 

“During this time, our technical team’s resources were directed not toward product development for Zerkalo, but toward strengthening our infrastructure,” Zerkalo Director Aliaksandra Pushkina told CPJ. 

The outlet has since invested additional resources in developing an early detection system for DDoS attacks, Pushkina added. 

Pozirk

RESIDENT.NGO, a digital security organization supporting civil society in Eastern Europe, documented two large-scale DDoS attacks against independent media outlet Pozirk in mid-May. Between May 9-10, the Pozirk website suffered a massive, 12-hour DDoS attack involving 14.38 billion requests from over 31,000 different IP addresses, according to RESIDENT.NGO. 

Although Cloudflare — a U.S.-based cybersecurity company that can mitigate DDoS attacks — blocked more than 99% of the traffic, around 41 million requests bypassed its defenses, causing a near-total outage. 

A smaller attack on May 17-18, which also knocked Pozirk offline, appeared to use a coordinated network of bots to mimic standard internet users, RESIDENT.NGO reported. The attackers sourced much of the traffic from major cloud providers, a U.S.-based hosting service, and Tor, a decentralized global privacy tool that routes internet traffic through multiple relay servers to ensure anonymity.

Around the world, CPJ has tracked the use of cheap and accessible online tools to launch DDoS attacks against news sites, while masking the identities of the perpetrators. 

Reform.news

Independent news website Reform.news has been hit frequently since March, staff said, and most recently on June 2.

“Attacks on our website cause the server to be overwhelmed by requests, resulting in the website going down,” said Editor-in-Chief Fyodar Pauluchenka.

To combat the attacks, Reform.news has enabled Cloudflare’s DDoS protection mode, which allows them to instantly restore service, Pauluchenka said. 

“So far, the attacks do not appear to be serious, and our technical capabilities allow us to fend them off,” he added.

Euroradio

Euroradio Editor-in-Chief Yauhen Kazartsau said that DDoS attacks on his outlet had become “regular” since late April.

“Each time, [DDoS attackers] use different methods,” Kazartsau told BAJ. “On June 2, the attack lasted several hours until we fixed the vulnerability on the site that they had exploited.” 

Cloudflare managed to block the “vast majority” of DDoS attacks, Kazartsau said.

Cloudflare, which offers a free cybersecurity product to certain civil society organizations, like media outlets, said in a recent annual report that DDoS attacks accounted for over 80% of malicious traffic threatening those using it globally.

Cloudflare’s press service did not respond to CPJ’s emailed request for comment on how their service is adapting to increased challenges posed by DDoS attacks against Belarusian media outlets.  

Nasha Niva

An editor at Nasha Niva, which was targeted on May 11, told CPJ on condition of anonymity for fear of reprisal that the DDoS attack had “little impact on our operations, as we face DDoS attacks all the time. … We counter them efficiently and quickly.”

BAJ

Barys Haretski, deputy chairman of BAJ, told CPJ that their website was targeted “quite often,” most recently on May 7, after they published a report on the expulsion of the Russian Union of Journalists, a pro-Kremlin association, from the International Federation of Journalists.

Russian state media regulator Roskomnadzor blocked BAJ’s website the same day. 

“Obviously, after that we lost all our Russian traffic,” Haretski said. 

CPJ reached out to Mediazona.Belarus for comment on a March DDoS attack on its website, but did not immediately receive a response.

Censorship tactic 

Journalists at several of the outlets said intensified DDoS attacks coincided with coverage of sensitive issues and political events.

Pushkina said she believes the attack in late April was “part of a coordinated attack by the Belarusian authorities” to silence, among other things, coverage of the 40th anniversary of the 1986 Chernobyl nuclear plant explosion. Parts of Belarus were heavily contaminated after that disaster, and coverage of the anniversary is “traditionally silenced at the official level,” Pushkina said.

She could not be certain that a specific report triggered that attack, but another large-scale DDoS attack in July 2025 seemed to clearly target a report about opposition leader Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya. 

Since then, Zerkalo has suffered six more attacks, with four since February 2026.

“Both the scale and frequency of attacks have increased compared to previous years,” Pushkina told CPJ. 

Editors at the targeted outlets said attackers may have wanted to smother reporting on the May elections for the Coordination Council, a non-governmental democratic opposition body operating in exile. On May 11, the Coordination Council’s online voting platform was itself targeted by a large-scale DDoS attack. 

Kazartsau said that DDoS attacks on Euroradio had become regular “roughly since the start of voting for the Coordination Council elections.” 

Pushkina and the Nasha Niva editor similarly linked recent attacks on their site to the elections, as did RESIDENT.NGO regarding the May attacks on Pozirk. 

The attacks “demonstrate that the authorities in Minsk have the means to paralyze the operation of any website,” Pauluchenka told CPJ.

Pauluchenka told CPJ that DDoS attacks on Reform.news became more frequent around Belarus’ Freedom Day on March 25, which commemorates the creation of the Belarusian People’s Republic in 1918. 

Belarusian authorities have banned celebration of the day, which is associated with opposition to Lukashenko’s government. Reform.news had published stories about it, but Pauluchenka said he did not believe a specific piece of content triggered the attacks.

“This seems more like a new tactic by the Belarusian authorities — to create constant obstacles for independent media,” Pauluchenka explained. “Perhaps they are trying to force us to spend more on hosting. We specifically moved from cloud hosting to a separate dedicated server to control costs in the event of an attack. It is easier for us to take the site offline than to spend thousands of euros on protection against attacks.” 

Belarus’ Ministry of Information, which regulates and enforces the government’s media policy, did not respond to CPJ’s email on June 15 requesting comment about the DDoS attacks.

Read the full article here

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using AI-powered analysis and real-time sources.

Get Your Fact Check Report

Enter your email to receive detailed fact-checking analysis

5 free reports remaining

Continue with Full Access

You've used your 5 free reports. Sign up for unlimited access!

Already have an account? Sign in here

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email Telegram Copy Link
News Room
  • Website
  • Facebook
  • X (Twitter)
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn

The FSNN News Room is the voice of our in-house journalists, editors, and researchers. We deliver timely, unbiased reporting at the crossroads of finance, cryptocurrency, and global politics, providing clear, fact-driven analysis free from agendas.

Related Articles

Global Free Speech

2 French journalists, Togolese fixer detained 26 days following arrest while documentary filming in northern Togo

3 hours ago
Global Free Speech

  Chow Hang-tung and Lee Cheuk-yan, co-leaders of the now disbanded Hong Kong Alliance in Support of Patriotic Democratic Movements of China (HKA) were found guilty today (21 August 2026) of incitement to subversion, because they organised vigils attended by tens of thousands in Hong Kong’s Victoria Park to mark the 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre. The vigils were banned in 2020 and both have been detained since 2021. Below is a translation of Chow Hang-tung’s message to the world, published yesterday I’m curious about tomorrow’s verdict. Justice resides in the hearts of the people; there’s no need to look up to such top-down judgments. One verdict is nothing. Thank you all for walking alongside me in different ways. I have received all your support and blessings. ************ Because I don’t want everyone to worry too much, and I don’t want the focus to be lost, I’m sharing these feelings that have been weighing on my mind since the trial: Several years ago, I made a documentary with friends, trying to visualise the issue of torture by inviting Hong Kong friends to experience the various forms of torture suffered by protesters in China, so that it wouldn’t just remain a “tragedy” on paper. The “torture” depicted in the film was designed and researched by me. I thought I had some understanding of the subject, but only in the last couple of days have I realised I was a completely incompetent “torture officer” back then. I knew absolutely nothing about inflicting physical pain. It’s true that some things are impossible to comprehend no matter how much you read about them; you have to experience them firsthand. I say this because since the trial began, the Correctional Services Department [Hong Kong’s prison authority] has changed its method of transport. It’s no longer just simple handcuffs; now they use a full set of handcuffs, leg irons, waist chains, and ankle chains, and then lead the prisoners like dogs on a chain. From the written description alone, it seems like it’s just more inconvenient and somewhat humiliating, nothing like torture. But it’s only when you actually put on those shackles that you realise the devil is in the details. Ordinary handcuffs have buckles on both sides that connect with slipknots, allowing for limited movement between the hands. However, this set of specially made handcuffs has an outer layer of hard plastic covering the outer layer, locking the hands tightly together. This alone wouldn’t be so bad, but the “rings” on the handcuffs aren’t the round kind you usually see in adult stores (uh, I’ve been there, but only to buy props for filming!). Instead, there’s an additional hard material inside, shrinking into a flat, crescent shape that fits snugly at the thickest part of the wrist. So, when the wrist is inside, there’s absolutely no possibility of rotation; you can only constantly twist your arm to accommodate the angle designed by the handcuffs. That already restricts movement to two dimensions. Then comes the small buckle on the waist chain, which locks the handcuffs above the abdomen. If you dare to relax and let your hands hang down, the buckle will move up and lock into the thicker part of the wrist. Moreover, the locking angle is an extremely unnatural twisted pretzel, forcing one to constantly hunch their shoulders, hunch their back, bend their wrists, and twist their arms to try and avoid the handcuffs getting stuck in their wrist bones. However, complete avoidance is impossible; after all, constantly hunching one’s shoulders for the entire journey from Tai Lam [the prison where Hang-tung is incarcerated] to West Kowloon [the courthouse where the trial is taking place] would likely lead to muscle cramps. So, one can only “choose” which part of the body shall suffer in turn—when the shoulders are too tired, let the bones ache; when the hands are numb with pain, tighten the shoulders further. Then, throughout the entire journey, although most of the time is spent “still,” one is already exhausted from the unseen “muscle battle.” Not to mention, no matter how you are locked, you have to carry your belongings; for me, that means court documents. With that added weight, it is inevitable that the handcuffs will cut into the flesh. The deep marks carved into the wrists don’t fade even after a whole day in court. It turns out that locking a person’s joints in certain relative positions can create a kind of “interlocking” effect between body parts. But to the untrained eye, it’s invisible—”It’s just putting your hands in front of your stomach, child’s play.” Sigh, just looking at that statement, I feel I have no reason to complain; but I never imagined the combined effect of locking all the joints would be so powerful. Thinking back to when I was researching for the documentary, I only focused on finding the most exaggerated physical movements, the torture methods most easily identifiable by the naked eye. I was indeed viewing the victims’ experiences through the eyes of a layman. When I “tortured” my friend, the handcuffs were loosely fastened. I was completely unaware that locking the joints was the key—it really was just a childish experiment. Sophisticated torture, much like mature totalitarianism, avoids the visible, “violent” acts of violence. Its power lies in exploiting and creating internal conflicts among the people, fostering constant mutual surveillance, control, and reporting. This diffuses the perpetrators, making it impossible to identify or apprehend any single “evildoer.” People appear to have “choices,” but they are ultimately forced to choose between harming one party and abandoning another. Power, however, seems detached, never directly intervening. Visible, publicly observable conflicts vanish, leaving only unseen internal strife. The damage to society can be far more lasting and profound than occasional violence. On a more personal level, I find my resistance to physical torture is quite low. When my body aches, my mind becomes blank, overwhelmed by aches and pains, making it impossible to enjoy the scenery as usual. If I were subjected to some of the Ten Great Tortures of the Qing Dynasty, I might confess quickly. The ability to endure torture truly requires dedicated training. So, on the bright side, these 75 days of transport can be seen as initial training in physical endurance—as long as my hands aren’t ruined? To say that this correctional system is intentionally designed to torture prisoners wouldn’t be accurate; it’s just that the prisoners’ comfort or pain isn’t a consideration in its design. So, frankly, what I have endured is far from real torture; at best, it was just a preliminary glimpse. The designers’ primary consideration was probably “safety first,” ensuring prisoners have no possibility of movement. Ultimately, prisoners are at the bottom of the food chain—voiceless, powerless. Our opinions, even after suffering, are meaningless in the face of “safety.” Not to mention asking what security needs there were – frankly, even without handcuffs, a weak scholar like me couldn’t escape. Using so many tricks is overkill, but where can I reason with that? In cases where national security is invoked, even if a lawsuit is filed, it will have to be dropped and legal fees paid. But it’s precisely because I don’t want to never have anywhere to voice my grievances, and I don’t want people to remain silent and at the mercy of others, that I must persist in fighting for democracy and human rights, and for systemic change. In this sense, this new experience offered by Correctional Services is actually helping to strengthen my resolve to fight. Well then, thank you for this generous gift. I will certainly not let you down and will fight this ongoing battle well. I also hope that everyone can gain something from this long trial, perhaps just a little bit of strength, a little bit of encouragement, and that would be enough to fulfill my wish! This message was first posted on Chow Hang-tung’s Patreon account yesterday. We are publishing this with the permission of Brian Kern who translated her message on his Substack account     READ MORE

6 hours ago
Global Free Speech

CPJ joins call to extend UN fact-finding mission on Sudan

10 hours ago
Global Free Speech

Reporting in Somalia is becoming a much more dangerous proposition. Photo: UNSomalia/Ilyas Ahmed “Do you know that we can kill you? To us, your life is worth less than a cigarette.” These are the words with which operatives from Somalia’s National Intelligence and Security Agency (NISA) threatened freelance journalist Mohamed Bulbul, days after he co-authored a news report for UK news outlet The Guardian about the prosecution of activist Sadia Moalim Ali. Two days after the article ran in June 2026, Bulbul was having dinner with two fellow journalists at a restaurant in Mogadishu’s Zoobe area when armed men wearing black masks entered the establishment. “They walked straight towards our table [shouting] ‘Stand up! Stand up!’” Bulbul told Index. The masked men beat all three journalists before they dragged him outside, placed a bag over his head and forced him into a vehicle.  After being moved between two police stations and the offices of the regional police commissioner, Bulbul was interrogated by NISA officers about the article. “They asked me why I had published it.” He was then, he said, given three choices: “Work with us and take money, leave the country, or if you refuse both, we will kill you.” Bulbul fled Somalia and is now in an undisclosed safe location. “Saving my own life become my priority,” he said. “I can no longer spend time with my parents or my children.” Bulbul’s experience is not unique. Across Somalia, journalists and press freedom advocates say that intelligence and security agencies are intimidating, detaining and otherwise silencing reporters. Recent cases in Mogadishu and Puntland state indicate the state’s growing reliance on intelligence agencies and extra-legal actions, rather than the police and the courts, to deal with critical journalism. On 2 July, journalist Suways Jama Mohamed was arrested outside her home in Garowe, Puntland. Suways, founder of Suways Media, a Facebook-based news platform covering social issues, was detained after the platform published a 15-second video showing armed militia operating in her neighbourhood. She was held in Puntland’s Garowe Central Prison for 13 days before being released on bail on 15 July. Mohamed has been charged with spreading false information, defamation, insulting public officials and disturbing public order. If convicted, she could face up to three years in prison. Qareen Abdiweli, Suways’ lawyer, has challenged both the legal basis of the charges and the court’s jurisdiction. “A journalist cannot be prosecuted under the Penal Code for acts related to the exercise of their profession,” Abdiweli told RSF. Suways’ defence team have filed a motion asking for the case be referred to the Puntland Media Council, the media regulatory body. The case is pending. Less than two weeks after Suways’ arrest, Mohamed Jama Mohamad, an independent journalist who had previously worked for private television channel SBC TV, was also detained in Puntland state. Mohamed had been reporting on business closures in the city of Bosaso, following an increase in port taxes. Mohamed was taking photographs of the closed market when he noticed several men following him. “They looked suspicious and kept talking on their phones while following me everywhere I went.” Moments later, a vehicle pulled to a halt beside him. “[The people in the vehicle] weren’t police officers,” Mohamed told Source. “Their uniform [sic] looked more like military uniforms.”  Mohamed was forced into the vehicle without explanation, blindfolded and then taken to a detention facility run by the Puntland Intelligence Service (PISA). Mohamed said that he was held for four days without seeing a lawyer or being arraigned before a court.  “I had simply been taken from the marketplace. No warrant. No judge. No lawyer.” According to the Somali Journalists Syndicate (SJS), these arrests are indicative of the government’s wish to suppress free expression. In June, SJS reported the abduction by NISA agents of journalist Mascuud Warsame, founder of Xogbile TV, in Mogadishu. Warsame was released, without charge, after 39 days in detention. For media organisations, these incidents are becoming increasingly familiar. “Compared with previous years, the overall pattern of violations remains consistent,” Abdalle Ahmed Mumin, Secretary General of the Somali Journalists Syndicate, told Index. “But this year has seen a sharp increase in arbitrary arrests [and] politically motivated detentions, particularly during the ongoing political and constitutional crisis in Somalia.” Somalia’s federal government is currently advancing amendments to the country’s constitution despite objections from two federal states. This may have implications for the balance of power between the federal states, and critics fear that it will allow incumbent president Hassan Sheikh Mohamud to extend his current term of office. Mumin said that while journalists in Somalia have long been obliged to deal with intimidation and violence, the first seven months of 2026 have seen a spike in the use of prolonged detention without charge, alongside more overt interventions by Somalia’s intelligence agencies. Security analyst Samira Gaid told Index that Somalia’s security institutions are increasingly being used as a tool to suppress journalism, activists and anyone courageous enough to challenge the government.  “The role of the media is to hold those in public office accountable,” she said.  “Yet journalists are being targeted simply because they reported information that the government did not want the public to know.” International partners, according to Gaid, invested heavily in building Somalia’s security institutions – a key priority following the end of the country’s destructive civil war. “Those institutions are now being used in ways that go beyond the law.”  Gaid said, noting that NISA was created to protect national security rather than investigate journalists or detain civilians engaged in legitimate reporting. The journalists interviewed for this article all described strikingly similar experiences – arrests without warrants, detention by intelligence agencies, questioning over their reporting. For Somalia’s independent media, the message is becoming increasingly clear; reporting on anything deemed sensitive by the authorities may carry consequences extending far beyond the newsroom. READ MORE

10 hours ago
Global Free Speech

The University of Cambridge. Photo: llee_wu / ICC BY-ND 2.0 Last month Index ran a story about a filmmaker and activist from Pakistan. His name was Roshaan Khattak and he was exploring human rights violations in Balochistan. Cambridge University had accepted him on a research pathway, with the understanding that completing this successfully would lead to him being accepted on the PhD programme. But then Khattak received a death threat and there was an unidentified explosion outside his college which scared him. He expected Cambridge to protect him but instead, as Khattak told Index, he was first locked out of his college then, despite achieving a distinction for his work, was told that he could not progress to doing a PhD and his enrolment was terminated. He saw this, and his supervisors agreed with him, as the university caving in to transnational repression. There has been little national newspaper coverage of his case. On the contrary, there was excessive and sometimes unjustifiable coverage of the allegations of plagiarism made against Professor Jason Arday. He was once hailed by Cambridge as their newest Black recruit and at 37, the youngest professor at the university. As Stephen Bush in the FT observes the question of race then became the focus of the media’s coverage, rather than Arday’s academic integrity. As the university came under increasing pressure, it announced an investigation into Arday. Since Arday’s death, there have been calls to impose curbs on the media. As you might expect, Index strongly opposes any regulation as an impingement of the right – indeed the duty – of the press to report on matters of genuine public interest. What purpose would regulation have served here? It might have shut down legitimate questions about Cambridge and its reputation for academic excellence; about the appointment of academics at the university; and about plagiarism, itself a growing issue across academia. Indeed, public focus on the role of the media in the events of the last few weeks has allowed Cambridge, arguably a more powerful institution than the press today, to evade scrutiny of its role in elevating Arday. Cambridge is supposed to be a world leader in research and teaching, yet when Arday was appointed three years ago, according to the BBC, there were only five other Black professors at Cambridge out of a total of more than 970. The numbers nationally are appalling too: 270 Black university professors in the whole of the country. There are so few Black professors today in British academia that they fear that they too will become the targets of impossible levels of public scrutiny – into their research, into their lives, into their very right to occupy a place in the public sphere on the basis of what they do for a living: in short that their freedom of expression will be curtailed. Also, research at Cambridge seems to be concentrated around subjects that are politically and financially advantageous to the institution – as opposed to research that has clear merit, but is less relevant with respect to commercial interests and priorities. Research income from China topped £23 million in 2024/25. The Judge Business School has formed a partnership with the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia’s defence ministry. I started with Khattak, a scholar from Pakistan whom Cambridge first welcomed and then cast aside. I end with the tragedy of Arday, who became the focus of arguments that extended far beyond the question of the rigour of his academic practice. The link between the two is that Cambridge adopted both as instruments that served its own purposes; then abandoned them when that purpose no longer suited them. Both cases have implications, direct and indirect, for the right to free expression in universities. READ MORE

11 hours ago
Global Free Speech

From prosecutions to bans and spurious copyright claims: how Kazakhstan’s journalists are being silenced

1 day ago
Add A Comment

Comments are closed.

Editors Picks

Bitcoin Consolidates Near $77K as $90K Odds Hit 48%

19 minutes ago

Solana Just Got Faster—Is It Bullish for SOL?

20 minutes ago

Zero Knowledge Proofs Aren’t Age Verification Silver Bullets

55 minutes ago

Police in Atlanta Settle Eric André Lawsuit, End Airport Drug Searches

59 minutes ago
Latest Posts

Treasury ‘Not-QE’ Fuels Bitcoin Rally

1 hour ago

Washington Goes All-In on Crypto: Trump Pushes Clarity, SEC Rules, and CFTC Warnings

1 hour ago

Utah Needs More Housing. The Army Corps Shut Down 265 New Homes Because of a Small Ditch.

2 hours ago

Subscribe to News

Get the latest news and updates directly to your inbox.

At FSNN – Free Speech News Network, we deliver unfiltered reporting and in-depth analysis on the stories that matter most. From breaking headlines to global perspectives, our mission is to keep you informed, empowered, and connected.

FSNN.net is owned and operated by GlobalBoost Media
, an independent media organization dedicated to advancing transparency, free expression, and factual journalism across the digital landscape.

Facebook X (Twitter) Discord Telegram
Latest News

Pass the Clarity Act

15 minutes ago

Bitcoin Consolidates Near $77K as $90K Odds Hit 48%

19 minutes ago

Solana Just Got Faster—Is It Bullish for SOL?

20 minutes ago

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest news and updates directly to your inbox.

© 2026 GlobalBoost Media. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Our Authors
  • Contact

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

🍪

Cookies

We and our selected partners wish to use cookies to collect information about you for functional purposes and statistical marketing. You may not give us your consent for certain purposes by selecting an option and you can withdraw your consent at any time via the cookie icon.

Cookie Preferences

Manage Cookies

Cookies are small text that can be used by websites to make the user experience more efficient. The law states that we may store cookies on your device if they are strictly necessary for the operation of this site. For all other types of cookies, we need your permission. This site uses various types of cookies. Some cookies are placed by third party services that appear on our pages.

Your permission applies to the following domains:

  • https://fsnn.net
Necessary
Necessary cookies help make a website usable by enabling basic functions like page navigation and access to secure areas of the website. The website cannot function properly without these cookies.
Statistic
Statistic cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
Preferences
Preference cookies enable a website to remember information that changes the way the website behaves or looks, like your preferred language or the region that you are in.
Marketing
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.