Close Menu
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
  • Home
  • News
    • Politics
    • Legal & Courts
    • Tech & Big Tech
    • Campus & Education
    • Media & Culture
    • Global Free Speech
  • Opinions
    • Debates
  • Video/Live
  • Community
  • Freedom Index
  • About
    • Mission
    • Contact
    • Support
Trending

EFF to Court: Don’t Make Embedding Illegal

31 minutes ago

New Mexico Dems Pass An Affordable Broadband Law In 25 Days

35 minutes ago

Justice Scalia did not read The New York Times; Justice Barrett does.

35 minutes ago
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Discord Telegram
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
Market Data Newsletter
Tuesday, March 3
  • Home
  • News
    • Politics
    • Legal & Courts
    • Tech & Big Tech
    • Campus & Education
    • Media & Culture
    • Global Free Speech
  • Opinions
    • Debates
  • Video/Live
  • Community
  • Freedom Index
  • About
    • Mission
    • Contact
    • Support
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
Home»News»Media & Culture»Rep. Green Again Pounds The Drum On Impeachment, And This Time A Majority Of Democrats March To The Beat
Media & Culture

Rep. Green Again Pounds The Drum On Impeachment, And This Time A Majority Of Democrats March To The Beat

News RoomBy News Room3 months agoNo Comments5 Mins Read825 Views
Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest Copy Link LinkedIn Tumblr Email VKontakte Telegram
Rep. Green Again Pounds The Drum On Impeachment, And This Time A Majority Of Democrats March To The Beat
Share
Facebook Twitter Pinterest Email Copy Link

Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

Key Takeaways

Playback Speed

Select a Voice

from the oath-honoring dept

This week Representative Al Green (Texas) filed another set of impeachment articles against Trump. They didn’t move forward; in fact, they failed an initial vote for Congress to decide to even think about moving them forward. But that impeachment didn’t move forward this time is not the story, because even though it didn’t, pursuing it was hardly for naught. It was, at minimum, an opportunity to get everyone on the record about whether they were in favor of pursuing impeachment against Trump. And the good news is that, importantly, and for the first time, a significant majority of Democrats went on record saying yes.

And at this stage that’s the result that matters. Because it’s a first step to build the momentum necessary so that someday all the Democrats, and even enough Republicans, will be able to get the impeachment effort over the finish line.

Of course, that day has not yet arrived. As it was there were 23 Democrats who still said no to impeachment. (Note: their “no” votes look like “yes” votes, but in this case “yes” meant “yes, let’s ignore these impeachment articles”). But it appears that number was originally going to be higher, suggesting that several “no” votes switched to “present” before the voting finished.

Voting “present,” as Democrat leadership declared it would, is, of course, a cowardly way of handling the question of whether impeachment should be pursued. After all, the oath every member of Congress took compels them to act to end Trump’s presidency as soon as possible. And the rationale that “leadership” cited for why they didn’t want to vote to move impeachment along was nonsense: no extensive investigations and hearings are necessary to chuck him out of office— Trump’s crimes are happening in plain sight. Impeachment can happen immediately, as soon as there are enough votes for it.

On the other hand, the fact that several “no” votes switched to “present” suggests Congress is starting to feel significant political pressure to finally get behind the impeachment effort. Also, voting “present” was a lot less destructive to the impeachment movement than a no vote would have been. So while the 47 “present voters” still chickened out on lending their support to the initiative, at least they didn’t try to sabotage it like so many Democrats had on an earlier occasion when Rep. Green had brought forth impeachment articles, when their “no” votes not only doomed the effort to fail but also kneecapped the overall impeachment movement, instead of letting it build momentum. Whereas this time the momentum survives. And with 140 Democrats now openly saying yes to the idea of impeaching Trump, it signals to those remaining hold-out Democrats, Republicans across the aisle, Senate colleagues, the public, and even Trump himself that comeuppance is at last coming.

And maybe even before the midterms, as exigency requires. Further impeachment articles therefore need to be brought forth again before too long, to keep pounding that drum until no one in Congress will be able to still to turn a deaf ear to the need to get Trump removal from office finally done.

But in the meantime there are two more sets of impeachment articles waiting in the wings, with Rep. Thanedar having drafted impeachment articles against Pete Hegseth and Rep. Stevens bringing them against RFK Jr.

There are so many members of the Trump Administration deserving of immediate ejection from their positions of trust. RFK Jr. and Hegseth aren’t even the only ones with body counts—Noem’s lawless goons and deportations have already caused deaths, as has Rubio’s unlawful closure of USAID, for instance—but RFK Jr. and Hegseth are a good place to start. RFK Jr. is responsible for the premature deaths of countless people due to his war on health science, and Hegseth for his war on everyone else. He’s not just destroyed the military readiness of our nation, leaked secrets to our adversaries, and squandered the nation’s military resources, human and otherwise, but he’s also doing murder and war crimes and making the rest of us accomplices to his atrocities.

With the impeachment articles against the two of them, Congress will now have a chance to clearly and boldly say, “Enough,” and start moving for their removal. And perhaps impeachment may even soon succeed, as RFK and Hegseth’s behavior has raised ire on both sides of the aisle. Impeaching either may not even be a political reach for Republicans, or at least trying to save them not worth the political capital. But even if Republican members of Congress continue to refuse to fulfill their own oversight responsibilities and support impeachment, by at least forcing the issue by filing these articles it forces everyone to make a public choice about whether or not they support removing them from office. Which means there can be a political price paid for that choice if any rep chooses wrong—as if the choice to fire someone like Hegseth or RFK Jr. is one that anyone is likely to regret.

But while their dismissal would be a good beginning to taking back our government from the incompetent monsters currently running it, and, on its own, help protect America from their further destruction, no impeachment of any Trump appointee itself solves the real problem, which is Trump himself. Everything he does endangers us, in such volume that it is simply not possible to address each threat one at a time. It is long past time to strike at the root of all the problems he and his cohorts have caused and evict him from the Oval Office. And while it will obviously take still more time to get there, it is good that Democrats have at last taken the first step.

Filed Under: al green, democrats, donald trump, impeachment

Read the full article here

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using AI-powered analysis and real-time sources.

Get Your Fact Check Report

Enter your email to receive detailed fact-checking analysis

5 free reports remaining

Continue with Full Access

You've used your 5 free reports. Sign up for unlimited access!

Already have an account? Sign in here

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email Telegram Copy Link
News Room
  • Website
  • Facebook
  • X (Twitter)
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn

The FSNN News Room is the voice of our in-house journalists, editors, and researchers. We deliver timely, unbiased reporting at the crossroads of finance, cryptocurrency, and global politics, providing clear, fact-driven analysis free from agendas.

Related Articles

AI & Censorship

EFF to Court: Don’t Make Embedding Illegal

31 minutes ago
Media & Culture

New Mexico Dems Pass An Affordable Broadband Law In 25 Days

35 minutes ago
Media & Culture

Justice Scalia did not read The New York Times; Justice Barrett does.

35 minutes ago
Cryptocurrency & Free Speech Finance

Scientists Turn Milk Protein Into a Biodegradable Plastic Alternative—Here’s How

58 minutes ago
Media & Culture

SCOTUS Seems Skeptical of the Federal Ban on Gun Possession by Cannabis Consumers

2 hours ago
Cryptocurrency & Free Speech Finance

Tether, Anchorage Tap Deloitte for First USAT Stablecoin Reserve Report

2 hours ago
Add A Comment

Comments are closed.

Editors Picks

New Mexico Dems Pass An Affordable Broadband Law In 25 Days

35 minutes ago

Justice Scalia did not read The New York Times; Justice Barrett does.

35 minutes ago

Crypto world faces growing pressure to relent on stablecoin rewards to win bigger prize

51 minutes ago

Are Investors Giving Up on BTC?

56 minutes ago
Latest Posts

Scientists Turn Milk Protein Into a Biodegradable Plastic Alternative—Here’s How

58 minutes ago

SCOTUS Seems Skeptical of the Federal Ban on Gun Possession by Cannabis Consumers

2 hours ago

Japanese payments firm PayPay, partial owner of Binance Japan, seeks $1.1 billion IPO

2 hours ago

Subscribe to News

Get the latest news and updates directly to your inbox.

At FSNN – Free Speech News Network, we deliver unfiltered reporting and in-depth analysis on the stories that matter most. From breaking headlines to global perspectives, our mission is to keep you informed, empowered, and connected.

FSNN.net is owned and operated by GlobalBoost Media
, an independent media organization dedicated to advancing transparency, free expression, and factual journalism across the digital landscape.

Facebook X (Twitter) Discord Telegram
Latest News

EFF to Court: Don’t Make Embedding Illegal

31 minutes ago

New Mexico Dems Pass An Affordable Broadband Law In 25 Days

35 minutes ago

Justice Scalia did not read The New York Times; Justice Barrett does.

35 minutes ago

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest news and updates directly to your inbox.

© 2026 GlobalBoost Media. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Our Authors
  • Contact

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

🍪

Cookies

We and our selected partners wish to use cookies to collect information about you for functional purposes and statistical marketing. You may not give us your consent for certain purposes by selecting an option and you can withdraw your consent at any time via the cookie icon.

Cookie Preferences

Manage Cookies

Cookies are small text that can be used by websites to make the user experience more efficient. The law states that we may store cookies on your device if they are strictly necessary for the operation of this site. For all other types of cookies, we need your permission. This site uses various types of cookies. Some cookies are placed by third party services that appear on our pages.

Your permission applies to the following domains:

  • https://fsnn.net
Necessary
Necessary cookies help make a website usable by enabling basic functions like page navigation and access to secure areas of the website. The website cannot function properly without these cookies.
Statistic
Statistic cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
Preferences
Preference cookies enable a website to remember information that changes the way the website behaves or looks, like your preferred language or the region that you are in.
Marketing
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.