Close Menu
Market Data Newsletter
Wednesday, September 30
Global Free Speech

Russia detains journalist Svetlana Khustik for ‘fake’ news about Ukraine war

News RoomBy No Comments2 Mins Read1 Views
Russia detains journalist Svetlana Khustik for ‘fake’ news about Ukraine war

Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

New York, October 1, 2025—The Committee to Protect Journalists calls on Russian authorities to end the prosecution of Russian journalist Svetlana Khustik, who faces up to 10 years on charges of spreading “fake” information about Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, and to release her immediately.

On September 30, a court in the east-central city of Krasnoyarsk placed her under arrest for two months, pending investigation. Khustik, a local freelance journalist, faces imprisonment under Part 2, Article 207.3 of the criminal code. 

“The criminal case against Svetlana Khustik is yet more evidence that Russian authorities have no shame in imprisoning journalists for their work,” said Gulnoza Said, CPJ’s Europe and Central Asia program coordinator. “Russian authorities must drop all charges against Khustik and release her immediately, along with all imprisoned journalists.”

According to the authorities, who posted a video of the journalist being detained, Khustik had published an interview in May 2023 that contained “fake” news about the Russian army in an online media outlet the government calls a “foreign agent” in exchange for 64,000 rubles (US$775). Russian state news agency TASS said the outlet was Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty’s Siberia-focused project Sibir.Realii.

The Russian Ministry of Justice added RFE/RL to its foreign agents register in 2017. During her court hearing, Khustik confirmed that she had worked with the outlet until 2023, but said she stopped after authorities labeled it “undesirable” in February 2024. According to independent newspaper Novaya Gazeta, the charges against Khustik stem from an editor’s note in the May 2023 interview about a Russian missile killing 23 people in the central Ukrainian city of Uman on April 28, 2023. 

In the last few years, Khustik has covered the environment, culture, and social issues for a range of outlets, including independent news websites Takie Dela and Kedr.

Russia was the fifth worst jailer of journalists worldwide, with at least 30 behind bars as of December 1, 2024, according to CPJ’s annual global prison census. Of these, six were jailed for producing so-called fake news.

Nika Novak, another RFE/RL journalist, is serving a four-year prison sentence on charges that she’d had “confidential cooperation with a foreign organization.” 

CPJ did not receive a response to its request for comment sent via email to the Main Investigative Directorate of the Investigative Committee of Russia for Krasnoyarsk Krai and the Republic of Khakassia.

Read the full article here

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using AI-powered analysis and real-time sources.

Share.

The FSNN News Room is the voice of our in-house journalists, editors, and researchers. We deliver timely, unbiased reporting at the crossroads of finance, cryptocurrency, and global politics, providing clear, fact-driven analysis free from agendas.

Related Articles

Global Free Speech

The BBC clearly sees the value of television series That Mitchell and Webb Look. Marking the 20th anniversary of its original screening, the Beeb has re-released the series on iPlayer. But – and there is very often a “but” with these things – they’ve removed around 11 sketches from the BAFTA award-winning show. The official word is that these sketches don’t “work today”, which is polite speak for “they may cause offence”. The episodes singled out include scenes featuring a battle reenactment with characters in blackface, a contestant on a show wearing a burka and a lost tribe” in a garden centre. These sketches set out to challenge stereotypes, not to reinforce them; but 20 years on, this distinction seems to have been lost along the way. I’m a bit uncomfortable about this. I find it infantilising, to say the least. Can’t we trust audiences to make up their own minds, to switch off if they find the sketches in question unpalatable? Does the BBC think that we are just passive consumers, unable to disaggregate the mocking of racism from racism itself? These sketches set out to challenge stereotypes, not to reinforce them This act of censorship is distorting – of the shows, whose narratives and rhythms were built to include these sketches, and more broadly too. Conversations we were having 20 years ago have been erased, as if to suggest that they never happened. But they did! And with this erasure, the opportunity for thoughtful engagement and learning from our past is gone. “Let’s just pretend we were all lovely 20 years ago. It’s better that way” seems to be the message. Speaking as a minority myself, I find that knowing the nasty stuff that people said before – and indeed, still say today – is much more useful than pretending it never happened. This approach, I think, is also inconsistent. What it reveals is a cherry-picking (intended or not) of the groups that we can mock, and those that we can’t. Let’s face it, gender stereotypes are rarely deemed to have aged beyond the pale – if that were the case, we would have to wave goodbye to half the television made before the mid-2010s. Suppression like this sends a bad message to artists, namely that what they’re creating today may hold less value tomorrow. Or, even worse, that future audiences may deem them bigots – that Sword of Damocles hovering over the heads of any creative paying attention to the discourse of the moment. Suppression like this sends a bad message to artists The BBC’s decision reaffirms a broader trend. In 2020, Little Britain was removed from the iPlayer platform for similar reasons. It has since been reinstated – minus some sketches. Meanwhile, the UK’s arts space more broadly is seeing a retreat to the land of “safe”, as Index recently revealed in a year-long investigation into self-censorship in UK theatre. The BBC, it must be said, does remarkable stuff. The ongoing podcast investigation into the disappearance of US journalist Austin Tice is just one example. But this does not mean, however, that they don’t sometimes get it wrong. Chopping at That Mitchell and Webb Look is one example. Sure, the removal of the material isn’t the life-or-death story that Index often works on. Sure, Mitchell and Webb aren’t the faces of persecuted artists – they have huge platforms and agreed to the changes themselves. Still, one can’t help but think that the decision came from a place of conservatism, perhaps even fear. This is weak and dispiriting, indeed the very opposite of what enables creativity in the arts. We shouldn’t be encouraging this cultural timidity. Rather, we should harness culture and creativity as the starting points of a conversation about our here and now. That’s what the arts are for, after all. READ MORE

Add A Comment

Comments are closed.