Close Menu
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
  • Home
  • News
    • Politics
    • Legal & Courts
    • Tech & Big Tech
    • Campus & Education
    • Media & Culture
    • Global Free Speech
  • Opinions
    • Debates
  • Video/Live
  • Community
  • Freedom Index
  • About
    • Mission
    • Contact
    • Support
Trending

Review: A Chaotic History Podcast for People Who Don’t Care About Historical Accuracy

43 seconds ago

Polymarket takes next step in U.S. comeback with margin trading plan

12 minutes ago

Metaplanet Studies Bitcoin-backed Digital Bonds in Japan

13 minutes ago
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Discord Telegram
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
Market Data Newsletter
Friday, July 10
  • Home
  • News
    • Politics
    • Legal & Courts
    • Tech & Big Tech
    • Campus & Education
    • Media & Culture
    • Global Free Speech
  • Opinions
    • Debates
  • Video/Live
  • Community
  • Freedom Index
  • About
    • Mission
    • Contact
    • Support
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
Home»News»Media & Culture»Young People Are Richer Than Boomers Were
Media & Culture

Young People Are Richer Than Boomers Were

News RoomBy News Room9 months agoNo Comments4 Mins Read263 Views
Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest Copy Link LinkedIn Tumblr Email VKontakte Telegram
Young People Are Richer Than Boomers Were
Share
Facebook Twitter Pinterest Email Copy Link

Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

Key Takeaways

Playback Speed

Select a Voice

Have you heard how young people suffer now?

Scroll TikTok, Instagram, etc., you see the same message: “Young people today can’t get ahead!”

One popular meme says when baby boomers like me were young, “A family could own a home, a car, and send their kids to college, all on one income.”

“That’s a fantasy,” says economist Norbert Michel. “We are much better off than we were.”

My new video takes the meme’s claims one by one, starting with “a family could own a home.”

On social media, many young people say things like, “Most people don’t live in houses because it’s too expensive.”

Yes, homes cost more now, but census data show more Americans own their homes now than when I was a kid.

And today’s homes are much bigger and twice as likely to have central air, dishwashers, garbage disposals, etc.

We want more now.

Also, young people can afford more now.

Today, Americans actually spend a smaller percentage of our money on food, clothing, and housing than we used to, according to Bureau of Labor Statistics survey data.

“We have a lot more things and we don’t have to work as hard to get them,” says Michel. “Now it’s the norm to go out for dinner.”

When I was young, few people did that.

Few people flew places for vacation. They didn’t have the money, and flying cost much more. Adjusted for inflation, a cross-country flight cost $1,000. Now it’s about $300.

“People did not just go on vacation,” says Michel, “did not fly all across the country.”

But the popular narrative circulates.

It’s part of progressives’ campaign for socialism. They tell young people: Not only does capitalism foster greed, inequality, etc., but it doesn’t even deliver the goods.

Columbia Business School Professor Jeremy Ney tells me, “The game changed on the younger generations. Hard work alone is not enough because the deck is stacked against so many folks.”

“The idea that nobody had to work hard, that everybody had job security,” replies Michel, “is absolutely ridiculous. My dad would’ve laughed at that and should have. Income is definitely higher, jobs are more plentiful, opportunities are more plentiful.”

They sure are. Unemployment today is 4.3 percent. It was almost twice that when I was young.

Gen Z, overall, is doing better than young people once did. A typical 25-year-old Gen Zer has annual household income that’s 50 percent above Baby Boomers’.

On to the meme’s claim that when I was young, “a family could afford to send their kids to college.”

Well, yes, some could, because college was much cheaper then. Tuition in 1963 averaged $10,542 (adjusted for inflation) versus $39,307 now.

Even so, “Most people didn’t go to college,” says Michel. “Roughly half of the labor force didn’t even finish high school.”

Finally, yes, it’s true—a family could own a car. But it wasn’t anything like today’s cars. It wasn’t as safe or comfortable, and it broke down sooner. Today’s cars last more than twice as long as cars did then.

Why do people spread misinformation about today’s generations being worse off when they’re clearly so much better off?

“Politically, it sells,” says Michel. “It makes it really easy for a politician to say, ‘I’m going to fix it.'”

Maybe that’s why President Donald Trump campaigned saying, “We don’t have a great country anymore! We’re going back to the old days.”

“We always have a tendency to believe in the things that are wrong and that are bad,” says Michel. “That’s unfortunate, because overall most people have been doing much, much better.”

That internet meme should really say:

“Once upon a time, a family who rarely ate out, or flew anywhere, could afford a smaller home, a lousy car, and they didn’t send their kids to college. All on one income.”

COPYRIGHT 2025 BY JFS PRODUCTIONS INC.

Read the full article here

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using AI-powered analysis and real-time sources.

Get Your Fact Check Report

Enter your email to receive detailed fact-checking analysis

5 free reports remaining

Continue with Full Access

You've used your 5 free reports. Sign up for unlimited access!

Already have an account? Sign in here

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email Telegram Copy Link
News Room
  • Website
  • Facebook
  • X (Twitter)
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn

The FSNN News Room is the voice of our in-house journalists, editors, and researchers. We deliver timely, unbiased reporting at the crossroads of finance, cryptocurrency, and global politics, providing clear, fact-driven analysis free from agendas.

Related Articles

Media & Culture

Review: A Chaotic History Podcast for People Who Don’t Care About Historical Accuracy

43 seconds ago
Cryptocurrency & Free Speech Finance

North Carolina Bill Recognizes CFTC’s ‘Federal Regulatory Authority’ Over Prediction Markets

15 minutes ago
Media & Culture

Brickbat: Hard Labor

2 hours ago
Media & Culture

Afroman on Free Speech, Government Abuse, and Election 2028

4 hours ago
Media & Culture

Mom That Blamed Deaths Of 1 Year Old Twins On Vaccines Charged With Their Murder

5 hours ago
Media & Culture

Today in Supreme Court History: July 9, 1868

5 hours ago
Add A Comment

Comments are closed.

Editors Picks

Polymarket takes next step in U.S. comeback with margin trading plan

12 minutes ago

Metaplanet Studies Bitcoin-backed Digital Bonds in Japan

13 minutes ago

North Carolina Bill Recognizes CFTC’s ‘Federal Regulatory Authority’ Over Prediction Markets

15 minutes ago

Metaplanet announces join study to bring BTC-powered digital credit to Japan

1 hour ago
Latest Posts

Binance Seeks New Crypto Licenses After MiCA Shift

1 hour ago

Brickbat: Hard Labor

2 hours ago

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Photo: WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM/swiss-image.ch/Jolanda Flubacher Benjamin Netanyahu’s coalition wants to impose what it calls “institutional neutrality” on the country’s universities. The proposals – which could become reality within a month – would prevent higher education institutions from taking political positions, organising strikes or suspending teaching in response to political developments. University presidents would themselves be barred from expressing views that might be perceived as political or could encourage others to be. All of which sounds more like “neuter” than “neutrality”. There’s a concession: lecturers and students can express themselves politically and “participate in public discourse” provided that the activity is done privately “and is not specific to the institution or done by virtue of their academic or administrative role and does not harm the institution’s regular activity”. These are very broad caveats, which will still leave people very exposed. There’s nothing subtle about these plans. They’re clearly designed to stop campuses mobilising against controversial government measures, of which in Netanyahu’s Israel there are now many. They will also chill academic freedom more broadly. After all, universities are not meant to be impartial spaces. They are meant to be intellectually independent and curious. They are meant to question orthodoxies, challenge power and create conditions in which difficult ideas can be tested. In the words of poet Stephen Spender in his op-ed that launched Index, “universities represent the developing international consciousness which depends so much on the free interchange of people, and of ideas.” Israeli academics understand the danger. One organisation opposing the proposals described them as “the essence of dictatorship, tyranny of silencing and instilling fear in those whose nature is independent thought”. They warned: “History will remember who was in positions of power and did not turn over every stone to prevent the elimination of Israeli academia and democracy.” This is not the first attack those within Israeli universities faced. As reported by our writer Akin Ajayi, Palestinian academics and students within Israel have already experienced harassment in various forms. This led to one person telling us “silence is the best option”. Then there’s the destruction of Gaza’s higher education system, which has been described by some as “scholasticide”. The assault is not confined to academia either. I read about the plans in Israel’s leading, left-leaning newspaper Haaretz. The following morning came news that the newspaper’s offices had been vandalised after a masked man threw a brick through its entrance. Haaretz has repeatedly been targeted, while only last week a similar attack struck Channel 12 News in Tel Aviv. In May this year, Israeli journalist Oren Persico wrote for us about how Israel’s targeting of Palestinian journalists had helped create an atmosphere in which Israeli journalists increasingly found themselves under attack too. His argument echoed Martin Niemöller’s famous warning: once repression becomes normalised against one group, it rarely stops there. Hence what we’re seeing in universities – both the continuation and the escalation of Netanyahu’s assault on freedom of expression. READ MORE

2 hours ago

Subscribe to News

Get the latest news and updates directly to your inbox.

At FSNN – Free Speech News Network, we deliver unfiltered reporting and in-depth analysis on the stories that matter most. From breaking headlines to global perspectives, our mission is to keep you informed, empowered, and connected.

FSNN.net is owned and operated by GlobalBoost Media
, an independent media organization dedicated to advancing transparency, free expression, and factual journalism across the digital landscape.

Facebook X (Twitter) Discord Telegram
Latest News

Review: A Chaotic History Podcast for People Who Don’t Care About Historical Accuracy

43 seconds ago

Polymarket takes next step in U.S. comeback with margin trading plan

12 minutes ago

Metaplanet Studies Bitcoin-backed Digital Bonds in Japan

13 minutes ago

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest news and updates directly to your inbox.

© 2026 GlobalBoost Media. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Our Authors
  • Contact

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

🍪

Cookies

We and our selected partners wish to use cookies to collect information about you for functional purposes and statistical marketing. You may not give us your consent for certain purposes by selecting an option and you can withdraw your consent at any time via the cookie icon.

Cookie Preferences

Manage Cookies

Cookies are small text that can be used by websites to make the user experience more efficient. The law states that we may store cookies on your device if they are strictly necessary for the operation of this site. For all other types of cookies, we need your permission. This site uses various types of cookies. Some cookies are placed by third party services that appear on our pages.

Your permission applies to the following domains:

  • https://fsnn.net
Necessary
Necessary cookies help make a website usable by enabling basic functions like page navigation and access to secure areas of the website. The website cannot function properly without these cookies.
Statistic
Statistic cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
Preferences
Preference cookies enable a website to remember information that changes the way the website behaves or looks, like your preferred language or the region that you are in.
Marketing
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.