Close Menu
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
  • Home
  • News
    • Politics
    • Legal & Courts
    • Tech & Big Tech
    • Campus & Education
    • Media & Culture
    • Global Free Speech
  • Opinions
    • Debates
  • Video/Live
  • Community
  • Freedom Index
  • About
    • Mission
    • Contact
    • Support
Trending

THORChain rejects Bitget request to block hacker as $6 million moves to bitcoin

8 minutes ago

Scammers steal $2M in ETH as fake GIWA network fools DYORSWAP

12 minutes ago

Morning Minute: SEC Clears Token Buybacks for Crypto Networks

14 minutes ago
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Discord Telegram
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
Market Data Newsletter
Monday, September 28
  • Home
  • News
    • Politics
    • Legal & Courts
    • Tech & Big Tech
    • Campus & Education
    • Media & Culture
    • Global Free Speech
  • Opinions
    • Debates
  • Video/Live
  • Community
  • Freedom Index
  • About
    • Mission
    • Contact
    • Support
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
Home»News»Global Free Speech»In eastern DRC, journalists face death, arson threats for reporting on war
Global Free Speech

In eastern DRC, journalists face death, arson threats for reporting on war

News RoomBy News Room2 months agoNo Comments4 Mins Read12 Views
Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest Copy Link LinkedIn Tumblr Email VKontakte Telegram
In eastern DRC, journalists face death, arson threats for reporting on war
Share
Facebook Twitter Pinterest Email Copy Link

Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

Key Takeaways

Playback Speed

Select a Voice

Government-allied Wazalendo militiamen have threatened to kill or capture one reporter and to burn down another’s radio station because of unfavorable coverage, as frontlines shift under diplomatic pressure for peace in eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo.

The Rwanda-backed M23 and Congo River Alliance (AFC) rebels — who made unprecedented territorial gains in early 2025 — withdrew from several parts of South Kivu province in May, after the United States sanctioned DRC’s former President Joseph Kabila and the Rwandan army. The U.S. alleged that Kabila and neighboring Rwanda were supporting the rebel alliance in violation of December’s faltering peace agreement to end the decades-old conflict — a move Rwanda condemned as one-sided.

For journalists on the ground, the shifting frontlines have increased the risks they face reporting on intense clashes and drone strikes in civilian areas. None of the myriad warring parties are comfortable with the press reporting freely on their activities. Many journalists have fled eastern DRC, while those who remain face threats from both sides. 

‘Keep publishing your stories and you’ll be killed’

Radio Tuungane’s Anne Nanduhura told CPJ she was threatened three times in June over her reporting on the government’s attacks and blockade of South Kivu’s Minembwe commune, a current hotspot and home to the Banyamulenge ethnic minority. The strategic highland area was captured in 2025 by the Twirwaneho, a Banyamulenge armed group allied with the M23/ AFC. 

Radio Tuungane’s Anne Nanduhura. (Photo: Courtesy of Anne Nanduhura)

In a bid to regain control, the government and its Wazalendo allies have encircled the area, forcing people to flee and preventing the delivery of food, medicines, and humanitarian aid. Fighting continues.

“I have produced several reports focusing on drone strikes, the conflict’s impact on civilians, and the humanitarian blockade,” said the Minembwe-based mother of five, whose husband, a nurse, was killed by a drone strike in 2022.

“I now live in constant fear. I worry about being arrested, attacked, or killed because of my professional work … The security situation in our region is extremely concerning.”

In March, Radio Tuungane was bombed twice by drones and the Wazalendo threatened a staff member over reporting that implicating their forces in abuses. Both the government and the rebels have carried out high-profile drone strikes this year — a growing threat to journalists worldwide.

Nanduhura said she received two threatening phone calls from men who said they were with the Wazalendo. Three other local professionals, who spoke to CPJ on condition of anonymity, citing fear of reprisals, corroborated Nanduhura’s account. The third threat — a text message reviewed by CPJ — appeared to be from the Wazalendo or army, as it referred to their efforts to regain Minembwe.

Nanduhura said she received the first threat on June 8, following her online report that two people had been killed and six injured the previous day by government drone strikes in Ilundu locality.

“Keep publishing your stories and you’ll be killed,” the caller said.

In a June 10 call, a second man who identified himself as Katete again told Nanduhura that she would be killed for that report.

A June 20 WhatsApp message said, “Anne, if we retake Minembwe, you will be our woman,” after she reported that the army and Wazalendo were blocking a key supply route into the locality. 

Journalist hiding after Wazalendo threaten to torch his station 

Zachee Nabihazire Kalume, director of Radio Faraja.
Zachee Nabihazire Kalume, director of Radio Faraja. (Photo: Courtesy of Zachee Nabihazire Kalume)

Zachee Nabihazire Kalume, director of Radio Faraja, told CPJ that he has been in hiding since late June after receiving multiple death threats, by phone and text message, from a Wazalendo leader called Nehémie Ndaheba. 

In May, the rebels withdrew from several towns in South Kivu’s Ruzizi Plain, including Sange, where Radio Faraja is based, allowing government and Wazalendo forces to advance.

On June 1, Ndaheba threatened to burn down the radio station because its reporting was undermining his militia’s morale. In several messages, he complained about its broadcast of a May 30 order by the government’s Brigadier General Jean-Jacques Ilunga Kabamba, in which he instructed Wazalendo fighters to leave Sange so that the army’s special forces could secure the area.

CPJ reviewed all six threatening messages, dated June 1, 7, 11, 16, 19, and 28, and interviewed two other journalists familiar with the case, on condition of anonymity for security reasons, about the incidents.

Ndaheba did not respond to CPJ’s requests for comment via phone and messaging app.

Read the full article here

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using AI-powered analysis and real-time sources.

Get Your Fact Check Report

Enter your email to receive detailed fact-checking analysis

5 free reports remaining

Continue with Full Access

You've used your 5 free reports. Sign up for unlimited access!

Already have an account? Sign in here

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email Telegram Copy Link
News Room
  • Website
  • Facebook
  • X (Twitter)
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn

The FSNN News Room is the voice of our in-house journalists, editors, and researchers. We deliver timely, unbiased reporting at the crossroads of finance, cryptocurrency, and global politics, providing clear, fact-driven analysis free from agendas.

Related Articles

Global Free Speech

Northern Ireland: 25 years after journalist Martin O’Hagan was murdered, CPJ and Amnesty call for new investigation

52 minutes ago
Global Free Speech

Ahead of trial, CPJ, partners demand release of detained photojournalist Hamdi al-Zaeem

2 days ago
Global Free Speech

Journalist Henry Constantín detained in Cuba on ‘disobedience’ charge

3 days ago
Global Free Speech

The BBC clearly sees the value of television series That Mitchell and Webb Look. Marking the 20th anniversary of its original screening, the Beeb has re-released the series on iPlayer. But – and there is very often a “but” with these things – they’ve removed around 11 sketches from the BAFTA award-winning show. The official word is that these sketches don’t “work today”, which is polite speak for “they may cause offence”. The episodes singled out include scenes featuring a battle reenactment with characters in blackface, a contestant on a show wearing a burka and a lost tribe” in a garden centre. These sketches set out to challenge stereotypes, not to reinforce them; but 20 years on, this distinction seems to have been lost along the way. I’m a bit uncomfortable about this. I find it infantilising, to say the least. Can’t we trust audiences to make up their own minds, to switch off if they find the sketches in question unpalatable? Does the BBC think that we are just passive consumers, unable to disaggregate the mocking of racism from racism itself? These sketches set out to challenge stereotypes, not to reinforce them This act of censorship is distorting – of the shows, whose narratives and rhythms were built to include these sketches, and more broadly too. Conversations we were having 20 years ago have been erased, as if to suggest that they never happened. But they did! And with this erasure, the opportunity for thoughtful engagement and learning from our past is gone. “Let’s just pretend we were all lovely 20 years ago. It’s better that way” seems to be the message. Speaking as a minority myself, I find that knowing the nasty stuff that people said before – and indeed, still say today – is much more useful than pretending it never happened. This approach, I think, is also inconsistent. What it reveals is a cherry-picking (intended or not) of the groups that we can mock, and those that we can’t. Let’s face it, gender stereotypes are rarely deemed to have aged beyond the pale – if that were the case, we would have to wave goodbye to half the television made before the mid-2010s. Suppression like this sends a bad message to artists, namely that what they’re creating today may hold less value tomorrow. Or, even worse, that future audiences may deem them bigots – that Sword of Damocles hovering over the heads of any creative paying attention to the discourse of the moment. Suppression like this sends a bad message to artists The BBC’s decision reaffirms a broader trend. In 2020, Little Britain was removed from the iPlayer platform for similar reasons. It has since been reinstated – minus some sketches. Meanwhile, the UK’s arts space more broadly is seeing a retreat to the land of “safe”, as Index recently revealed in a year-long investigation into self-censorship in UK theatre. The BBC, it must be said, does remarkable stuff. The ongoing podcast investigation into the disappearance of US journalist Austin Tice is just one example. But this does not mean, however, that they don’t sometimes get it wrong. Chopping at That Mitchell and Webb Look is one example. Sure, the removal of the material isn’t the life-or-death story that Index often works on. Sure, Mitchell and Webb aren’t the faces of persecuted artists – they have huge platforms and agreed to the changes themselves. Still, one can’t help but think that the decision came from a place of conservatism, perhaps even fear. This is weak and dispiriting, indeed the very opposite of what enables creativity in the arts. We shouldn’t be encouraging this cultural timidity. Rather, we should harness culture and creativity as the starting points of a conversation about our here and now. That’s what the arts are for, after all. READ MORE

3 days ago
Global Free Speech

CPJ urges US senators to seek accountability for Israel’s killing of journalist Shireen Abu Akleh

3 days ago
Global Free Speech

4 Cameroonian journalists jailed for theft of minister’s glasses – that he later found

4 days ago
Add A Comment

Comments are closed.

Editors Picks

Scammers steal $2M in ETH as fake GIWA network fools DYORSWAP

12 minutes ago

Morning Minute: SEC Clears Token Buybacks for Crypto Networks

14 minutes ago

Once Recession-Proof, D.C. Feels the Pain From Federal Workforce Reductions

49 minutes ago

Northern Ireland: 25 years after journalist Martin O’Hagan was murdered, CPJ and Amnesty call for new investigation

52 minutes ago
Latest Posts

Bitcoin drops to $83,000 as oil climbs back above $100: Crypto Markets Today

1 hour ago

Bitget Restores Bitcoin Withdrawals After $388M Hack

1 hour ago

California Bans Public Officials From Issuing Meme Coins Under New Newsom Law

1 hour ago

Subscribe to News

Get the latest news and updates directly to your inbox.

At FSNN – Free Speech News Network, we deliver unfiltered reporting and in-depth analysis on the stories that matter most. From breaking headlines to global perspectives, our mission is to keep you informed, empowered, and connected.

FSNN.net is owned and operated by GlobalBoost Media
, an independent media organization dedicated to advancing transparency, free expression, and factual journalism across the digital landscape.

Facebook X (Twitter) Discord Telegram
Latest News

THORChain rejects Bitget request to block hacker as $6 million moves to bitcoin

8 minutes ago

Scammers steal $2M in ETH as fake GIWA network fools DYORSWAP

12 minutes ago

Morning Minute: SEC Clears Token Buybacks for Crypto Networks

14 minutes ago

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest news and updates directly to your inbox.

© 2026 GlobalBoost Media. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Our Authors
  • Contact

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

🍪

Cookies

We and our selected partners wish to use cookies to collect information about you for functional purposes and statistical marketing. You may not give us your consent for certain purposes by selecting an option and you can withdraw your consent at any time via the cookie icon.

Cookie Preferences

Manage Cookies

Cookies are small text that can be used by websites to make the user experience more efficient. The law states that we may store cookies on your device if they are strictly necessary for the operation of this site. For all other types of cookies, we need your permission. This site uses various types of cookies. Some cookies are placed by third party services that appear on our pages.

Your permission applies to the following domains:

  • https://fsnn.net
Necessary
Necessary cookies help make a website usable by enabling basic functions like page navigation and access to secure areas of the website. The website cannot function properly without these cookies.
Statistic
Statistic cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
Preferences
Preference cookies enable a website to remember information that changes the way the website behaves or looks, like your preferred language or the region that you are in.
Marketing
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.