Close Menu
Market Data Newsletter
Monday, September 28
Global Free Speech

Hong Kong arrests two journalists in latest sedition case targeting independent bookstores

News RoomBy No Comments3 Mins Read9 Views
Hong Kong arrests two journalists in latest sedition case targeting independent bookstores

Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

New York, July 16, 2026—The Committee to Protect Journalists calls on Hong Kong authorities to immediately release freelance journalists and booksellers Sum Wan-wah and Mandy Lau and end their escalating crackdown on independent publishing in the city, following the second such incident in less than a month.

On July 15, Hong Kong police said its National Security Department arrested two men and three women after raiding two bookstores in Mong Kok district. The five are suspected of violating the city’s Safeguarding National Security Ordinance and displaying items with “seditious intent” and selling publications with “seditious content.”

Among those arrested were Sum and Lau, who co-founded the Have a Nice Stay bookstore with three other journalists in 2022 after losing their jobs amid Hong Kong’s worsening press freedom climate, according to sources familiar with the matter, who spoke on condition of anonymity for fear of reprisal.

Have A Nice Stay’s owners include former reporters from the now-shuttered news outlet Stand News, according to Pulse HK News. One of the bookstore’s missions, its website says, is to promote journalism and literary reportage. In 2023, the bookstore also launched the online magazine Leave Blank to “reclaim the identity of being journalists.”

“Using national security legislation to go after another bookstore run by journalists is an attack on press freedom and independent publishing in the city,” said CPJ Asia-Pacific Director Beh Lih Yi. “Hong Kong authorities must release journalists Sum Wan-wah and Mandy Lau and stop persecuting independent publishers.”

Police have accused the five of selling and displaying publications that incited hatred against the Hong Kong government, the judiciary, and law enforcement agencies. Officers seized books during the operation and all five remain in detention pending investigation, police said.

Among the books with “seditious intention” intercepted by custom authorities were “Let Only Red Flowers Bloom: Identity and Belonging in Xi Jinping’s China,” by National Public Radio journalist Emily Feng, news outlet InMedia reported.  

Hong Kong authorities have targeted journalists, publishers, booksellers, and independent cultural institutions since Beijing imposed the National Security Law in 2020 and the city enacted its homegrown Article 23 legislation in 2024. 

CPJ has documented the steady erosion of press freedom in Hong Kong, where journalism and publishing activities are increasingly treated as national security offenses.

Last month, Hong Kong’s National Security Police arrested journalist and bookseller Leticia Wong Man-huen, owner of Hunter Bookstore, on suspicion of selling seditious publications and receiving funds from foreign political organizations under the Beijing-imposed National Security Law. She was later released on bail.

China consistently ranks as the world’s worst jailer of journalists, with at least 50 behind bars, according to CPJ’s latest research.

The Hong Kong government did not immediately respond to CPJ’s emailed request for comment.  

Read the full article here

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using AI-powered analysis and real-time sources.

Share.

The FSNN News Room is the voice of our in-house journalists, editors, and researchers. We deliver timely, unbiased reporting at the crossroads of finance, cryptocurrency, and global politics, providing clear, fact-driven analysis free from agendas.

Related Articles

Global Free Speech

The BBC clearly sees the value of television series That Mitchell and Webb Look. Marking the 20th anniversary of its original screening, the Beeb has re-released the series on iPlayer. But – and there is very often a “but” with these things – they’ve removed around 11 sketches from the BAFTA award-winning show. The official word is that these sketches don’t “work today”, which is polite speak for “they may cause offence”. The episodes singled out include scenes featuring a battle reenactment with characters in blackface, a contestant on a show wearing a burka and a lost tribe” in a garden centre. These sketches set out to challenge stereotypes, not to reinforce them; but 20 years on, this distinction seems to have been lost along the way. I’m a bit uncomfortable about this. I find it infantilising, to say the least. Can’t we trust audiences to make up their own minds, to switch off if they find the sketches in question unpalatable? Does the BBC think that we are just passive consumers, unable to disaggregate the mocking of racism from racism itself? These sketches set out to challenge stereotypes, not to reinforce them This act of censorship is distorting – of the shows, whose narratives and rhythms were built to include these sketches, and more broadly too. Conversations we were having 20 years ago have been erased, as if to suggest that they never happened. But they did! And with this erasure, the opportunity for thoughtful engagement and learning from our past is gone. “Let’s just pretend we were all lovely 20 years ago. It’s better that way” seems to be the message. Speaking as a minority myself, I find that knowing the nasty stuff that people said before – and indeed, still say today – is much more useful than pretending it never happened. This approach, I think, is also inconsistent. What it reveals is a cherry-picking (intended or not) of the groups that we can mock, and those that we can’t. Let’s face it, gender stereotypes are rarely deemed to have aged beyond the pale – if that were the case, we would have to wave goodbye to half the television made before the mid-2010s. Suppression like this sends a bad message to artists, namely that what they’re creating today may hold less value tomorrow. Or, even worse, that future audiences may deem them bigots – that Sword of Damocles hovering over the heads of any creative paying attention to the discourse of the moment. Suppression like this sends a bad message to artists The BBC’s decision reaffirms a broader trend. In 2020, Little Britain was removed from the iPlayer platform for similar reasons. It has since been reinstated – minus some sketches. Meanwhile, the UK’s arts space more broadly is seeing a retreat to the land of “safe”, as Index recently revealed in a year-long investigation into self-censorship in UK theatre. The BBC, it must be said, does remarkable stuff. The ongoing podcast investigation into the disappearance of US journalist Austin Tice is just one example. But this does not mean, however, that they don’t sometimes get it wrong. Chopping at That Mitchell and Webb Look is one example. Sure, the removal of the material isn’t the life-or-death story that Index often works on. Sure, Mitchell and Webb aren’t the faces of persecuted artists – they have huge platforms and agreed to the changes themselves. Still, one can’t help but think that the decision came from a place of conservatism, perhaps even fear. This is weak and dispiriting, indeed the very opposite of what enables creativity in the arts. We shouldn’t be encouraging this cultural timidity. Rather, we should harness culture and creativity as the starting points of a conversation about our here and now. That’s what the arts are for, after all. READ MORE

Add A Comment

Comments are closed.