Close Menu
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
  • Home
  • News
    • Politics
    • Legal & Courts
    • Tech & Big Tech
    • Campus & Education
    • Media & Culture
    • Global Free Speech
  • Opinions
    • Debates
  • Video/Live
  • Community
  • Freedom Index
  • About
    • Mission
    • Contact
    • Support
Trending

AI agents could drain cheap bank deposits, Apollo’s Torsten Slok warns

40 seconds ago

Strategy buys 1,665 Bitcoin for $143M as BTC stack hits 847,666

4 minutes ago

Strategy Sets New BTC Holdings Record After $143M Bitcoin Purchase

7 minutes ago
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Discord Telegram
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
Market Data Newsletter
Monday, September 28
  • Home
  • News
    • Politics
    • Legal & Courts
    • Tech & Big Tech
    • Campus & Education
    • Media & Culture
    • Global Free Speech
  • Opinions
    • Debates
  • Video/Live
  • Community
  • Freedom Index
  • About
    • Mission
    • Contact
    • Support
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
Home»News»Global Free Speech»Daphne Caruana Galizia’s murder: Landmark trial puts Malta’s press freedom back in spotlight
Global Free Speech

Daphne Caruana Galizia’s murder: Landmark trial puts Malta’s press freedom back in spotlight

News RoomBy News Room3 months agoNo Comments4 Mins Read10 Views
Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest Copy Link LinkedIn Tumblr Email VKontakte Telegram
Daphne Caruana Galizia’s murder: Landmark trial puts Malta’s press freedom back in spotlight
Share
Facebook Twitter Pinterest Email Copy Link

Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

Key Takeaways

Playback Speed

Select a Voice

More than eight years after the assassination of Maltese journalist Daphne Caruana Galizia sent shockwaves through Europe, all eyes are once again on the capital Valletta, where the alleged mastermind of her murder has been on trial since July 1. 

Yorgen Fenech, a powerful businessman, is standing trial on a charge of complicity in murder and has pleaded not guilty. Caruana Galizia, who reported extensively on corruption, money laundering, organized crime, and political misconduct in Malta, was killed in a car bomb in October 2017.

The verdict – expected in August – could finally bring justice to Caruana Galizia’s family, but it should also refocus European leaders’ minds on the action that still needs to be taken on press freedom in Malta and Europe.

“Finally, we may find out the truth of what happened, secure justice and send a powerful message across Europe: you cannot silence journalism through violence,” said Tom Gibson, CPJ’s deputy advocacy director, EU. “Throughout the long quest for justice, European officials in Strasbourg and Brussels have worked hard to shine a light on concerns about press freedom and the rule of law in Malta. Their scrutiny and support has been invaluable for the family and Maltese journalists, but there is still so much more to be done.” 

Before her murder, Caruana Galizia was subjected to an orchestrated campaign of harassment and vilification by the Maltese government, including legal intimidation, to silence her reporting.

In 2019, a suspected facilitator of her murder received a presidential pardon in exchange for naming those responsible. Since then, five people have been found guilty and jailed for orchestrating or carrying out the murder.

Atmosphere of impunity

Fenech’s trial could be the final chapter in the search for justice for Caruana Galizia but press freedom groups say the Maltese authorities must introduce long-overdue reforms to guarantee journalists’ safety.  

After pressure from the Caruana Galizia family and international institutions, the Maltese authorities set up a separate public inquiry in 2019 to independently examine the circumstances of the murder. Its report found that the assassination was both predictable and preventable. It said the Maltese state had created an atmosphere of impunity, failed to recognise the risks to Caruana Galizia’s life and did not take measures to protect her. The Maltese authorities have still not implemented most of the inquiry’s recommendations and have not undertaken meaningful press freedom reforms.

The Daphne Caruana Galizia Foundation has said that the failure of Maltese authorities to address the corruption and abuse of power that Caruana Galizia exposed, and that other Maltese journalists continue to investigate, contributes to an environment of insecurity and uncertainty for journalists.

Europe’s response

The robust response of the European Union, the Council of Europe and the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) to Caruana Galizia’s murder was powerful and, arguably, unparalleled.

The assassination generated meaningful debate within these multilateral institutions on journalist safety as it relates to the rule of law. 

European officials put sustained pressure on the Maltese authorities to address concerns around press freedom. The European Commission has also pushed through several pan-European media reforms addressing journalist safety in EU member states, including the 2024 anti-SLAPP Directive to combat abusive lawsuits and a 2021 Journalist Safety Recommendation.

The Council of Europe and the OSCE both provided detailed legal assessments and recommendations, including on corruption. The European Parliament and the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe also worked to secure positive change around the rule of law and press freedom in Malta. 

However, as European pressure mounted, the Maltese authorities responded with inaction and opaqueness and have failed to introduce long-overdue media reforms needed to spur change.

In October 2025, CPJ and other press freedom groups called on Malta to set up a national action plan on media freedom and journalist safety and provided a broad set of recommendations as part of a public consultation set up by the Maltese government. 

Since then, and despite repeated requests for information from CPJ and others, the Maltese government has failed to clarify what action it would take. However, local media has reported that Prime Minister Robert Abela, who won an election in May, plans to push through national media reforms during the new legislature but without meaningful consultation with civil society.

Read the full article here

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using AI-powered analysis and real-time sources.

Get Your Fact Check Report

Enter your email to receive detailed fact-checking analysis

5 free reports remaining

Continue with Full Access

You've used your 5 free reports. Sign up for unlimited access!

Already have an account? Sign in here

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email Telegram Copy Link
News Room
  • Website
  • Facebook
  • X (Twitter)
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn

The FSNN News Room is the voice of our in-house journalists, editors, and researchers. We deliver timely, unbiased reporting at the crossroads of finance, cryptocurrency, and global politics, providing clear, fact-driven analysis free from agendas.

Related Articles

Global Free Speech

Northern Ireland: 25 years after journalist Martin O’Hagan was murdered, CPJ and Amnesty call for new investigation

2 hours ago
Global Free Speech

Ahead of trial, CPJ, partners demand release of detained photojournalist Hamdi al-Zaeem

2 days ago
Global Free Speech

Journalist Henry Constantín detained in Cuba on ‘disobedience’ charge

3 days ago
Global Free Speech

The BBC clearly sees the value of television series That Mitchell and Webb Look. Marking the 20th anniversary of its original screening, the Beeb has re-released the series on iPlayer. But – and there is very often a “but” with these things – they’ve removed around 11 sketches from the BAFTA award-winning show. The official word is that these sketches don’t “work today”, which is polite speak for “they may cause offence”. The episodes singled out include scenes featuring a battle reenactment with characters in blackface, a contestant on a show wearing a burka and a lost tribe” in a garden centre. These sketches set out to challenge stereotypes, not to reinforce them; but 20 years on, this distinction seems to have been lost along the way. I’m a bit uncomfortable about this. I find it infantilising, to say the least. Can’t we trust audiences to make up their own minds, to switch off if they find the sketches in question unpalatable? Does the BBC think that we are just passive consumers, unable to disaggregate the mocking of racism from racism itself? These sketches set out to challenge stereotypes, not to reinforce them This act of censorship is distorting – of the shows, whose narratives and rhythms were built to include these sketches, and more broadly too. Conversations we were having 20 years ago have been erased, as if to suggest that they never happened. But they did! And with this erasure, the opportunity for thoughtful engagement and learning from our past is gone. “Let’s just pretend we were all lovely 20 years ago. It’s better that way” seems to be the message. Speaking as a minority myself, I find that knowing the nasty stuff that people said before – and indeed, still say today – is much more useful than pretending it never happened. This approach, I think, is also inconsistent. What it reveals is a cherry-picking (intended or not) of the groups that we can mock, and those that we can’t. Let’s face it, gender stereotypes are rarely deemed to have aged beyond the pale – if that were the case, we would have to wave goodbye to half the television made before the mid-2010s. Suppression like this sends a bad message to artists, namely that what they’re creating today may hold less value tomorrow. Or, even worse, that future audiences may deem them bigots – that Sword of Damocles hovering over the heads of any creative paying attention to the discourse of the moment. Suppression like this sends a bad message to artists The BBC’s decision reaffirms a broader trend. In 2020, Little Britain was removed from the iPlayer platform for similar reasons. It has since been reinstated – minus some sketches. Meanwhile, the UK’s arts space more broadly is seeing a retreat to the land of “safe”, as Index recently revealed in a year-long investigation into self-censorship in UK theatre. The BBC, it must be said, does remarkable stuff. The ongoing podcast investigation into the disappearance of US journalist Austin Tice is just one example. But this does not mean, however, that they don’t sometimes get it wrong. Chopping at That Mitchell and Webb Look is one example. Sure, the removal of the material isn’t the life-or-death story that Index often works on. Sure, Mitchell and Webb aren’t the faces of persecuted artists – they have huge platforms and agreed to the changes themselves. Still, one can’t help but think that the decision came from a place of conservatism, perhaps even fear. This is weak and dispiriting, indeed the very opposite of what enables creativity in the arts. We shouldn’t be encouraging this cultural timidity. Rather, we should harness culture and creativity as the starting points of a conversation about our here and now. That’s what the arts are for, after all. READ MORE

3 days ago
Global Free Speech

CPJ urges US senators to seek accountability for Israel’s killing of journalist Shireen Abu Akleh

3 days ago
Global Free Speech

4 Cameroonian journalists jailed for theft of minister’s glasses – that he later found

4 days ago
Add A Comment

Comments are closed.

Editors Picks

Strategy buys 1,665 Bitcoin for $143M as BTC stack hits 847,666

4 minutes ago

Strategy Sets New BTC Holdings Record After $143M Bitcoin Purchase

7 minutes ago

Trump Orders The FCC To Punish A Reporter. Where Did All The ‘Ministry Of Truth’ Screamers Go?

31 minutes ago

Archives: October 2026

42 minutes ago
Latest Posts

THORChain rejects Bitget request to block hacker as $6 million moves to bitcoin

1 hour ago

Scammers steal $2M in ETH as fake GIWA network fools DYORSWAP

1 hour ago

Morning Minute: SEC Clears Token Buybacks for Crypto Networks

1 hour ago

Subscribe to News

Get the latest news and updates directly to your inbox.

At FSNN – Free Speech News Network, we deliver unfiltered reporting and in-depth analysis on the stories that matter most. From breaking headlines to global perspectives, our mission is to keep you informed, empowered, and connected.

FSNN.net is owned and operated by GlobalBoost Media
, an independent media organization dedicated to advancing transparency, free expression, and factual journalism across the digital landscape.

Facebook X (Twitter) Discord Telegram
Latest News

AI agents could drain cheap bank deposits, Apollo’s Torsten Slok warns

40 seconds ago

Strategy buys 1,665 Bitcoin for $143M as BTC stack hits 847,666

4 minutes ago

Strategy Sets New BTC Holdings Record After $143M Bitcoin Purchase

7 minutes ago

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest news and updates directly to your inbox.

© 2026 GlobalBoost Media. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Our Authors
  • Contact

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

🍪

Cookies

We and our selected partners wish to use cookies to collect information about you for functional purposes and statistical marketing. You may not give us your consent for certain purposes by selecting an option and you can withdraw your consent at any time via the cookie icon.

Cookie Preferences

Manage Cookies

Cookies are small text that can be used by websites to make the user experience more efficient. The law states that we may store cookies on your device if they are strictly necessary for the operation of this site. For all other types of cookies, we need your permission. This site uses various types of cookies. Some cookies are placed by third party services that appear on our pages.

Your permission applies to the following domains:

  • https://fsnn.net
Necessary
Necessary cookies help make a website usable by enabling basic functions like page navigation and access to secure areas of the website. The website cannot function properly without these cookies.
Statistic
Statistic cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
Preferences
Preference cookies enable a website to remember information that changes the way the website behaves or looks, like your preferred language or the region that you are in.
Marketing
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.