Close Menu
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
  • Home
  • News
    • Politics
    • Legal & Courts
    • Tech & Big Tech
    • Campus & Education
    • Media & Culture
    • Global Free Speech
  • Opinions
    • Debates
  • Video/Live
  • Community
  • Freedom Index
  • About
    • Mission
    • Contact
    • Support
Trending

Data Centers and Their Discontents

27 minutes ago

AI agents could drain cheap bank deposits, Apollo’s Torsten Slok warns

49 minutes ago

Strategy buys 1,665 Bitcoin for $143M as BTC stack hits 847,666

52 minutes ago
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Discord Telegram
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
Market Data Newsletter
Monday, September 28
  • Home
  • News
    • Politics
    • Legal & Courts
    • Tech & Big Tech
    • Campus & Education
    • Media & Culture
    • Global Free Speech
  • Opinions
    • Debates
  • Video/Live
  • Community
  • Freedom Index
  • About
    • Mission
    • Contact
    • Support
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
Home»News»Global Free Speech»3 Nigerian journalists harassed with detention, summons, punitive bail conditions
Global Free Speech

3 Nigerian journalists harassed with detention, summons, punitive bail conditions

News RoomBy News Room3 months agoNo Comments4 Mins Read7 Views
Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest Copy Link LinkedIn Tumblr Email VKontakte Telegram
3 Nigerian journalists harassed with detention, summons, punitive bail conditions
Share
Facebook Twitter Pinterest Email Copy Link

Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

Key Takeaways

Playback Speed

Select a Voice

Abuja, July 10, 2026—The Committee to Protect Journalists calls on Nigerian authorities to stop harassing journalists, following the detention of journalist Zainab Sodiq on July 8, stringent bail conditions placed on Secret Reporters’ Stanley Ugagbe following his forcible disappearance on July 1, and an espionage summons issued to his publisher Fejiro Oliver on July 6.

“Is it outrageous that journalist Zainab Sodiq has been jailed by intelligence agents and has seemingly been denied due process. It is also utterly punitive for Stanley Ugagbe to spend hours, every other day, needlessly reporting to the police,” said CPJ Africa Director Angela Quintal. “Nigeria’s security services must focus their time and resources on the real criminals and not journalists who are keeping the public informed.”

On July 8, the State Security Service, also known as the Department of State Services or DSS, detained Sodiq, a videographer and journalist who also covers the political activities of Omoyele Sowore, founder of the Sahara Reporters outlet and a presidential candidate in Nigeria’s upcoming elections.

The intelligence agency said in a July 9 press release, also posted on X, that Sodiq was “intercepted” July 6 as she sought to board a flight from Lagos to Abuja, the capital, with a drone, without possessing the required End User Certificate. The DSS permitted her to board and ordered her to report to their offices on July 8, which she did. She was detained on arrival at the DSS office.

Sowore said he told the DSS that he owned the drone and he believed Sodiq was detained in connection to her coverage of his events and his ongoing trial for cybercrime and defamation charges and her secret June 22 recording of DSS officials’ physical harassment of Sowore inside a federal high court in Abuja.

Section 35(4) of Nigeria’s constitution states that anyone arrested should generally be brought before a court of law within 48 hours.

Separately on July 6, Ugagbe was freed from the National Cybercrime Centre in Abuja, after being secretly detained on July 1. The police had initially denied holding him.

Ugagbe told CPJ that he was released on bail, without charge, as police continue investigating. He said he was ordered to report to the cybercrime center every two days and that the police were still examining his phone and laptop.

Ugagbe said that on July 1 he was seized by two armed men from a shared public taxi at a traffic light near his home, forced into a car with four armed men, and taken to his house. Two men accompanied him inside to retrieve his laptop, then blindfolded and handcuffed him.

The journalist told CPJ that he remained blindfolded while held overnight in a police facility, which he was unable to identify. The handcuffs were only removed at night and used to chain his leg to a chair while he lay on the floor, Ugagbe said.

Ugagbe said he was transferred, still blindfolded, to the cybercrime center on July 2, where he developed a rash on his lower abdomen.

Also on July 6, the Cybersecurity Crime Centre summoned Secret Reporters’ publisher Tega Oghenedoro, known by his pen name, Fejiro Oliver, over allegations of espionage and cyberstalking, according to a copy of the letter, reviewed by CPJ.

The police accused Oliver of leaking government information and giving information to foreign governments — allegations that the journalist, who is outside Nigeria, and his lawyer, Adekunle Olanipekun, rejected. Oliver told CPJ that he was being targeted for his investigative reporting.

In 2025, Oliver was detained for 61 days before being released on bail on November 18. The cybercrimes and defamation cases are ongoing. Oliver was also targeted with surveillance and arrested in 2017 over his work.

CPJ’s calls and text messages to request comment about the cases involving Ugagbe and Oliver from national police spokesperson Anietie Okokon Edem Iniedu received no replies.

CPJ called all three of the publicly listed contact numbers on the DSS website on July 10. The first number, which was also listed as a “hotline” for “urgent security matters,” did not connect, and an automated response said the “called party is temporarily unavailable.”

The second number connected to what sounded like an automated responder, which did not directly answer questions and eventually disconnected.

The third number was answered by an individual who confirmed connection to the DSS and said Sodiq’s “matter” was “under investigation” and there was “nothing to be worried about,” before adding they were “not in the right position to discuss this.” The individual declined to immediately connect CPJ with someone who could comment further on the case, or to specify when someone else would be available to speak.



Read the full article here

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using AI-powered analysis and real-time sources.

Get Your Fact Check Report

Enter your email to receive detailed fact-checking analysis

5 free reports remaining

Continue with Full Access

You've used your 5 free reports. Sign up for unlimited access!

Already have an account? Sign in here

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email Telegram Copy Link
News Room
  • Website
  • Facebook
  • X (Twitter)
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn

The FSNN News Room is the voice of our in-house journalists, editors, and researchers. We deliver timely, unbiased reporting at the crossroads of finance, cryptocurrency, and global politics, providing clear, fact-driven analysis free from agendas.

Related Articles

Global Free Speech

Northern Ireland: 25 years after journalist Martin O’Hagan was murdered, CPJ and Amnesty call for new investigation

3 hours ago
Global Free Speech

Ahead of trial, CPJ, partners demand release of detained photojournalist Hamdi al-Zaeem

2 days ago
Global Free Speech

Journalist Henry Constantín detained in Cuba on ‘disobedience’ charge

3 days ago
Global Free Speech

The BBC clearly sees the value of television series That Mitchell and Webb Look. Marking the 20th anniversary of its original screening, the Beeb has re-released the series on iPlayer. But – and there is very often a “but” with these things – they’ve removed around 11 sketches from the BAFTA award-winning show. The official word is that these sketches don’t “work today”, which is polite speak for “they may cause offence”. The episodes singled out include scenes featuring a battle reenactment with characters in blackface, a contestant on a show wearing a burka and a lost tribe” in a garden centre. These sketches set out to challenge stereotypes, not to reinforce them; but 20 years on, this distinction seems to have been lost along the way. I’m a bit uncomfortable about this. I find it infantilising, to say the least. Can’t we trust audiences to make up their own minds, to switch off if they find the sketches in question unpalatable? Does the BBC think that we are just passive consumers, unable to disaggregate the mocking of racism from racism itself? These sketches set out to challenge stereotypes, not to reinforce them This act of censorship is distorting – of the shows, whose narratives and rhythms were built to include these sketches, and more broadly too. Conversations we were having 20 years ago have been erased, as if to suggest that they never happened. But they did! And with this erasure, the opportunity for thoughtful engagement and learning from our past is gone. “Let’s just pretend we were all lovely 20 years ago. It’s better that way” seems to be the message. Speaking as a minority myself, I find that knowing the nasty stuff that people said before – and indeed, still say today – is much more useful than pretending it never happened. This approach, I think, is also inconsistent. What it reveals is a cherry-picking (intended or not) of the groups that we can mock, and those that we can’t. Let’s face it, gender stereotypes are rarely deemed to have aged beyond the pale – if that were the case, we would have to wave goodbye to half the television made before the mid-2010s. Suppression like this sends a bad message to artists, namely that what they’re creating today may hold less value tomorrow. Or, even worse, that future audiences may deem them bigots – that Sword of Damocles hovering over the heads of any creative paying attention to the discourse of the moment. Suppression like this sends a bad message to artists The BBC’s decision reaffirms a broader trend. In 2020, Little Britain was removed from the iPlayer platform for similar reasons. It has since been reinstated – minus some sketches. Meanwhile, the UK’s arts space more broadly is seeing a retreat to the land of “safe”, as Index recently revealed in a year-long investigation into self-censorship in UK theatre. The BBC, it must be said, does remarkable stuff. The ongoing podcast investigation into the disappearance of US journalist Austin Tice is just one example. But this does not mean, however, that they don’t sometimes get it wrong. Chopping at That Mitchell and Webb Look is one example. Sure, the removal of the material isn’t the life-or-death story that Index often works on. Sure, Mitchell and Webb aren’t the faces of persecuted artists – they have huge platforms and agreed to the changes themselves. Still, one can’t help but think that the decision came from a place of conservatism, perhaps even fear. This is weak and dispiriting, indeed the very opposite of what enables creativity in the arts. We shouldn’t be encouraging this cultural timidity. Rather, we should harness culture and creativity as the starting points of a conversation about our here and now. That’s what the arts are for, after all. READ MORE

3 days ago
Global Free Speech

CPJ urges US senators to seek accountability for Israel’s killing of journalist Shireen Abu Akleh

3 days ago
Global Free Speech

4 Cameroonian journalists jailed for theft of minister’s glasses – that he later found

4 days ago
Add A Comment

Comments are closed.

Editors Picks

AI agents could drain cheap bank deposits, Apollo’s Torsten Slok warns

49 minutes ago

Strategy buys 1,665 Bitcoin for $143M as BTC stack hits 847,666

52 minutes ago

Strategy Sets New BTC Holdings Record After $143M Bitcoin Purchase

55 minutes ago

Trump Orders The FCC To Punish A Reporter. Where Did All The ‘Ministry Of Truth’ Screamers Go?

1 hour ago
Latest Posts

Archives: October 2026

2 hours ago

THORChain rejects Bitget request to block hacker as $6 million moves to bitcoin

2 hours ago

Scammers steal $2M in ETH as fake GIWA network fools DYORSWAP

2 hours ago

Subscribe to News

Get the latest news and updates directly to your inbox.

At FSNN – Free Speech News Network, we deliver unfiltered reporting and in-depth analysis on the stories that matter most. From breaking headlines to global perspectives, our mission is to keep you informed, empowered, and connected.

FSNN.net is owned and operated by GlobalBoost Media
, an independent media organization dedicated to advancing transparency, free expression, and factual journalism across the digital landscape.

Facebook X (Twitter) Discord Telegram
Latest News

Data Centers and Their Discontents

27 minutes ago

AI agents could drain cheap bank deposits, Apollo’s Torsten Slok warns

49 minutes ago

Strategy buys 1,665 Bitcoin for $143M as BTC stack hits 847,666

52 minutes ago

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest news and updates directly to your inbox.

© 2026 GlobalBoost Media. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Our Authors
  • Contact

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

🍪

Cookies

We and our selected partners wish to use cookies to collect information about you for functional purposes and statistical marketing. You may not give us your consent for certain purposes by selecting an option and you can withdraw your consent at any time via the cookie icon.

Cookie Preferences

Manage Cookies

Cookies are small text that can be used by websites to make the user experience more efficient. The law states that we may store cookies on your device if they are strictly necessary for the operation of this site. For all other types of cookies, we need your permission. This site uses various types of cookies. Some cookies are placed by third party services that appear on our pages.

Your permission applies to the following domains:

  • https://fsnn.net
Necessary
Necessary cookies help make a website usable by enabling basic functions like page navigation and access to secure areas of the website. The website cannot function properly without these cookies.
Statistic
Statistic cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
Preferences
Preference cookies enable a website to remember information that changes the way the website behaves or looks, like your preferred language or the region that you are in.
Marketing
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.