Close Menu
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
  • Home
  • News
    • Politics
    • Legal & Courts
    • Tech & Big Tech
    • Campus & Education
    • Media & Culture
    • Global Free Speech
  • Opinions
    • Debates
  • Video/Live
  • Community
  • Freedom Index
  • About
    • Mission
    • Contact
    • Support
Trending

Bitcoin faces $80,000 test as thinner weekend liquidity looms

12 minutes ago

Solana Cuts Blockchain Slot Time to 350 Milliseconds

14 minutes ago

Morning Minute: CFTC Will Give Crypto Clarity If Congress Won’t

16 minutes ago
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Discord Telegram
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
Market Data Newsletter
Friday, August 21
  • Home
  • News
    • Politics
    • Legal & Courts
    • Tech & Big Tech
    • Campus & Education
    • Media & Culture
    • Global Free Speech
  • Opinions
    • Debates
  • Video/Live
  • Community
  • Freedom Index
  • About
    • Mission
    • Contact
    • Support
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
Home»News»Media & Culture»84% of American Students Use AI. They’re Still Worried About What Comes Next.
Media & Culture

84% of American Students Use AI. They’re Still Worried About What Comes Next.

News RoomBy News Room2 months agoNo Comments5 Mins Read4 Views
Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest Copy Link LinkedIn Tumblr Email VKontakte Telegram
84% of American Students Use AI. They’re Still Worried About What Comes Next.
Share
Facebook Twitter Pinterest Email Copy Link

Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

Key Takeaways

Playback Speed

Select a Voice

Almost all American students (84 percent) use AI at least “a few times a year,” while two-thirds use it monthly, according to a recent survey of 11,443 high-achieving students conducted by the National Society of High School Scholars (NSHSS). The survey also found that the percentage of students “not using AI at all” has dropped from 36 percent in 2024 to 6 percent in 2026, while almost half (49 percent) use AI daily or weekly. The most common usage of AI includes searching for information (55 percent), brainstorming (51 percent), and proofreading (31 percent).

Other similar surveys also suggest that AI use among students is becoming increasingly normalized. According to the College Board, the share of high school students reporting that they use generative AI tools for schoolwork rose from 79 percent in January 2025 to 84 percent in May 2025. Students are using these tools for routine academic tasks, including brainstorming ideas, editing or revising essays, conducting research, and finding sources.

The NSHSS survey also found that American students are confident about their future prospects. Nearly all (94 percent) of students are extremely, very, or somewhat confident about their future after graduating from college. Confidence about employment prospects specifically is high, with the majority of students (79 percent) expecting to secure a full-time job before graduating or within six months of graduation.

Despite this confidence in their future, students were more pessimistic about the impact of AI more broadly. More than half of respondents to the NSHSS survey (69 percent) say that AI will have a more negative than positive impact on society over the next decade, and 53 percent believe that AI will have an “extremely” or “very much” negative effect on their privacy and security over the next decade.

Anxiety around the impact of AI, especially on job losses, is widespread. According to a survey conducted by Pew Research Center, about one-third of workers (32 percent) say that AI will lead to fewer job opportunities for them in the long run. While 36 percent of workers say they feel hopeful about how AI could be used in the future, 33 percent said they feel overwhelmed.

Despite that anxiety, among workers who currently use AI in their jobs, four out of ten say it has been extremely or very helpful in allowing them to do things more quickly. Similarly, 29 percent say AI has helped improve the quality of their work.

The survey data reveal a disparity: While both workers and students are increasingly using AI and say the tool helps reduce the time it takes to complete tasks they were already doing, they fear what impact AI will have on society. 

When it comes to AI’s impact on job security, the fears of mass layoffs have not materialized so far. Federal Reserve Bank of New York survey data suggest firms are more likely to retrain workers or adjust hiring plans than to fire existing employees because of AI. Richard Deitz, economic policy adviser at the New York Fed, told PYMNTS that “layoffs have been almost nonexistent due to AI use.” Indeed, a 2026 Federal Reserve analysis concludes that “thus far, there is no evidence of a reduction in job postings for industries or firms which have higher levels of AI adoption.”

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang has argued that much of the fear around AI comes from confusing a job with the tasks used to perform it. “The purpose of your job, and the tasks and tools that you use to do your job, are related, not the same,” Huang said. His point is not that AI will leave work untouched, but that automating tasks does not necessarily mean eliminating entire professions. As he has put it elsewhere, “You’re not going to lose your job to an AI, but you’re going to lose your job to someone who uses AI.”

Even where AI does spur job losses, the U.S. labor market is better able to deal with changes due to its labor market flexibility. Employers can terminate workers at any time and for almost any reason, while employees, too, can leave at any time, for any reason. That flexibility means that where there are job losses, the market is able to adjust far more quickly. A 2026 International Monetary Fund paper found that about 1 in 10 job postings in advanced economies now require at least one new skill, and these skills “often appear first in the United States.” Many are tech-related, with a growing share tied to AI, and new skills are associated with higher wages and employment in U.S. local labor markets.

America’s relatively flexible labor markets are probably part of the reason that emerging industries often start in America. As Pieter Garicano argues in Works in Progress, the stringent regulations on employment in European countries mean that companies shift away from industries that are susceptible to layoffs, such as experimental technologies and AI. Partly for this reason, compared to America, European economies are less conducive to innovation and experimentation. It also means that when there are disruptions, the economy is far less able to adapt, and the creation of new jobs is slower.

So while students in America may feel anxious about AI, they are already using it and are already among the best placed in the world to succeed with it.

Read the full article here

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using AI-powered analysis and real-time sources.

Get Your Fact Check Report

Enter your email to receive detailed fact-checking analysis

5 free reports remaining

Continue with Full Access

You've used your 5 free reports. Sign up for unlimited access!

Already have an account? Sign in here

#IndependentMedia #MediaAccountability #MediaBias #PoliticalNews #PublicDiscourse
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email Telegram Copy Link
News Room
  • Website
  • Facebook
  • X (Twitter)
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn

The FSNN News Room is the voice of our in-house journalists, editors, and researchers. We deliver timely, unbiased reporting at the crossroads of finance, cryptocurrency, and global politics, providing clear, fact-driven analysis free from agendas.

Related Articles

Cryptocurrency & Free Speech Finance

Morning Minute: CFTC Will Give Crypto Clarity If Congress Won’t

16 minutes ago
Media & Culture

Colonizing the Moon

54 minutes ago
Media & Culture

Trump FCC Weakens U.S. Broadband Speed Goals To The Benefit Of Elon Musk And Comcast

2 hours ago
Media & Culture

“Denaturalization’s Missing Limit” out in Northwestern University Law Review Online

2 hours ago
Cryptocurrency & Free Speech Finance

Most Americans Say Trump’s Crypto Profits Cross the Line: Poll

2 hours ago
Media & Culture

Today in Supreme Court History: August 21, 1798

3 hours ago
Add A Comment

Comments are closed.

Editors Picks

Solana Cuts Blockchain Slot Time to 350 Milliseconds

14 minutes ago

Morning Minute: CFTC Will Give Crypto Clarity If Congress Won’t

16 minutes ago

Colonizing the Moon

54 minutes ago

  Chow Hang-tung and Lee Cheuk-yan, co-leaders of the now disbanded Hong Kong Alliance in Support of Patriotic Democratic Movements of China (HKA) were found guilty today (21 August 2026) of incitement to subversion, because they organised vigils attended by tens of thousands in Hong Kong’s Victoria Park to mark the 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre. The vigils were banned in 2020 and both have been detained since 2021. Below is a translation of Chow Hang-tung’s message to the world, published yesterday I’m curious about tomorrow’s verdict. Justice resides in the hearts of the people; there’s no need to look up to such top-down judgments. One verdict is nothing. Thank you all for walking alongside me in different ways. I have received all your support and blessings. ************ Because I don’t want everyone to worry too much, and I don’t want the focus to be lost, I’m sharing these feelings that have been weighing on my mind since the trial: Several years ago, I made a documentary with friends, trying to visualise the issue of torture by inviting Hong Kong friends to experience the various forms of torture suffered by protesters in China, so that it wouldn’t just remain a “tragedy” on paper. The “torture” depicted in the film was designed and researched by me. I thought I had some understanding of the subject, but only in the last couple of days have I realised I was a completely incompetent “torture officer” back then. I knew absolutely nothing about inflicting physical pain. It’s true that some things are impossible to comprehend no matter how much you read about them; you have to experience them firsthand. I say this because since the trial began, the Correctional Services Department [Hong Kong’s prison authority] has changed its method of transport. It’s no longer just simple handcuffs; now they use a full set of handcuffs, leg irons, waist chains, and ankle chains, and then lead the prisoners like dogs on a chain. From the written description alone, it seems like it’s just more inconvenient and somewhat humiliating, nothing like torture. But it’s only when you actually put on those shackles that you realise the devil is in the details. Ordinary handcuffs have buckles on both sides that connect with slipknots, allowing for limited movement between the hands. However, this set of specially made handcuffs has an outer layer of hard plastic covering the outer layer, locking the hands tightly together. This alone wouldn’t be so bad, but the “rings” on the handcuffs aren’t the round kind you usually see in adult stores (uh, I’ve been there, but only to buy props for filming!). Instead, there’s an additional hard material inside, shrinking into a flat, crescent shape that fits snugly at the thickest part of the wrist. So, when the wrist is inside, there’s absolutely no possibility of rotation; you can only constantly twist your arm to accommodate the angle designed by the handcuffs. That already restricts movement to two dimensions. Then comes the small buckle on the waist chain, which locks the handcuffs above the abdomen. If you dare to relax and let your hands hang down, the buckle will move up and lock into the thicker part of the wrist. Moreover, the locking angle is an extremely unnatural twisted pretzel, forcing one to constantly hunch their shoulders, hunch their back, bend their wrists, and twist their arms to try and avoid the handcuffs getting stuck in their wrist bones. However, complete avoidance is impossible; after all, constantly hunching one’s shoulders for the entire journey from Tai Lam [the prison where Hang-tung is incarcerated] to West Kowloon [the courthouse where the trial is taking place] would likely lead to muscle cramps. So, one can only “choose” which part of the body shall suffer in turn—when the shoulders are too tired, let the bones ache; when the hands are numb with pain, tighten the shoulders further. Then, throughout the entire journey, although most of the time is spent “still,” one is already exhausted from the unseen “muscle battle.” Not to mention, no matter how you are locked, you have to carry your belongings; for me, that means court documents. With that added weight, it is inevitable that the handcuffs will cut into the flesh. The deep marks carved into the wrists don’t fade even after a whole day in court. It turns out that locking a person’s joints in certain relative positions can create a kind of “interlocking” effect between body parts. But to the untrained eye, it’s invisible—”It’s just putting your hands in front of your stomach, child’s play.” Sigh, just looking at that statement, I feel I have no reason to complain; but I never imagined the combined effect of locking all the joints would be so powerful. Thinking back to when I was researching for the documentary, I only focused on finding the most exaggerated physical movements, the torture methods most easily identifiable by the naked eye. I was indeed viewing the victims’ experiences through the eyes of a layman. When I “tortured” my friend, the handcuffs were loosely fastened. I was completely unaware that locking the joints was the key—it really was just a childish experiment. Sophisticated torture, much like mature totalitarianism, avoids the visible, “violent” acts of violence. Its power lies in exploiting and creating internal conflicts among the people, fostering constant mutual surveillance, control, and reporting. This diffuses the perpetrators, making it impossible to identify or apprehend any single “evildoer.” People appear to have “choices,” but they are ultimately forced to choose between harming one party and abandoning another. Power, however, seems detached, never directly intervening. Visible, publicly observable conflicts vanish, leaving only unseen internal strife. The damage to society can be far more lasting and profound than occasional violence. On a more personal level, I find my resistance to physical torture is quite low. When my body aches, my mind becomes blank, overwhelmed by aches and pains, making it impossible to enjoy the scenery as usual. If I were subjected to some of the Ten Great Tortures of the Qing Dynasty, I might confess quickly. The ability to endure torture truly requires dedicated training. So, on the bright side, these 75 days of transport can be seen as initial training in physical endurance—as long as my hands aren’t ruined? To say that this correctional system is intentionally designed to torture prisoners wouldn’t be accurate; it’s just that the prisoners’ comfort or pain isn’t a consideration in its design. So, frankly, what I have endured is far from real torture; at best, it was just a preliminary glimpse. The designers’ primary consideration was probably “safety first,” ensuring prisoners have no possibility of movement. Ultimately, prisoners are at the bottom of the food chain—voiceless, powerless. Our opinions, even after suffering, are meaningless in the face of “safety.” Not to mention asking what security needs there were – frankly, even without handcuffs, a weak scholar like me couldn’t escape. Using so many tricks is overkill, but where can I reason with that? In cases where national security is invoked, even if a lawsuit is filed, it will have to be dropped and legal fees paid. But it’s precisely because I don’t want to never have anywhere to voice my grievances, and I don’t want people to remain silent and at the mercy of others, that I must persist in fighting for democracy and human rights, and for systemic change. In this sense, this new experience offered by Correctional Services is actually helping to strengthen my resolve to fight. Well then, thank you for this generous gift. I will certainly not let you down and will fight this ongoing battle well. I also hope that everyone can gain something from this long trial, perhaps just a little bit of strength, a little bit of encouragement, and that would be enough to fulfill my wish! This message was first posted on Chow Hang-tung’s Patreon account yesterday. We are publishing this with the permission of Brian Kern who translated her message on his Substack account     READ MORE

1 hour ago
Latest Posts

The hard truth is that the Clarity Act is an anti-crypto bill

1 hour ago

Laser Digital Secures Japan Crypto Registration

1 hour ago

Trump FCC Weakens U.S. Broadband Speed Goals To The Benefit Of Elon Musk And Comcast

2 hours ago

Subscribe to News

Get the latest news and updates directly to your inbox.

At FSNN – Free Speech News Network, we deliver unfiltered reporting and in-depth analysis on the stories that matter most. From breaking headlines to global perspectives, our mission is to keep you informed, empowered, and connected.

FSNN.net is owned and operated by GlobalBoost Media
, an independent media organization dedicated to advancing transparency, free expression, and factual journalism across the digital landscape.

Facebook X (Twitter) Discord Telegram
Latest News

Bitcoin faces $80,000 test as thinner weekend liquidity looms

12 minutes ago

Solana Cuts Blockchain Slot Time to 350 Milliseconds

14 minutes ago

Morning Minute: CFTC Will Give Crypto Clarity If Congress Won’t

16 minutes ago

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest news and updates directly to your inbox.

© 2026 GlobalBoost Media. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Our Authors
  • Contact

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

🍪

Cookies

We and our selected partners wish to use cookies to collect information about you for functional purposes and statistical marketing. You may not give us your consent for certain purposes by selecting an option and you can withdraw your consent at any time via the cookie icon.

Cookie Preferences

Manage Cookies

Cookies are small text that can be used by websites to make the user experience more efficient. The law states that we may store cookies on your device if they are strictly necessary for the operation of this site. For all other types of cookies, we need your permission. This site uses various types of cookies. Some cookies are placed by third party services that appear on our pages.

Your permission applies to the following domains:

  • https://fsnn.net
Necessary
Necessary cookies help make a website usable by enabling basic functions like page navigation and access to secure areas of the website. The website cannot function properly without these cookies.
Statistic
Statistic cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
Preferences
Preference cookies enable a website to remember information that changes the way the website behaves or looks, like your preferred language or the region that you are in.
Marketing
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.