Close Menu
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
  • Home
  • News
    • Politics
    • Legal & Courts
    • Tech & Big Tech
    • Campus & Education
    • Media & Culture
    • Global Free Speech
  • Opinions
    • Debates
  • Video/Live
  • Community
  • Freedom Index
  • About
    • Mission
    • Contact
    • Support
Trending

Bitcoin faces $80,000 test as thinner weekend liquidity looms

11 minutes ago

Solana Cuts Blockchain Slot Time to 350 Milliseconds

14 minutes ago

Morning Minute: CFTC Will Give Crypto Clarity If Congress Won’t

16 minutes ago
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Discord Telegram
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
Market Data Newsletter
Friday, August 21
  • Home
  • News
    • Politics
    • Legal & Courts
    • Tech & Big Tech
    • Campus & Education
    • Media & Culture
    • Global Free Speech
  • Opinions
    • Debates
  • Video/Live
  • Community
  • Freedom Index
  • About
    • Mission
    • Contact
    • Support
FSNN | Free Speech News NetworkFSNN | Free Speech News Network
Home»News»Media & Culture»4 Ways the ‘Big Beautiful Bill’ Supercharged Trump’s Immigration Crackdown
Media & Culture

4 Ways the ‘Big Beautiful Bill’ Supercharged Trump’s Immigration Crackdown

News RoomBy News Room2 months agoNo Comments5 Mins Read5 Views
Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest Copy Link LinkedIn Tumblr Email VKontakte Telegram
4 Ways the ‘Big Beautiful Bill’ Supercharged Trump’s Immigration Crackdown
Share
Facebook Twitter Pinterest Email Copy Link

Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

Key Takeaways

Playback Speed

Select a Voice

It’s been nearly a year since President Donald Trump signed the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA). While the legislation was advertised as a sweeping tax bill, it also allocated roughly $191 billion to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to ramp up immigration enforcement. Included in this total was $75 billion for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and $65 billion for Customs and Border Protection (CBP).

Despite having the funds available through the end of FY 2029, the Trump administration released an estimated $114 billion, nearly 60 percent, of the funding allocated to DHS, ICE, and CBP within eight months of the OBBBA’s signing.

Here are some of the ways these immigration agencies have used the OBBBA funding over the last year to implement Trump’s immigration crackdown.

Flush with nearly $30 billion from the OBBBA for hiring and retaining personnel, ICE began its push to hire 10,000 new agents by offering starting salaries as high as $90,000 and offering $50,000 signing bonuses last summer. The hiring surge quickly drew criticism for multiple reasons, from using ads resembling wartime propaganda posters to lowering the minimum age requirement from 21 to 18 to concerns that the shortened ICE training program and issues with the vetting process would threaten civil liberties and lives.

Despite these concerns, however, the campaign was extremely effective and resulted in the hiring of over 12,000 ICE officers, a 120 percent increase, by the beginning of 2026. Similarly, the CBP drew from its over $2 billion in OBBBA funding for a hiring campaign that resulted in the agency reaching a new record high of 21,471 officers in June 2026.

These hiring sprees, along with over 14,000 federal agents being diverted to assist in immigration enforcement operations, led to a surge in immigration arrests. During Trump’s first year in office, the monthly immigration arrests rose from roughly 12,000 in January 2025 to over 40,000 in December 2025.

Trump’s immigration crackdown has grown far beyond the use of federal agents to conduct immigration arrests. The OBBBA set aside over $2 billion for the DHS to expand the 287(g) program and increase the number of state and local law enforcement agencies conducting immigration enforcement on behalf of ICE.

Just two months after the OBBBA’s signing, the DHS announced the number of 287(g) agreements had grown to 958 (up from 135 in January 2025) and had trained or were soon to train roughly 10,000 local law enforcement on immigration enforcement. Today, there are over 2,045 agreements across 39 states, essentially swelling the total number of local law enforcement agents conducting immigration enforcement to the tens of thousands.

Critics of the 287(g) program warn that such agreements not only run the risk of misusing local resources for civil immigration enforcement over criminal investigations, but also create public mistrust and transparency issues. In just one example of how these agreements create competing priorities for local law enforcement, a secretive memo was revealed in May barring local agencies participating in the 287(g) program from disclosing public records that include details of immigration enforcement operations without first consulting ICE, potentially in violation of many state Freedom of Information laws.

The surge in immigration arrests, along with an 87 percent decline in discretionary releases, led to a surge of people held in ICE custody. By January 2026, the number of ICE detainees rose 75 percent to a record-breaking 73,000 detainees. To accommodate this swell, the OBBBA apportioned an unprecedented $45 billion to double immigration detention capacity to over 107,000 beds.

Historically, the immigration detention network has consisted of local jails, private prisons, and ICE detention centers. But with funding from the OBBBA, DHS planned to revamp and centralize the ICE detention system by purchasing and retrofitting commercial warehouses. Former Acting Director Todd Lyons described the plan to centralize ICE detention as “[Amazon] Prime, but with human beings.” However, by June 2026, DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin acknowledged his agency’s missteps in acquiring $1 billion in warehouses without proper due diligence, admitting some conversions “probably won’t work.”

Meanwhile, ICE detention facilities have faced consistent criticism for their overcrowded and inhumane conditions, medical neglect, and lack of due process. Since Trump took office, 52 people have died in ICE custody, doubling the mortality rate of deaths in ICE custody and reaching the highest rate in over a decade.

Overlaying the entire expansion of immigration enforcement is over $6 billion provided by the OBBBA for “border surveillance technologies,” including AI surveillance. Over the last year, the DHS has significantly expanded its use of technologies like facial recognition, biometric scanning, and social media monitoring to track both undocumented immigrants and American citizens.

Some examples of DHS contracts to advance the agency’s surveillance tools under the guise of border security include $30 million to Palantir’s ImmigrationOS for real-time monitoring of self-deportations, $4.6 million for iris-scanning smartphones, and $3.75 million for Clearview AI facial recognition. The DHS has also teamed up with Mobile Fortify to allow immigration agents to collect photos and biometric data like fingerprints in the field, often without consent.

Critics of such large, warrantless surveillance states capable of tracking and monitoring people warn that this kind of power can be abused and chill the exercise of civil liberties, particularly as such tools are often adopted for one purpose but inevitably redirected for another. In fact, there is already evidence that the DHS has repurposed these border security surveillance technologies to help identify and track American citizens who oppose Trump’s immigration policy agenda.

Read the full article here

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using AI-powered analysis and real-time sources.

Get Your Fact Check Report

Enter your email to receive detailed fact-checking analysis

5 free reports remaining

Continue with Full Access

You've used your 5 free reports. Sign up for unlimited access!

Already have an account? Sign in here

#MediaAccountability #MediaAndPolitics #MediaEthics #NewsAnalysis #PoliticalCoverage
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email Telegram Copy Link
News Room
  • Website
  • Facebook
  • X (Twitter)
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn

The FSNN News Room is the voice of our in-house journalists, editors, and researchers. We deliver timely, unbiased reporting at the crossroads of finance, cryptocurrency, and global politics, providing clear, fact-driven analysis free from agendas.

Related Articles

Cryptocurrency & Free Speech Finance

Morning Minute: CFTC Will Give Crypto Clarity If Congress Won’t

16 minutes ago
Media & Culture

Colonizing the Moon

54 minutes ago
Media & Culture

Trump FCC Weakens U.S. Broadband Speed Goals To The Benefit Of Elon Musk And Comcast

2 hours ago
Media & Culture

“Denaturalization’s Missing Limit” out in Northwestern University Law Review Online

2 hours ago
Cryptocurrency & Free Speech Finance

Most Americans Say Trump’s Crypto Profits Cross the Line: Poll

2 hours ago
Media & Culture

Today in Supreme Court History: August 21, 1798

3 hours ago
Add A Comment

Comments are closed.

Editors Picks

Solana Cuts Blockchain Slot Time to 350 Milliseconds

14 minutes ago

Morning Minute: CFTC Will Give Crypto Clarity If Congress Won’t

16 minutes ago

Colonizing the Moon

54 minutes ago

  Chow Hang-tung and Lee Cheuk-yan, co-leaders of the now disbanded Hong Kong Alliance in Support of Patriotic Democratic Movements of China (HKA) were found guilty today (21 August 2026) of incitement to subversion, because they organised vigils attended by tens of thousands in Hong Kong’s Victoria Park to mark the 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre. The vigils were banned in 2020 and both have been detained since 2021. Below is a translation of Chow Hang-tung’s message to the world, published yesterday I’m curious about tomorrow’s verdict. Justice resides in the hearts of the people; there’s no need to look up to such top-down judgments. One verdict is nothing. Thank you all for walking alongside me in different ways. I have received all your support and blessings. ************ Because I don’t want everyone to worry too much, and I don’t want the focus to be lost, I’m sharing these feelings that have been weighing on my mind since the trial: Several years ago, I made a documentary with friends, trying to visualise the issue of torture by inviting Hong Kong friends to experience the various forms of torture suffered by protesters in China, so that it wouldn’t just remain a “tragedy” on paper. The “torture” depicted in the film was designed and researched by me. I thought I had some understanding of the subject, but only in the last couple of days have I realised I was a completely incompetent “torture officer” back then. I knew absolutely nothing about inflicting physical pain. It’s true that some things are impossible to comprehend no matter how much you read about them; you have to experience them firsthand. I say this because since the trial began, the Correctional Services Department [Hong Kong’s prison authority] has changed its method of transport. It’s no longer just simple handcuffs; now they use a full set of handcuffs, leg irons, waist chains, and ankle chains, and then lead the prisoners like dogs on a chain. From the written description alone, it seems like it’s just more inconvenient and somewhat humiliating, nothing like torture. But it’s only when you actually put on those shackles that you realise the devil is in the details. Ordinary handcuffs have buckles on both sides that connect with slipknots, allowing for limited movement between the hands. However, this set of specially made handcuffs has an outer layer of hard plastic covering the outer layer, locking the hands tightly together. This alone wouldn’t be so bad, but the “rings” on the handcuffs aren’t the round kind you usually see in adult stores (uh, I’ve been there, but only to buy props for filming!). Instead, there’s an additional hard material inside, shrinking into a flat, crescent shape that fits snugly at the thickest part of the wrist. So, when the wrist is inside, there’s absolutely no possibility of rotation; you can only constantly twist your arm to accommodate the angle designed by the handcuffs. That already restricts movement to two dimensions. Then comes the small buckle on the waist chain, which locks the handcuffs above the abdomen. If you dare to relax and let your hands hang down, the buckle will move up and lock into the thicker part of the wrist. Moreover, the locking angle is an extremely unnatural twisted pretzel, forcing one to constantly hunch their shoulders, hunch their back, bend their wrists, and twist their arms to try and avoid the handcuffs getting stuck in their wrist bones. However, complete avoidance is impossible; after all, constantly hunching one’s shoulders for the entire journey from Tai Lam [the prison where Hang-tung is incarcerated] to West Kowloon [the courthouse where the trial is taking place] would likely lead to muscle cramps. So, one can only “choose” which part of the body shall suffer in turn—when the shoulders are too tired, let the bones ache; when the hands are numb with pain, tighten the shoulders further. Then, throughout the entire journey, although most of the time is spent “still,” one is already exhausted from the unseen “muscle battle.” Not to mention, no matter how you are locked, you have to carry your belongings; for me, that means court documents. With that added weight, it is inevitable that the handcuffs will cut into the flesh. The deep marks carved into the wrists don’t fade even after a whole day in court. It turns out that locking a person’s joints in certain relative positions can create a kind of “interlocking” effect between body parts. But to the untrained eye, it’s invisible—”It’s just putting your hands in front of your stomach, child’s play.” Sigh, just looking at that statement, I feel I have no reason to complain; but I never imagined the combined effect of locking all the joints would be so powerful. Thinking back to when I was researching for the documentary, I only focused on finding the most exaggerated physical movements, the torture methods most easily identifiable by the naked eye. I was indeed viewing the victims’ experiences through the eyes of a layman. When I “tortured” my friend, the handcuffs were loosely fastened. I was completely unaware that locking the joints was the key—it really was just a childish experiment. Sophisticated torture, much like mature totalitarianism, avoids the visible, “violent” acts of violence. Its power lies in exploiting and creating internal conflicts among the people, fostering constant mutual surveillance, control, and reporting. This diffuses the perpetrators, making it impossible to identify or apprehend any single “evildoer.” People appear to have “choices,” but they are ultimately forced to choose between harming one party and abandoning another. Power, however, seems detached, never directly intervening. Visible, publicly observable conflicts vanish, leaving only unseen internal strife. The damage to society can be far more lasting and profound than occasional violence. On a more personal level, I find my resistance to physical torture is quite low. When my body aches, my mind becomes blank, overwhelmed by aches and pains, making it impossible to enjoy the scenery as usual. If I were subjected to some of the Ten Great Tortures of the Qing Dynasty, I might confess quickly. The ability to endure torture truly requires dedicated training. So, on the bright side, these 75 days of transport can be seen as initial training in physical endurance—as long as my hands aren’t ruined? To say that this correctional system is intentionally designed to torture prisoners wouldn’t be accurate; it’s just that the prisoners’ comfort or pain isn’t a consideration in its design. So, frankly, what I have endured is far from real torture; at best, it was just a preliminary glimpse. The designers’ primary consideration was probably “safety first,” ensuring prisoners have no possibility of movement. Ultimately, prisoners are at the bottom of the food chain—voiceless, powerless. Our opinions, even after suffering, are meaningless in the face of “safety.” Not to mention asking what security needs there were – frankly, even without handcuffs, a weak scholar like me couldn’t escape. Using so many tricks is overkill, but where can I reason with that? In cases where national security is invoked, even if a lawsuit is filed, it will have to be dropped and legal fees paid. But it’s precisely because I don’t want to never have anywhere to voice my grievances, and I don’t want people to remain silent and at the mercy of others, that I must persist in fighting for democracy and human rights, and for systemic change. In this sense, this new experience offered by Correctional Services is actually helping to strengthen my resolve to fight. Well then, thank you for this generous gift. I will certainly not let you down and will fight this ongoing battle well. I also hope that everyone can gain something from this long trial, perhaps just a little bit of strength, a little bit of encouragement, and that would be enough to fulfill my wish! This message was first posted on Chow Hang-tung’s Patreon account yesterday. We are publishing this with the permission of Brian Kern who translated her message on his Substack account     READ MORE

1 hour ago
Latest Posts

The hard truth is that the Clarity Act is an anti-crypto bill

1 hour ago

Laser Digital Secures Japan Crypto Registration

1 hour ago

Trump FCC Weakens U.S. Broadband Speed Goals To The Benefit Of Elon Musk And Comcast

2 hours ago

Subscribe to News

Get the latest news and updates directly to your inbox.

At FSNN – Free Speech News Network, we deliver unfiltered reporting and in-depth analysis on the stories that matter most. From breaking headlines to global perspectives, our mission is to keep you informed, empowered, and connected.

FSNN.net is owned and operated by GlobalBoost Media
, an independent media organization dedicated to advancing transparency, free expression, and factual journalism across the digital landscape.

Facebook X (Twitter) Discord Telegram
Latest News

Bitcoin faces $80,000 test as thinner weekend liquidity looms

11 minutes ago

Solana Cuts Blockchain Slot Time to 350 Milliseconds

14 minutes ago

Morning Minute: CFTC Will Give Crypto Clarity If Congress Won’t

16 minutes ago

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest news and updates directly to your inbox.

© 2026 GlobalBoost Media. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Our Authors
  • Contact

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

🍪

Cookies

We and our selected partners wish to use cookies to collect information about you for functional purposes and statistical marketing. You may not give us your consent for certain purposes by selecting an option and you can withdraw your consent at any time via the cookie icon.

Cookie Preferences

Manage Cookies

Cookies are small text that can be used by websites to make the user experience more efficient. The law states that we may store cookies on your device if they are strictly necessary for the operation of this site. For all other types of cookies, we need your permission. This site uses various types of cookies. Some cookies are placed by third party services that appear on our pages.

Your permission applies to the following domains:

  • https://fsnn.net
Necessary
Necessary cookies help make a website usable by enabling basic functions like page navigation and access to secure areas of the website. The website cannot function properly without these cookies.
Statistic
Statistic cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
Preferences
Preference cookies enable a website to remember information that changes the way the website behaves or looks, like your preferred language or the region that you are in.
Marketing
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.